Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
References:- ["Committee of Management Anjuman Intezamia Masajid, Varanasi VS Rakhi Singh - Supreme Court"]- ["Union Territory Of J & K (Previously State Of Jammu & Kashmir) VS Raja Muzaffar Bhat - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 1249"]- ["JUNAID AYUBI VS STATE OF HARYANA - National Green Tribunal"]- ["Anjuman Intezamia Masajid Varanasi VS Rakhi Singh - Allahabad"]- ["Ankush Kashinath Mhaske vs State of Maharashtra - Bombay"]- ["Gali Venkata Nukaraju vs The State of Andhra Pradesh - Andhra Pradesh"]- ["Darnasi Vasantha Rao vs The State of Andhra Pradhesh - Andhra Pradesh"]- ["Revulamadugu Bhupathi vs State of Andhra Pradesh - Andhra Pradesh"]- ["Kasani Papa Rao vs State of Andhra Pradesh - Andhra Pradesh"]- ["Baddula Sri Ramaiah vs State of Andhra Pradesh - Andhra Pradesh"]- ["Baddula Hariskrishna vs State of Andhra Pradesh - Andhra Pradesh"]- ["Savaram Sriram Satish vs State of Andhra Pradesh - Andhra Pradesh"]- ["M/S TVS MOTOR COMPANY LTD. Vs UNION OF INDIA - Karnataka"]- ["Kurra Brahmananda Reddy vs The State of Andhra Pradesh - Andhra Pradesh"]- ["AJIT DAS vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS - Gauhati"]- ["GREEN ROOTS NATURE CONSERVATION FORUM vs GOVERNMENT OF INDIA - Kerala"]- ["PRABHAT MOHAN PANDEY S/O SHRI MOHAN PANDEY VS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR - National Green Tribunal"]- ["Anandeshwar Agro Foods Private Ltd vs State Of UP - Allahabad"]- ["GAURAV ASHOK DHOTE VS MINING OFFICER NAGPUR - National Green Tribunal"]
In the world of construction and infrastructure development, sand excavation from riverbeds is a common practice. But is a replenishment study important for sand excavation? This question arises frequently amid growing concerns over environmental sustainability and legal compliance. As rivers supply a vital resource for building, unchecked extraction can lead to severe ecological damage. This blog explores the legal and environmental imperatives behind replenishment studies, drawing from key guidelines and court insights to guide stakeholders.
A replenishment study assesses how naturally rivers deposit sediment to replace extracted sand. It ensures extraction rates do not exceed the river's natural replenishment capacity, preventing issues like riverbed deepening, bank erosion, and habitat loss. The 2020 Guidelines for river bed sand mining explicitly emphasize this: The need for replenishment study for river bed sand is required in order to nullify the adverse impacts arising due to excessing sand extraction. Union Territory Of J & K (Previously State Of Jammu & Kashmir) VS Raja Muzaffar Bhat - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 1249
Without such studies, sand mining risks long-term riverine health degradation. These studies are not optional; they form a cornerstone of sustainable practices mandated for riverbed operations.
Indian regulations, particularly the 2020 Guidelines, make replenishment studies mandatory before and during sand mining. They help evaluate sediment dynamics and set safe extraction limits. Key points include:
In one analysis, survey reports from February 2018 were critiqued: Survey reports even if, accepted to be correct or true, it does not show any such study. This becomes more important because of order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court mentioned supra, mandating replenishment study. Jyoti VS State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Revenue & Forest Department - 2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 565
Failure to comply signals non-adherence to environmental safeguards, potentially inviting legal challenges.
Riverbed sand mining alters critical stream characteristics: channel geometry, bed elevation, substratum stability, flow velocity, sediment transport, turbidity, and temperature. These changes disrupt aquatic habitats, increase flood risks, and harm biodiversity. Union Territory Of J & K (Previously State Of Jammu & Kashmir) VS Raja Muzaffar Bhat - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 1249
A replenishment study quantifies natural sediment compensation, enabling minimal disturbance. Without it, excess extraction leads to:
Sustainable mining balances resource needs with ecological preservation, underscoring the study's role.
Documents reveal significant gaps, such as missing replenishment evidence in environmental assessments. This contravenes guidelines and Supreme Court directives, risking:
While past lapses may not automatically void activities, future operations demand strict compliance. Proper safeguards, including replenishment assessments, are integral to lawful sand mining. Union Territory Of J & K (Previously State Of Jammu & Kashmir) VS Raja Muzaffar Bhat - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 1249
Not all excavations trigger the same rules. Insights from related cases clarify distinctions, particularly under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code (MLRC), 1966, Section 48(7).
For ordinary earth excavated for construction—like leveling land or laying foundations—no additional permission or royalty applies if non-commercial. Courts consistently rule: The liability under Section 48(7) for excavation of ordinary earth would, therefore, truly depend on a determination of the use/purpose for which the excavated earth had been put to. AIGP Developers (Pune) Private Limited VS State of Maharashtra, Revenue and Forest Department, Through the Office of the Government Pleader - 2024 Supreme(Bom) 265Royale Urbanspace VS State of Maharashtra - 2022 Supreme(Bom) 152P. S. C. Pacific VS State Of Maharashtra - 2021 Supreme(Bom) 1771Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Ltd. VS State of Maharashtra, Through its Principal Secretary to thereafter Ministry of Revenue, Mantralaya - 2021 Supreme(Bom) 471
Key rulings include:
However, riverbed sand mining differs fundamentally. It involves minor minerals under specific guidelines, requiring replenishment studies due to ecological sensitivity—unlike on-land earth for construction. GALIB VS STATE OF U. P. - 2018 Supreme(All) 1528 This contrast highlights context-specific regulations.
Omitting replenishment studies breaches 2020 Guidelines and court mandates, potentially halting operations or imposing remedies. Yet, documents note procedural non-compliance alone may not invalidate past activities, stressing future adherence. Jyoti VS State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Revenue & Forest Department - 2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 565
Exceptions apply to non-river, non-commercial digs, but river sand demands rigorous oversight.
To navigate these rules effectively:
Regulatory bodies must enforce guidelines rigorously.
Replenishment studies are vital for sustainable sand excavation, safeguarding rivers while enabling resource use. While ordinary earth digs for construction often evade extra permissions, river sand mining's environmental stakes elevate requirements. Always prioritize compliance to avoid lapses.
This post provides general insights based on referenced documents and is not legal advice. Consult qualified professionals for specific cases.
That it is further submitted that the survey team will study the pillars and architectural members, detail study of western wall, survey of complex and structure, study of open place/floor, GPR survey and photo documentations etc. 15. ... That it is further submitted that no drilling, no cutting, no removal of brick or stone from the existing structure will be done while conducting the survey and study. 18. ... He has submitted that the scientific investigation would be carried out beyond the structure and in open areas ....
The preparation of District Survey Report is an important initial step. ... It is assumed that the riparian habitat disturbance is minimum if the replenishment is equal to excavation for a given stretch. ... It is assumed that the riparian habitat disturbance is minimum if the replenishment is equal to excavation for a given stretch. ... of DSR or replenishment study can be dispensed with. ... The excavation will, therefore, be limited to estimated replenishment estimated with consideration of other reg....
It is assumed that the riparian habitat disturbance is minimum if the replenishment is equal to excavation for a given stretch. ... the replenishment study. ... “Sustainable Sand Mining Guidelines, 2016” issued by MoEF&CC requires preparation of District Survey Report (DSR), which is an important initial step before grant of mining lease/LoI. ... The next issue relates to replenishment study. ... Clause 5 deals with replenishment study and provides as under:- “5.0 REPLENISHMENT STUDY ....
He has submitted that the scientific investigation would be carried out beyond the structure and in open areas only; no drilling, no cutting, no removal of brick or stones from the existing structure will be done while conducting the survey and study. ... In considering the nature of archaeological evidence, it is important to remember that archaeology as a branch of knowledge draws sustenance from the science of learning, the wisdom of experience and the vision which underlies the process of interpretation. ... During the course of hearing, an affidavit h....
However, we note that the most important reason pleaded for inability to excavate sand, is opposition from the local villagers in some of the villages. Those villages are village Bori Budruk, village Bori- Khurd and village Shiroli Tarfe Aale. ... The said clause also provides that if a particular Gram Sabha has not given permission for sand excavation, and if unauthorised excavation is found, legal action is supposed to be taken. 16. ... Similarly, the correspondence from Sarpanch of village Bori-Budruk is produced, referring to collapse....
of sane in prohibited areas, trading and selling of sand, charging beyond cost of transportation and excavation, transporting sand without GPS devices, use or usage of machinery and vehicles in un-authorized excavation and transportation of sand to other States. ... (a) In the case of the vehicles engaged in illegal/un- (16) Offences and Penalties: The following penal provisions are applicable against the persons who involved in sale/illegal extraction/un-authorized excavation
of sane in prohibited areas, trading and selling of sand, charging beyond cost of transportation and excavation, transporting sand without GPS devices, use or usage of machinery and vehicles in un-authorized excavation and transportation of sand to other States. ... (a) In the case of the vehicles engaged in illegal/un- (16) Offences and Penalties: The following penal provisions are applicable against the persons who involved in sale/illegal extraction/un-authorized excavation
of sane in prohibited areas, trading and selling of sand, charging beyond cost of transportation and excavation, transporting sand without GPS devices, use or usage of machinery and vehicles in un-authorized excavation and transportation of sand to other States. ... (a) In the case of the vehicles engaged in illegal/un- authorized excavation in the prohibited ... Upon perusal of Clause 16 of G.O.Ms.No.71 Industries, Infrastructure, Investment and Commerce (Mines-II) (16) Offences and Penalties: The following penal provi....
No excavation was reported in respect of the land at Kharadi, on which roads had been constructed. Excavation of 80,858 brass was reported in respect of the Subject Land. ... As use can only follow extraction or excavation it is the purpose of the excavation that has to be seen. The liability under Section 48(7) for excavation of ordinary earth would, therefore, truly depend on a determination of the use/purpose for which the excavated earth had been put to. ... The activity undertaken, therefore, canno....
of sane in prohibited areas, trading and selling of sand, charging beyond cost of transportation and excavation, transporting sand without GPS devices, use or usage of machinery and vehicles in un-authorized excavation and transportation of sand to other States. ... (a) In the case of the vehicles engaged in illegal/un- (16) Offences and Penalties: 7) Upon perusal of Clause 16 of G.O.Ms.No.71 Industries, Infrastructure, Investment and Commerce (Mines-II) Department, dated 04.09.2019, it is clear that the vehicle/machinery found involved ....
The liability under Section 48(7) for excavation of ordinary earth would, therefore, truly depend on a determination of the use/purpose for which the excavated earth had been put to. An excavation undertaken to lay the foundation of a building would not, ordinarily, carry the intention to use the excavated earth for the purpose of filling up or levelling. As use can only follow extraction or excavation it is the purpose of the excavation that has to be seen.
The liability under Section 48(7) for excavation of ordinary earth would, therefore, truly depend on a determination of the use/purpose for which the excavated earth had been put to. As use can only follow extraction or excavation it is the purpose of the excavation that has to be seen. An excavation undertaken to lay the foundation of a building would not, ordinarily, carry the intention to use the excavated earth for the purpose of filling up or levelling.
As use can only follow extraction or excavation it is the purpose of the excavation that has to be seen. The liability under Section 48(7) for excavation of ordinary earth would, therefore, truly depend on a determination of the use/purpose for which the excavated earth had been put to. An excavation undertaken to lay the foundation of a building would not, ordinarily, carry the intention to use the excavated earth for the purpose of filling up or levelling.
Excavation of ordinary earth for uses not contemplated in the aforesaid notification, therefore, would not amount to a mining activity so as to attract the wrath of the provisions of either the Code or the 1957 Act. 16. An excavation undertaken to lay the foundation of a building would not, ordinarily, carry the intention to use the excavated earth for the purpose of filling up or levelling. As use can only follow extraction or excavation it is the purpose of the excavation that has to be seen. The liability under Section 48(7) for excavation of ordinary earth would, theref....
An excavation undertaken to lay the foundation of a building would not, ordinarily, carry the intention to use the excavated earth for the purpose of filling up or levelling. The liability under Section 48(7) for excavation of ordinary earth would, therefore, truly depend on a determination of the use/purpose for which the excavated earth had been put to. As use can only follow extraction or excavation it is the purpose of the excavation that has to be seen.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
