Ugrasen Singh vs Addl. Court No. 1 Lko.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 2712

SHREE PRAKASH SINGH
Ugrasen Singh – Appellant
Versus
Addl. Court No. 1 Lko. – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Applicant : Upendra Kumar Singh.
For the Opposite Party : G.A.

ORDER

Shree Prakash Singh, J.

Sri Upendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant submits that due to mistake, he has impleaded the court as opposite party no. 1. He submits that he may be allowed to delete the opposite party no. 1 from the array of opposite parties during the course of the day.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection to the contention aforesaid.

3. Prayer is allowed and the learned counsel for the applicant is permitted to delete the opposite party no. 1 from the array of opposite parties during the course of the day.

4. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Girijesh Kumar Dwivedi, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

5. Instant application under section 483 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to direct the opposite party no. 1, the Additional Court No. 1, Lucknow for speedy disposal of Case No. 532 of 2019, under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, Police Station-Gomti Nagar, District-Lucknow, within the stipulated period as this court may think fit.

6. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the matter pertains to section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. He added that there was a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document