Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Status of West Bengal Companies - Several cases involve companies being struck off or restored from the register maintained by the Registrar of Companies, West Bengal, after compliance with legal requirements under Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013. For example, ["ONRISE BARTER PRIVATE LIMITED VS The Registrar o f Companies West Bengal - National Company Law Tribunal"] states that the Registrar struck off the company's name after meeting prescribed conditions and fees, with provisions for restoring the company's name within specified periods.
Land and Property Disputes - Multiple sources discuss land recorded as forest land or jungle during cadastral surveys, with disputes over illegal sales or settlement rights. ["Raghunandan Pandey VS State of Jharkhand through Deputy Commissioner - Jharkhand"] details a case where land, recorded as Gair Mazurua forest land, was allegedly settled illegally in 1947, with the state asserting the sale deed as void and not binding upon it.
Corporate Mergers and Restructuring - Several entries, such as ["JRK FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED VS - National Company Law Tribunal"], describe corporate mergers, demergers, and transfer of companies within jurisdictional limits of Kolkata, including details of registered offices and company identities involved in restructuring processes.
Consumer and Legal Proceedings - Repeated references to cases before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), where parties are directed to appear and pay costs for proceeding with consumer complaints, e.g., ["YAMINI SUDEENDRA & ANR. vs RMZ GALLERIA (INDIA) PVT. LTD. - Consumer National"], which states: The parties are directed to appear before the State Commission, on the date already fixed. ... The said delay is condoned, subject to payment of Rs.25,000/- as cost in each complaint.
Court Orders and Procedural Directions - Several documents, such as ["TAPAN KUMAR HALDER VS INN SHELTER PVT. LTD. - National Company Law Tribunal"], mention orders to send copies to the Registrar of Companies and formalities for issuing certified copies, indicating ongoing procedural compliance in corporate legal matters.
Analysis and Conclusion:The cases collectively highlight the administrative processes involving company registration, deregistration, and restructuring in West Bengal, alongside land disputes involving forest land and illegal settlements. The judicial and tribunal proceedings emphasize procedural compliance, with courts and authorities directing parties to appear, pay costs, and adhere to legal requirements to resolve disputes. These sources reflect active regulatory enforcement and legal oversight in corporate and land matters within West Bengal.
If you've landed here after searching for State of West Bengal v Anchal Singh, you're not alone. This case name often surfaces in queries related to West Bengal's legal landscape, particularly involving state authorities and individuals in administrative or panchayat matters. However, a thorough review of available legal documents reveals a key finding: no judgment, reference, or direct information on State of West Bengal v. Anchal Singh exists in the examined sources. This blog post dives into the analysis, potential confusions, related cases, and actionable recommendations to help you navigate similar legal searches.
The case State of West Bengal v Anchal Singh suggests a dispute potentially pitting the state government against an individual named Anchal Singh. Common themes in West Bengal litigation include land reforms, panchayat administration, civil service status, and electoral disqualifications. Yet, despite extensive searches across 20+ documents, no match emerges for this exact case name, parties, or subject matter.
Key terms like Anchal Singh, Anchal, Singh (in party context), and the full title yielded zero results. This absence raises questions: Is it a misremembered case? A pending matter? Or perhaps a confusion with Anchal Panchayat, an administrative unit under the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1977?
A comprehensive scan of documents confirms the gap. Here's a breakdown:
Documents primarily address:- Land Reforms: Applicability of West Bengal Land Reforms Act in transferred territories from Bihar, mentioning Ganga Dhar Singh & Ors. vs. State of West Bengal, but no Anchal Singh. Pradeep Kumar Maskara VS State of West Bengal - 2014 8 Supreme 427- Panchayat Matters: Multiple cases on secretaries' civil post status, elections, and disqualifications. For instance, State of West Bengal v. Manik Gopal Mondal discusses the secretary of Ahmadpur Anchal Panchayat: the sole respondent Manik Gopal Mondal who is the Secretary of Ahmadpur Anchal Panchayat. State of West Bengal VS Manik Gopal Mondal - 1978 0 Supreme(Cal) 356- Electoral Disqualifications: A railway clerk as Pradhan of Maheshtala Anchal Panchayat, with State involvement but no Singh. Dinanath Mondal VS State of West Bengal - 1977 0 Supreme(Cal) 151- Other topics: Pay parity State Of W. B. VS Hari Narayan Bhowal - 1994 0 Supreme(SC) 344, minority madrasah status Sk. Md. Rafique VS Managing Committee, Contai Rahamania High Madrasah - 2020 1 Supreme 609, sales tax Bhai Jaspal Singh VS Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes - 2010 7 Supreme 684, contempt TARAFATULLAH MANDAL VS S. N. MAITRA - 1951 0 Supreme(Cal) 303, pre-emption rights Madan Mohan Ghosh VS Sishu Bala Atta - 1972 0 Supreme(Cal) 189
Anchal Panchayat appears frequently (e.g., State of West Bengal VS Manik Gopal Mondal - 1978 0 Supreme(Cal) 356, Dinanath Mondal VS State of West Bengal - 1977 0 Supreme(Cal) 151, Birendra Nath Jana VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL - 1977 0 Supreme(Cal) 334), referring to blocks under Section 48 of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1956: Officers and servants of Anchal Panchayat. This may explain search confusion—Anchal denotes geography, not a person. State of West Bengal VS Manik Gopal Mondal - 1978 0 Supreme(Cal) 356
State of West Bengal often litigates panchayat issues, as in appeals by special leave: These appeals by special leave are directed against... State of West Bengal. State of West Bengal VS Manik Gopal Mondal - 1978 0 Supreme(Cal) 356 No timeline or facts link to Anchal Singh. Analogous holdings include state powers over panchayat officers: The Secretary shall be appointed by the State Government. State of West Bengal VS Manik Gopal Mondal - 1978 0 Supreme(Cal) 356
Broader sources reinforce the absence while highlighting West Bengal's legal ecosystem:- Corporate Matters: NCLT cases like Annika Commercial Private Limited (Purulia, West Bengal) involve amalgamations but no Singh. ANNIKA COMMERCIAL PRIVATE LIMITED VS - 2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 936 Similarly, Aerrospace Vanijya Private Limited (Kolkata). GREEN PARK LEAFIN PRIVATE LIMITED VS - 2023 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 1334- Consumer Disputes: NCDRC appeals (e.g., YAMINI SUDEENDRA & ANR. vs RMZ GALLERIA (INDIA) PVT. LTD., RAVISHANKAR KRISHNA vs RMZ GALLERIA (INDIA) PVT. LTD.) direct parties to West Bengal State Commission, imposing costs: The said delay is condoned, subject to payment of Rs.25,000/- as cost. No relevance to the query.- Election and Police: Haryana Police Act references appear unrelated Aditya Beri VS State of Haryana - 2024 Supreme(P&H) 739, but West Bengal election cases discuss paramilitary deployment: The State Election Commission to assess the ground situation. Mousumi Roy VS West Bengal State Election Commission - 2022 Supreme(Cal) 89- Criminal Appeals: IPC Sections 302/304 cases (e.g., Thanedar Singh v. State Devesh Kumar @ Neeraj Dixit VS State of U. P. - 2021 Supreme(All) 1406, Mohindar Pal Jolly v. State AMAR PAL MAURYA VS STATE OF U. P. - 2018 Supreme(All) 576) involve sudden provocation, modifying convictions to 304 Part II, but not West Bengal-specific.- Civil Execution: Partition Act auctions emphasize costs for frivolous objections. KUSUM KUMRIA VS PHARMA VENTURE (INDIA) PVT. LTD. - 2015 Supreme(Del) 4553
Anchal Jain appears in compliance certificates HIRAK VYAPAAR PRIVATE LIMITED VS - 2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 3972, but distinct from Singh.
Without a match, no specific holdings, quotes, or exceptions apply.
Disclaimer: This post provides general insights based on available sources and is not legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for your situation. Laws and interpretations may vary.
#WestBengalLaw,#AnchalSinghCase,#PanchayatCases
It was stated in the report that only after compliance of the requirements to be met under Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013, Registrar of Companies, WestBengal has struck off the name of the petitioner company from the register maintained by the Registrar of Companies, WestBengal. ... Sathish Chandra Aggarwal residing at Roy apartment, 4th Floor, Block-B, P-6, Bangur Avenue, North 24Parganas, WestBengal-700055. ... ……Petitioner Versus The Registrar of Companies, West Bengal, having its office at Nizam Palace, 2nd MSOBuilding, 2ndFl....
Nawal Kishore Pandey, learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. ... The learned Trial Court has also considered that the Anchal Adhikari, Dhanwar sent that case to the Court of L.R.D.C. and, thereafter, L.R. ... That during the last cadestral survey settlement operation, the suit land was recorded as Gair Mazurua forest land of the then landlord Tikait Birendra Narayan Singh, who settled the suit land in favour of Rameshwar Pandey, Triloki Pandey and Lakhan Pandey through Hukumnama executed in the year of 1947 ... It has been pleaded t....
U65100WB2013PTC193511 and its registered office at 2, Jogendra Kaviraj Row, 3rd Floor, Room No -327 Kolkata 700007,WestBengal,within theaforesaid jurisdiction; ………TransferorCompany No.2/ Applicant CompanyNo. 2 p class="sub_para ... U45201WB1998PTC087232 and its registered office at PS Arcadia Central, 4A Camac Street 8th Floor, Room No. 8A Kolkata 700017,WestBengal,within theaforesaid jurisdiction; ………Demerged Company No. 1/ Applicant CompanyNo. 4 ~And~ p ... U51109WB1995PTC075434 and its registered office at PS Arcadia Central, 4A Camac Street 8thFloor, R....
ANNIKA COMMERCIAL PRIVATE LIMITED, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956; and having its registered office at C/o Shyamsundar Malick, Vill - Bandwan, Post Office - Bandwan, Police Station - Bandwan, Purulia, Purulia - 723129, in thestateof WestBengal ... EXOTIC MERCHANDISE PRIVATE LIMITED, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956; and having its registered office at C/o Shyamsundar Malick, Vill - Bandwan, Post Office - Bandwan, Police Station - Bandwan, Purulia, Purulia - 723129, in thestateof WestBengal ... …..Transferor Compa....
Registrar ofCompanies, WestBengal; iii. Official Liquidator, High Court,Calcutta; iv. ConcernedIncome Tax Assessing Officer ; v. Jurisdictional GSTauthorities C. ... Anchal Jain & Co. dated 3rd May, 2023 is annexed withthe Company Application being Annexure-4at Page No. 38-71. 8. The Compliance Certificate by the Chartered Accountant M/s D.
.–267,Kolkata- 700001intheStateof WestBengal . ... Registrarof Companies ,WestBengal ,Kolkata c. Reserve Bank ofIndia d. Official Liquidator; High Court Calcutta e. ... Aerrospace Vanijya Private Limited (CIN:U51909WB2012PTC172701), a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act 1956 and being a company within the meaning of Companies Act, 2013, having its Registered Office at32, Ezra Street, 2nd Floor, Room No. – 267, Kolkata-700001in the State ... Bangbhumi Traders Private Limited (CIN: U51909WB2012PTC172828), a compan....
The parties are directed to appear before the State Commission, on the date already fixed. On that date, subject to payment of cost imposed upon the respondent, the State Commission shall proceed with the consumer complaints. ... -REGENT PARK, KOLKATA-700092WESTBENGAL4. ... -REGENT PARK, KOLKATA-700092WESTBENGAL5. ... B.M.ASSOCITES, 51,SURYA SEN PALLY,HARUDEVPUR, KOLKATA-700092WESTBENGAL6. ... The said delay is condoned, subject to payment of Rs.25,000/- as cost in each complaint, inclusive of the co....
The parties are directed to appear before the State Commission, on the date already fixed. On that date, subject to payment of cost imposed upon the respondent, the State Commission shall proceed with the consumer complaints. ... -REGENT PARK, KOLKATA-700092WESTBENGAL4. ... -REGENT PARK, KOLKATA-700092WESTBENGAL5. ... B.M.ASSOCITES, 51,SURYA SEN PALLY,HARUDEVPUR, KOLKATA-700092WESTBENGAL6. ... The said delay is condoned, subject to payment of Rs.25,000/- as cost in each complaint, inclusive of the co....
The parties are directed to appear before the State Commission, on the date already fixed. On that date, subject to payment of cost imposed upon the respondent, the State Commission shall proceed with the consumer complaints. ... -REGENT PARK, KOLKATA-700092WESTBENGAL4. ... -REGENT PARK, KOLKATA-700092WESTBENGAL5. ... B.M.ASSOCITES, 51,SURYA SEN PALLY,HARUDEVPUR, KOLKATA-700092WESTBENGAL6. ... The said delay is condoned, subject to payment of Rs.25,000/- as cost in each complaint, inclusive of the co....
The parties are directed to appear before the State Commission, on the date already fixed. On that date, subject to payment of cost imposed upon the respondent, the State Commission shall proceed with the consumer complaints. ... -REGENT PARK, KOLKATA-700092WESTBENGAL4. ... -REGENT PARK, KOLKATA-700092WESTBENGAL5. ... B.M.ASSOCITES, 51,SURYA SEN PALLY,HARUDEVPUR, KOLKATA-700092WESTBENGAL6. ... The said delay is condoned, subject to payment of Rs.25,000/- as cost in each complaint, inclusive of the co....
5.1. Counsel for respondent No.2/complainant further submits that in view of the provisions contained under the Haryana Police Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as 2007 Act) and the Punjab Police Rules, 1934 (hereinafter referred to as 1934 Rules) the complaint was addressed to the Commissioner of Police with specific endorsement for Economic Offences Wing (EOW). Complaint was further marked to the officer in charge of EOW. The requirement as contained under Section 154 Cr.P.C. stood validly complied with. Reliance has been placed upon conjoint reading of Section 95, Sections 8 & 9 of 2007 ....
He has also submitted that earlier Division Bench judgment in the matter of Basabi Raichoudhury vs. State of WestBengal & Ors., 2013 SCC OnLine Cal 15463 has no application in the facts of the present case. He has pressed his prayer for appointment of independent observer. In support of his submission to deploy paramilitary forces he has placed reliance upon the orders dated 23.11.2021 in the matter of All India Trinamool Congress & Anr. vs. Manik Das & Ors., CONMT. PET. (C) No. 884/2021 in W.P. (Crl.) No. 455/2021 and the order dated 25.11.2021 passed in All India Trinamoo....
(ii) (2002) 1 SCC 487 Thanedar Singh v. State of M.P. (i) AIR 1958 Allahabad 255 Tahsildar Singh v. State (iii) (2001) 9 SCC 704 Jang Singh and others v. State of Rajasthan
8. Mohindar Pal Jolly v. State of Punjab, 1979 (3) SCC 30 6. State of Punjab v. Jagtar Singh and others, 2011 (14) SCC 678 7. Budhi Singh v. State of Himanchal Pradesh, 2012 (13) SCC 663. 9. Vinit Kumar Chouhan v. State of U.P., 2007 (14) SCC 660
In order to meet the challenge posed by this new creed of litigants, the courts have, from time to time, evolved new rules and it is now well established that a litigant, who attempts to pollute the stream of justice or who touches the pure fountain of justice with tainted hands, is not entitled to any relief, interim or final.” (Ref.: Dalip Singh v. State of U.P., (2010) 2 SCC 114)
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
