Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
The acts are characterized by violence, use of deadly weapons, chasing, and forcibly removing the father from his residence, indicating a serious breach of peace and security ["Manoranjan Mahato VS State of West Bengal - Calcutta"], ["Md. Abdul Kuddus VS State of Assam - Gauhati"], ["Salim Mian vs State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand"], ["Bamia Ho @ Sayan VS State of Orissa - Orissa"].
Legal provisions and judicial insights:
Analysis and Conclusion:The collected evidence consistently shows that sons have committed acts of violence against their aged fathers, including physical assault, chasing, and forcibly removing them from their homes. The legal framework underscores that a son has no automatic right to reside in a house owned by the father and that such violent acts are unlawful. Courts have recognized the severity of such offenses, emphasizing the protection of elderly persons and condemning familial violence. These incidents highlight the importance of legal safeguards against assault and unlawful eviction within family disputes, reinforcing that violence and forced eviction are criminal acts subject to prosecution ["Manoranjan Mahato VS State of West Bengal - Calcutta"], ["Md. Abdul Kuddus VS State of Assam - Gauhati"], ["Pradeep Kumar VS Raj Kumar - Delhi"], ["JEEVAN RAO vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY - Karnataka"].
In distressing family conflicts, what happens when a son assaults his aged father and chases him out of the house owned by the father? This scenario raises critical questions about legal protections for senior citizens and parents under Indian law. Many elderly individuals face harassment, assault, or eviction from their own properties by children or relatives, leaving them vulnerable. Fortunately, the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (Senior Citizens Act) offers robust remedies. This post explores the key provisions, court interpretations, and practical steps, drawing from judicial precedents. Note: This is general information, not specific legal advice—consult a lawyer for your situation.
The aged father, as a senior citizen or parent owning the house, can invoke Sections 21 and 22 of the Senior Citizens Act to seek protection of his life and property from the assaulting son. Tribunals have jurisdiction to order eviction if necessary for the father's safety and welfare. Assault constitutes harassment, justifying such relief, though eviction is discretionary and prioritizes maintenance where possible. S. VANITHA VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT - 2021 1 Supreme 139
Tribunals can order eviction against the son (or relatives like daughter-in-law) for harassment or unauthorized occupation, without requiring Indian citizenship for parents. **S. VANITHA VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT - 2021 1 Supreme 139Samtola Devi VS State of Uttar Pradesh - 2025 3 Supreme 678
Chapter V (Sections 21-23) of the Senior Citizens Act safeguards life and property. Tribunals or District Magistrates can order eviction for unauthorized occupation or protection. The Tribunal may order eviction if necessary to ensure maintenance and protection. Eviction is an incident of enforcement of the right to maintenance and protection. **S. VANITHA VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT - 2021 1 Supreme 139
In cases where a son harasses or chases parents, tribunals permit conditional stays (e.g., one room, pay maintenance) but order eviction for misbehavior like assault. It is only in the contingency of son not behaving properly or continuing to humiliate or torture the parents that the eviction proceedings would be necessary.Samtola Devi VS State of Uttar Pradesh - 2025 3 Supreme 678 Assault qualifies as torture/harassment, especially from the father's owned house. Courts prefer maintenance or restraints first, avoiding automatic eviction without necessity. Samtola Devi VS State of Uttar Pradesh - 2025 3 Supreme 678
Rules in states like Chandigarh/Punjab allow eviction against any person in unauthorized occupation, not just children. Eviction order can be passed against any person who is in unauthorized occupation of the property of the Senior Citizen/Parent. **Hamina Kang VS District Magistrate (U. T. ), Chandigarh - Crimes (2016)Hamina Kang VS District Magistrate (U. T. ), Chandigarh - 2016 0 Supreme(P&H) 490Hamina Kang VS District Magistrate (U. T. ), Chandigarh - Current Civil Cases (2016)Mamta Sharma VS Additional Deputy Commissioner cum Maintenance Tribunal - 2020 0 Supreme(P&H) 2108
Parents need not be Indian citizens; the definition covers any father/mother. **Hamina Kang VS District Magistrate (U. T. ), Chandigarh - 2016 0 Supreme(P&H) 490Hamina Kang VS District Magistrate (U. T. ), Chandigarh - Crimes (2016)Hamina Kang VS District Magistrate (U. T. ), Chandigarh - Current Civil Cases (2016)
A son has no independent right to occupy the father's self-acquired house. A child... resides in the house with the parents not as a licensee... but only as members of the family.Conrad Dias VS Joseph Dias - 1994 0 Supreme(Bom) 617 Harassment like assault voids permission; parents can seek eviction. If the parents feel humiliated and harassed, it is only in those circumstances that the extreme step... is taken.Mamta Sharma VS Additional Deputy Commissioner cum Maintenance Tribunal - 2020 0 Supreme(P&H) 2108
Limits apply: No eviction from son's separate residence or without imminent threat. **Ravi Shankar VS State of Bihar - Current Civil Cases (2024) Here, the father owns the house, making remedies directly applicable.
The Senior Citizens Act's non-obstante clause (Section 3) prevails over DV Act claims. The father's house isn't a 'shared household' for the son's wife. House which is owned by father-in-law... is not a ‘shared household’ qua her.Hamina Kang VS District Magistrate (U. T. ), Chandigarh - 2016 0 Supreme(P&H) 490Hamina Kang VS District Magistrate (U. T. ), Chandigarh - Crimes (2016) Eviction holds despite DV proceedings if senior protection demands. S. VANITHA VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT - 2021 1 Supreme 139
Beyond civil remedies, assault triggers criminal law. Under the Indian Penal Code (IPC), such acts may attract Sections like 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 324 (hurt by dangerous weapons), or 506 (criminal intimidation), escalating to 302/304 if grievous. Other sources highlight family assaults: In one case, a complainant was chased, assaulted, and sent out of the house, with wrongful confinement alleged. Anil Patil VS State - 2020 Supreme(Kar) 957 Courts granted anticipatory bail but noted bail as rule, requiring prima facie case. Anil Patil VS State - 2020 Supreme(Kar) 957
Eyewitness accounts in assault-chase incidents are crucial, as seen in murder cases where fathers or relatives were chased and assaulted. When she questioned the appellant, she was chased and was assaulted... informed her father.Dago Hunda VS State Of Bihar - 2000 Supreme(Pat) 661Accused chased them and assaulted on their head.Karma Oraon VS State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) - 2018 Supreme(Jhk) 387 Consistent testimonies, medical evidence, and seizures prove guilt. **Karma Oraon VS State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) - 2018 Supreme(Jhk) 387
In family contexts, a son cannot run away when his father is being assaulted—unnatural conduct questions witness reliability. **State of Rajasthan VS Badri Ram - 2015 Supreme(Raj) 1799 These underscore assault's severity, supporting Senior Citizens Act claims with police FIRs for interim protection.
File before the Tribunal/District Magistrate under Sections 4/5 (maintenance) and 21/22 (protection/eviction), alleging assault, harassment, unauthorized occupation. Seek interim orders, police aid. Prove via ownership documents, medical reports/affidavits. Son may stay conditionally (pay maintenance). Appeal to Appellate Tribunal (Section 16). Check local rules.
Empower yourself with knowledge. For personalized guidance, reach out to legal experts or helplines like Elder Line (14567). Stay safe.
#SeniorCitizensAct, #ElderlyProtection, #FamilyLawIndia
His father resisted whereupon appellant nos.1,2 & 3 and one Gunadhar dipped his father into the water. Gunadhar was injured in the pond. He rescued his father and the appellants chased them. They entered the house of Kanai Hembram. The appellants encircled the house of Kanai. ... The appellant no.1 dragged his father from P.W.2’s house. Appellant no.3 assaulted him with arrow. Appellant no.2 assaulted his #HL_START....
His son, who was aged 22 years, used to go to Panchagangavali River every night for fishing. ... She has also stated that her house is by the side of the house of the deceased. ... Later, the four accused again objection with regard to taking a soda bottle from Canara Soft Drinks Factory owned ... He requested the police to find out the cause for the death of his son.
When she questioned the appellant, she was chased and was assaulted with farsa on her left arm and out of fear, she went inside her house and informed her father P.W. 6 who was ill from before. ... When she protested, she was also assaulted by the appellant as a result of which she sustained injuries on her left arm. She has also stated in her evidence that she informed her father about the occurrence and when his father came out from his house, he w....
Again, he states that at first, the accused persons assaulted to his father and due to which, he fell down, then accused persons chased him and due to fear, he returned to his home and bolted door from inside. ... is being assaulted by so many accused persons found remained in their house and after the occurrence, some villagers informed about death of their father then they went to place of occurrence and saw the dead body of deceased from 100 yards away from their house#HL_....
The prosecution allegation is that in an incident that took place on 19.4.91, son of Subed Ali Master was assaulted by the accused persons. Next day, the accused persons armed with deadly weapons came to attack the house of Subed Ali which is situated adjacent to the house of Azizul Haque. ... PW 3 is the teen aged son of the deceased, who was waterish father at the relevant time. He has deposed that on the early hours of the fateful day, the accused persons armed wit....
to the backside of the house they assaulted him. ... Muklesa Begum (PW-2), aged about 12 years on the date of recording of evidence, deposed that deceased Manu Ali was her father. She stated that on the date of the incident, at about 8/9.30 P.M. while her father was returning home, the accused persons chased him. ... She also deposed that after her father was assaulted, he had been taken outside the house and his dead body was left ....
In this context, it is also worthwhile to take note of the opinion expressed by various Benches of this Court relating to the right of possession of a son in the house owned by the father. ... Where the house is self acquired house of the parents, son whether married or unmarried, has no legal right to live in that house and he can live in that house only at the mercy of his parents upto the time the parents allow.....
In order to save his life, his father rushed to the house of their neighbour Balbir Singh but the offenders chased him and managed to catch hold of him in the verandah of that house. ... Moti Nagar was registered on the basis of statement of a minor child aged 13 years who is son of the deceased and an eye witness. ... As per the statement made by the son of the deceased, his two sisters along with his mother reside separately at his maternal grandmother’s h....
In para-22 he had stated that his father was assaulted due to which he fell down. Even then he was assaulted. ... house of Mahagu Singh. ... and brother Laxman Mahto was returning to his house. ... Bhallu Singh, son of Gokhul Singh.
Her husband and son ran towards the field of Dhondhi Chick Baraik to save their life but both the accused persons chased them and assaulted on their head as a result of which both fell down and died. She ran from the well but by that time they had died. ... Hal Nahas, Eta Kharia and Pusha Kharia started making hulla then her husband and son ran from Kusumdon to the field of Dhondhi Chick Baraik. Both accused chased them and assaulted till they fell down and died. She ran towards them a....
Complainant then came to his house, but accused chased him and assaulted and sent out of the house. The complainant called 108 Ambulance and his wife was at the house of accused only and when the complainant went to call his wife, the house was locked and wife was wrongly confined inside the house of the petitioner No.1 for two days. The complainant got admitted himself in the Hospital.
His father tried to flee away, but he was chased by the accused and assaulted by firearm, whereupon he also fell down. He has stated that the accused had no enmity with Sriram.
In course of cross examination, he disclosed that accused is mentally ill and he was treated by a doctor about 10 (ten) months ago. The accused was chased and found ½ away from his house and he brought him and handed over to his father and then to police. He hurried to home and found that accused had already fled.
The conduct of PW.5 of running away from the place of crime is also very unnatural. A son cannot run away when his father is being assaulted.
His father had rushed towards the accused and accused then turned towards his father and assaulted him.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
