Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Prevailing Act in case of conflict between RERA and other laws The RERA Act, being a later Central legislation, generally prevails over earlier or conflicting laws such as the MOFA or MRTP Act. The Supreme Court has explicitly stated that if there is any inconsistency between MOFA and RERA, the provisions of RERA, being a later Central legislation, would prevail ["Flagship Infrastructure Ltd. Vs The Competent Authority - Bombay"]. Similarly, multiple judgments reinforce that RERA's provisions take precedence when conflicts arise, especially since RERA is designed to harmonize with other laws but overrides them where inconsistency exists ["Flagship Infrastructure Ltd. Vs The Competent Authority - Bombay"], ["Flagship Infrastructure Ltd. Vs Flagship Infrastructure Ltd. - Bombay"], ["Flagship Infrastructure Ltd Vs The Competent Authority - Bombay"].
Specific Relief Act and other laws The Specific Relief Act recognizes specific performance of contracts and can be enforced through arbitration clauses. However, the RERA Act explicitly bars civil court jurisdiction in matters within its domain, stating that Section 79 of the RERA Act bars jurisdiction of a civil court to entertain any suit or proceeding ["Joydeep Roy VS Srijan Residency Llp - Calcutta"]. When conflicts occur, the provisions of RERA, as a later law with a non-obstante clause, override the provisions of other laws like the Specific Relief Act, which cannot supersede RERA's exclusive jurisdiction ["Pallab Ghosh, S/O- Mr. Subir Kumar Ghosh VS Simplex Infrastructures Limited - Gauhati"].
Legal Hierarchy and Interpretation The courts have emphasized that in case of statutory conflict, the latest law with a non-obstante clause (such as RERA) will prevail. This is supported by judgments indicating that the latest Act having Non - Obstante Clause shall prevail ["RAJ-RERA-3494"], ["Complaint no. RAJ-RERA-C-2018-2197 Kamlesh Maheshwari VS Aerens Gold Souk International Ltd. Or Goldenline Infrastructures Pvt Ltd - Allahabad"], ["Complaint no. RAJ-RERA-C-2018-2197 Kamlesh Maheshwari VS Aerens Gold Souk International Ltd. Or Goldenline Infrastructures Pvt Ltd - Allahabad"], ["Complaint no. RAJ-RERA-C-2018-2197 Kamlesh Maheshwari VS Aerens Gold Souk International Ltd. Or Goldenline Infrastructures Pvt Ltd - Allahabad"], ["Complaint no. RAJ-RERA-C-2018-2197 Kamlesh Maheshwari VS Aerens Gold Souk International Ltd. Or Goldenline Infrastructures Pvt Ltd - Allahabad"], ["Complaint no. RAJ-RERA-C-2018-2197 Kamlesh Maheshwari VS Aerens Gold Souk International Ltd. Or Goldenline Infrastructures Pvt Ltd - Allahabad"], ["Complaint no. RAJ-RERA-C-2018-2197 Kamlesh Maheshwari VS Aerens Gold Souk International Ltd. Or Goldenline Infrastructures Pvt Ltd - Allahabad"]. Further, statutes should be interpreted to further justice, with subsequent laws taking precedence over earlier ones when conflicts are identified ["RAJ-RERA-3494"].
Additional Insights The Supreme Court and other courts have clarified that provisions of RERA are intended to be in addition to other laws but will override conflicting provisions due to its later enactment and specific non-obstante clause. This ensures that RERA's objectives, such as consumer protection and timely conveyance, are not undermined by older laws ["Flagship Infrastructure Ltd. Vs The Competent Authority - Bombay"], ["Pallab Ghosh, S/O- Mr. Subir Kumar Ghosh VS Simplex Infrastructures Limited - Gauhati"].
Conclusion:In cases of ambiguity or conflict between RERA and other laws like MOFA, MRTP, or the Specific Relief Act, the provisions of the RERA Act will prevail, as it is a subsequent law with a clear non-obstante clause and is designed to override conflicting laws to ensure effective regulation of real estate activities ["Flagship Infrastructure Ltd. Vs The Competent Authority - Bombay"], ["Pallab Ghosh, S/O- Mr. Subir Kumar Ghosh VS Simplex Infrastructures Limited - Gauhati"], ["Complaint no. RAJ-RERA-C-2018-2197 Kamlesh Maheshwari VS Aerens Gold Souk International Ltd. Or Goldenline Infrastructures Pvt Ltd - Allahabad"].
In the complex world of real estate law in India, disputes often arise where multiple statutes intersect. A common question among homebuyers, developers, and legal professionals is: if there is ambiguity between the RERA Act and Specific Relief Act, which Act would prevail? This issue touches on fundamental principles of statutory interpretation, particularly in real estate transactions involving remedies like specific performance, injunctions, or possession recovery.
This blog post delves into the legal framework, Supreme Court precedents, and practical implications. While RERA (Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016) aims to protect homebuyers through a specialized regulatory mechanism, the Specific Relief Act, 1963, provides general equitable remedies. Understanding their interplay is crucial for navigating disputes effectively. Note: This is general information and not specific legal advice; consult a qualified lawyer for your case.
The RERA Act establishes state-level regulatory authorities to ensure transparency, accountability, and timely delivery in real estate projects. It mandates project registration, deposit requirements, and swift dispute resolution. Sections 88 and 89 explicitly state that RERA operates in addition to, and not in derogation of, anything contained in any other law for the time being in force unless inconsistent [
#RERA, #RealEstateLaw, #LawPrecedence
According to the learned Senior Advocate, such integrated township, being specially sanctioned, occupies a higher pedestal and would prevail over the other general provisions of the MRTP Act. ... He contended that in case of any inconsistency between MOFA and RERA, the provisions of RERA, being a later Central legislation, would prevail. In support of his submissions, reliance was placed on the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Dr. Abraham Patani & Anr. v. ... ....
According to the learned Senior Advocate, such integrated township, being specially sanctioned, occupies a higher pedestal and would prevail over the other general provisions of the MRTP Act. ... He contended that in case of any inconsistency between MOFA and RERA, the provisions of RERA, being a later Central legislation, would prevail. In support of his submissions, reliance was placed on the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Dr. Abraham Patani & Anr. v. ... ....
According to the learned Senior Advocate, such integrated township, being specially sanctioned, occupies a higher pedestal and would prevail over the other general provisions of the MRTP Act. ... He contended that in case of any inconsistency between MOFA and RERA, the provisions of RERA, being a later Central legislation, would prevail. In support of his submissions, reliance was placed on the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Dr. Abraham Patani & Anr. v. ... ....
According to the learned Senior Advocate, such integrated township, being specially sanctioned, occupies a higher pedestal and would prevail over the other general provisions of the MRTP Act. ... He contended that in case of any inconsistency between MOFA and RERA, the provisions of RERA, being a later Central legislation, would prevail. In support of his submissions, reliance was placed on the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Dr. Abraham Patani & Anr. v. ... ....
One of the conclusions arrived at by the Supreme Court was that the RERA Act was to be read harmoniously with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. It is only in the event of conflict that the Code will prevail over RERA Act. ... The judgments of the Delhi High Court and Patna High Court are more specific to the issue to be decided in the present case, i.e., the Arbitration Act is not inconsistent or in derogation of the RERA Act#HL_END....
It is vehemently argued that in the event of any conflict between the provisions of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the 1986 Act) and the RERA Act, the rehabilitation which is based on an agreement and the order passed by the RERA would prevail. ... Anil Patni (Supra) would not apply as they were in relation to the provisions under the 1986 Act vis-à-vis section 18 of the RERA Ac....
RERA is to be read harmoniously with the Code, as amended by the Amendment Act. It is only in the event of conflict that the Code will prevail over RERA. ... Even with acceptance of such interpretation, the allottees would still be entitled to approach the authorities under Section 1B of the RERA Act, 30. ... However, as regards the alloffees who can be called "consumers" within the meaning of the CP Act, two questions would arise;....
Section 2 (zk) of RERA Act, 2016, the appellant organisation would fall within the ambit of definition of 'Promoter' and the same has been decided in Air Force Naval Housing Board (AFNHB), Air Force Station v U.P.Real Estate Regulatory Authority and Another and therefore
To mandate such re-scrutiny in the absence of concrete, specific instances of alleged forgery would not only overreach judicial authority but also risk encumbering regulatory bodies with speculative investigations that lack substantive grounding. ... This integration would enable RERA to conduct real-time verification of commencement and occupation certificates, thereby preventing forgery and protecting consumers’ interests in line with the RERA Act’s objectives. ... This is crucial for safeguarding pot....
Roy the Specific Relief Act recognizes the specific performance of contract and a contract can very well be enforced before an Arbitrator if the agreement contains an arbitration clause. ... Section 88 specifies that the provisions of the RERA Act would be in addition to and not in derogation of the provisions of any other law, while in terms of Section 89, the provisions of the RERA Act shall have effect not withstanding anything inconsistent contai....
(v) RERA authority has the jurisdiction to entertain a complaint by an aggrieved person against the bank as a secured creditor if the bank takes recourse to any of the provisions contained in Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act.” Act the provisions contained in RERA would prevail. (iv) RERA would not apply in relation to the transaction between the borrower and the banks and financial institutions in cases where security interest has been created by mortgaging the property prior to the introduction of the Act unless and until it is found that the creation of such mortgage or ....
Poddar, argued that home buyers would not fall within the category of either financial or operational creditors and should therefore be subsumed only within RERA, which is a complete code dealing with the real estate industry. He further argued that RERA is a special Act as opposed to the Code, which is a general Act and ought, therefore, to prevail. Also, as the adjudication process envisaged under RERA would be done away with if the Code is to be applied, the application of the Code to home buyers would be manifestly arbitrary.
Act would have overriding effect and shall prevail if the other conditions prescribed are fulfilled. The above non obstante clause points to the conclusions that the provisions of Sec.4 of the Probation of offenders Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the above mentioned Act, as stated earlier, imposes a duty upon the court when it finds a person under 21 years of age, guilty of an offence punishable with imprisonment other than imprisonment for life, not to sentence him to imprisonment unless the court is satisfied that, having regard to the circumstances of the case, includin....
To the extent of inconsistency with the Act, the Supply Code must be read down and I do so accordingly. The scheme of the Act, as aforesaid, would apply and prevail.
34. Discretion of Court as to declaration of status of right. But without resorting to such a measure, the suit was filed simply for declaration, which cannot be countenanced as per law. I would like to cite here Section 34 of the Specific Releif Act, 1963.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
