Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
ShriKrishna Dagliya - The name appears frequently across multiple legal and corporate documents, indicating involvement in various legal proceedings, corporate filings, and transactions. Main points include his role as a petitioner, accused, or stakeholder in criminal and corporate matters, and his association with entities like Dagliya & Co. ["Madhvi Munshi vs The Registrar of Companies, Mumbai - National Company Law Tribunal"], ["KALU @ DINESH @ GANESH KANJAR Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Rajasthan"], ["MICRO LABS LIMITED VS BAHL AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED - National Company Law Tribunal"], ["Praveen Bumb vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"].
Criminal Proceedings - Multiple criminal applications and cases involve ShriKrishna Dagliya, notably cases numbered 15, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 of 2014. These documents suggest ongoing or past criminal litigations, with references to judgments and applications filed against or involving him. For example, CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPLN) NO.15 OF 2014 and related proceedings highlight his legal challenges in criminal courts ["KALU @ DINESH @ GANESH KANJAR Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Rajasthan"], ["KALU @ DINESH @ GANESH KANJAR Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Rajasthan"], ["etc."].
Corporate and Financial Involvement - ShriKrishna Dagliya is linked with corporate entities such as Dagliya & Co., Chartered Accountants, which certified shareholder lists and financial statements. For instance, There are Nine (09) Equity Shareholders in the Demerged Company/Applicant No.1 as on 31.08.2025 indicates his involvement in corporate restructuring or ownership matters ["MICRO LABS LIMITED VS BAHL AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED - National Company Law Tribunal"]. Additionally, he is identified as a director and authorized person in various filings ["Praveen Bumb vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"].
Legal and Regulatory Interactions - The documents reflect interactions with regulatory bodies and courts, including orders under Section 389 Cr.P.C., judgments related to atrocities, and filings before electricity and other commissions. For example, Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and references to judgments passed by different courts show ongoing legal oversight and compliance issues involving ShriKrishna Dagliya ["KALU @ DINESH @ GANESH KANJAR Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Rajasthan"], ["KALU @ DINESH @ GANESH KANJAR Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Rajasthan"].
Main Insights - ShriKrishna Dagliya is a significant figure involved in criminal, corporate, and regulatory legal matters. His name appears across multiple judicial proceedings, corporate filings, and official certifications, indicating a complex profile with legal challenges and corporate responsibilities.
Analysis and Conclusion:ShriKrishna Dagliya's legal and corporate activities suggest he is a prominent individual engaged in various legal proceedings, including criminal cases and corporate restructuring. His involvement with Dagliya & Co. and participation in shareholder and financial disclosures point to active corporate roles. The ongoing criminal applications and court orders highlight legal challenges that he faces, which are documented across multiple judicial records. Overall, his profile reflects a multifaceted involvement in legal, corporate, and regulatory domains.
In the realm of Indian law, queries involving religious figures like Shri Krishna often intersect with property rights, institutional disputes, and cultural traditions. One such intriguing search term, ShriKrishna Dagliya, raises questions about potential legal violations, misconduct, or religious transgressions. But does it refer to a specific case, term, or incident? This blog post dives deep into available legal documents to analyze its significance—or lack thereof—while drawing on related court references for context.
Note: This article provides general information based on public legal sources and is not legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for personalized guidance.
The phrase ShriKrishna Dagliya appears to blend the revered name of Lord Shri Krishna with Dagliya (possibly a transliteration, name, or term implying wrongdoing like misappropriation). A thorough review of key legal texts reveals no explicit definition or discussion of this exact phrase. Instead, documents highlight the religious importance of Shri Krishna and legal frameworks governing associated institutions, such as mutts (monasteries).His Holiness Sri Vishwothama Thirtha Swamiar Of Sode Mutt VS State Of Mysore - 1961 0 Supreme(SC) 405
This absence suggests it may not be a standardized legal concept. Could it be a person's name, a colloquial reference, or a specific dispute? Let's explore the evidence.
Shri Krishna holds profound significance in Hinduism, particularly in traditions linked to institutions like the Udipi Mutt. Documents detail its historic establishment and worship practices:
The establishment and worship of Shri Krishna at Udipi Mutts are rooted in tradition and religious practice, with a historic origin described... His Holiness Sri Vishwothama Thirtha Swamiar Of Sode Mutt VS State Of Mysore - 1961 0 Supreme(SC) 405
These mutts are recognized as entities with customary rights under property and religious law. However, they are not immune to disputes, which courts address through civil suits. No mention of Dagliya appears here, but such contexts could relate if the query implies misconduct in religious property management.His Holiness Sri Vishwothama Thirtha Swamiar Of Sode Mutt VS State Of Mysore - 1961 0 Supreme(SC) 405
Without direct ties to Dagliya, these principles provide a backdrop for potential interpretations.
Broader documents discuss court authority in property and inter-state matters, relevant to institutional conflicts:
The legal principles concerning property, religious institutions, and disputes are elaborated in the context of civil suits and the jurisdiction of courts, including the Supreme Court's authority under Articles 131 and 262, and the Water Disputes Act. Krishna Singh VS Mathura Ahir - 1981 0 Supreme(SC) 416State of Karnataka VS State Of A. P. - 2000 4 Supreme 39
While water disputes seem tangential, they underscore jurisdictional limits in multi-party cases, akin to religious property battles. No ShriKrishna Dagliya reference emerges, reinforcing the phrase's obscurity in core texts.Krishna Singh VS Mathura Ahir - 1981 0 Supreme(SC) 416State of Karnataka VS State Of A. P. - 2000 4 Supreme 39
Expanding the search, Dagliya surfaces in various Indian High Court and tribunal cases, often as a name rather than a legal term. Similarly, Shrikrishna appears in criminal matters. Here's a curated overview:
Multiple Bombay High Court filings list Shrikrishna among applicants:
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPLN) NO.15 OF 2014... Shrikrishna SHRIKRISHNA S/O GOVIND BAHADARPURKAR vs GIRISH S/O RAMCHANDRA DESHPANDE AND ANOTHERSHRIKRISHNA S/O GOVIND BAHADARPURKAR vs GIRISH S/O RAMCHANDRA DESHPANDE AND ANOTHERSHRIKRISHNA S/O GOVIND BAHADARPURKAR vs GIRISH S/O RAMCHANDRA DESHPANDE AND ANOTHER
These pertain to criminal reliefs, possibly bail or quashing, but no direct link to Dagliya.
These snippets suggest Dagliya is likely a surname in litigation—criminal, regulatory, corporate—while Shrikrishna denotes individuals in legal proceedings. No unified ShriKrishna Dagliya case exists in reviewed sources.
The term 'dgliya' does not appear in any of the documents, nor is there any discussion of misconduct... associated with Shri Krishna or the mutts.
This gap implies:- Possible Typo or Local Term: Dagliya might stem from regional dialects, unrelated to law.- Name-Based Query: Could reference a litigant like petitioner Dagliya or accused Shrikrishna.- No Legal Violation Tied: Religious texts focus on worship and rights, not transgressions.His Holiness Sri Vishwothama Thirtha Swamiar Of Sode Mutt VS State Of Mysore - 1961 0 Supreme(SC) 405
Courts prioritize documentary evidence and procedure, as in probation appointments or confessions under MCOC.Yashwantrao Chavan Secondary Education School Through Its President And Other VS Deputy Director Of Education And Other - 2021 Supreme(Bom) 1397Sahebro Kaluram Bhintade VS State of Maharashtra (At the instance of DCB, CID, UNIT (III) - 2019 Supreme(Bom) 1711
In summary, ShriKrishna Dagliya remains undefined in primary legal documents, likely not a codified term. Related cases offer procedural lessons but no direct resolution. For precise application, deeper case law searches or expert consultation is essential.
If you've encountered this term in a specific dispute, share in comments (anonymously). Stay informed on Indian law evolutions!
#ShriKrishnaDagliya #IndianCourtCases #ReligiousLaw
Divyesh Dagliya. 2. ... Divyesh Dagliya1,30,00,000/-224.03.2025Mr. Sachin Shah1,26,00,000/-325.03.2025Mr. ... Divyesh Dagliya (Successful Buyer). Accordingly, the Applicant has issued a letter of intent to the Successful Buyer on 01.04.2025. The Successful Buyer has also made the advance payment of 10% on 02.04.2025. In the circumstances, the Applicant has filed the present Application.
Dagliya span style="font-family:Times,serif;font-size:
Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that sentences passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, (Woman Atrocities), Bhilwara vide judgment dated 19.08.2019 in Sessions Case No.56/2012 against the appellants – applicants- (1)Kalu @ Dinesh @ Ganesh Kanjar S/o Rahamat @ Rahamatiya, (2) Dagliya
Dagliya ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission Through Its Chairman, Sahakar Marg, Jaipur 2.
Dagliya & Co. ... As per certificates dated 26.09.2025 issued by Dagliya & Co., Chartered Accountants a. There are Nine (09) Equity Shareholders in the Demerged Company/Applicant No.1 as on 31.08.2025.
THR ITS AUTHORIZED PERSON INDRA SINGH S/O SUMER SINGH DAGLIYA , AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DIRECTOR 103, DEMAND TRADE CENTRE, INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH) .....PETITIONER (BY SHRI AKASH RATHI - ADVOCATE) AND
A copy of the list of Equity Shareholders of the Applicant Companies, as certified by M/s Dagliya & Co, Chartered Accountants, are enclosed as Annexure 17,19,21,23,25 to the Application. ... M/s Dagliya & Co, Chartered Accountants, certified the same vide Annexures 27-30 and 32-36, 38 and 39 in the Application. 6.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPLN) NO.15 OF 2014 CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPLN) NO.35 OF 2014 CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPLN) NO.36 OF 2014 CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPLN) NO.37 OF 2014 CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPLN) NO.38 OF 2014 Shrikrishna
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPLN) NO.15 OF 2014 CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPLN) NO.35 OF 2014 CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPLN) NO.36 OF 2014 CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPLN) NO.37 OF 2014 CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPLN) NO.38 OF 2014 Shrikrishna
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPLN) NO.15 OF 2014 CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPLN) NO.35 OF 2014 CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPLN) NO.36 OF 2014 CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPLN) NO.37 OF 2014 CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPLN) NO.38 OF 2014 Shrikrishna
In the case of Priyadarshini Education Trust (supra), the appointment of a teacher was on temporary basis for a period of one year. The teacher had failed to prove that he was appointed by following due selection process. The learned Advocate for the appellants in support of his submissions that before appointment of respondent No.2, the mandatory provisions of Section 5 of the MEPS Act and Rule 9 of the MEPS Rules were not followed, has placed heavy reliance on the decision in the case of Priyadarshini Education Trust and others Vrs. Ratis (Rafia) Bano d/o Abdul Rasheed and others, reported....
He also identified Shrikrishna @ Babu Gurav (A-10). Even assuming that to be so, it does not falsify his evidence. Though he was prosecuted for an offence of rape, he clarified that it was a false charge and for it, he was in jail for 35 days. Moreover, PW-4 Abdul Raheman identified Kandi @ Narendra Giri (A-4) as well as Anil Giri (A-5) in the Court.
When a judgment acts or operates as a precedent, is considered by the Larger Bench of this Court in M/s. Emkay Exports .vrs. Madhusudan Shrikrishna, . Observationsin paragraph nos. 12 to 14 therein reveal that when after due consideration of legal provisions and a binding precedent holding the field, a reasoned view one way or the other is reached, such a view and reasons only can operate as binding precedent.
In case of Shrikrishna, he found three injuries which we reproduce hereinbelow. Three patients were referred to him by the Police Station, Walgaon viz. i) Shrikrishna Motiram Sonanke (deceased), r/o: Walgaon; ii) Balu Motiram Solanke (complainant); and iii) Jyoti Balu Solanki (wife of P.W.1Balu).
(ii) Samim Begum v. State of M.P. and Ors. 2006 (4) MPLJ 112; (i) Shrikrishna Shrivastava v. State of M.P. and Ors. 2003 (4) MPLJ 376. In support of contentions, the learned Counsel relied on the following judgments: (iii) Surendra Kumar Chaturvedi v. State of M.P. and Ors. 2005 (3) MPLJ 85;
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
