Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Custody of Movables Post-Auction - Once the auction is completed and the sale certificate is issued, the auction purchaser's right is to enjoy possession, and the bank or authorized officer is responsible for handing over physical possession of the immovable property. The property, including movables, should be kept in custody by the authorized officer or a person authorized by him, taking care as an owner ["Everspace Realty LLP. vs Vasu Coco Resorts Pvt. Ltd. - Kerala"], ["Vasu Coco Resorts Pvt. Ltd. VS Authorised Officer, State Bank of India, Stressed Assets Management Branch - Kerala"], ["Vaidhai Agarwal alias Sonu Kumari Kedia vs Indian Bank (Erstwhile Allahabad Bank) - Calcutta"].
Next Step After Handover - The primary step after handing over the movables or immovable assets to the auction purchaser is to ensure the transfer of physical possession and the registration of the sale certificate in favor of the purchaser, in accordance with law. The bank or authorized officer must facilitate this transfer, and the auction purchaser can file necessary legal remedies if dispossession or irregularities occur ["Everspace Realty LLP. vs Vasu Coco Resorts Pvt. Ltd. - Kerala"], ["Vasu Coco Resorts Pvt. Ltd. VS Authorised Officer, State Bank of India, Stressed Assets Management Branch - Kerala"], ["Vaidhai Agarwal alias Sonu Kumari Kedia vs Indian Bank (Erstwhile Allahabad Bank) - Calcutta"], ["M/S. EVERSPACE REALTY LLP. vs M/S. VASU COCO RESORTS PVT. LTD. - Kerala"].
Handling of Movables - Movables lying in the premises at the time of sale, which are not hypothecated or subject to auction, can be removed by the auction purchaser or the rightful owner, provided they follow due process and inventory procedures. The sale of movables is valid if conducted lawfully, but movables not included in the auction cannot be forcibly taken without proper legal process ["M/S.R P RAJARAJAN ASSOCIATES vs THE CORPORATION OF CHENNAI - Madras"], ["RANEESH ABRAHAM vs SOUTH INDIAN BANK - Kerala"].
Legal Remedies and Disputes - If the auction or handover process is challenged (e.g., due to irregularities or pending appeals), the auction purchaser's next step is to seek legal remedies such as filing writ petitions or appeals to protect their rights, especially if possession has been handed over or sale certificates issued ["Everspace Realty LLP. vs Vasu Coco Resorts Pvt. Ltd. - Kerala"], ["Vasu Coco Resorts Pvt. Ltd. VS Authorised Officer, State Bank of India, Stressed Assets Management Branch - Kerala"], ["M/S. EVERSPACE REALTY LLP. vs M/S. VASU COCO RESORTS PVT. LTD. - Kerala"], ["Maruti Gurappa v. Krishna Bala - Bombay"].
Summary - After handing over movables or immovable assets to the auction purchaser, the subsequent step is to ensure the official transfer of possession and registration of sale in accordance with law. The auction purchaser should act to secure legal possession and can resort to legal remedies if their rights are infringed or if irregularities are alleged ["Everspace Realty LLP. vs Vasu Coco Resorts Pvt. Ltd. - Kerala"], ["Vasu Coco Resorts Pvt. Ltd. VS Authorised Officer, State Bank of India, Stressed Assets Management Branch - Kerala"], ["Vaidhai Agarwal alias Sonu Kumari Kedia vs Indian Bank (Erstwhile Allahabad Bank) - Calcutta"].
References:- ["Everspace Realty LLP. vs Vasu Coco Resorts Pvt. Ltd. - Kerala"]- ["Vasu Coco Resorts Pvt. Ltd. VS Authorised Officer, State Bank of India, Stressed Assets Management Branch - Kerala"]- ["SRI. PARAMESHWARA K vs THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD., - Karnataka"]- ["M/S. EVERSPACE REALTY LLP. vs M/S. VASU COCO RESORTS PVT. LTD. - Kerala"]- ["RANEESH ABRAHAM vs SOUTH INDIAN BANK - Kerala"]- ["M/S.R P RAJARAJAN ASSOCIATES vs THE CORPORATION OF CHENNAI - Madras"]- ["Maruti Gurappa v. Krishna Bala - Bombay"]- ["Vaidhai Agarwal alias Sonu Kumari Kedia vs Indian Bank (Erstwhile Allahabad Bank) - Calcutta"]
In the complex world of secured asset recovery under India's SARFAESI Act, 2002, auction sales of movables can leave secured creditors, authorized officers, and purchasers navigating tricky post-sale procedures. Imagine this: the auction hammer falls, payment is made, and movables are handed over to the auction purchaser's custody. What's next? This common query arises frequently: what is the next step after handover of the movables to the custody of an auction purchaser?
This blog post breaks down the legal framework, key obligations, potential pitfalls, and judicial insights to guide stakeholders. Note: This is general information based on statutes, rules, and precedents; it is not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act), along with the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, outlines the process. After the authorized officer hands over movables to the auction purchaser, the focus shifts to ensuring smooth transition, preservation, and compliance.
Under Rule 7(2), upon full payment, the authorized officer issues a sale certificate, making the sale absolute and serving as prima facie evidence of the purchaser's title. Delivery of possession is integral, with Rules 8(9) and 9(9) mandating handover free from known encumbrances after dues are cleared. Celir LLP VS Bafna Motors (Mumbai) Pvt. Ltd. - 2023 0 Supreme(SC) 977
However, movables often require additional steps like removal or inventory if not promptly taken by the buyer.
Typically, the secured creditor or authorized officer must:
A 30-day notice to the borrower precedes movable sales, with 15 days for re-auctions if needed. Post-handover, transparency is key to avoid disputes.
What if the auction purchaser delays removal? The creditor cannot sit idle. Lawful actions include:
In R.S. Raju v. State Bank of India, the court directed the bank to ensure vacant possession and inventory movables post-handover, underscoring proactive steps. Bholanath Rajpati Shukla VS Punjab National Bank Recovery Deptt. - 2014 0 Supreme(All) 1463
Similarly, Royal Star Trading Co. v. IFCI Ltd. criticized failures in possession delivery, stressing statutory compliance for movables removal. Celir LLP VS Bafna Motors (Mumbai) Pvt. Ltd. - 2023 0 Supreme(SC) 977
UCO Bank v. Rekha Sahu highlighted duties to verify encumbrances and facilitate post-sale handling. Celir LLP VS Bafna Motors (Mumbai) Pvt. Ltd. - 2023 0 Supreme(SC) 977
From other precedents, auction purchasers often seek court aid for clearance. In one case, the purchaser filed for clearance of the movables lying in the factory premises, so that they can enjoy the fruits of the sale certificate issued on 11.12.2017. M/s. Asset Reconstruction Company India Limited vs Abhishek Steel and Power - 2019 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 1247M/s. Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited, Vs Abhishek Steel and Power
Another instance notes the purchaser's plight: caught in between the secured creditor and the Debts Recovery Tribunal, the auction purchaser... has come up with W.P No.3553 of 2019 seeking clearance of the movables. M/s. Asset Reconstruction Company India Limited vs Abhishek Steel and Power - 2019 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 1247
These illustrate that delays can trap purchasers, prompting judicial intervention for removal.
Courts emphasize fairness and procedure. In a challenge to auction validity, separate valuation of movables and immovables was mandated, with sales below reserve price scrutinized. The court stressed lenders must act fairly for maximum value. M/S. EVERSPACE REALTY LLP. vs M/S. VASU COCO RESORTS PVT. LTD. - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 59031
On encumbrances, purchasers buy with known ones disclosed. One ruling held: The auction purchaser purchased the property along with the known encumbrances... The auction purchaser is made aware of the known encumbrances by the secured creditors. Indian Overseas Bank, Asset Recovery Management Branch, Coimbatore VS Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise & service Tax, Salem - 2023 Supreme(Mad) 2763
Liability shifts post-possession: In a Noida Authority dues dispute, dues were payable by the creditor until handover. The court directed: UPFC to hand over possession of the property to the Auction Purchaser. Minnie Pan (India) P. Ltd. VS Eurobike Ltd. - 2018 Supreme(Del) 462
Auction purchasers may face hurdles like attachments; courts refuse removal requests if encumbrances persist, protecting public interest. Indian Overseas Bank, Asset Recovery Management Branch, Coimbatore VS Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise & service Tax, Salem - 2023 Supreme(Mad) 2763
Fraud allegations can void sales, but require proof: Fraud vitiates all solemn proceedings, including compromise decrees and auction sales. RAMA MURTHY IYYAKANNU MUDALIAR MAJOR AND RAVICHANDRAN RAMA VS H. S. GOUTHAM SHANTHILAL MAJOR AND H. M. RAVEENDRA KUMAR - 2006 Supreme(Kar) 714
In execution contexts, courts direct custody to nazir or curators for movables, reimbursing custodians. V. S. Dasa Reddy VS Vivek Mehra - 2008 Supreme(Kar) 804
To mitigate risks:
If non-compliance, file for possession recovery in DRT.
For Auction Purchasers:
Approach courts if blocked, as in factory clearance petitions. SRI. PARAMESHWARA K vs THE SOUTH INDIA BANK LTD. - 2024 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 40220
General Tips:
All actions must align with law to prevent quashing, as procedural lapses invite scrutiny. M/S. EVERSPACE REALTY LLP. vs M/S. VASU COCO RESORTS PVT. LTD. - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 59031
Understanding these steps protects rights in SARFAESI auctions. Stay compliant, document diligently, and seek expert counsel promptly.
References:1. Bholanath Rajpati Shukla VS Punjab National Bank Recovery Deptt. - 2014 0 Supreme(All) 1463: Inventory and possession directives.2. Celir LLP VS Bafna Motors (Mumbai) Pvt. Ltd. - 2023 0 Supreme(SC) 977: Compliance in possession and movables.3. M/s. Asset Reconstruction Company India Limited vs Abhishek Steel and Power - 2019 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 1247: Purchaser's clearance petitions.4. Others as cited.
#SARFAESIAct #AuctionPurchaser #BankingLaw
The Borrower contended that the Auction Purchaser was hand-in- glove with the Bank even prior to the e-auction. It was submitted that the letter was not issued by an individual Director, but on behalf of “M/s. Everspace Realty LLP.” ... The Auction Purchaser legally participated in the auction and purchased the property for a total amount of Rs.41.71 Crores (Rs. 39.31 Crores for immovables and Rs.2.40 Crores for movables). ... The Auction#H....
7.5 It is further submitted that the auction purchaser is not a bona fide purchaser. ... (3) In the event of possession of immovable property is actually taken by the authorised officer, such property shall be kept in his own custody or in the custody of any person authorised or appointed by him, who shall take as much care of the property in his custody as a owner ... The auction purchaser was also a joint proposer of a One-time Settlement proposa....
The petitioners then approached the DRT before whom the Bank appears to have sought time to file statement of objections and in the time that is granted by the DRT have registered the sale certificate in favour of the auction purchaser. The auction purchaser had begun demolition of the property. ... In the interregnum, the learned Senior counsel submits that taking advantage of the time gap, the sale certificate is registered in favour of the auction purchaser and the auctio....
The petitioners then approached the DRT before whom the Bank appears to have sought time to file statement of objections and in the time that is granted by the DRT have registered the sale certificate in favour of the auction purchaser. The auction purchaser had begun demolition of the property. ... In the interregnum, the learned Senior counsel submits that taking advantage of the time gap, the sale certificate is registered in favour of the auction purchaser and the auctio....
The right of the auction purchaser of obtaining vacant possession cannot be allowed to be defeated in this manner for the failure of the bank to make necessary arrangements or inventorise the movables and thereafter dispose of the movables in accordance with law. ... The petitioner admittedly is the auction purchaser whose bid at the auction was the highest bid and was duly accepted. Full consideration has been paid by the petitioner. ... purchaser. ....
The Borrower contended that the Auction Purchaser was hand-in- glove with the Bank even prior to the e-auction. It was submitted that the letter was not issued by an individual Director, but on behalf of “M/s. Everspace Realty LLP.” ... The Auction Purchaser legally participated in the auction and purchased the property for a total amount of ₹ 41.71 Crores ( ₹ 39.31 Crores for immovables and 2.40 Crores for movables). ... shows that the Auc....
The Borrower contended that the Auction Purchaser was hand-in- glove with the Bank even prior to the e-auction. It was submitted that the letter was not issued by an individual Director, but on behalf of “M/s. Everspace Realty LLP.” ... The Auction Purchaser legally participated in the auction and purchased the property for a total amount of ₹ 41.71 Crores ( ₹ 39.31 Crores for immovables and ₹ 2.40 Crores for movables). ... shows that the A....
Pandu Ranga Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the auction purchaser. 3. ... No.3553 of 2019 is concerned, the same is filed by the auction purchaser for the clearance of the movables lying in the factory premises, so that they can enjoy the fruits of the sale certificate issued on 11.12.2017. ... In the meantime, caught in between the secured creditor and the Debts Recovery Tribunal, the auction purchaser, who got the sale certificate registered about sixteen (16)....
No.3553 of 2019 is concerned, the same is filed by the auction purchaser for the clearance of the movables lying in the factory premises, so that they can enjoy the fruits of the sale certificate issued on 11.12.2017. ... In the meantime, caught in between the secured creditor and the Debts Recovery Tribunal, the auction purchaser, who got the sale certificate registered about sixteen (16) months ago, has come up with W.P No.3553 of 2019 seeking clearance of the movables from the prem....
The property now vests in the hands of auction purchaser. If at all aggrieved, it is the auction purchaser who has to file a Writ Petition. 6. ... The auction purchaser purchased the property along with the known encumbrances. ... The auction purchaser is made aware of the known encumbrances by the secured creditors. ... Therefore the supra mentioned Office Memoramdum squarely applies to the case in hand. ....
The relevant directions in this regard are as follows:- “..... 11. Similarly, on 29.07.2004 after the entire consideration had been paid by the Auction Purchaser, this court confirmed the sale in favour of the Auction Purchaser and directed UPFC to hand over possession of the property to the Auction Purchaser. Mr. Bansal has drawn my attention to an order dated 23rd November, 2003 passed in this case wherein it was made clear that all dues, including government dues in respect of the property in question shall be payable by the Auction Purchaser from the date when the posse....
Therefore, it is a preponderous on the part of the review applicant to claim himself to be a bona fide purchaser for value. The review application along with the condone delay petitions and grant leave petition were filed in February 2015. For the past 11 months, the auction purchaser has managed to ensure that the Department does not hand over the possession of the property to the owners.
But what happens if the auction-purchaser is the decree holder himself ? At any rate when he proceeds with the execution he is aware of the fact that an appeal against the original decree is pending. In our opinion, the situation would materially alter and this decree holder-auction purchaser should not be entitled to any protection.
Instead, the petitioner-decree holder has been directed to keep the movable properties removed during execution of the decree in his custody by its order which was subsequently confirmed by order dated 16.8.1997. However, the next step for the executing court was to hand over movable properties to the custody of the Nazar for its safe keeping. The trial court has not examined whether the curator was appointed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, or not.
In our opinion, the situation would materially alter and this decree holder-auction purchaser should not be entitled to any protection. But what happens if the auction-purchaser is the decree holder himself? At any rate, when he proceeds with the execution he is aware of the fact that an appeal against the original decree is pending. This proceeds on the footing that the equity in favour of the stranger should he protected and the situation is occasionally reached on account of default on the part of the judgment debtor not obtaining stay of the execution of the decree duri....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
