Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Withdrawal and settlement: Order dated 20.05.2023
Legal Procedure & What to Do After Complaint Dies
Summary:If a complaint under Section 138 dies or is dismissed, the appropriate course is to analyze the reason—procedural lapses, limitation, or settlement—and act accordingly. Remedies include rectifying procedural errors, filing a new complaint within the limitation period, or seeking quashing if proceedings are unjustified.
In the fast-paced world of business transactions, cheque bounce cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act) are common. However, what happens if your complaint gets dismissed due to a procedural default, such as the complainant's absence in court? Or if the complainant passes away mid-proceedings? Many individuals face this setback, wondering how to restore EK complaint dismissal default under Negotiable Instrument Act.
Don't worry—this post breaks down the legal framework, actionable steps, and important considerations to help you navigate this challenge. While this information is based on established legal precedents, it is general in nature and not a substitute for professional legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your specific case.
Section 138 NI Act deals with the dishonour of cheques, making it a punishable offence. These are treated as summons cases under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC). Dismissals or 'defaults' typically occur under Section 256 CrPC, which addresses non-appearance or death of the complainant. Ankur Gopalbhai Patel VS Chisti Vasimudin Khurshidbhai - 2017 Supreme(Guj) 1898 - 2017 0 Supreme(Guj) 1898
Not all dismissals are final. Courts adopt a non-hypertechnical approach, prioritizing justice. Puran Chauhan Alias Puran Chand VS Tara Chand - Himachal Pradesh (2017)
Section 256(1) CrPC allows acquittal on non-appearance but permits substitution if the complainant dies. Legal heirs can continue prosecution, as the right to prosecute subsists even after the death of the original complainant. Sanjit Kumar Mishra VS Ranjit Mishra - Orissa (2022)
Section 256(2) provides a remedy for absence: The complainant (or representative) can appear before acquittal is pronounced, show good cause for absence, and request the hearing to proceed. The acid test is good faith, not mere disposal. In summons case, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 if the.... V. Kumaravel VS B. Muralikrishna - 2014 Supreme(Mad) 3066 - 2014 0 Supreme(Mad) 3066
Follow these steps promptly to maximize chances of success:
For death, confirm legal heir status.
File Application for Restoration/Substitution:
Court discretion applies but leans towards allowing unless compelling reasons against. Puran Chauhan Alias Puran Chand VS Tara Chand - Himachal Pradesh (2017)
Gather Supporting Documents:
Cheque, notice, dishonour memo originals.
Approach the Court:
Argue continuance serves justice; trial proceeds as if original complainant alive. Kushal Kumar Talukdar VS Chandra Prasad Goenka - Dishonour Of Cheque (2004)
Alternative Remedies if Restoration Fails:
File immediately to avoid delays. Late applications risk rejection. Puran Chauhan Alias Puran Chand VS Tara Chand - Himachal Pradesh (2017)
Courts emphasize procedural fairness. In absence cases, Magistrates needn't wait till end of day without request. V. Kumaravel VS B. Muralikrishna - 2014 Supreme(Mad) 3066 - 2014 0 Supreme(Mad) 3066 For prosecution rights post-death, substitution upholds justice. Sanjit Kumar Mishra VS Ranjit Mishra - Orissa (2022) Refiling works for time-barred originals if fresh cause exists. M. Srinivasa Kumar, S/o. Late M. V Krishna Rao VS Mibom Pertin, S/o. Late Gora Pertin - 2024 Supreme(Gau) 1628 - 2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 1628
Restoring a dismissed Section 138 NI Act complaint due to default is feasible with timely action under Section 256 CrPC. Whether absence or death, legal heirs or complainants can seek substitution or recall, ensuring the cheque bounce case proceeds. Always check dismissal grounds—procedural ones are restorable, substantive may need fresh start.
Key Takeaways:- File restoration/substitution application ASAP with proofs.- Distinguish procedural vs. substantive dismissals.- Prepare for trial post-restoration.- Seek professional advice.
By acting swiftly, you can safeguard your financial interests. Stay informed, and remember: justice favors the diligent.
References: Bulaki Ram Saini VS State - Rajasthan (2006)Sanjit Kumar Mishra VS Ranjit Mishra - Orissa (2022)Kushal Kumar Talukdar VS Chandra Prasad Goenka - Dishonour Of Cheque (2004)Puran Chauhan Alias Puran Chand VS Tara Chand - Himachal Pradesh (2017)Ankur Gopalbhai Patel VS Chisti Vasimudin Khurshidbhai - 2017 Supreme(Guj) 1898 - 2017 0 Supreme(Guj) 1898V. Kumaravel VS B. Muralikrishna - 2014 Supreme(Mad) 3066 - 2014 0 Supreme(Mad) 3066N.P. Murugan Rep by its Partner, N.P.Murugan, S/o.Perumal vs Arul Exports and Imports, Rep. by its Proprietor, Mr.A.Arulrajan, S/o. Arputham - 2024 Supreme(Mad) 2323 - 2024 0 Supreme(Mad) 2323M. Srinivasa Kumar, S/o. Late M. V Krishna Rao VS Mibom Pertin, S/o. Late Gora Pertin - 2024 Supreme(Gau) 1628 - 2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 1628Thummuru Sita Ramireddy, S/o. Seshi Reddy vs Kondamadugula Siva Parvathi, W/o. Ravindra Reddy - 2025 Supreme(AP) 263 - 2025 0 Supreme(AP) 263
#NIACT #Section138 #ChequeBounce
, void in view of non-compliance of the requirement mentioned in proviso to Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. ... (2008) 2 SCC 321 , wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that service of a notice is imperative in character for maintaining a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. ... The operation of Section 138 of the ....
Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. ... Case No. 02/2019 under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, for commission of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, read with Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, before the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lower Dibang Val....
Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, without going into the controversy as to whether the petitioner was aware of the proceedings going against him under the Negotiable Instrument Act or not; the fact remains that the petitioner had been declared as proclaimed person ... After considering the rival contentions and perusing the record, it is not disputed that a complaint ....
Negotiable Instrument Act is a special Act. ... punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (for short ‘the N.I. ... Section 118 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 mandates the Courts to believe :- (a) that every negotiable instrument w....
The case is arising under the Negotiable Instrument Act and the ingredient of Sections 406, 420 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code is not attracted. 8. ... It is well settled that the court is required to pass order in terms of the statute, which is lacking in the case in hand. In this case, Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act ....
In terms of Section 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instrument Act once the signature of the accused on the cheque was admitted then there was a reverse onus on him to discharge the presumption imposed upon him. ... Based on the preliminary evidence lead, the accused/petitioner came to be summoned to face trial under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. 4. ... of law as per which ....
In nutshell, the brief facts of the case are that a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘N.I. Act’ in short) has been filed before learned Additional Civil Judge (Sr. ... (Criminal) 952; are concerned the same pertains to the case wherein after trial and appreciation of offence the learned trial Court had passed f....
-maker, acceptor or indorser respectively of a negotiable instrument is discharged from liability thereon- (a) by cancellation. ... Presumptions as to negotiable instruments. ... It is also submitted that even if the petitioner had made the payments during the pendency of the complaint, it does not bar the complaint case from being maintainable against the petitioner. 7. ... -Until the ....
Facts of the case are in brief, that the respondent filed a complaint U/s 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, alleging that Oriental Nicco Projects Pvt. ... if any cheque is issued for security the same would not come within the purview of section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act. ... The Respondent No.1/ Complainant filed a false Criminal ....
Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the matter pertains to section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. ... He added that there was a civil dispute of certain transaction of money in between the parties and thereafter a complaint was lodged under sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instrument Act,1881 which is pending consideration since the yea....
16. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. 14. As the fundamental instrument on which the complaint under Section 138 and 142 of Negotiable Instrument Act is filed has lost its identity as a valid cheque as on the date of its presentation. The criminal proceedings under Section 138 of NI Act also cannot lie. Only a Negotiable Instrument can be subject of a complaint under Negotiable Instruments Act. This Court finds the case as a fit case for exercise of the inh....
While he has been discharged in Complaint case under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act.'
The complainant of this case has filed a complaint u/s138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. After issuance of process, the accused of this case remains present regularly. The Magistrate, while dismissing the complaint, in exercise of its powers under Section 256 of the Cr.P.C., observed as under: “(1) Looking to the record and proceedings of this complaint, it appears that, the complainant of this case does not remain present regularly, therefore an application was submitted ....
The acid test is one of good faith and not to be used for merely disposing of the matter. Equally, there is no corresponding obligation for a Judicial Magistrate to wait till the close of the working day for proceedings under Section 256 of Cr.P.C, when the Complainant is absent or when no request was made by his counsel or his representative for either adjourning the case or for passing over the matter. In summons case, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 if the....
Therefore, the governing section would be section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act which deals with "offence" and not "transaction". In the present case, we are not concerned with the provisions of any such enactment. Here is a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act filed before an ordinary Criminal Court/magistrate. It is held in number of cases that the cause of action for filing of the complaint arise only after the notice of dishonour of the cheq....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
