Back
D. K. SINGH
Vasu Coco Resorts Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Authorised Officer, State Bank of India, Stressed Assets Management Branch – Respondent
What is the legality of the auction sale conducted under the SARFAESI Rules where separate valuations for movable and immovable assets were not obtained and reserve prices were not fixed as required? What is the effect of a sale confirmed below the reserve price and whether the auction purchaser can be regarded as a bona fide purchaser in such circumstances? How does Section 13(8) of the SARFAESI Act impact challenges to the auction proceedings when there has been non-compliance with the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules 2002?
JUDGMENT :
D.K. Singh, J.
Heard Ms. V. Mohana, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Praveen K. Joy, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Mr. K. Jaju Babu, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Tom K. Thomas, learned Counsel for R1 and R2 and Mr. P.L. Narayanan learned Senior Counsel for R3.
Facts:
2. The first petitioner, a private limited Company, runs a resort at Cherthala, Alleppey under the name and style “Vasundhara Resorts”. The second petitioner is the Managing Director of the first respondent Company. The petitioners had availed credit facilities to the tune of Rs.53 crores from the first respondent Bank for the construction of a five-star resort. The said loan was secured by creating an equitable mortgage of certain immovable properties and hypothecation of the movable properties. The primary security comprised 6.60 Ares of land with resort building and superstructure. Fourteen agricultural lands were offered as collateral security to secure the aforesaid loan. It is stated that as a result of the Nipah Virus, Kerala floods and COVID-19, the resort business faced huge hardship as the tourism business itself was down to a great extent. The petitioners failed to discharge
The auction sale of secured assets was invalid due to violations of statutory procedures, including failure to obtain separate valuations and selling below the reserve price.
The auction sale is invalid if not compliant with SARFAESI Act rules on property valuation, requiring distinct treatment of movable and immovable assets without collusion.
Mandatory compliance with procedural requirements under the SARFAESI Act is essential; failure to adhere prejudices borrowers' rights and invalidates auction proceedings.
Point of Law - Rule 15 of Schedule II Part I of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the first place it will have to be stated that a reading of the said Rule does not in any way conflict with either Section....
Secured creditors must adhere to proper notice and valuation requirements per the SARFAESI Act, as failure to do so invalidates asset sales.
The court reinforced that compliance with statutory notice requirements and fair valuation is essential in property auctions under the SARFAESI Act to protect borrower rights.
The court upheld the auction process under the SARFAESI Act, affirming that auctions must follow statutory requirements and can only be challenged on limited grounds such as fraud or procedural irreg....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
