Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
The consistent theme is that projects or tenders canceled at the last minute or near completion, especially without reasons, are challenged successfully in courts, which demand transparency and proper justification for such decisions.
Analysis and Conclusion
References:- ["DELICATE BUILDERS SDN BHD vs INTIGA SDN BHD - High Court"]- ["P.K. SEBASTIAN Vs PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY - Kerala"]- ["P.K. SEBASTIAN Vs PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY - Kerala"]- ["P.K. SEBASTIAN Vs PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY - Kerala"]-4515_2020)- ["P.K. SEBASTIAN Vs PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY - Kerala"]- ["Probhat Bauri VS State of West Bengal - Calcutta"]
Imagine pouring your resources into a major infrastructure project for the North Eastern Council (NEC), reaching the verge of completion, only to have it abruptly canceled without explanation—and your bill left unpaid. This scenario raises a critical question: Can the North East Council cancel the project at the verge of its completion without assigning any reason, with the bill not paid?
In government contracts, especially those involving regional development authorities like the NEC, balancing administrative discretion with contractor rights is key. This post dives into the legal nuances, drawing from relevant judgments and principles of natural justice. While authorities often hold broad powers, cancellations at advanced stages with outstanding payments can invite challenges on grounds of arbitrariness.
Generally, the NEC possesses authority to cancel projects under policy or procedural grounds without mandating detailed reasons. However, when cancellation occurs near completion and bills remain unpaid, it may violate principles of natural justice, appearing arbitrary and unfair to the contractor Tirupati Food Products VS Union of India - 2009 0 Supreme(Gau) 370. Courts have emphasized transparency, especially when significant work is done and dues are pending Hi-Tech Construction and Co. VS Chief Secretary, Govt. of Nagaland - 2022 0 Supreme(Gau) 717.
Key takeaway: While discretion exists, it isn't absolute—contractors may challenge such actions legally.
These points highlight that while clauses like without assigning any reason appear in tenders (e.g., Clause 7.7 in CORPORATE INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED vs SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.), their application isn't unchecked.
The NEC's framework grants wide latitude for project decisions. Document Tirupati Food Products VS Union of India - 2009 0 Supreme(Gau) 370 states: The powers and functions of the authority... the jurisdiction of the Executive Committee is limited... The authority exercises a larger power. Policy shifts often justify non-disclosure of reasons, as the Executive Committee could not cancel the entire tender but higher bodies can Tirupati Food Products VS Union of India - 2009 0 Supreme(Gau) 370.
Similar precedents affirm this: Governments may reject bids or cancel tenders citing lack of competition, even assigning reasons optionally STATE OF JHARKHAND VS CWE-SOMA CONSORTIUM - 2016 5 Supreme 465. Municipalities too hold discretion if financially unfeasible, without liability to bidders P.K. SEBASTIAN Vs PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY - 2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 33628.
The rub lies in timing and payments. Near completion, contractors have invested heavily, creating vested interests. Courts scrutinize for fairness: Merely accepting the final bill cannot deprive the appellant of his right to claim damages Hi-Tech Construction and Co. VS Chief Secretary, Govt. of Nagaland - 2022 0 Supreme(Gau) 717.
In KERALA STATE LIBRARY COUNCIL Vs STATE OF KERALA - 2009 Supreme(Online)(KER) 28324, cancellation of a construction sanction without inquiry or reasons was quashed for breaching natural justice—echoing that administrative revocations demand due process. Likewise, rejecting plot allotments sans reasons violates fair play Ravij Kumar Singh VS State Of Jharkhand - 2019 Supreme(Jhk) 1722.
Other cases reinforce: Tender cancellations mustn't defeat public processes arbitrarily Omega Enterprises, Rep. by its Sole Proprietor Mr. Ramiah VS Ministry of Civil Aviation, Rep. by its Secretary - 2019 Supreme(Mad) 2769, and while authorities reserve rights (e.g., Clause 28.2: The authority reserves right to cancel any or all bids without assigning any reason ASCENOER Lift and Automation Private Limited VS State of Odisha - 2020 Supreme(Ori) 191), judicial review checks mala fides or unreasonableness STATE OF JHARKHAND VS CWE-SOMA CONSORTIUM - 2016 5 Supreme 465.
In P.K. SEBASTIAN Vs PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY - 2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 33628, no legal right accrued to challenge mere discretionary cancellation absent mala fides.
If facing NEC cancellation:
Precedents like Municipal Council auctions canceled for valid reasons (yet power exists without) show discretion's breadth, but fairness prevails C. Ranganathan VS District Collector - 2012 Supreme(Mad) 3546.
Indian jurisprudence balances efficiency with equity:- Judicial Review Limits: Courts avoid appellate roles, focusing on process infirmities, not merits STATE OF JHARKHAND VS CWE-SOMA CONSORTIUM - 2016 5 Supreme 465ASCENOER Lift and Automation Private Limited VS State of Odisha - 2020 Supreme(Ori) 191.- Financial Feasibility: Bodies like SDMC or Municipalities cancel for better outcomes without liability CORPORATE INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED vs SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.P.K. SEBASTIAN Vs PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY - 2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 33628.- KVK/ICAR Funding: Even specialized grants allow halts for unsatisfactory progress, but with audits Kailash Chandra Paneru VS Vice Chancellor of Govind Ballabh Pant Agriculture and Technology University Pant Nagar - 2017 Supreme(UK) 297.
Yet, cryptic rejections (e.g., JIADA plot allotment) get quashed for lacking reasons Ravij Kumar Singh VS State Of Jharkhand - 2019 Supreme(Jhk) 1722.
While the NEC typically can cancel projects without reasons under policy discretion Tirupati Food Products VS Union of India - 2009 0 Supreme(Gau) 370, doing so near completion with unpaid bills risks judicial intervention for arbitrariness and natural justice breaches Hi-Tech Construction and Co. VS Chief Secretary, Govt. of Nagaland - 2022 0 Supreme(Gau) 717. Contractors hold rights to reasons, hearings, and dues settlement.
Key Takeaways:- Discretion exists but must be reasonable.- Late cancellations demand justification.- Unpaid bills remain recoverable.
This post provides general insights based on judgments like Hi-Tech Construction and Co. VS Chief Secretary, Govt. of Nagaland - 2022 0 Supreme(Gau) 717 and Tirupati Food Products VS Union of India - 2009 0 Supreme(Gau) 370, alongside others (e.g., KERALA STATE LIBRARY COUNCIL Vs STATE OF KERALA - 2009 Supreme(Online)(KER) 28324, STATE OF JHARKHAND VS CWE-SOMA CONSORTIUM - 2016 5 Supreme 465). It is not legal advice—consult a qualified lawyer for your case.
References:1. Hi-Tech Construction and Co. VS Chief Secretary, Govt. of Nagaland - 2022 0 Supreme(Gau) 717: Stresses reasons for actions impacting rights.2. Tirupati Food Products VS Union of India - 2009 0 Supreme(Gau) 370: Outlines NEC's broader powers.3. Additional: CORPORATE INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED vs SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS., STATE OF JHARKHAND VS CWE-SOMA CONSORTIUM - 2016 5 Supreme 465, etc., for contextual support.
#NECProjectCancellation, #ContractorRightsIndia, #NaturalJusticeLaw
Elevation claim will be paid directly by the defendant to NYC and not to be paid by the plaintiff; (ii) NYC's East Elevation claim is limited to the supply of labour only; and (iii) the North Elevation work is omitted from the LoA and will be taken over completely by NYC and to be paid by ... [46] Based on the SCJ's judgment, evidently, she did not consider the defendant's pleaded case in para 11.4 of the Defence regarding othe three conditions in r....
Reference is also made to Clause 7.7 which provides “The without assigning any reason.” 11. ... No.4515/2020 Page 6 of 25 all proposals received, without assigning any reason” 12. ... Firstly, it is stated that the respondent SDMC had reserved its right to reject any, or all of the bids without assigning any reasons therefor, and that the SDMC may terminate the RFP process at any time without assignin....
Reference is also made to Clause 7.7 which provides “The without assigning any reason.” 11. ... No.4515/2020 Page 6 of 25 all proposals received, without assigning any reason” 12. ... Firstly, it is stated that the respondent SDMC had reserved its right to reject any, or all of the bids without assigning any reasons therefor, and that the SDMC may terminate the RFP process at any time without assignin....
According to the petitioners, Ext.P12 decision taken by the Municipality to cancel the tender without assigning reasons, is arbitrary, illegal, unfair and high-handed. That apart, it lacks bonafides and for the said reason, it is vitiated by malafides. ... Even though the 2nd respondent Municipal Engineer, after tender evaluation, recommended the petitioners' tenders for approval of the Municipality by Ext.P11, as per Ext.P12 resolution, the tenders have been rejected and decided to re-tender all the works, wi....
Reference is also made to Clause 7.7 which provides “The without assigning any reason.” 11. ... No.4515/2020 Page 6 of 25 all proposals received, without assigning any reason” 12. ... Firstly, it is stated that the respondent SDMC had reserved its right to reject any, or all of the bids without assigning any reasons therefor, and that the SDMC may terminate the RFP process at any time without assignin....
The remaining amount of the bill has not yet been out of which the respondent authorities have only paid Rs.31,37,245/- The Secretary, Department of Tourism, Government of Jharkhand, Project
assigning any reason thereof. ... assigning any reason thereof. ... assigning any reason thereof. ... the tender at any stage without any reason to the parties. ... assigning any cogent reason.
It is the further case of the petitioner that the property in question was already handed over to the petitioner as per Ext.P7 and now Ext.P3 order is issued without any enquiry and without giving an opportunity to the petitioner and that too without assigning any reason whatsoever. ... In Ext.P3 also, absolutely no reason is stated or the so-called mistake is not mentioned to cancel Ext.P1 order. 3. ... construction and :-6-: completion#HL....
Sibal that Condition 8 of the letter of allotment is unconscionable as it gives IOCL an unfettered right to terminate the distributorship without assigning any reason. In the instant case, Respondent 2 is far weaker in economic strength and has no bargaining power with IOCL. ... Condition 8 of the letter of allotment provides for unilateral termination of distributorship without assigning any reason which is liable to be read down in the light of Article 14 of the Constitution of India....
The appellant-state was well within its rights to reject the bid without assigning any reason thereof. ... ... In terms of the above clause 24 of NIT and clause 32.1 of SBD, though Government has the right to cancel the tender without assigning any reason, appellant-state did assign a cogent and acceptable reason of lack of adequate competition to cancel the tender and invite a fresh tender ... This is apparent from clause 24 of NI....
Further, looking to the further conditions at page 14 onwards of the brief in the same tender notice at clause 28.2 this Court finds, the same reads as follows: The authority reserves right to cancel any or all bids without assigning any reason."
This writ petition is under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, whereby and whereunder the communication dated 24.03.2019 passed by the Jharkhand Industrial Area Development Authority in short "JIADA" wherein, the application filed by the petitioner for allotment of plot no. T-6 at Tetuldanga, East Singhbhum, has been rejected but according to the petitioner without assigning any reason and in one word, it has been held to be found not satisfactory by the Project Clearance Committee.
The efficacious of public tender cannot be defeated by canceling the same without any reason. Therefore, the cancellation without reason is an arbitrary action and consequently, this Court can interfere with the same. The price quoted by the petitioner is admittedly more than the upset price fixed by the respondent. Therefore, they cannot cancel the tender without assigning any reason.
The expenditure incurred from the grant will be audited by the Accountant General, Central Revenues /Commerce, Works and Miscellaneous or Accountant General of the State concerned or the Examiner of the Local Fund Accounts or Statutory Auditors of the Grantee Institutions or a Chartered Accountant or the ICAR’s own interest auditors. On the basis of the assessment of these reports, the Council would release grants for the scheme every half year. In the event of an unsatisfactory progress of work at a Kendra as assessed by the Council, the Council may stop the release of further gra....
In the present case, the auction held on 28.2.2012 was cancelled by the Council for valid reasons. Hence, the Writ Petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed. The Municipal Council has power to cancel any auction without assigning any reason.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
