Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Seized cows and animals can be given on interim custody to the owner or a charitable organization like a pinjrapole, depending on certain factors such as the nature of the offence and the owner’s history ["Abdul Kadir S/o Abdul Matin VS State of Assam Represented by the PP - Gauhati"] ["Lekkaluri Gurrappa VS State of Andhra Pradesh - 2024 0 Supreme(AP) 859"] ["Dhyan Foundation vs THE STATE OF TRIPURA AND ANR. - Tripura"] ["Dhyan Foundation vs THE STATE OF TRIPURA AND ANR. - Tripura"].
Courts have, in multiple instances, granted interim custody of seized cattle to the owners or trusted organizations, provided that appropriate conditions are met, such as executing indemnity bonds or ensuring proper care ["Abdul Kadir S/o Abdul Matin VS State of Assam Represented by the PP - Gauhati"] ["Gau Gyan Foundation, Rep By Sanjay Kulkarni, S/o. Suresh Rao Kulkarni vs Govindagowda, S/o. Balappa Gowda - Karnataka"] ["Dhyan Foundation vs THE STATE OF TRIPURA AND ANR. - Tripura"] ["SHRI. VITTAL SATHYPPA PUJERI Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA - Karnataka"] ["GINJALA NAGA APPALA RAJU Vs STATE REP BY - Madras"].
The discretion to grant interim custody lies with the magistrate, who must consider factors like the severity of the offence, the owner’s first-time or repeat offence status, and the welfare of the animals ["Abdul Kadir S/o Abdul Matin VS State of Assam Represented by the PP - Gauhati"] ["Lekkaluri Gurrappa VS State of Andhra Pradesh - 2024 0 Supreme(AP) 859"] ["Dhyan Foundation vs THE STATE OF TRIPURA AND ANR. - Tripura"] ["GINJALA NAGA APPALA RAJU Vs STATE REP BY - Madras"].
It is generally held that if the owner is found to be prima facie guilty of cruelty or offences, interim custody should not be granted to them until the case concludes; instead, custody may be transferred to a responsible organization or pinjrapole ["Abdul Kadir S/o Abdul Matin VS State of Assam Represented by the PP - Gauhati"] ["Lekkaluri Gurrappa VS State of Andhra Pradesh - 2024 0 Supreme(AP) 859"] ["Dhyan Foundation vs THE STATE OF TRIPURA AND ANR. - Tripura"].
Courts often impose conditions such as bonds, sureties, or safeguards to ensure animal welfare during interim custody ["Gau Gyan Foundation, Rep By Sanjay Kulkarni, S/o. Suresh Rao Kulkarni vs Govindagowda, S/o. Balappa Gowda - Karnataka"] ["Dhyan Foundation vs THE STATE OF TRIPURA AND ANR. - Tripura"].
When the owner or accused is acquitted or found not guilty, the issue of custody is to be revisited, and animals may then be returned to them or transferred to proper organizations ["Abdul Kadir S/o Abdul Matin VS State of Assam Represented by the PP - Gauhati"] ["Dhyan Foundation vs THE STATE OF TRIPURA AND ANR. - Tripura"].
Analysis and Conclusion:Courts generally permit interim custody of seized cows to owners or responsible organizations like pinjrapoles, especially when conditions are strictly imposed to safeguard animal welfare. However, if there is prima facie evidence of cruelty or offences, interim custody to the owner is typically denied until the conclusion of the case. The decision is at the discretion of the magistrate, guided by principles of justice and animal protection ["Abdul Kadir S/o Abdul Matin VS State of Assam Represented by the PP - Gauhati"] ["Lekkaluri Gurrappa VS State of Andhra Pradesh - 2024 0 Supreme(AP) 859"] ["Dhyan Foundation vs THE STATE OF TRIPURA AND ANR. - Tripura"].
In the realm of animal law in India, particularly concerning livestock like cows, seizures often occur amid allegations of cruelty, illegal transport, or slaughter. Livestock owners facing such charges frequently seek interim custody of seized animals to ensure their care and sustain their livelihood. But can seized cows be given on interim custody to the accused? This question arises commonly under provisions like Section 451 of the CrPC and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (PCA) Act, 1960.
This blog post delves into court precedents, statutory frameworks, and practical considerations. Note that this is general information based on judicial trends and not specific legal advice—consult a qualified lawyer for your case.
Interim custody of seized property, including animals, is typically governed by Section 451 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973, which empowers magistrates to release property to the person entitled to possession pending trial. However, special statutes like the PCA Act, 1960, and state-specific cow protection laws introduce nuances.
Courts generally lean towards granting interim custody to owners unless prohibited by statute or compelling evidence of wrongdoing. Ownership proof, animal welfare, and livelihood needs are pivotal. As held in key judgments, Ownership and the purpose of livelihood are critical in determining the interim custody of seized property under Cr.P.C. Lekkaluri Gurrappa VS State of Andhra Pradesh - 2024 0 Supreme(AP) 859
Several high court rulings affirm that seized cows may be released to the accused under favorable conditions:
These decisions underscore that mere suspicion does not bar interim relief. In another instance, the court set aside lower orders denying custody, noting, unless the owner of the animal in respect of which he is facing prosecution, is deprived of the custody (which can be done only on his conviction under the Act for the second time), no bar can be inferred against him to claim interim custody of the animal Rahimuddin S/o Abdul Gafur Islam VS State of Assam - 2022 Supreme(Gau) 453.
The PCA Act, 1960, particularly Sections 35 and 11, allows magistrates discretion in custody matters. Section 35 permits handing animals to a pinjrapole (animal shelter) but does not mandate it. The Magistrate has discretion to hand over interim custody of the animal to a pinjrapole, but is not bound to do so, and emphasizes that ownership rights and the animal’s condition are relevant Shri Chatrapati Shivaji Gaushala VS State of Maharashtra - 2022 0 Supreme(SC) 1664Manager, Pinjrapole Deudar VS Chakram Moraji Nat - 1998 7 Supreme 45.
State laws like the Chhattisgarh Agricultural Cattle Preservation Act, 2004, or Assam Cattle Preservation Act may restrict custody, but courts interpret them flexibly. For example, Section 7 of the 2004 Act is enabling, not prohibitive of CrPC Sections 451/457 Md. Vasim Qurashi S/o Md. Kalim Qurashi VS State of Chhattisgarh - 2021 Supreme(Chh) 152. No express bar exists unless conviction occurs.
Courts typically grant interim custody when:- Valid ownership documents are produced.- No evidence of cruelty, slaughter, or illegal transport exists Shri Chatrapati Shivaji Gaushala VS State of Maharashtra - 2022 0 Supreme(SC) 1664.- Animals are vital for livelihood, like milk production or farming.- Seizure was based on suspicion, not proof Ramavath Hanuma @ Hanumanthu VS State of Telangana - 2017 0 Supreme(AP) 534.- Animals' condition does not warrant shelter detention.
In BABLU @ JANARDAN YADAV VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 1178, the petitioner was entitled to custody on conditions under BNSS Section 503 (successor to CrPC 451). Likewise, GO BHACHAV SAMITTEE, NALKHEDA VS STATE - 1989 Supreme(MP) 74 upheld custody to owner Babukhan despite burden of proof under cattle preservation acts, as he was interested in maintenance.
Interim custody may be denied in serious cases:
Other cases deny to accused if suspected for slaughter, directing to goshalas Dhyan Foundation vs The State of Tripura and OrsR. Sakthivel VS State by Inspector of Police Chavady Police station - 2014 Supreme(Mad) 1803. Discretion must follow sound principles, considering offence nature and animal condition R. Sakthivel VS State by Inspector of Police Chavady Police station - 2014 Supreme(Mad) 1803.
To bolster chances:1. Produce ownership proofs (sale deeds, vaccination records).2. Demonstrate legitimate purpose (affidavit on livelihood use).3. Highlight no cruelty evidence and comply with transport rules if applicable.4. Offer conditions like bonds, supervision by vets, or periodic reporting Arun Prasanna VS State Rep. by Sub-Inspector of Police, Chenglepet - 2013 Supreme(Mad) 1710.5. Approach magistrate promptly under CrPC 451, with appeals if denied.
Courts may impose bonds (e.g., Rs.10 lakhs) or direct costs to owners Meher Banu Begum W/o Hazarat Ali Ahmed VS State of Assam - 2021 Supreme(Gau) 550. In doubt, conditional custody with welfare oversight is prudent.
Seized cows can generally be given on interim custody to the accused if ownership is established, no cruelty or illegality proven, and statutes permit. Courts balance property rights with welfare, favoring release absent strong contra-indications Lekkaluri Gurrappa VS State of Andhra Pradesh - 2024 0 Supreme(AP) 859Ramavath Hanuma @ Hanumanthu VS State of Telangana - 2017 0 Supreme(AP) 534. However, prima facie violations tilt towards shelters.
Key Takeaways:- Ownership and livelihood are paramount.- Statutory discretion exists but is fact-specific.- Exceptions apply for cruelty/transport breaches.- Always seek professional legal counsel.
This evolving area reflects India's cow protection ethos alongside owner rights. Stay informed on judgments for best outcomes.
#SeizedCows #InterimCustody #AnimalLaw
In deciding whether the interim custody of the animal be given to the owner who is facing prosecution, or to the pinjrapole, the following factors will be relevant: (1) the nature and gravity of the offence alleged against the owner; (2) whether it is the first ... Chakram, Moraji Nat and others” (Supra) has held that subject to certain conditions the interim custody of seized animal may be given even to an owner who is facing an ac....
BNS S, 2023 seeking interim release / custody of the seized cattle. ... Keeping the said aspect, it is just and necessary to set aside the order of the trial court and to release the cows and oxen as mentioned in the petition to their interim custody by imposing conditions. Accordingly, I answer point No.1 in the affirmative. ... The cows and oxen are released to the interim custody of the petitioners subject to following conditions....
He therefore prayed to grant interim custody of the seized cattle. 6. ... No. 883 of 2023, in connection with Crime No. 216 of 2023 of Kadapa Taluk Police Station, on the file of II Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kadapa, whereby the petition filed by the revision petitioner under Sections 451 & 457 of Cr.P.C. seeking interim custody of the cattle (seized cows ... It is the case of the petitioner that 73 cows belonging to him were #HL_....
of the petitioner-organization after being seized during trafficking from the accused persons. ... In these facts and allegations against the accused, it was observed that they were prima facie guilty of causing cruelty to the animals and, therefore, interim custody of the animals ought not to be ... No.41 of 2021 in respect of the case of the petitioner in connection with the interim custody of the cattle under the same Act of 1960 and the rules framed th....
In deciding whether the interim custody of the animals is given to the owner who is facing prosecution or to the Pinjirapole following factors will be relevant: (1) The nature and gravity of the offence alleged against the owner. ... 1978 and other provisions of the Act, set aside the order of interim custody of the cattle given to accused person, with observations “that the number of cattle were transported in a vehicle violating the norms and princ....
Consequently, the petitioner is entitled to interim custody of the seized cattle on appropriate conditions. 25. ... custody (supurdnama) of the seized cattle has been rejected. ... During investigation, the cattle were seized and kept in custody. The petitioner claimed ownership of the seized cattle and filed an application before the Trial Court for grant of interim custody under Section 503 of the BNSS. The Tria....
Interim custody of the cattle in question has been ordered to be given to the non-applicant Babukhan. ... ( 2 ) CIRCUMSTANCES giving rise to the revision petition are these. ... It is true that S. 12 of the Act casts the burden on the accused but that does not come in the way of an order for interim custody of the cattle. The non-applicant Babukhan as the owner of the cattle is certainly interested in their being properly maintained. ... and, therefore, the impugned order directing #H....
After hearing both sides, the learned Court of SDJM (S), Barpeta, vide impugned order dated 17.08.2021, rejected the aforesaid petition, as because the seized cattles were given interim custody to the respondent No. 2/Dhyan Foundation. ... It has been held that if the accused(s) are found to be not guilty then the issue of custody of the animals will logically be dealt with in accordance with the concerned Rules or Regulations, but at this stage, the accused(s) are de....
, interim custody of the animals ought not to be handed over to the accused. ... of the animals ought not to be given to the accused until the case ends in his acquittal. ... of the seized cows. ... Till then, status quo with regard to the custody of the seized animals shall be maintained. ... If the accused are finally found to be not guilty, then the issue of custody of the animals wil....
AP 16 U 9114 to slaughter house without having any certificate by Veterinary Doctor or permission for transport and after apprehending the accused, the prosecution has also seized the 42 cows and claves and aggrieved by the same, the owner of the alleged cows and calves filed the application. ... custody of the case property i.e., 42 cows and calves to the respondent No.2. ... As per the proceedings sheet dated 18.10.2010, learned counsel for the revision petitioner has submitted that ....
The impugned Judgment and Orders passed by the learned courts below stands set aside and quashed. The seized cattle shall be given in the interim custody of the petitioner pending trial, on the following terms and conditions that:
Therefore, till the conclusion of prosecution, interim custody of seized Agriculture cattle could only be given to specified institutions. The provision contained in Section 7 of the Act of 2004 therefore, impliedly prohibits interim custody of Agriculture cattle to any person or institution other than those specified in Section 7 of the Act. The Act is applicable in respect of the Agriculture cattle being animal specified under the schedule appended to the Act. The Act contains special provision with regard to interim custody/possession of seized Agriculture catt....
Complaints were given by the people who care for the cattle stating that the cattle have been transported in utter disregard to the provisions of the Act and Transport Rules and that the owner of the cattle having violated the provisions of the Act and Rules, are not entitled to interim custody. The controversy in these cases is as to whether the owners of the cattle from whom the cattle were seized are entitled for interim custody. Undoubtedly, the power to grant of interim custody is discretionary and while the discretion should be exercised on sound principles.
8. Judging from the above yardstick, this Court is of the opinion that accused respondents are not entitled to the interim custody of seized cattle. The orders of the revisional court are, therefore, liable to be set aside. Whereas the orders passed by learned Judicial Magistrate suffer from no infirmity, the orders passed by the revisional court are contrary to the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Mustakeem’s case (supra).
The petitioner/owner of the property has to execute a bond for Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten lakh only) with one surety for a likesum. 2. The 2nd respondent filed an application before the Court below for interim custody of the cattle and after hearing the defacto complainant and accused, the learned Judicial Magistrate has inclined to deliver interim custody of 15 cows along with their calves to the 2nd respondent on the following conditions:
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
