Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Obligation of the Developer to Transfer Balances: Section 15(1)(a) of the SMA 2013 mandates that the developer must transfer all remaining balances in the maintenance and sinking fund accounts to the Joint Management Body (JMB) before the management period expires. This transfer includes all monies collected for maintenance purposes, after deducting expenses incurred ["
IDEAL CITY DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD vs TRIBUNAL PENGURUSAN STRATA PUTRAJAYA WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN & ANOR - 2024 MarsdenLR 2838
"], ["TRANSPACC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SDN BHD vs BADAN PENGURUSAN BERSAMA PANGSAPURI AMAN LARKIN & ANOR - High Court
"], ["KERAJAAN MALAYSIA LWN. SANJUNG UTAMA SDN BHD (DALAM LIKUIDASI); TENAGA NASTIONAL BERHAD (PEMOHON) - High Court
"].All Balances Less Expenditure: The section explicitly states that the developer shall transfer all balances of monies, which implies that the transfer is to be made after deducting all necessary expenditures, payments, or obligations related to the maintenance and management of the property. This ensures that the developer's financial obligations are settled before handing over the funds to the JMB ["
IDEAL CITY DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD vs TRIBUNAL PENGURUSAN STRATA PUTRAJAYA WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN & ANOR - 2024 MarsdenLR 2838
"].Supporting Documentation and Record-Keeping: The developer is also required to hand over invoices, receipts, and payment vouchers related to these funds, ensuring transparency and accountability in the transfer process ["
IDEAL CITY DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD vs TRIBUNAL PENGURUSAN STRATA PUTRAJAYA WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN & ANOR - 2024 MarsdenLR 2838
"].Legal and Practical Implication: The transfer of balances less expenditure aims to prevent disputes over unaccounted funds and ensures that the JMB starts its management with a clear financial position. The law emphasizes that the transfer is a comprehensive handover, including all relevant financial records and remaining funds.
Arab-Malaysian Prima Realty Sdn Bhd & Ors ["2001"] 1 MLJ 324: The court clarified that the transfer of contractual rights (such as the balances in the maintenance account) can only take effect through an assignment either contractually or by operation of law. This underscores the importance of proper formalities in the transfer process ["
TRANSPACC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SDN BHD vs BADAN PENGURUSAN BERSAMA PANGSAPURI AMAN LARKIN & ANOR - High Court
"].Prangin Mall Case: It was held that any ‘handing over’ or transfer of contractual rights, including funds, must involve an assignment of such rights, either explicitly or by law, to be effective ["
TRANSPACC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SDN BHD vs BADAN PENGURUSAN BERSAMA PANGSAPURI AMAN LARKIN & ANOR - High Court
"].Section 15 of the SMA 2013 and Predecessor Laws: Several cases have discussed the transition from earlier laws (like the Building and Common Property Act 2007 and the Strata Titles Act 1985) to the SMA 2013, emphasizing that the transfer obligations remain consistent, and formal transfer procedures are necessary for legal validity ["
PARK ACCESS SDN BHD & ORS vs BADAN PENGURUSAN BERSAMA PRIMA AVENUE DAN DPCC FASA 1 (BLOK G H I) & .... - Court Of Appeal
"], ["Amber Court Management Corporation vs Tee Soon Hin & Ors
"].Section 15 of the SMA 2013 imposes a clear obligation on developers to transfer all remaining balances in maintenance and sinking fund accounts, less any expenditure, to the JMB before the expiry of the management period. This ensures a transparent handover process, safeguarding the interests of purchasers and the management body. Proper documentation and adherence to legal procedures, including the assignment of contractual rights, are essential for the validity of such transfers.
Malaysian case law, notably Arab-Malaysian Prima Realty and Prangin Mall, reinforce that the transfer of these balances must be formalized either through contractual assignment or by operation of law to be effective. These legal principles underpin the statutory requirement under Section 15, emphasizing the importance of proper legal procedures in the transfer process.
References:
IDEAL CITY DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD vs TRIBUNAL PENGURUSAN STRATA PUTRAJAYA WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN & ANOR - 2024 MarsdenLR 2838
"]TRANSPACC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SDN BHD vs BADAN PENGURUSAN BERSAMA PANGSAPURI AMAN LARKIN & ANOR - High Court
"]KERAJAAN MALAYSIA LWN. SANJUNG UTAMA SDN BHD (DALAM LIKUIDASI); TENAGA NASTIONAL BERHAD (PEMOHON) - High Court
"]Amber Court Management Corporation vs Tee Soon Hin & Ors
"]PARK ACCESS SDN BHD & ORS vs BADAN PENGURUSAN BERSAMA PRIMA AVENUE DAN DPCC FASA 1 (BLOK G H I) & .... - Court Of Appeal
"]
In the realm of Malaysian property development, the transition from developer control to resident-led management is a critical phase. Many strata property owners and developers grapple with questions like: Can you explain in the context of all balances to be transferred by the developer less expenditure? Can we also have some Malaysian case law? This provision ensures a smooth handover, protecting parcel owners' interests. This article breaks down (), its implications, and supporting jurisprudence. Note: This is general information, not specific legal advice—consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
Enacted to regulate strata developments, replaced earlier laws like the . Section 15 specifically addresses the Handing over by the developer to the (). It mandates that before the developer's management period expires, they must transfer all balances of moneys in the , less any expenditure properly charged to the
.
This isn't just about funds—it's a comprehensive handover. Developers must also deliver:- Relevant documents, including .- Assets, records for maintenance and management.- Invoices, receipts, and payment vouchers
.
The goal? To equip the with resources for effective post-developer management
. Failure to comply is an offence, potentially leading to severe consequences like title invalidation
- 2024 MarsdenLR 4365
- 2024 MarsdenLR 805
.Under (), the developer shall:
Transfer all balances of moneys in the , after payment of to these accounts, to the
.
This explicit language leaves little room for ambiguity. Properly charged expenditures must be legitimate and documented—think routine maintenance or verified costs, not arbitrary deductions. The handover extends to physical and administrative assets, ensuring the isn't left scrambling.
Post-handover, the assumes full control. As noted in related provisions, the objective of sections like 15 and 16 of (and predecessors in ) is clear: seamless transition
.
.
Non-compliance risks offences under the Act, including fraud if is mishandled
- 2024 MarsdenLR 4365
.emphasize strict adherence to these duties. While some cases predate (applying BCPA), their principles align seamlessly, as SMA built on BCPA frameworks
.
In a key dispute involving the Centrestage development, the court affirmed: The court affirmed that in development areas must be managed by the , and any unlawful sale by the developer renders such transactions void under statutory definitions
. The claimed ownership against a developer who sold and failed to hand over documents. Rulings included:- Declaring strata
- 2024 MarsdenLR 4365
- 2024 MarsdenLR 805
.- Mandatory handover of documents and rectification of strata registers (Paras 42, 94)
.
Similarly, another case reinforced: The court affirmed that in a development area cannot be unlawfully appropriated by developers, establishing the rights of the over such property
. Here, under (mirroring SMA), the developer failed to hand over essentials and sold unlawfully. The court , deemed titles void for fraud, and ordered possession delivery to the (Paras 51-57, 80-95)
.
Courts have held that failure by developers to transfer documents and assets or unlawfully selling breaches statutory duties, leading to the titles being declared defeasible due to fraud and unlawful acts
- 2024 MarsdenLR 4365
- 2024 MarsdenLR 805
. Even in transitional cases, Section 15's intent is upheld: developers cannot circumvent obligations.
These precedents underscore that JMBs have to enforce handovers, even if formed post-acquisition (Paras 45-46)
.
Section 15 isn't absolute:- Timing: Applies before management period expiry; post-expiry, takes over independently.- Deductions: are deductible if documented—no gratuitous work claims without basis
.- Pre-SMA Cases: Material facts before (Selangor enforcement) may invoke BCPA, but principles persist
.
Unlawful acts, like selling , invite challenges under
.
Proactive steps prevent litigation, as seen where claims for funds failed due to standing issues
.
.
- 2024 MarsdenLR 4365
.
- 2024 MarsdenLR 805
.Strata management thrives on transparency. For tailored advice, engage a Malaysian property lawyer. Stay informed on SMA updates to safeguard your investment.
References:1.
: Core Section 15 text.2.
- 2024 MarsdenLR 4365
,- 2024 MarsdenLR 805
: Fraud and title defeasibility.3.,
: and handover precedents.4.
: Section 15 objectives.
This analysis draws from cited legal documents; laws may evolve.
#StrataManagement, #SMA2013, #PropertyLawMY
Strata Management Act 2013 (the SMA 2013), the Strata Management (Maintenance & Management) Regulations 2015 ("the SRA") and Strata Titles Act 1985 ("the STA 1985") regulate the management and maintenance of strata scheme developments. ... [Emphasis Added] [68] Section 27 of the SMA 2013 in turn makes it mandatory for the JMB to undertake the similar transfer and hand-over arrangement (like imposed in ....
Section 23(2) states that the monies in the JMB's maintenance account shall consist of all the balances of the monies in the developer's maintenance account transferred by the developer to the JMB under section 15(1)(a). ... R1 is established under the Strata Management Act 2013 ("SMA"). A JMB is a body corporate established under s 17(1) of the SMA. It comprises of the developer and the purchasers of the parcel units in the develop....
Section 15(1) of the SMA 2013 requires the developer before the developer's management period expires, inter cilia, to transfer all balances of moneys in the maintenance account and the sinking fund account; and hand over all invoices, receipts and payment vouchers in respect of the maintenance ... Diperturunkan seperti bawah mengenai seksyen berkenaan dengan peranan developer dan JMB masing-masing untuk rujukan mudah: "Pursuant to s 38 of the Strata Management #HL_S....
Strata Titles Act 1985 section 45 of the 45. Management fund. ... The plaintiff is a statutory body which performs its duties and powers through its council members of the management committee in accordance with the (before 2013) and Strata Management Act 2013 (after June 2015). ... [50]The case of Prangin Mall also decided that any ‘handing over’ or transfer of contractual rights can only take effect if there is an assignmen....
Strata Management Act 2013 (" SMA ") came into operation on 1 June 2015. ... (2) of the BCP Act provides:- "15. ... (1) All references to the repealed Act in any written law or document shall, when this Act comes into operation, be construed as references to this Act. ... Establishment Of The Management Corporation [26] The MC is established by operation of law once a book of strata register i....
Strata Management Act 2013 (SMA) but the material facts in this case arose before the enforcement of SMA. Hence, the application of BCPA in this case. B. ... ) Act 2013 (Act A1450) in Selangor with effect from 1 June 2015]; and (4) section 340(2)(a) and (b) of the Financial Services Act 2013 . ... [42] The relevant part of s 15 of the SMA is reproduced below: "Section....
Strata Management Act 2013 (SMA) but the material facts in this case arose before the enforcement of SMA. Hence, the application of BCPA in this case. B. ... ) Act 2013 (Act A1450) in Selangor with effect from 1 June 2015]; and (4) section 340(2)(a) and (b) of the National Land Code (NLC) ("Alleged Illegality"). ... [42] The relevant part of s 15 of the SMA is reproduced below: "Section #HL_STAR....
[2] BCPA has now been repealed by the Strata Management Act 2013 (SMA) but the material facts in this case arose before the enforcement of SMA. Hence, the application of BCPA in this case. B. ... ) Act 2013 (Act A1450) in Selangor with effect from 1 June 2015]; and (4) section 340(2)(a) and (b) of the National Land Code (NLC) ("Alleged Illegality"). ... [42] The relevant part of s 15 of the SMA is reproduced belo....
[39] Act 663 was repealed by the Strata Management Act 2013 ("Act 757"). Act 757 came into force on 1st June 2015. ... [Emphasis Added] [69] Section 15 (1)(a) of Act 757 states as follows: "Handing over by the developer to the joint management body [70] The objective of s 22(1) of Act 663 and ss 15(1) and 16 of the Act 757, is sufficiently clear. ... (2) T....
[33] We note that the Strata Management Act 2013 ("SMA") came into operation on 1 June 2015. ... Significantly, s 15(2)(a) of the BCP Act was repealed and replaced by s 27(2) of the SMA. This demonstrates that Parliament does not perceive there to be any ambiguity in the above law. ... The JMB shall be automatically dissolved 3 months after the 1 st AGM (s 15(1) of the BCP Act and s 27(1) of the SMA). In this case, the JMB was diss....
The expenditure by the Developer is not such that can be denied. Therefore, in his submission, some provision must be made to secure at least the return of the Developer's investment in the project. There will be a claim for loss of profit and possibly for damages. After all, he submits, the Developer started work, and admittedly did a fair amount of it, but none of it was intended to be done gratuitously.
It has already come on record that the Balance-Reconciliation Certificate was jointly signed by you and the Senior Manager but it has never been proved that the certificate was prepared in your handwriting. In such a situation a question normally comes as to who is exactly responsible for what. In this context, it can never be concluded that you are responsible for alleged inflation of balances.
We are in complete agreement with the view taken by the Division Bench in the above case. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, (264 ITR 117)” following the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in “Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Mahindra Ugine and Steel Co. Ltd.” (supra), the Rajasthan High Court held that the claim of the assessee in respect of expenditure incurred on the public issue to raise capital for expansion of his business would fall under sub-clause (iv) of Section 35D(2)(c) of the Act and the assessee would be entitled for the benefit of the provisions of Section 35D of the Act.....
I am aware that the Metropolitan Magistrates handling the matters of any railway police station on central line get first class free pass right from Nagpur to Igapturi. Even the staff attached to such Magistrates also get free passes. Your lady ticket collectors at Dadar instead of understanding our difficulties have further harassed us in the most insulting manner and this has left a deep scar in our mind. If you care to know how nasty your people could be, you may depute a representative to whom we can explain the facts.
If you care to know how nasty your people could be, you may depute a representative to whom we can explain the facts. Your lady ticket collectors at Dadar, instead of understanding our difficulties have further harassed us in the most insulting manner and this has left a deep scar in our mind. I am aware that the Metropolitan Magistrates handling the matters of any Railway Police Station on central line get First Class free pass right from Nagpur to Igatpuri. Even the staff attached to such Magistrates also get free passes.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
