Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Order of Pay and Recover by Tribunal - Generally, the Tribunal can pass an order directing the insurance company to pay compensation and subsequently recover the amount from the vehicle owner, especially when the deceased was traveling as a gratuitous passenger in a goods vehicle. This principle is supported by judgments referencing the Swaran Singh and Laxmi Narain Dhut cases, which affirm the statutory liability of the insurance company to pay and recover from the owner ["Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited VS Peruboina Rambabu - Andhra Pradesh"], ["Kankipati Salmon VS Dasari Ramaiah - Andhra Pradesh"], ["Pantadi Durga, W/o. (Late) Ganesh VS M. Venkata Ramana, S/o. Suranna @ Suryanarayana - Andhra Pradesh"].
Main Points and Insights:
Evidence indicating that the deceased was traveling as an owner or authorized person related to the goods, or as a paid passenger, can influence whether the insurer is liable or whether the pay and recover order is justified ["Divl Mgr, Oriental Insurance Co Ltd. VS Yerramsetty Lakshmi - Andhra Pradesh"], ["Branch Manager, M/s Sriram General Insurance Company Limited vs S. Pandiselvam - Madras"], ["Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. VS Reeta Devi - Himachal Pradesh"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
References:- ["R. Nagarani VS Muthukrishnan Another - Madras"]- ["Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited VS Peruboina Rambabu - Andhra Pradesh"]- ["Kankipati Salmon VS Dasari Ramaiah - Andhra Pradesh"]- ["Pantadi Durga, W/o. (Late) Ganesh VS M. Venkata Ramana, S/o. Suranna @ Suryanarayana - Andhra Pradesh"]- ["NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. VS DUDABHAI GAGJIBHAI - Gujarat"]- ["Branch Manager, M/s Sriram General Insurance Company Limited vs S. Pandiselvam - Madras"]- ["Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. VS Reeta Devi - Himachal Pradesh"]
In motor accident claims, families often seek swift justice and compensation after tragic losses. But what happens when the deceased was traveling in a goods vehicle without any goods? Can the tribunal direct the insurance company to pay compensation first and then recover it from the vehicle owner—a so-called pay and recover order? This question arises frequently under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and has been addressed in key Supreme Court judgments.
This post breaks down the legal position, drawing from authoritative rulings and related cases. Note: This is general information based on judicial precedents and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your case.
A pay and recover order requires the insurer to pay the compensation awarded by the tribunal to the claimants upfront, even if policy conditions aren't fully met, with the right to later recover the amount from the insured (vehicle owner/driver). This principle aims to provide immediate relief to victims' families while holding the insured accountable.
However, this isn't automatic. It applies only in specific circumstances, such as third-party liability or where statutory coverage exists under Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Branch Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. , Branch Office, Nethaji Bye Pass Road, Dharmapuri Town VS Nagammal & Others - 2008 0 Supreme(Mad) 4747Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. VS Hanso - 2019 0 Supreme(HP) 1075. Tribunals must examine policy terms and facts carefully before issuing such orders.
Can an order of pay and recover be passed by a tribunal when the deceased was traveling in a goods vehicle without goods?
Generally, no, unless the insurance policy explicitly covers passengers in such scenarios or specific legal exceptions apply. Section 147 limits insurer liability for passengers in goods vehicles to the owner of the goods or their authorized representative. Gratuitous or incidental passengers traveling without goods fall outside statutory coverage Bajaj Allianz General Ins. Co. Ltd. VS Satya Devi - 2019 0 Supreme(J&K) 6National Insurance Company Ltd. VS Bhoora Kha - 2023 0 Supreme(All) 1432.
The Supreme Court has consistently ruled that insurers aren't liable for such passengers absent explicit policy coverage. The pay and recover doctrine doesn't extend here, as there's no initial liability to fasten on the insurer Bajaj Allianz General Ins. Co. Ltd. VS Satya Devi - 2019 0 Supreme(J&K) 6.
In New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Asha Rani, the Supreme Court overruled earlier decisions like Satpal Singh, clarifying that Section 147's any person doesn't cover gratuitous passengers in goods vehicles. Post-1994 amendments extended coverage only to goods owners/representatives, not others. The words 'any person' in Section 147 do not automatically extend to cover gratuitous or incidental passengers in goods vehicles unless explicitly included by law or policy Bajaj Allianz General Ins. Co. Ltd. VS Satya Devi - 2019 0 Supreme(J&K) 6.
The Court emphasized that tribunals can't impose pay and recover orders where no statutory or contractual liability exists.
In Baljit Kaur (2004) and related rulings, the apex court reaffirmed: Insurers aren't liable for gratuitous passengers in goods vehicles without goods. The pay and recover principle is discretionary and inapplicable without explicit coverage National Insurance Company Ltd. VS Bhoora Kha - 2023 0 Supreme(All) 1432Branch Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. , Branch Office, Nethaji Bye Pass Road, Dharmapuri Town VS Nagammal & Others - 2008 0 Supreme(Mad) 4747. The law does not require insurers to cover gratuitous or incidental passengers in goods vehicles unless explicitly included National Insurance Company Ltd. VS Bhoora Kha - 2023 0 Supreme(All) 1432.
These cases set the precedent: When the deceased travels without goods, tribunals typically cannot pass pay and recover orders.
Judicial opinions vary slightly, but align with Supreme Court limits, especially for vehicles without goods.
In one appeal, the court exonerated the insurer for a gratuitous passenger in a goods vehicle (tempo), modifying the tribunal's award: The insurance company would not be liable to pay compensation if the victim was a gratuitous passenger in the goods vehicle Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. VS Ranjanben Motisinh Kher - 2022 Supreme(Guj) 1006. Claimants could recover only from the owner.
Another case upheld no liability for 60+ passengers in a goods carriage used for a marriage party, a permit breach: The deceased, traveling as a gratuitous passenger in a goods carriage, was not covered under the statutory umbrella of insurance cover New India Assurance Co. Ltd. VS Thavra, s/o. Badhu Chavan - 2023 Supreme(Bom) 722. Yet, in some instances, pay and recover was directed due to practical justice, though not directly for no-goods scenarios.
Contrasting views exist: One court allowed pay and recover for a commercial use breach, stating, The Insurance Company would be in a position to recover the amount from the owner... directing the Insurance Company to pay the compensation amount first and then recover New India Assurance Co. Ltd. VS Suryabhan - 2023 Supreme(Bom) 1820. However, this involved a gratuitous passenger but not explicitly no-goods.
For no-goods cases, stricter stances prevail: In the absence of the goods in the vehicle at the time of the accident, the person travelling in the said goods vehicle... tribunals shouldn't interfere without evidence of goods ownership NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. VS AMMINI W/O VIJAYAN K. R. (LATE) - 2023 Supreme(Ker) 998.
Explicit rejection: In the case of gratuitous passengers travelling in goods vehicle, pay and recover direction cannot be granted Branch Manager, The New India Assurance Company Limited, Thanjavur VS Amsavalli - 2021 Supreme(Mad) 2500.
These cases illustrate that while some tribunals issue pay and recover for policy breaches, Supreme Court law bars it for gratuitous passengers without goods or policy cover Sakeena Begum VS New India Assurance Co. Ltd. - 2020 Supreme(J&K) 467United India Insurance Company Ltd. VS Sukumarbai W/o Suryakant Nikam - 2019 Supreme(Bom) 1239.
Tribunals may issue such orders in limited scenarios:
However, if Insurance Company has no liability to pay at all, then it cannot be compelled... to pay the compensation amount and later on recover it from owner United India Insurance Company Ltd. VS Sukumarbai W/o Suryakant Nikam - 2019 Supreme(Bom) 1239.
| Scenario | Pay & Recover Possible? | Key Citation ||----------|--------------------------|--------------|| Goods vehicle with goods (owner/rep) | Yes, if policy aligns | Section 147 || Without goods, gratuitous passenger | Generally No | Bajaj Allianz General Ins. Co. Ltd. VS Satya Devi - 2019 0 Supreme(J&K) 6National Insurance Company Ltd. VS Bhoora Kha - 2023 0 Supreme(All) 1432 || Explicit policy cover for passengers | Yes | Policy terms || Other breaches (e.g., permit) | Sometimes, discretion | New India Assurance Co. Ltd. VS Suryabhan - 2023 Supreme(Bom) 1820 |
Under prevailing law, tribunals generally cannot pass pay and recover orders when the deceased traveled in a goods vehicle without goods, as insurers lack liability per Supreme Court clarifications in Asha RaniBajaj Allianz General Ins. Co. Ltd. VS Satya Devi - 2019 0 Supreme(J&K) 6 and Baljit KaurNational Insurance Company Ltd. VS Bhoora Kha - 2023 0 Supreme(All) 1432. Exceptions hinge on policy wording or proven goods links. This balances insurer protections with victim relief but underscores policy importance.
For tailored advice, reach out to a motor accident claims specialist. Stay informed on evolving jurisprudence to navigate these claims effectively.
#PayAndRecover, #GoodsVehicleClaims, #MotorAccidentLaw
Since the Tribunal arrived at a finding that the deceased persons have travelled in the goods vehicle as gratuitous passengers, the Tribunal dismissed the claim petitions as against the Insurance Company and had passed an award as against the owner of the vehicle. ... Based upon the depositions of PW1 and PW3, the Tribunal arrived at a finding that the deceased persons were not load men but gratuitous passengers travelling....
While so, in our view, the High Court ought not to have interfered with the award passed by the Tribunal directing the first respondent to pay and recover from the owner of the vehicle. ... The award passed by the Tribunal directing the insurance company to pay the compensation amount awarded to the claimants and, thereafter, recover the same from the owner of the vehicle in question is in accordance with the judgm....
While so, in our view, the High Court ought not to have interfered with the award passed by the Tribunal directing the first respondent to pay and recover from the owner of the vehicle. ... Thereafter it shall recover the same from the owner of the offending vehicle without initiating separate proceedings by filing Execution Petition before the Tribunal. Except for modifying the above, the award passed by the #HL_S....
The learned Tribunal exonerated the respondent No.2/Insurance Company from indemnifying the owner of the offending vehicle holding that the deceased was a gratuitous passenger travelling in the offending vehicle, which is a goods carrier and passed the decree against the 1st respondent/owner-cum-driver ... Under Ex.B1 Policy issued for the offending vehicle, the risk of the owner of goods not covered. In those circumstances, any per....
On the other hand, the Insurance Company would be in a position to recover the amount from the owner of the said vehicle and, therefore, I see no illegality in the order passed by learned Member of the Tribunal directing the Insurance Company to pay the compensation amount first and then recover the ... The tribunal has no jurisdiction to direct the Insurance Company to pay first and recover amount from the owner o....
It is the case of the appellant that the deceased was travelling in tempo which is a goods carriage vehicle and, therefore, liability cannot be fastened on it and the order of the pay and recover ought not to have been passed by the Tribunal. ... to pay the compensation as the deceased was traveling as a gratuitous passenger on the goods vehicle at the time of a....
As a result, the appeal is partly allowed without costs by modifying the Award passed by the Tribunal by holding that 2nd respondent/ Insurance Company can recover the compensation from the owners of the offending vehicle after payment of compensation to the claimants as awarded by the Tribunal within ... Thus it is established that the deceased was travelling as a representative of the owner of goods in the offending vehi....
Although, the accident and consequential death is not disputed, the liability to pay the compensation has been disowned on the ground that, the deceased was travelling in goods carriage along with 60 other persons. ... However, in view of dismissal of appeal against respondent nos.1 to 3/original claimants, the appellant/insurer will have to satisfy award as passed by the Tribunal with liberty to recover compensation amount from insured/ Owner of vehicle#HL_....
In such circumstances, after considering all the materials placed on record, I do not find any justifiable grounds to interfere in the award passed by the Tribunal. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed, confirming the award passed by the Tribunal. ... Sukumaran’s case (supra), a single Bench of this Court held that in the absence of the goods in the vehicle at the time of the accident, the person travelling in the said goods vehicle#HL_E....
That pay and recovery cannot be passed by any Court or Tribunal. ... Considering the view taken by this Court in different cases, no order of pay and recover can be passed against the appellant as admittedly, the respondents-claimants were traveling as an owner of the goods, in other words as gratuitous passengers. ... The deceased and injured were travelling in the offending vehicle as gratuitous....
The Tribunal is wrong in passing an order against the appellant to pay the claimants and to recover the same from the owners of the vehicle. In the case of gracious passengers travelling in goods vehicle, pay and recover direction cannot be granted. The Tribunal failed to consider the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., v. Ram Prasad Varma reported in 2009 (1) TNMAC 103 and in the case of National Insurance Co. Ltd., v. Rattani reported in 2012 (1) TNMAC 646 are cited.
On issue No. 2, the Tribunal concluded that the monthly income of the deceased, at the time of accident, was Rs. 1500/- and, accordingly held the appellant entitled to total compensation of Rs. 1,20,000/-. On issue No. 3, the Tribunal held that the deceased was a gratuitous passenger travelling in a goods vehicle and absolved the insurer of its liability to indemnify the insured and pay compensation to the appellant. This way, issue No. 3 was decided in favour of the insurer and against respondent Nos. 2 and 3, the owner and the driver of the offending vehicle respectively.
Therefore, even when the deceased was travelling in the goods vehicle as a gratuitous passenger, the insurer has to be directed to pay and recover the compensation from the owner of the vehicle in the very proceeding by filing an execution petition against the insurer. Under these circumstances, this Court holds that the facts proved in the case on hand are squarely covered by this judgment and it is just and necessary to pass an order for pay and recover. Accordingly the insurer has to be directed to satisfy the award and recover from the insured in the very proceedings by....
Here, when the passenger travelling from the vehicle for hire or reward, against the policy condition, cannot be treated as "third party" then the Tribunal ought not to have passed the order of 'pay and recover' in this case. In view of this position of law, it is held that the Tribunal has committed error in holding the Insurance Company liable to pay jointly and severally with opponent No. 01 and to that extent, decision of the Tribunal needs to be set aside.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
