Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Non Obstante Clause Effect - A non obstante (notwithstanding) clause in legislation explicitly states that the provisions of that law shall prevail over any inconsistent provisions in other laws for the time being in force. When such a clause is present, the enacted law with the non obstante clause overrides conflicting laws, including earlier statutes, customs, or usages ["Pramod Yadav vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"], ["UPENDRA RAI Vs CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ANR. - Delhi"], ["RAJENDRA VISHWAKARMA @ RAJENDRA SHARMA AND ANOTHER vs State of U.P. AND ANOTHER - Allahabad"].
Legislative Intent and Hierarchy - Courts recognize that the presence of a non obstante clause signifies legislative intent for the law to prevail over other laws, regardless of chronological order. If the legislature enacts a law with such a clause, it indicates a clear intention to override conflicting laws, even if those laws were enacted earlier ["Pramod Yadav vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"], ["UPENDRA RAI Vs CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ANR. - Delhi"], ["RAJENDRA VISHWAKARMA @ RAJENDRA SHARMA AND ANOTHER vs State of U.P. AND ANOTHER - Allahabad"].
Multiple Non Obstante Clauses - When two laws contain non obstante clauses, the general rule of construction is that the later law with the non obstante clause prevails over the earlier one, unless explicitly stated otherwise ["UPENDRA RAI vs CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ANR. - Delhi"], ["UPENDRA RAI vs CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ANR. - Delhi"].
Application in Specific Laws - For statutes like the MSMED Act, PMLA, and others, non obstante clauses explicitly give effect to the provisions of the later law, overriding conflicting laws in force at the time of enactment ["Pramod Yadav vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"], ["UPENDRA RAI Vs CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ANR. - Delhi"], ["RAJENDRA VISHWAKARMA @ RAJENDRA SHARMA AND ANOTHER vs State of U.P. AND ANOTHER - Allahabad"].
Legal Presumption - Courts tend to presume that the legislature, when including a non obstante clause in a subsequent law, intended that law to prevail over previous statutes, reflecting legislative awareness of existing laws at the time of enactment ["RAJENDRA VISHWAKARMA @ RAJENDRA SHARMA AND ANOTHER vs State of U.P. AND ANOTHER - Allahabad"].
Analysis and Conclusion:A non obstante clause in legislation is a clear legislative tool to assert supremacy of the enacted law over other conflicting laws for the time being in force. When such a clause explicitly states that the law shall prevail despite any other law, it generally takes precedence, including over earlier statutes with or without similar clauses. In cases where multiple laws contain non obstante clauses, the later law is presumed to prevail, reaffirming the principle that the legislature's explicit intention to override previous provisions must be respected. Therefore, the presence of a non obstinate clause, especially with language indicating it will prevail notwithstanding anything in any other law for the time being in force, effectively ensures that this provision will override all other conflicting laws.
In the complex world of legislation, conflicts between laws are common. But what happens when a provision explicitly states it will override everything else? This is where the —often beginning with —comes into play. A frequent legal question arises: will Prevail over all other Provisions when it is Stated that Notwithstanding in any other Law Time being in Force this Provision will Prevail over all the Acts and Provisions.
Generally speaking, yes, such clauses are designed to give overriding effect, but their scope isn't unlimited. This blog post dives deep into the purpose, effect, limitations, and judicial approaches to non-obstante clauses, drawing from authoritative sources and case insights. Note: This is general information, not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
A is a legislative tool that explicitly grants overriding or predominant effect to a specific provision over any contrary law, rule, or regulation. It typically uses phrases like . UPENDRA RAI vs & ANR.-1923_2020)
Its core intent is to remove obstacles or conflicts that might arise from other laws, ensuring the law containing the operates fully despite conflicting provisions . Courts recognize it as a device to prioritize the provision, limiting or nullifying inconsistent laws .
The primary purpose is clear: to ensure the provision has full play without hindrance from other statutes. As noted, A explicitly states that certain provisions shall operate ... indicating that the law or specific section shall prevail over conflicting laws .
This overriding effect is crucial in areas like recovery mechanisms. For instance, in , i.e. would prevail over the recovery mechanism of , being enacted later in point of time, overriding all other laws being in force at that point of time... provides that provisions under shall have effect notwithstanding anything inc... . Here, the later-enacted 's clause takes precedence.
Judicially, A provision beginning with () must be enforced and implemented by giving effect to the provisions ... is inconsistent with any other law for the time being in f.... UPENDRA RAI vs & ANR.. This underscores enforcement priority.
While powerful, the effect isn't absolute. The scope and effect of a depend on the context, language used, object, and purpose of the legislation, and it generally signifies that the provision following it shall prevail over inconsistent laws or provisions .
Courts confine it to legislative intent: The effect of such clauses is not always absolute... must be interpreted in light of the object and purpose of the legislation, and it is generally confined to the legislative policy behind the law . No conflict? No override needed—laws can coexist if they operate in different fields .
Key limitations include:- Does not override constitutional provisions or fundamental rights unless explicitly stated.- No implied repeal where no actual conflict exists.- Scope limited by context, object, and purpose .
Tougher when both laws have such clauses. Courts harmonize by examining object, purpose, and language of each, often favoring the later-enacted law, especially if aware of the prior one, unless the earlier is a special statute .
For example, phrases like other law for the time being in force repeatedly affirm this in judgments ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (LAW) COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT , RAJASTHAN vs M/S KESRI VANASPATI PRODUCTS LTDASSISTANT COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER vs M/S VANASTHALI TEXTILES INDUSTRIES LIMITEDASSTT COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER vs M/S PUNUSUMI INDIA LIMITED. In MSMED vs. SARFAESI, timing and specificity tipped the scale .
Courts prefer harmonious construction: The courts have consistently held that the is a legislative device to give the provision full effect despite other laws. However, the clause does not automatically mean that all other laws are rendered inoperative; rather, its effect is to remove obstructions or conflicts that might arise .
Interpretation aligns with legislative policy, avoiding overly broad readings . Special vs. general laws? Special often prevails unless later law yields .
echoes: must be enforced and implemented by giving effect to the provisions UPENDRA RAI vs & ANR.-1923_2020) UPENDRA RAI vs & ANR.UPENDRA RAI vs & ANR. - Delhi_Delhi_WP(CRL)-1923_2020 2021_DHC_1589.
Legislative language is key—clear drafting prevents disputes.
For lawmakers:- Clearly define the overriding scope to minimize ambiguity.
For courts and practitioners:- Focus on harmonious interpretation, legislative object, and purpose.- In multi-clause conflicts, weigh enactment date, specificity, and intent.
These steps promote legal certainty .
Understanding non-obstante clauses is vital for navigating Indian legislation, from MSMED recoveries to broader statutory clashes. Stay informed, but seek professional advice for case-specific guidance.
References:- : Purpose, effect, and judicial principles.- : Overriding effect and scope.- : Context, object, and harmonious construction.- Additional cases: , UPENDRA RAI vs & ANR.-1923_2020), UPENDRA RAI vs & ANR., etc.
#NonObstanteClause, #LegalPrecedence, #OverridingLaws
obstante clause in one of the two provisions in the same statute saying, “notwithstanding anything in this Act or any other law for the time being in force …..”. ... provisions would have effect "notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in #HL....
A provision beginning with non obstante clause (notwithstanding anything inconsistent contained therein in any other law for the time being in force) must be enforced and implemented by giving effect to the provisions of the Act and by limiting the provisions of other laws. ... any other law for the....
It is submitted that therefore, non - obstante clause in MSMED Act, i.e. S.24 would prevail over the recovery mechanism of SARFAESI Act, being enacted later in point of time, overriding all other laws being in force at that point of time. ... S.24 provides that provisions under S.15 to 23 shall have effect notwithstanding anything inc....
A provision beginning with non obstante clause (notwithstanding anything inconsistent contained therein in any other law for the time being in force) must be enforced and implemented by giving effect to the provisions ... is inconsistent with any other law for the time being in f....
A provision beginning with non obstante clause (notwithstanding anything inconsistent contained therein in any other law for the time being in force) must be enforced and implemented by giving effect to the provisions ... is inconsistent with any other law for the time being in f....
A provision beginning with non obstante clause (notwithstanding anything inconsistent contained therein in any other law for the time being in force) must be enforced and implemented by giving effect to the provisions ... is inconsistent with any other law for the time being in f....
other law for the time being in force'.
other law for the time being in force'.
other law for the time being in force'.
By contrast, the provisions of Section 20 of the SC/ST Act, carries a non obstante clause in unqualified terms, giving overriding effect to the provisions of the said Act over any other law for the time being in force, or ... This is because at the time of enactment of the later statute, the legislature was aware of the earlier l....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
