Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
The section also establishes a bar on granting anticipatory bail under Sections 18 and 18A, meaning that individuals accused under the Act generally cannot seek anticipatory bail, especially when prima facie cases are made out (["Santoshbai VS State of M. P. - Madhya Pradesh"], ["CHANDU CHANDRAN Vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala"], ["Accused No.3 vs State - Karnataka"]).
Legal Interpretation and Judicial Precedents:
The courts have held that unless a prima facie case is not established, the bar under Sections 18 and 18A applies, and anticipatory bail is generally denied when offences under the Act are involved (["Santoshbai VS State of M. P. - Madhya Pradesh"], ["SURESH.P. Vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala"]).
Exceptions and Court Discretion:
Section 18A of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, primarily mandates that no preliminary enquiry is necessary for case registration and establishes a statutory bar on anticipatory bail under Sections 18 and 18A when offences under the Act are involved, especially if a prima facie case is made out. Judicial interpretations reinforce that anticipatory bail is generally not permissible in such cases unless specific exceptions apply, emphasizing the Act's intent to prevent misuse and ensure strict compliance.
References:- ["Santoshbai VS State of M. P. - Madhya Pradesh"]- ["CHANDU CHANDRAN Vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala"]- ["C H SHAMEEM vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala"]- ["DON BABY vs THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE - Kerala"]- ["Accused No.3 vs State - Karnataka"]- ["KASHIGOUDA S/O SHIVANAGOUDA KALLANAGOUDA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA - Karnataka"]- ["NIKHIL vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala"]- ["SURESH.P. Vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala"]
In India, protecting marginalized communities from atrocities is a pressing legal priority. The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989—commonly known as the SC/ST (POA) Act—plays a crucial role. But what exactly is in Section 18A of SC/ST POA? This provision, introduced via the 2018 amendment, revolutionizes procedural aspects like FIR registration, arrests, and bail. If you're facing or advising on such cases, understanding it is essential—though this is general information, not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
Section 18A was inserted by the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2018 to address delays in atrocity cases. Its core aim? To ensure swift action by eliminating procedural bottlenecks. Priti Agarwalla VS State of GNCT of Delhi - 2024 5 Supreme 76
This subsection (1) reflects legislative intent to prioritize victim protection in sensitive cases. Priti Agarwalla VS State of GNCT of Delhi - 2024 5 Supreme 76
The most impactful part is Section 18A(2): The provisions of section 438 of the Code shall not apply to a case under this Act, notwithstanding any judgment or order or direction of any Court. Priti Agarwalla VS State of GNCT of Delhi - 2024 5 Supreme 76
Section 438 of the CrPC deals with anticipatory bail (pre-arrest bail). Under Section 18A(2), it's explicitly barred in SC/ST (POA) cases—regardless of court judgments. This overrides prior rulings like Dr. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan, ensuring no pre-arrest relief even if allegations seem motivated. Priti Agarwalla VS State of GNCT of Delhi - 2024 5 Supreme 76
Courts have upheld this as an absolute bar, emphasizing Parliament's goal to prevent misuse of procedures and deliver prompt justice. Priti Agarwalla VS State of GNCT of Delhi - 2024 5 Supreme 76
Indian courts have reinforced Section 18A's rigor, especially post-2018. In Prathvi Raj Chauhan v. Union of India, the Supreme Court clarified that even after Section 18A, anticipatory bail is unavailable if a prima facie case exists under the Act. JIMMY JOSEPH vs STATE OF KERALA - 2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 9942ARUN RAJ vs STATE OF KERALA - 2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 13127
However, nuances emerge if no prima facie case is made out. Post-Section 18A, courts have noted: in cases where there is no prima facie case, grant of anticipatory bail is not specifically barred. X VS State Of Kerala - 2022 Supreme(Ker) 930
For instance:- In a bank employee case involving caste-name abuse amid prior litigations, pre-arrest bail was granted as allegations seemed prima facie doubtful due to enmity. X VS State Of Kerala - 2022 Supreme(Ker) 930- Where no materials showed the accused had knowledge of screening an offender under Section 3(2)(vi), proceedings were quashed. Abdul Khader Thidil S/o Late M. Abdul Rehman VS State of Kerala Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala - 2020 Supreme(Ker) 946
Yet, in serious offences like murder under Section 3(2)(v), courts direct surrender for regular bail, upholding Sections 18 and 18A. Jagadeesh VS State Of Karnataka - 2020 Supreme(Kar) 690Karikadai Karthik @ Karthik VS State Rep. by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mettur - 2021 Supreme(Mad) 1383
While Section 18A(2) appears absolute, courts sometimes consider:- Patently false or motivated allegations: If enmity or lack of prima facie evidence is clear, regular bail or quashing may be explored post-arrest. Priti Agarwalla VS State of GNCT of Delhi - 2024 5 Supreme 76X VS State Of Kerala - 2022 Supreme(Ker) 930- No bar if no prima facie case: As in Prathvi Raj Chauhan, bail isn't auto-barred without initial evidence. JIMMY JOSEPH vs STATE OF KERALA - 2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 9942
Importantly, Section 14A allows appeals against Special Court bail orders directly to the High Court, bypassing standard CrPC routes. Jagadeesh VS State Of Karnataka - 2020 Supreme(Kar) 690
In a conviction appeal involving IPC Section 302 and SC/ST provisions, suspension of sentence was granted due to appeal delays, with conditions like monthly reporting. Karikadai Karthik @ Karthik VS State Rep. by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mettur - 2021 Supreme(Mad) 1383
Subsection (1) mandates immediate FIR without enquiry, and arrests without nod if suspicion holds. This counters past delays but raises concerns over potential misuse—hence the judicial prima facie filter. Priti Agarwalla VS State of GNCT of Delhi - 2024 5 Supreme 76
For example, in a liquor-related quarrel escalating to murder, evidence of retaliation led to convictions, but bail considerations factored community dynamics. Balu @ Balasubramaniyam VS State Rep by The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Perur Division, Coimbatore - 2019 Supreme(Mad) 889
| Provision | Key Effect ||-----------|------------|| 18A(1) | No preliminary enquiry for FIR; no arrest approval needed. Priti Agarwalla VS State of GNCT of Delhi - 2024 5 Supreme 76 || 18A(2) | No anticipatory bail under CrPC 438, overriding courts. Priti Agarwalla VS State of GNCT of Delhi - 2024 5 Supreme 76 || Judicial View | Bar applies if prima facie case; exceptions for no evidence. JIMMY JOSEPH vs STATE OF KERALA - 2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 9942X VS State Of Kerala - 2022 Supreme(Ker) 930 |
Section 18A fortifies the SC/ST (POA) Act's protective framework, balancing speed with scrutiny. Stay informed, but always seek professional advice tailored to facts. This overview draws from statutory text and precedents for educational purposes.
References:- Priti Agarwalla VS State of GNCT of Delhi - 2024 5 Supreme 76: Core text and interpretations of Section 18A.- JIMMY JOSEPH vs STATE OF KERALA - 2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 9942, ARUN RAJ vs STATE OF KERALA - 2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 13127, X VS State Of Kerala - 2022 Supreme(Ker) 930, etc.: Select judgments on bail applications.
#SCSTPOA, #Section18A, #AnticipatoryBail
... ... Ratio Decidendi: Court emphasized that section 18A nullifies prior legal standards, upholding that if a prima facie case ... Learned counsel for the State as well as complainant opposed the appeal and submitted that since this is an anticipatory bail under section SC/ST (POA) Act, hence, it is not maintainable under the provisions of sections 18 and 18-A of the SC/ST (POA) Act and therefore, the ....
Even after amendment and incorporation of Section 18A, a three bench of the Apex Court considered the impact of Section 18 and 18-A Prathvi Raj Chauhan v. ... It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellants that, prima facie case to find commission of offences under the SC/ST (POA) Act could not be read out from the prosecution records and therefore the statutory bar under Section 18 and #HL_STA....
Being so, I find the appellant to be entitled for pre-arrest bail, despite the prohibition under Section 18A. ... Even though appellant approached the Special Court seeking anticipatory bail, that application was dismissed finding the offences under the SC/ST (PoA) Act have been prima facie made out and hence, the prohibition under Section 18A of the Act being applicable. Hence, this appeal. ... It is co....
It is doubtful, whether the allegations raised would attract offences under the SC/ST (POA) Act. In the above circumstances, the court below is erred in holding that the bar under Section 18A(2) of the SC/ST (POA) Act will operate in the case. 3. ... Said application was dismissed by the court below for the reason that Section 18A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Preventi....
He also submitted that in this matter, the bar under Section 18 and 18A of the SC/ST (POA) Act would squarely apply. 6. ... Insofar as grant of anticipatory bail in crimes involving offences under the SC/ST (POA) Act is concerned, the law is well settled. Even after introduction of Section 18A of the SC/ST Act by way of amendment, the Apex Court held in Prathvi Raj Chauhan v. ... There i....
Even after amendment and incorporation of Section 18A, a three bench of the Apex Court considered the impact of Section 18 and 18-A Prathvi Raj Chauhan v. ... While canvassing anticipatory bail, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that no prima facie case made out in this case and, therefore, the bar under Section 18 and 18A of the SC/ST (POA) Act has no applications....
Having regard to the nature of the allegation against appellant, bar under Section 18A of the SC/ST (POA) Act cannot be attracted at this juncture. ... No prima facie case is made out against the appellant to attract the provision of Section 18 and 18A of the SC/ST (POA) Act. Appellant is ready and willing to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for....
Further, Section 18A of SC/ST [POA] Act mandates that no preliminary enquiry is required for registration of the case. ... Further, Section 18A of SC/ST [POA] Act makes it clear that no preliminary enquiry is necessary for registration of the case. ... [POA] Act is applicable. ... Hence, as per Section 18 of SC/ST [POA] Act the....
Even after amendment and incorporation of Section 18A, a three bench of the Apex Court considered the impact of Sections 18 and 18A Prathvi Raj Chauhan v. ... M.P NO.1755/2022, ON THE FILES OF SPECIAL COURT FOR SC/ST (POA) ACT, MANJERI, IN CRIME NO. 847/2022 OF TIRURANGADI POLICE STATION. ... M.P NO.1782/2022, ON THE FILES OF SPECIAL COURT FOR SC/ST (POA) ACT, MANJERI, IN CRIME NO. 847/2022 OF TIRURANGAD....
Even after amendment and incorporation of Section 18A, a three bench of the Apex Court considered the impact of Sections 18 and 18A Prathvi Raj Chauhan v. ... M.P NO.1755/2022, ON THE FILES OF SPECIAL COURT FOR SC/ST (POA) ACT, MANJERI, IN CRIME NO. 847/2022 OF TIRURANGADI POLICE STATION. ... M.P NO.1782/2022, ON THE FILES OF SPECIAL COURT FOR SC/ST (POA) ACT, MANJERI, IN CRIME NO. 847/2022 OF TIRURANGAD....
Act, when there is prima facie case, the statutory bar in granting anticipatory bail under Section 18 and 18A of the SC/ST (POA) But he did not go into the previous incidents narrated by the learned counsel for the appellant. Act, in cases where there is no prima facie case, grant of anticipatory bail is not specifically barred. According to the learned counsel for the defacto complainant, in a case involving offence/offences under the SC/ST (POA) Although there is ....
The aforesaid sentences were ordered to run concurrently. 2. The petitioner, who was the second accused in Spl. S.C. No. 19 of 2019 before the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Salem, Salem District, was convicted and sentenced as follows on 17.04.2021: S. No. Provision under which convicted Sentence 1 Section 302 IPC Life imprisonment and fine of Rs. 1,000/- in default to undergo four years rigorous imprisonment. Lif....
A additional charge sheet in Crime No. 698/2011 of Neeleswaram Police station is the one as per Section 3(2)(vi) of the SC/ST(POA) Act, 1989. That could be confirmed only after getting an expert's report. Section 3(2)(vi) of the SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989 reads as follows: The case was registered on the tentative opinion formed by the detecting officer that what contained in that jar was spirit.
In case, if the bail is rejected, the petitioners shall approach the High Court by filing an appeal. The offence under Section 307 of the IPC is punishable with ten years and up to life imprisonment. Therefore, Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (POA) Act also attracts. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Prathvi Raj Chauhan supra has clearly upheld the provisions of Sections 18 and 18A of the SC/ST (POA) Act and laid down the law regarding maintainability of Section....
Act sentenced to undergo 6 months rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs 1000/- in default 1 month Simple imprisonment; for offence under section 294(b) of IPC sentenced to undergo 3 months rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.1000/- in default 3 weeks Simple imprisonment and for offence under section 324 IPC sentenced to undergo 1 year rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.1,000/- in default 3 months Simple imprisonment. For offence under section 3 (1)(X) of SC and ST (POA)
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
