Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Proof of Will When Both Attesting Witnesses Are Dead - Generally, the law requires the examination of at least one attesting witness to prove the due execution of a Will (Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act). If both witnesses are unavailable, the propounder must establish the authenticity through alternative means, such as proof of handwriting and circumstances suggesting proper execution (Section 69 & 71) Basavaramatarakam Memorial Medical Trust, Hyderabad vs Nandamuri Lakshmi Parvathi - Telangana.
Necessity of Evidence from Attesting Witnesses - The examination of attesting witnesses is mandatory unless one witness is unavailable or dead, and the other is examined and proves the execution. Mere assertion of witnesses being dead or unavailable is insufficient without proof like death certificates or evidence of diligent search (Section 68 & 71) Basavaramatarakam Memorial Medical Trust, Hyderabad vs Nandamuri Lakshmi Parvathi - Telangana, Bhagwan Bux Singh VS Board of Revenue U. P. Allahabad - Allahabad.
Application of Sections 69 & 71 - Section 69 allows proof of handwriting of a deceased attesting witness if no witnesses are available. Section 71 provides that if one attesting witness is examined and fails to prove execution, the absence of the other witness cannot automatically invalidate the proof, but both witnesses' testimonies are generally preferred (Section 69 & 71) Tapati Patra VS Swarup Das - Calcutta, Santosh Kumar VS Harkhas Aam - Rajasthan.
Legal Presumption & Diligent Search - Courts presume witnesses are alive unless proved otherwise through death certificates or evidence of diligent search. The failure to summon or examine available witnesses weakens the proof of execution (Section 68, Bhagwan Bux Singh VS Board of Revenue U. P. Allahabad - Allahabad, K.R. Leela Devi, W/o. P.A. Ramachandran and D/o. K.S. Raghavan vs K.R. Rajaram, S/o. K.S. Raghavan - 2025 Supreme(Ker) 1493 - 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 1493).
Case Law & Judicial Viewpoints - Courts have held that proving a Will with only one attesting witness is permissible if that witness proves the execution; however, it is preferable to examine both witnesses. When witnesses are dead, proof can be established through handwriting and circumstantial evidence, but absence of witnesses' examination diminishes the strength of proof Santosh Kumar VS Harkhas Aam - Rajasthan, Daya Kishan VS Bhim Singh (deceased) through his LRs - Punjab and Haryana, Kamalam (Died) VS Sasikala - Madras.
Analysis & Conclusion:To prove the execution of a Will when both attesting witnesses are dead, the law permits alternative evidence such as proof of handwriting (Section 69) and circumstances indicating proper execution. However, the best practice is to examine at least one witness who can establish the attestation, and if both are unavailable, the propounder must demonstrate diligent efforts to locate them and rely on circumstantial evidence and handwriting analysis. The absence of examination of witnesses or proof of their death weakens the case, but legal provisions do allow proof through other credible means when witnesses are truly unavailable.
Imagine discovering a loved one's will after their passing, only to find that both attesting witnesses have also passed away. This common yet challenging scenario raises a critical question: How to prove execution of a will when both attesting witnesses are dead? In Indian law, while this situation complicates probate proceedings, it does not render the will invalid. Courts provide alternative pathways to establish authenticity, primarily through Sections 68 and 69 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. This blog post breaks down the legal principles, requirements, judicial precedents, and practical recommendations to guide you through this process.
Note: This article provides general information based on legal principles and case law. It is not a substitute for professional legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your specific case.
Under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, a will must be executed by the testator in the presence of at least two attesting witnesses, who must sign the document in the testator's presence and in the presence of each other Nachhattar Singh VS Jangir Singh - Punjab and Haryana (2003)Jayanti Gogoi VS Pranati Duara - Gauhati (2003). This attestation ensures the will's genuineness and voluntariness.
Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, further mandates that, to prove the due execution of the will, at least one attesting witness—if alive and capable—must be examined in court Nachhattar Singh VS Jangir Singh - Punjab and Haryana (2003)Jagdish Prasad VS State - Current Civil Cases (2015). This examination confirms the testator's signature, mental capacity, and the attestation process. However, the law anticipates scenarios where witnesses are unavailable, such as death, making alternative proof essential Basavaramatarakam Memorial Medical Trust, Hyderabad vs Nandamuri Lakshmi Parvathi - Telangana.
When both attesting witnesses are deceased, rigid adherence to Section 68 becomes impossible. Fortunately, Section 69 of the Evidence Act offers a vital exception. It states that if no attesting witness can be found, the will can be proved by showing:
As highlighted in judicial interpretations, Section 69 clearly provides that in cases where no attesting witnesses can be found evidence can be led to prove the handwriting of one of the attesting witnesses... either of the attesting witnesses Mansukhlal Kanji Shah VS Sunita Anant Mehta - 2023 Supreme(Bom) 325 - 2023 0 Supreme(Bom) 325. This provision shifts the focus to documentary and expert evidence rather than live testimony.
Courts may also consider proof of the testator's signature through comparison with admitted handwriting or expert opinion, even without direct witness accounts Jayanti Gogoi VS Pranati Duara - Gauhati (2003)Jagdish Prasad VS State - Current Civil Cases (2015).
Section 71 complements these provisions by allowing proof through other evidence if the examined witness fails or if witnesses are unavailable after diligent efforts. However, mere claims of death are insufficient; propounders must provide evidence like death certificates or proof of exhaustive searches Basavaramatarakam Memorial Medical Trust, Hyderabad vs Nandamuri Lakshmi Parvathi - TelanganaBhagwan Bux Singh VS Board of Revenue U. P. Allahabad - Allahabad. One source notes, unless summons is issued to the attesting witnesses, it cannot be concluded that the witnesses are dead K.R. Leela Devi, W/o. P.A. Ramachandran and D/o. K.S. Raghavan vs K.R. Rajaram, S/o. K.S. Raghavan - 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 1493.
Failure to demonstrate such diligence can weaken the case, as courts presume witnesses are alive until proven otherwise Bhagwan Bux Singh VS Board of Revenue U. P. Allahabad - AllahabadK.R. Leela Devi, W/o. P.A. Ramachandran and D/o. K.S. Raghavan vs K.R. Rajaram, S/o. K.S. Raghavan - 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 1493.
To succeed under Section 69:
Courts emphasize substantive proof: the proof of execution relies on alternative evidence, primarily the signature of the testator and the handwriting of the attesting witnesses Jagdish Prasad VS State - Current Civil Cases (2015)Jayanti Gogoi VS Pranati Duara - Gauhati (2003).
Indian courts, including the Supreme Court and High Courts, have consistently upheld wills proved via Section 69 despite dead witnesses. Key holdings include:
In another ruling, examination of even one witness or scribe, combined with consistent evidence, discharges the propounder's onus M. Shobha W/O S. L. Suresh VS M. Dinesh S/O. Late L. Mahadev - 2019 Supreme(Kar) 1350 - 2019 0 Supreme(Kar) 1350. Courts also take judicial notice of cultural contexts supporting female attestors in certain regions P. Arakhita Senapati VS P. Sabitri Senapati - Current Civil CasesP. Arakhita Senapati VS P. Sabitri Senapati - Current Civil Cases.
These precedents affirm that while examining witnesses is preferable, alternative proof strengthens probate claims when unavailable Santosh Kumar VS Harkhas Aam - RajasthanDaya Kishan VS Bhim Singh (deceased) through his LRs - Punjab and HaryanaKamalam (Died) VS Sasikala - Madras.
To bolster your case:
Failure to prove handwriting may lead to invalidation, so comprehensive preparation is key Basavaramatarakam Memorial Medical Trust, Hyderabad vs Nandamuri Lakshmi Parvathi - Telangana.
In summary, proving a will's execution when both attesting witnesses are dead is feasible through Sections 69 and 71 of the Evidence Act, backed by precedents emphasizing handwriting proof and presumptions. While challenging, meticulous evidence gathering can secure probate. For tailored guidance, engage a probate specialist to navigate these nuances effectively.
#WillProbate #IndianLaw #DeadWitnesses
Mere statement of the plaintiff about the non-availability of the attesting witnesses itself was not sufficient to hold that the attesting witnesses were either dead or their whereabouts were not known. ... Section 68 of the Act mandates proof by attesting witnesses of not merely of execution but also attestation by two witnesses. Tha....
If one attesting witness can prove the execution of the Will, the examination of other attesting witnesses can be dispensed with; vii. ... Because the execution of will cannot be proved unless attesting witnesses are examined. Neither the attesting witnesses were examined not the scribed was produced.4. ... Ranjit Ku....
Thus, Section 71 is a safeguard to the mandatory provisions of Section 68 to meet a situation where it is not possible to prove the execution of the Will by calling attesting witnesses, though alive. ... The said section can only be requisitioned when the attesting witnesses, who having being called fail to prove the execution of the document by reason....
Section 69 clearly provides that in cases where no attesting witnesses can be found evidence can be led to prove the handwriting of one of the attesting witnesses. ... either of the attesting witnesses. ... of the handwritings of the deceased and attesting witnesses, and also of any circumstances which may raise a presumption in favo....
witnesses were dead, the matter to be proved under Section 69 of the Evidence Act, is the same as a matter to be proved under Section 68 of the Evidence Act. ... This Court has taken the view that while it is open to prove the will and the attestation by examining a single attesting witness, it is incumbent upon him to prove attestation not only by himself but also attestation by the other attes....
Jarnail Singh and others, Law Finder Doc Id #1414018, none of the attesting witnesses of the Will was examined to prove the execution. It was not claimed by the defendants that none of the attesting witnesses were alive. ... (Civil) 48 attesting witnesses were dead. It was held that Will may be proved by examining the witnes....
Ram Sahai alias Ram Singh (supra), it was further argued that unless summons is issued to the attesting witnesses, it cannot be concluded that the witnesses are dead. ... Therefore, a witness cited to prove a Will under Section 69 of the Evidence Act need not necessarily be a person who had seen the executant and attesting witnesses affixing their signatures; it is suff....
Section 71 has no application to a case where one attesting witness, who alone had been summoned, has failed to prove the execution of the will and other attesting witnesses though are available to prove the execution of the same, for reasons best known, have not been summoned before the court. ... It cannot be said that if one attesting witness denies....
Section 71 has no application to a case where one attesting witness, who alone had been summoned, has failed to prove the execution of the will and other attesting witnesses though are available to prove the execution of the same, for reasons best known, have not been summoned before the court. ... It cannot be said that if one attesting witness denies....
It is not even their case that both the attesting witnesses were dead, even in which case they have to satisfy the Court in that regard, by producing their death certificates or some other acceptable evidence to clinch the factum of death of the attesting witnesses. ... Coming to the Will, Ex.B-13, executed by Late P.Ramathal, admittedly none of the attesting witnesses ....
Two of the attesting witnesses adduced evidence to prove the execution and attestation of the Will. These discrepancies are the natural expression of the witnesses rather to put them in doubt. There are no discrepancies in such evidence adduced by them. The process of execution and attestation has been described in detail.
He further contended that in the case on hand, the propounder has not only examined the two attesting witnesses but also examined the scribe of the document and their evidence is consistent. Examination of one of the attesting witnesses is sufficient to prove the execution of the Will. It has been further observed at para Nos.40 and 41 with regard to propounder of the Will discharges the onus of proving the Will by proving that the testator had read and signed the Will in the....
Judicial notice of the fact can be taken that in the areas from which parties hail where South Indian culture and tradition influence the social scenario as also the family life of the parties, such association of the female members of the family in the business very much remains there, their society being a matriarchal one as also their power in joining with males in taking important decisions in family affairs. The plaintiff in the case has proved that both the attesting witnesses ....
Judicial notice of the fact can be taken that in the areas from which parties hail where South Indian culture and tradition influence the social scenario as also the family life of the parties, such association of the female members of the family in the business very much remains there, their society being a matriarchal one as also their power in joining with males in taking important decisions in family affairs. Besides the oral evidence, the same has been shown through documentary evidence s....
As concurrently held by the Courts below that 1st Defendant who is the daughter of executant Bakthavatchalu Naicker in her evidence admitted the signature of her father in Ex.A1 Will. When both attesting witnesses are dead, requirements of law would be satisfied by any evidence showing that Will was executed in the presence of two witnesses. .Signature of executant may be proved under Sec.69 of Indian Evidence Act by a contemporaneous admission.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
