Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Section 340 of Cr.P.C. - Provides the procedure for initiating proceedings against a person for false statements or perjury in judicial proceedings. The power to initiate such proceedings is discretionary and must be exercised judiciously, considering the context and specific preconditions. Courts must exercise caution and ensure due consideration before proceeding ["2021 0 Supreme(MP) 514"], ["2021 Supreme(Online)(MP) 7648"], ["2023 0 Supreme(Cal) 1167"], ["2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 104"].
Discretion and Judicial Prudence - The courts emphasize that the exercise of power under Section 340 should be careful, judicious, and based on substantial grounds to prevent misuse or abuse of process. The discretion is not absolute and must align with principles of justice, as highlighted in various judgments ["2021 0 Supreme(MP) 514"], ["2021 Supreme(Online)(MP) 7648"], ["2023 0 Supreme(Cal) 1167"].
Preconditions for Initiation - Two key conditions must be met for initiating proceedings under Section 340: (1) existence of a false statement or perjury, and (2) the statement must be made in a judicial proceeding. The court's role is to assess whether these conditions are satisfied before proceeding ["2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 13129"].
Application in Corporate and Criminal Contexts - Section 340 is applied in cases involving corporate misconduct, fraud, cheating, and breach of trust, especially where false statements impact companies or public interest. Courts have dismissed petitions where proceedings are deemed abuse of process or where allegations lack sufficient basis ["2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 13129"], ["2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 13857"].
Standards of Proof and Elements - In criminal cases involving Section 340, the prosecution must establish the false statement with a subjective understanding (knowing or having reason to believe). The burden of proof is high, and courts stress that proceedings should not be initiated lightly ["
DHARMAPALA VS. OFFICER-IN-CHARGE COLOMBO SPECIAL CRIMES DIVISION
"], ["DHARMAPALA VS. OFFICER-IN-CHARGE COLOMBO SPECIAL CRIMES DIVISION
"].Analysis and Conclusion:Section 340 of the Cr.P.C. grants courts the authority to initiate criminal proceedings against individuals who make false statements in judicial or official contexts. However, this power is circumscribed by principles of caution, requiring courts to exercise discretion judiciously to prevent misuse. Initiation depends on clear preconditions, including the existence of false statements made knowingly or with reason to believe, and should be exercised only in appropriate cases to uphold justice and integrity of proceedings. The case law underscores the importance of exercising this power carefully, balancing the need for accountability with safeguarding against frivolous or malicious prosecutions ["2021 0 Supreme(MP) 514"], ["2021 Supreme(Online)(MP) 7648"], ["2023 0 Supreme(Cal) 1167"], ["2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 13129"], ["2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 104"].
In the complex landscape of Indian criminal law, questions often arise about procedural remedies post-judgment. One common query is: After Judgment, can a 340 CrPC application be filed on a criminal appeal? This issue typically surfaces in cases involving alleged , , or other offenses under , where parties seek court intervention to address misconduct during trial or appeal proceedings.
Understanding the nuances of , is crucial for litigants, lawyers, and legal enthusiasts. This blog post breaks down the provision, its applicability post-judgment, and insights from judicial precedents. Note: This is general information and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your case.
outlines the procedure in cases mentioned in Section 195, which deals with prosecutions for , , or in judicial proceedings. When a court believes an offense like (under ) or fabricating evidence has occurred in or in relation to a proceeding in that court, it may initiate an inquiry.
Key elements include:- : The court must form an opinion that inquiry is necessary 2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 2686.- : Optional before making a complaint to a magistrate.- Court's power: Any court—civil, criminal, tribunal, or revenue—can invoke it if the offense relates to its proceedings 2017 0 Supreme(Bom) 488.
As per the provision: When, upon an application made to it in this behalf or otherwise, any Court is of opinion that it is expedient in the interests of justice that an inquiry should be made into any offence referred to in ... 2017 0 Supreme(Bom) 488.
Yes, generally, a application can be filed even after the main judgment in the case, provided the alleged offense pertains to the proceedings. The timing is not strictly barred post-judgment; the focus is on whether justice demands an inquiry into misconduct like false testimony or forged documents produced during the trial.
Courts have held that proceedings under Section 340 are independent and can be initiated or on application at any stage if expedient. For instance:- Rule 66 of Criminal Rules states: Every application under Section 340 of the Code shall be registered as a 2019 0 Supreme(Ker) 158.- In civil contexts, it's filed as an , and appeals lie under 2019 0 Supreme(Ker) 158.
The power extends post-judgment because the provision aims to protect judicial integrity, not just resolve the main dispute.
The question specifically addresses criminal appeals. Here, appellate courts can exercise powers under if the trial court hasn't acted. Section 340(2) provides: The power conferred on a Court by sub-section (1) in respect of an offence may, in any case where that Court has neither made a complaint under sub-section (1) in respect of that offence nor rejected an application for the making of such complaint, be exercised by the Court to which such former Court is subordinate within the meaning of sub-section (4) of section 195 2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 2686 2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 2695.
In a criminal appeal:1. Appellate court's jurisdiction: If or is alleged in trial court records reviewed during appeal, the or (as appellate forum) may inquire
.2. Procedure: Register as a miscellaneous petition. No need to hear the accused before preliminary opinion formation 2017 0 Supreme(Bom) 488.3. Hearing rights: Post-complaint registration, the respondent gets a chance to be heard, but not at the inquiry initiation stage 2017 0 Supreme(Bom) 488.
Important: Civil courts enjoy CrPC powers during Section 340 inquiries, including summoning witnesses under 2017 0 Supreme(Bom) 488. This extends analogously to criminal appellate proceedings.
Several judgments clarify post-judgment and appellate applications:
Registration and Appeals: In a case before a Sub Judge, a Section 340 application was dismissed, appealed under Section 341. The noted appeals against such orders follow civil appellate remedies, emphasizing procedural compliance even post-main judgment 2019 0 Supreme(Ker) 158.
Superior Court Powers: Courts subordinate to higher ones allow escalation if the lower court hasn't acted. One ruling dismissed a Section 340 application for lack of suppression or misleading intent, post-FIR and bail proceedings, showing post-judgment scrutiny is possible 2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 2686.
No Pre-Complaint Hearing Needed: Before registering the complaint by the Magistrate under Section 340 of Code of Criminal Procedure hearing the person against whom prosecution is likely to be instituted is not contemplated 2017 0 Supreme(Bom) 488. This supports swift post-judgment action.
Transparency in Proceedings: In a property dispute involving alleged , the court rejected Section 340, holding parties were transparent and no facts suppressed 2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 2695.
Abuse of Process: Proceedings can be quashed if not constituting an offense, as in a COTPA violation case where movie scenes didn't qualify under strict penal construction 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 2020. Though not directly 340, it underscores strict interpretation.
These cases illustrate that while possible, success depends on proving expediency and a offense.
When contemplating a Section 340 application post-judgment in appeal:- Verify offense scope: Must relate to court proceedings (e.g., false affidavits, forged exhibits).- Director's role?: In some regulatory contexts, a Director's inquiry determines status, but for CrPC 340, it's judicial 1978 0 Supreme(All) 1237. (Note: Producer definitions from agricultural laws don't directly apply but highlight strict statutory interpretation.)- No automatic right: Court discretion is key; emotional pleas insufficient 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 2020.- Remedies: If rejected, appeal under Section 341 or invoke inherent powers cautiously.
Actionable Steps:- Gather evidence of /.- File as miscellaneous petition in appellate court.- Prepare for .
In summary, while offers a vital tool to uphold justice against judicial process abuses, its invocation post-judgment in appeals requires careful navigation. Always align with statutory definitions and court precedents for the best outcome. For tailored guidance, reach out to a legal expert.
Disclaimer: This article provides general insights based on legal provisions and cases. Laws evolve, and outcomes vary by facts. Seek professional advice.
#CrPC340, #CriminalAppeal, #Section340CrPC
Section 340 of Cr.P.C. runs as under:- “340. ... Respondent No.2 – Keshav Singh Chauhan, is a person having criminal antecedents, therefore petitioner prayed to initiate enquiry against respondents No.2 & 3, namely Keshav Singh Chauhan & Nitin Chauhan under section 340 r/w section 195(1)(b) of Cr.P.C. ... Saving for inherent power of High Court – Nothing in this Code shall be deemed to limit or affect th....
Section 340 of Cr.P.C. runs as under:- “340. Procedure in cases mentioned in section 195. ... In view of the language used in Section 340 Cr.P.C. ... Chauhan under Section 340 r/w Section 195(1)(b) of Cr.P.C. ... Under Section 340 of Cr.P.C., the discretion vests with the Court and the discretion required to be exercised under Section 340 of Cr.P.C. should be judiciously along with the....
Therefore, it is incumbent that the power given by Section 340 of the Code should be used with utmost care and after due consideration. The scope of Section 340(1) which corresponds to Section 476(1) of the old Code was examined by this Court in K. Karunakaran v. T.V. ... The above provisions of Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure are alluded only for the purpose of showing that necessary care a....
others were Directors of Company by name Progressive NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL ... The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal 4 aba 340-2020.odt Nahush S/o Ghanshyam Tijare p style="position:absolute;white-space:pre;margin:0;padding:0;top:
LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7733/2025 Between: 1.VEERANKI SRIRAMULU, S/0 DURGA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,DIRECTOR OF IFL GREEN PRODUCER COMPANY LTD AND M.D OF INAKULA FARMERS LIFE PRODUCES CO LTD. D. ... LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7733 OF 2025 Between: BNSS ’) by the petitioner/Accused No.1 for granting of pre-arrest bail in connection with Crime No.212 of 2025 of Jangareddygudem Police Station, Eluru District, registered fo....
SC/APPEAL/155/2014 HC/APPEAL/MCA/106/08 MC MALIGAKANDA 22070/05 JUNE 25, 2020 Intellectual Property rights-Criminal prosecution-Intellectual Property Act, No. 36 of 2003, sections 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 21, 178(2)- Penal Code, section 24-Code of Criminal ... Learned Senior State Counsel also did not express disagreement with this standard of proof expected from the prosecution in any criminal case, which is a salient featu....
SC/APPEAL/155/2014 HC/APPEAL/MCA/106/08 MC MALIGAKANDA 22070/05 JUNE 25, 2020 Intellectual Property rights-Criminal prosecution-Intellectual Property Act, No. 36 of 2003, sections 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 21, 178(2)- Penal Code, section 24-Code of Criminal ... Learned Senior State Counsel also did not express disagreement with this standard of proof expected from the prosecution in any criminal case, which is a salient featu....
The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the a href="./.. ... 2025 of Jangareddygudem Police Station, Eluru District, registered for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 316(4) 338 336(3), 340 ... The complainant seeks legal action for fraud, cheating, criminal breach of trust, and damage to the company’s reputation. The complainant suspects that th....
In the result, all the criminal original petitions are allowed. Consequently, all connected pending Crl.M.Ps. are closed. ... The criminal complaint has been filed not for the violation of any Rules and it has been filed specifically for the violation of Section 5 of the COTPA. ... Mr.S.Cyril Alexander, who was impleaded as the second respondent in some of the above criminal original petitions, claims to be the State Convenor of a movement....
– this is the interesting question that falls for consideration in this criminal appeal filed under Section 341 of Cr.P.C. 2. ... Section 340 of Cr. P.C. provides for the procedure enumerated in Section 195(1)(b). ... The prosecution allegation, in brief, in SC No.867/2012, is that pursuant to a criminal conspiracy hatched by A8 to A14, with the assistance of A1, A3, A5, A7, A15 to A18, A20 to A25, and A27 to A30, at about 22.10 hours, on 4....
5. Shri Vipin Narayan has brought to my notice the provision in Rule 66 of the Criminal Rules of the practice, which is extracted below: “Every application under Section 340 of the Code shall be registered as a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition.”
25. Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code is reproduced hereunder: "340. (2) The power conferred on a Court by sub-section (1) in respect of an offence may, in any case where that Court has neither made a complaint under sub-section (1) in respect of that offence nor rejected an application for the making of such complaint, be exercised by the Court to which such former Court is subordinate within the meaning of sub-section (4) of section 195. Procedure in cases mention....
(2) The power conferred on a Court by sub-section (1) in respect of an offence may, in any case where that Court has neither made a complaint under sub-section (1) in respect of that offence nor rejected an application for the making of such complaint, be exercised by the Court to which such former Court is subordinate within the meaning of sub-section (4) of section 195. 21. Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code is reproduced hereunder: "340. Procedure in cases mention....
30. Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code is reproduced hereunder: "340. Procedure in cases mentioned in section 195.- (1) When, upon an application made to it in this behalf or otherwise, any Court is of opinion that it is expedient in the interests of justice that an inquiry should be made into any offence referred to in clause (b) of subsection (1) of section 195, which appears to have been committed in or in relation to a proceeding in that Court or, as the case may ....
When upon an application made to it in this behalf or otherwise, any Court is of opinion that it is expedient in the interests of justice that an inquiry should be made into any offence referred to in clause (b) of subsection (1) of section 195, which appears to have been committed in or in relation to a proceeding in that Court or, as the case may be, in respect of a document produced or given in evidence in a proceeding in that Court, such Court may, after such preliminary inquiry, if any, a....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
