Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Disqualification and Merger Restrictions: Members who join or merge with another political party after an election are generally disqualified from holding office. For example, under Section 14 of the Representation of the People Act, a person elected as a member, other than as a candidate set up by a political party, becomes disqualified if they join a different party after the election. Mergers or defections are scrutinized, and events after expressions of intent or resignation are considered relevant, especially if done hastily or without proper opportunity to be heard ["Likha Sang Chorre, W/o. Shri Likha Tara VS Deputy Commissioner Lower Subansiri District, Arunachal Pradesh - Gauhati"].
Timing and Legal Constraints: The law emphasizes that a member cannot simply change allegiance or merge with another party at will post-election without facing disqualification. The period immediately after an election is critical, and legal provisions restrict such mergers to prevent destabilization or misuse. The exact time frame is not explicitly specified in terms of days but is governed by the procedural and legal framework, including the filing of petitions and the period within which disqualification proceedings are initiated and adjudicated ["Sanitha Saji, D/o. Saji VS Salimkumar, S/o. Thankappan - Kerala"].
Election Laws and Recognized Periods: Recognition of political parties and their mergers are subject to registration and recognition by the Election Commission, with specific procedures and deadlines. The registration process and recognition orders are time-bound, and splinter groups or mergers are recognized mainly for contesting elections, not necessarily for post-election mergers without legal validation ["Mathew Joseph S/o Joseph VS Joseph John S/o John - Kerala"], ["TIRUPATI NARASHIMA MURARI VS UNION OF INDIA - Delhi"].
Legal Precedents and Practice: Courts and the Election Commission operate within statutory periods, often within the timelines set for filing election petitions or objections. Mergers or defections occurring during these periods are scrutinized, and decisions are made based on the timing of such actions relative to the election schedule and legal deadlines ["Praveena Ravikumar VS State Election Commission - Kerala"].
Conclusion:While there is no fixed number of days explicitly specified universally, the legal framework and judicial precedents emphasize that mergers should ideally be completed before the finalization of election results and within the period allowed for legal challenges, generally immediately post-election until the conclusion of relevant legal proceedings.
elected as a member, otherwise than as a candidate set up by a political party, shall be disqualified for being a member if he joins any political party after such election.” ... political party to which they belong. ... It is also argued that the events that took place, after the appellants had expressed their intention to merge with another #HL_START....
her political party. ... After getting elected by the people through a political party or political alliance, a person cannot give up the political party and political alliance and act in accordance with his whims and fancies because the people elected him through a political party or political alli....
Musalimeen as a political party by the Election Commission of India. ... has no power to review the order registering a political party for having violated the provisions of the Constitution or for having committed breach of undertaking given to the Election Commission at the time of registration. ... the Constitution or any provision of undertaking given before the #HL....
by the political party from time to time to recommend the symbol of the political party concerned for contesting in election shall be deemed to be valid. ... membership in the political party. ... Both the petitions were contested by the appellant - petitioner and after contest, the State Election Commission accepted....
Although the purpose which accounts for the origin of symbols was of a limited character, the symbol of each political party with the passage of time acquired a great value because the bulk of the electorate associated the political party at the time of elections with its symbol......” ... However, conduct by authorities as exhibited herein may seriously compel the Court to have a compre....
Kerala Congress (M) is a political party registered under Section 29A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. At the time of the election and after the election to the local body, the Kerala Congress (M) (P.J. Joseph group) was never registered as a political party. ... Joseph group is treated as a political party, that would a....
Under our Constitution, no party or Organisation can simultaneously be a political and a religious party." ... 4. ... " ... (Emphasis supplied) ... The concept of secularism to be maintained by a political party / organization cannot be mixed up with a statutory requirement to be complied with under the provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, while submitting a nomination or contesting....
As elected members of the Panchayat, they had given declarations before the Secretary of the Panchayat showing their association with the political party and affirmed that they belonged to the political party INC based on which the register showing the political affiliation was also prepared. ... The said provision creates a fiction that the whip issued by the person authorised to recommend the symbol of ....
Section 2(f) of the Act, 1951 interprets 'political party' to mean an association or a body of individual citizens of India registered with the Election Commission as a political party under Section 29A. 14. ... 'An Original Political Party' in relation a member of a House means 'the Political Party to which he belongs for the purpose....
He has submitted that as per Rule 7 of the Election Rules, the final voters list shall be published and no time period is prescribed for such publication. ... However, conduct by authorities as exhibited herein may seriously compel the Court to have a comprehensive re- think, as to whether the selfimposed restrictions may need a more liberal interpretation, to ensure that justice is not only done but also seen to be #HL_ST....
The total population of the Panchayat Union as per 2011 Census was 115515 with the ST residents of 1195 and therefore, the Panchayat post has been reserved for ST. After commencement of election process, no petition filed before Courts in the interregnum period can be entertained and it can be done only after the election is over. 4. Learned Advocate General appearing for the Government submitted that in the Sriperumbudur Constituency, there are 58 Panchayats and one such Pan....
On the other hand, if the original political party had taken a decision not to merge, there is no question of 2/3rd of the members of the legislative party deciding to merge and make possible a deeming of merger of the political party because Para 4(2) will make possible for deeming of ‘such merger’ of the original political party.’ It is possible that the majority of the original political party actually took a decision not to merge but 2/3rd members of the legislative party decidin....
If there is no such political inclination at the time of such election, he/she may choose any political party of his/her choice after being elected; but joining any such political party after the election must be effected within a time frame i.e. within a period of six months from the date on which he takes the seat in the respective House. However, he/she should and must be allowed to continue to enjoy his/her political freedom at the time of his/her nomination.
7. Does 10th Schedule of the Constitution of India contemplate a situation where the original political party may merge with another political party and yet its Legislature Party can remain a separate entity not influenced by the merger of the original political party ? OPP.
neither Section 77 nor Rule 86 makes any distinction between election expenses which can be traced to the candidate and election expenses which can be traced to a political party or others. Once any expenditure is treated as election expenses of the candidate, whatever may be the source, the candidate becomes liable to maintain accounts in respect of such expense, even if it is incurred by any political party or others. The requirement that the candidate should account for al....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
