Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Legal Proceedings and Court Status: Multiple cases involving Sachin Sharma and Indu Sharma have been heard in various courts, including the Supreme Court of India and other judicial forums. For instance, a petition for special leave to appeal was called on for judgment on 5 December 2019, resulting in the appeal being allowed ["STATION HOUSE OFFICER CBI/ACB/BANGALORE vs B.A. SRINIVASAN - Supreme Court"]. Similarly, a case was adjourned to 9 September 2022, indicating ongoing judicial activity ["STATION HOUSE OFFICER CBI/ACB/BANGALORE vs B.A. SRINIVASAN - Supreme Court"].
Marriage and Matrimonial Disputes: Several cases involve matrimonial issues, including divorce proceedings, separation, and matrimonial disputes. One case details a settlement agreement reached through mediation, with parties staying together until 5 July 2022, after which they separated, citing irretrievable breakdown of marriage ["STATION HOUSE OFFICER CBI/ACB/BANGALORE vs B.A. SRINIVASAN - Supreme Court"]. Additionally, a petition discusses the tragic suicide of Indu Sahu (Gudiya) on 14 July 2022, with her husband Subhash Sahu also committing suicide shortly after, indicating severe marital distress ["STATION HOUSE OFFICER CBI/ACB/BANGALORE vs B.A. SRINIVASAN - Supreme Court"].
Criminal Cases and Investigations: Several documents detail criminal investigations involving Sachin Sharma, including FIR registrations, confessions, and evidence collection related to crimes such as murder and conspiracy. For example, in a case involving the murder of Komal Sharma, statements and confessions linked Pradeep Tyagi and others to the crime, with Sachin Kumar (likely Sachin Sharma) identified as a witness to the last scene of the victim ["STATION HOUSE OFFICER CBI/ACB/BANGALORE vs B.A. SRINIVASAN - Supreme Court"], ["State VS Sanjay @ Surender Kharb - Delhi"]. These cases highlight complex criminal proceedings with multiple accused and witnesses.
Legal Filings and Court Orders: The courts have granted extensions, adjourned hearings, and ordered mediation or settlement processes. For instance, a case was referred to mediation, resulting in a settlement recorded by the mediator ["STATION HOUSE OFFICER CBI/ACB/BANGALORE vs B.A. SRINIVASAN - Supreme Court"]. Some petitions were dismissed or adjourned, reflecting procedural and substantive legal developments ["STATION HOUSE OFFICER CBI/ACB/BANGALORE vs B.A. SRINIVASAN - Supreme Court"], ["STATION HOUSE OFFICER CBI/ACB/BANGALORE vs B.A. SRINIVASAN - Supreme Court"].
Legal Complexity: The cases involving Sachin Sharma and Indu Sharma span matrimonial disputes, criminal investigations, and appellate proceedings, illustrating a complex legal landscape. The courts have actively managed these cases through mediation, adjournments, and judgments, emphasizing procedural diligence.
Marital and Personal Disputes: Several cases reflect intense personal conflicts, including separation, irretrievable breakdowns, and tragic suicides, indicating strained relationships that have escalated to legal battles and criminal investigations.
Judicial Trends: The judiciary appears to favor resolution through mediation where possible, as seen in the recorded settlement ["STATION HOUSE OFFICER CBI/ACB/BANGALORE vs B.A. SRINIVASAN - Supreme Court"]. The progression of cases from initial FIRs to appeals and judgments demonstrates the layered nature of legal proceedings in such disputes.
Note: The references include various case files and proceedings related to Sachin Sharma and Indu Sharma, reflecting ongoing legal matters, personal disputes, and criminal investigations as of the latest available date.
Matrimonial disputes in India often make headlines, involving complex issues like divorce, child custody, cruelty, and maintenance under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. One such query that frequently arises is about the case Sachin Sharma vs Indu Sharma filed on 12/05/2022. Couples seeking clarity on similar matters turn to court records for precedents, but what happens when direct details are elusive? This post dives into an analytical review based on available legal documents, highlighting related principles that may apply generally to such cases.
Important Disclaimer: This article provides general information on legal concepts and is not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance on your situation.
The legal question centers on Sachin Sharma vs Indu Sharma (12/05/2022), likely a matrimonial matter given the context of family law searches. However, a thorough review of key provided documents reveals no direct reference to this case, parties, or filing date. No precedent or specific findings can be traced solely from the supplied records. This absence underscores the importance of accessing original court files for precise details.
Despite this, the documents offer valuable insights into analogous issues under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955—common in divorce and custody battles. Let's break down the analysis.
Two primary case summaries stand out: NUTAN GAUTAM VS PRAKASH GAUTAM - 2019 4 Supreme 153 and Neelam Kumar VS Dayarani - 2010 5 Supreme 201. Both address matrimonial disputes but do not mention Sachin Sharma, Indu Sharma, or 12/05/2022.
In NUTAN GAUTAM VS PRAKASH GAUTAM - 2019 4 Supreme 153, the focus is on a child's welfare amid a divorce. The court emphasized: Matrimonial dispute – Welfare of child – Inclination of the child and where he is comfortable are also important factors – The other parent is entitled to visitation rights. (Para 13, 15). Facts involved a child named Krish alias Master Krishav Gautam, school admission disputes (Col. Satsangi’s Kiran Memorial Public School, New Delhi), and interim orders from 21.05.2018 and 20.08.2018. The appeal was allowed, prioritizing the child's inclination over rigid prior orders.
Neelam Kumar VS Dayarani - 2010 5 Supreme 201 examines a divorce appeal under Section 13(1)(ia) for cruelty from the 1st Additional District Judge, Balaghat. The High Court set aside the trial court's decree, noting: High Court found that judgment of trial court was mainly based on three allegations cited by the appellant husband as instances of respondent’s cruelty and Irretrievable breakdown of marriage is not a ground for divorce as it is not contemplated under section 13.
These cases illustrate strict interpretations in family courts, relevant to broader Hindu Marriage Act petitions.
While direct matches are absent, related Supreme Court and High Court records mention similar names, offering contextual depth:
In Anoop VS Vani Shree - 2014 Supreme(P&H) 1625 and Anoop VS Vani Shree - 2014 Supreme(P&H) 1314, a respondent married Sachin Sharma on 10.12.2006, living together until 15.9.2008. Petitioners (extended family) sought quashing of domestic violence proceedings under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 12. The court held: Petitioners are related to husband of respondent-complainant being members of an extended family... not in any way residing in the shared household... Complaint against the petitioners is clearly an abuse of process of law. (Paras 4 & 14). It criticized impleading distant relatives as Legal terrorism.
UBER INDIA SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED vs UNION OF INDIA lists Sachin Patil (possibly related) and Indu Marwah in proceedings dated 05-08-2022, involving permissions for additional documents.
Other mentions include Sachin Sharma as advocate in STATION HOUSE OFFICER CBI/ACB/BANGALORE vs B.A. SRINIVASAN, UNION OF INDIA vs RADHA YADAV - 2024 Supreme(Online)(SC) 11259, and domestic violence contexts, but no exact match to the 2022 query.
In Sarita VS Vikas Kanaujia - 2019 Supreme(All) 1564, courts rejected irretrievable breakdown pleas, citing Neelu Kohli (supra) and Ashwani Kumar Kohli (supra): divorce cannot be granted on aforesaid ground particularly when such plea is raised by one party alone.
R. Ajithakumari VS A. S. Subhagan - 2017 Supreme(Ker) 757 discusses condonation of cruelty: if the husband has condoned the acts of the respondent wife, the same has to be borne in mind... flimsy, shallow and baseless allegations shall not constitute cruelty.
These snippets highlight trends in family law: protecting genuine victims while curbing misuse against extended families.
Drawing from the sources:
| Principle | Key Document | Quote/Example ||----------|--------------|--------------|| Child Welfare | NUTAN GAUTAM VS PRAKASH GAUTAM - 2019 4 Supreme 153 | Inclination of the child... important factors || No Irretrievable Breakdown | Neelam Kumar VS Dayarani - 2010 5 Supreme 201 | Not contemplated under section 13 || Quashing DV vs Relatives | Anoop VS Vani Shree - 2014 Supreme(P&H) 1625 | Abuse of process of law |
If your case resembles Sachin Sharma vs Indu Sharma:- Obtain Original Records: File RTI or check e-courts portal for the 12/05/2022 filing.- Gather Evidence: For cruelty or custody, document specifics; avoid unsubstantiated claims.- Explore Mediation: Many courts refer to mediation for amicable settlements RASHI SACHIN JALAN/ RASHI AGRAWAL vs SACHIN LAKSHMAN PRASAD JALAN - 2024 Supreme(Online)(SC) 1618.- Seek Analogous Precedents: Use child inclination NUTAN GAUTAM VS PRAKASH GAUTAM - 2019 4 Supreme 153 or proper cruelty pleading Neelam Kumar VS Dayarani - 2010 5 Supreme 201.
Consult court records from the relevant family court for accuracy.
The Sachin Sharma vs Indu Sharma (12/05/2022) case lacks direct documentation in reviewed sources, but related judgments illuminate paths forward in Hindu Marriage Act disputes. Prioritize child welfare, substantiate cruelty, and respect statutory grounds to strengthen claims. As family laws evolve, staying informed prevents misuse and promotes fair resolutions.
Key Takeaways:- No specific details found; verify originals.- Child's best interest trumps all NUTAN GAUTAM VS PRAKASH GAUTAM - 2019 4 Supreme 153.- Cruelty needs proof; breakdown insufficient Neelam Kumar VS Dayarani - 2010 5 Supreme 201.- Beware overreach in DV cases Anoop VS Vani Shree - 2014 Supreme(P&H) 1625.
For updates or consultations, reach out to family law experts. Share your thoughts below!
#SachinSharmaVsInduSharma #HinduMarriageAct #FamilyLawIndia
Respondent(s) (IA No. 54807/2022 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES) Date : 05-08-2022 These matters were called on for hearing today. ... Aman Sharma, Adv. Mr. Shyam Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Atharv Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Rahul Chitnis, Adv. Mr. Sachin Patil, AOR. Mr. ... (INDU MARWAH) (ANITA RANI AHUJA) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Digitally signed by Indu....
JUSTICE SUDHANSHU DHULIA Digitally signed by Indu Marwah Date: 2022.05.23 12:40:27 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified 2 (FOR ADMISSION) Date : 19-05-2022 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. ... IA No. 42552/2022 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 36472/2022 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 62455/2022 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 48178/2022 - IN....
Sachin Sharma, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) Ms. N. Annapoorani, AOR Hon’ble Mr. ... Respondent(s) Date : 05-12-2019 This petition was called on for pronouncement of Judgment today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Om Prakash Shukla, Adv. Mr. ... (SUNIL KUMAR RAJVANSHI) COURT MASTER BRANCH OFFICER (Signed Reportable Judgment is placed on the File) Digitally signed by MUKESH KUMAR Date: 2019.12.05 ....
JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 21.11.2025 CD not received. List the matter again on 05.01.2026. ... 7: NARESH GOVIND GAIKWAD S/O GOVIND GAIKWAD R/O 10-12 TARABAI GHAG CHAWL PALI PATHAR DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD DR AMBEDKAR ROAD BANDRA WEST MUMBAI-400050 8: GAURI NARESH GAIKWAD R/O 10-12 TARABAI GHAG CHAWL PALI PATHAR DR. ... MONISHKA SACHIN ADHIKARI D/O MR. SACHIN ADHIKARI R/O F-801 SAI RADIANCE SECTOR-15 OPP. D.Y. ... MITALI SACHIN ADHIKARI D/O MR. SACHIN#HL....
JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, ASG Mr. Sachin Sharma, Adv. Mr. Nachita Joshi, Adv. Ms.Bharti Tyagi, Adv. Mr. ... (INDU MARWAH) (RAJINDER KAUR) COURT MASTER (SH) BRANCH OFFICER Digitally signed by INDU MARWAH Date: 2019.05.09 09:05:09 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified ... No. 1267-1268/2019 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) Date : 07-05-2....
Sachin Sharma, Adv. Mr. Raj Bhadur, Adv. Mr. A.K. Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal,Adv. ... /05/2016 in CWJC No. 10860/2015 passed by the High Court Of Patna) ANIRUDH BANSHI DHAR SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND ... [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Indu Pokhriyal ] A.R.-cum-P.S. ... C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to App....
It is apposite to refer to the relevant paragraphs delineated in the Joint Application that are as under: Digitally signed by Indu Marwah Date: 2024.05.16 16:18:08 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified “3. ... By an order dated 12.12.2023, the matter was referred to mediation for an amicable settlement. The mediation resulted in a successful settlement and the learned mediator recorded the settlement agreement between the parties. ... The parties stayed together until 05.07.2022#HL_EN....
Nupur Sharma, Adv. Mr. J.K. Mishra, Adv. Mr. Gaichangpou Gangmei, AOR Mr. Sachin Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. ... [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Indu Kumari Pokhriyal ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Asstt. ... Arvind Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajesh K Singh, Adv. ... Registrar Digitally signed by CHARANJEET KAUR Date: 2018.10.29 17:05:27 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified ... Pawan Kumar Sharma, Adv. ....
Sachin Chauhan, Adv. Mrs. Shiel Sethi,Adv. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Mathur, Adv. Ms. Laxmi Arvind,Adv. ... (Sanjay Kumar-II) (Indu Pokhriyal) Court Master Court Master ... (s) for directions and Office Report) Date : 12/08/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. ... S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).34248/2012 (Arising out of impugned final ....
Sachin Sharma, Adv. Mr. R. Balasubramanian, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. ... Appeal No.63/2006 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05-07-2016 in Crl.A. ... JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA By Courts Motion For Petitioner(s) Mr. T. N. Singh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Ashok K. ... VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondent(s) (IA No.38269 of 2019 – Application for extension of time) Date : 05 ... following ....
12.01.2018 2 WCP 601/2018 Deepak Dave Vs Pk Sharma & Anr. 01.05.2018 No Appeal was filed by Respondent University Appointment order dated
Neelu Kohli (supra) Court made recommendation to Union of India that Act, 1955 be amended to incorporate irretrievable breakdown of marriage as a ground for grant of divorce.” Neelu Kohli, (2006) 4 SCC 558 and Rishikesh Sharma vs. Saroj Sharma, 2006 (12) SCALE 282. On the ground of irretrievable marriage, Courts have allowed decree of divorce and reference may be made to Naveen Kohli vs.
This judgment is rendered by a learned Single Judge of Himachal Pradesh High Court wherein it is held that if the husband has condoned the acts of the respondent wife, the same has to be borne in mind while granting or refusing the relief of divorce. In this case, the Court had given a narration of what would amount to cruelty and all the related judgments had been cited. It is also held that flimsy, shallow and baseless allegations shall not constitute cruelty. (ii) Mahesh Chander Sharma vs. Renu Sharma, 2016 KHC 3889.
Respondent got married to Sachin Sharma on 10.12.2006. It was found that the respondent had lived with her husband at Noida till 15.9.2008. It also transpired that petitioner No. 3 Narinder Sharma was a heart patient. The daughter of petitioners No. 2 and 3 was mentally sick and was bed-ridden and was being looked after by them.
It was found that the respondent had lived with her husband at Noida till 15.9.2008. The daughter of petitioners No. 2 and 3 was mentally sick and was bed-ridden and was being looked after by them. Respondent got married to Sachin Sharma on 10.12.2006. It also transpired that petitioner No. 3 Narinder Sharma was a heart patient.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
