Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Development of Bazi and Aarz Reports in MPLRC System - Main points and insights:
Legal Framework and Procedure: The creation of Bazi and Aarz reports is governed by sections of the MPLRC, particularly Sections 248, 250, and 51. These sections outline the procedures for possession, demarcation, and review processes, emphasizing timely action and reasoned orders ["Smt. Sunita vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"], ["Bhagwan Das Mishra vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"], ["Haribhagat Singh (Since Died) Thr. Lrs Kalpana Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"].
Demarcation and Boundary Verification: Demarcation reports, often prepared by Patwaris and Revenue Inspectors, form the basis for Bazi and Aarz reports. Proper demarcation is crucial, and reports must be supported by spot inspection and moka panchnama, especially when boundary disputes or encroachments are involved ["Kalu vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"], ["Smt. Sunita vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"].
Encroachment and Possession Verification: When encroachments are identified, reports should include detailed inspection findings, boundary demarcation, and evidence of possession. Orders under Section 250 are issued for recovery of possession, and reports must be within limitation periods (generally two years) to be valid ["Kalu vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"], ["Bhagwan Das Mishra vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"].
Filling and Uploading Reports: The MPLRC system mandates uploading various reports such as Individual Care Plans, Social Investigation Reports, Rehabilitation Cards, and decision documents related to Children in Conflict with Law and Children in Need of Care. Regular uploading and updating are essential for transparency and accountability ["DALIP SINGH AND ANR vs COMMISSIONER, AMBALA DIV., AMBALA AND ORS - Punjab and Haryana"].
Reporting and Review Mechanisms: The State Commission and authorities are required to submit annual and special reports, which should be uploaded on the official website. The system should also facilitate filling vacancies and ensuring timely review of reports, with instructions issued within specific timeframes (e.g., four weeks for vacancies) ["DALIP SINGH AND ANR vs COMMISSIONER, AMBALA DIV., AMBALA AND ORS - Punjab and Haryana"].
Legal Timelines and Limitations: Reports must be prepared and submitted within prescribed limitation periods—generally 180 days for suo-moto powers and two years for reinstatement applications under Section 250. Delays or failure to act within these periods can invalidate reports or orders ["Bhagwan Das Mishra vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"], ["Haribhagat Singh (Since Died) Thr. Lrs Kalpana Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
Developing Bazi and Aarz reports within the MPLRC system requires strict adherence to procedural provisions, timely preparation, and proper documentation supported by demarcation, inspection, and boundary verification reports ["Kalu vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"].
The system emphasizes transparency through uploading detailed reports and ensuring accountability via regular reporting to the State Legislature ["DALIP SINGH AND ANR vs COMMISSIONER, AMBALA DIV., AMBALA AND ORS - Punjab and Haryana"].
Legal timelines are critical; reports and orders must be within prescribed limitation periods to maintain validity, and authorities need to exercise suo-moto powers within reasonable timeframes to avoid legal challenges ["Bhagwan Das Mishra vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"].
Proper integration of these steps ensures effective land management, dispute resolution, and compliance with statutory requirements under MPLRC.
References:- ["DALIP SINGH AND ANR vs COMMISSIONER, AMBALA DIV., AMBALA AND ORS - Punjab and Haryana"]- ["Kalu vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"]- ["Smt. Sunita vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"]- ["Bhagwan Das Mishra vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"]- ["Haribhagat Singh (Since Died) Thr. Lrs Kalpana Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"]
In the complex world of land revenue administration in Madhya Pradesh, accurate documentation is crucial for establishing property rights, boundaries, and classifications. Landowners, revenue officers, and legal practitioners often grapple with specialized reports like Bazi and Aarz reports under the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 (MPLRC). These reports typically pertain to land classification, boundary demarcation, rights determination, or revenue assessments, though not explicitly defined in core statutes, they align with procedural frameworks for surveys and records. Kanchan Motiani W/o Shri Satish Motiani VS State Of Madhya Pradesh Principal Secretary Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) - 2024 0 Supreme(MP) 564
If you're wondering about the steps to develop Bazi and Aarz reports within MPLRC system, this guide breaks down the process based on established legal principles. Note that this is general information derived from case law and provisions; consult a qualified legal expert for specific advice.
While MPLRC documents do not explicitly define Bazi or Aarz reports, they appear linked to land survey outputs, such as boundary demarcations or revenue settlements. Aarz may relate to Wajib-ul-Aarz or Sharat Wajib-ul-Aarz, historical revenue records classifying land uses like pastures (Gau Charand). DALIP SINGH AND ANR vs COMMISSIONER, AMBALA DIV., AMBALA AND ORS For instance, courts have referenced Sharat Wajib-ul-Aarz to determine land status under the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, with parallels in MPLRC proceedings. DALIP SINGH AND ANR vs COMMISSIONER, AMBALA DIV., AMBALA AND ORS
Bazi likely refers to field-level reports on land parcels or divisions prepared during inquiries. These reports form the backbone of official land records, ensuring transparency in revenue matters. Procedural lapses in their preparation can lead to appeals or revisions. Anubai VS State of M. P. - 2023 0 Supreme(MP) 309
The development of these reports is rooted in MPLRC provisions on demarcation (Section 129), record corrections, and natural justice principles. Revenue Officers like Tahsildars, Sub-Divisional Officers (SDOs), and Collectors oversee the process. Key tenets include:
Courts emphasize procedural adherence. In one case, the Commissioner's reversal of an Additional Collector's order was upheld due to jurisdictional errors in land subdivision appeals under Sections 44 and 129. Devika Choudhary vs Commissioner - 2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 34
Drawing from MPLRC procedures, here is a typical workflow:
An application for land correction, classification, or demarcation triggers the process. The Tahsildar or Patwari initiates an inquiry or survey. Hradesh Kumar VS Mithlesh Kumar - 2021 0 Supreme(MP) 652Kanchan Motiani W/o Shri Satish Motiani VS State Of Madhya Pradesh Principal Secretary Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) - 2024 0 Supreme(MP) 564
Revenue Inspectors or Patwaris conduct field surveys, documenting boundaries, classifications, or rights. This draft report—potentially the Bazi or Aarz— is submitted to the Revenue Officer for review. Kanchan Motiani W/o Shri Satish Motiani VS State Of Madhya Pradesh Principal Secretary Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) - 2024 0 Supreme(MP) 564
Interested parties (landowners, claimants) receive notices. Objections are heard, often under Section 129(4)-(5). The officer considers claims before modifications. Kanchan Motiani W/o Shri Satish Motiani VS State Of Madhya Pradesh Principal Secretary Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) - 2024 0 Supreme(MP) 564Anubai VS State of M. P. - 2023 0 Supreme(MP) 309 Proper notice is mandatory; absence renders reports invalid. Kanchan Motiani W/o Shri Satish Motiani VS State Of Madhya Pradesh Principal Secretary Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) - 2024 0 Supreme(MP) 564
After hearings, the Tahsildar confirms or alters the report, ensuring fairness. This finalized version becomes official. Kanchan Motiani W/o Shri Satish Motiani VS State Of Madhya Pradesh Principal Secretary Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) - 2024 0 Supreme(MP) 564
The report updates revenue registers, forming the basis for rights or assessments. Kanchan Motiani W/o Shri Satish Motiani VS State Of Madhya Pradesh Principal Secretary Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) - 2024 0 Supreme(MP) 564
Aggrieved parties appeal to higher authorities. The Board of Revenue can review suo motu or on application, within reasonable time limits. Premlata @ Sunita VS Naseeb Bee - 2022 4 Supreme 90Tukojirao Puar (Dead) Through LRs Shrimant Gayatri Raje Puar VS Board of Revenue - 2020 0 Supreme(MP) 44Tukojirao Puar (Dead) Through LRs Shrimant Gayatri Raje Puar VS Board of Revenue - 2020 0 Supreme(MP) 59 For example, revisions under Section 51 require notice to parties. Siddharth Dev Singh VS State of M. P. - 2018 Supreme(MP) 834
These cases reinforce that Bazi and Aarz reports must embody procedural integrity to withstand scrutiny.
In conclusion, developing these reports demands strict procedural compliance under MPLRC to safeguard land rights. While this outlines general steps, individual cases vary—always engage professionals for tailored guidance. Stay informed on revenue laws to navigate Madhya Pradesh's land administration effectively.
References:- Premlata @ Sunita VS Naseeb Bee - 2022 4 Supreme 90, Kanchan Motiani W/o Shri Satish Motiani VS State Of Madhya Pradesh Principal Secretary Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) - 2024 0 Supreme(MP) 564, Anubai VS State of M. P. - 2023 0 Supreme(MP) 309, Prakash Kunwar VS Revenue Department - 2025 0 Supreme(MP) 140, Hradesh Kumar VS Mithlesh Kumar - 2021 0 Supreme(MP) 652, DALIP SINGH AND ANR vs COMMISSIONER, AMBALA DIV., AMBALA AND ORS, Jagdish Singh Yadav VS Narendra Singh Yadav - 2016 Supreme(MP) 59, Devika Choudhary vs Commissioner - 2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 34, ABDE ALI VS STATE OF M. P. - 2018 Supreme(MP) 845, Siddharth Dev Singh VS State of M. P. - 2018 Supreme(MP) 834
#MPLRCLandReports #BaziAarz #LandRevenueCode
As per the Sharat Wajib-ul-Aarz, the disputed land was used for “Gau Charand” (pasture) and according to the Sharat Wajib-ul-Aarz ... Not only this, as discussed above, in the Sharat Wajib-ul-Aarz, ... Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, has held that Sharat Wajib-ul-Aarz ... Sharat Wajib-ul-Aarz, and has been span style="font-family
The Tehsildar passed an order under Section 250 of the MPLRC directing the Revenue Inspector and Patwari to take steps for handing over possession to the respondents. Appellants challenged the order passed by the Tehsildar before the Sub Divisional Officer as well as the Additional Commissioner. ... Appellants refused to accept the notice and demarcation was done and moka panchnama and spot inspection reports were prepared wherein appellants were found to be encroachers. Proceedings u/S 250 of the M.P. ... , the proceedings u/S 129 and 25....
under the MPLRC. ... in regard to removal of such encroachment within the period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of such order. ... also disposed of vide order dated 30.7.2014 in Writ Petition No.4272/14, so in such premises, the present applicant was having sufficient opportunity to defend himself in the matter of section 248 of the MPLRC in accordance with the procedure provided under the MPLRC. ... Thereafter, no steps or proceeding was taken against the applicant by the State authoriti....
Additionally, the State Commission has to submit special reports at any time. The State Government is obligated to present the annual and special reports of the State Commission before the State Legislature within one year from the date of receipt of such reports. 22. ... This system should mandate the uploading of Individual Care Plans, Social Investigation Reports, Rehabilitation Cards, and decisions taken thereafter regarding Children in Conflict with the Law and Children in Need of....
As the property in question has come within the Municipal Area and the petitioners cannot cultivate the same, therefore, they want to sell out their share. ... to the present petitioners to sell out their share of the property in question in accordance with law keeping in view the provisions of MPLRC. ... Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, in the interest of justice, this petition stands disposed off with a Signature Not Verified Signed by: MAHENDRA direction to the Collector to take necessary steps in....
SBIN0030528, CIF No.73003108919} within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, and the acknowledgement of the same shall be also filed before the Registry of this Court. ... Such things cannot be ignored and recusal of a Judge cannot be asked on the ground of conflict of interest, it would be the saddest day for the judicial system of this country to ignore such aspects on the unfounded allegations and materials. ... under Section 44(3) of the MPLRC in the first place, which lies only under Section....
Therefore, the condition to apply for continuation of lease, within six months is mandatory in nature as the word 'shall' is used therein. Admittedly, the ancestors of the plaintiffs did not apply within six months from 5.6.1951. ... To claim the allotment as a matter of right by virtue of old lease, he was required to apply to the Government within six months. ... Lands Revenue Code (MPLRC). Later on, the said notice was cancelled and in Case No.2/61/59 another notice dated 23.6.1961 was issued u/s. 181 and 172 of #HL_S....
Tukaram Subbanvar S/o Bazi Subbanvar Aged About 65 Years R/o Irrigation Colony Darra Post Jamnipali District- Korba, Chhattisgarh. 2. ... Joint Director Pension And Lock Lekha Department Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Hemant Kesharwani, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl. ... The said writ petitions have been allowed by this Court vide order dated 30.09.2022 directing the respondents to grant leave encashment and surrender leave to petit....
is within limitation. ... the Tahsildar within two years. ... The petitioners have also raised the issue of limitation as under section 250 of the MPLRC a Tahsildar can reinstate the possession of a Bhumiswami who is improperly dispossessed within 2 years from the date of application. ... Board of Revenue reported in 20013 (3) MPLJ 184 has rightly treated the matter within limitation for the purposes of Section 250(1)(a)(b) of the MPLRC. Merely because the appellants were paying Prope....
State of M.P., reported in 2010 (4) MPLJ 178 in relation to Section 50 of the MPLRC has held that the suo moto powers can be exercised by the revisional authority within a period of 180 days from the date of the knowledge of illegality, impropriety and irregularity of the proceedings committed ... In view of the above, the law has been duly settled that suo moto powers have to be exercised within reasonable time. In the instant case the authorities have failed to exercise suo-moto powers within reasonable t....
1 is directed to take forthwith all required steps to remove shortcomings in the system and to develop a system of accountability of erring officers/employees.
The inhabitants of nearby rooms usually go to sleep during noon time. Again said, I had disclosed some facts to Abida Bazi.
11. Section 51 of the MPLRC provides for review of the order. Proviso (i-a) provides that no order shall be varied or reversed unless notice has been given to the parties interested to appear and be heard in support of such order. As per sub-section (1), the Board and every Revenue Officer may, either on its/his own motion or on the application of any party interested review any order passed by itself/himself.
Develop a system of independent investigation commissions In any event, the Investigation Commission has not given particulars about the nature of the said Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant and its constitution, etc. A system for appointing independent investigation committees, including experts largely from the private sector, must be developed to deal with unresolved issues, including, but not limited to, the decommissioning process of reactors, dealing with spent fuel issues, limiting accident effects and decontamination. "
The Court also noticed steps to be taken in checking the despatch of reports from the FSL and recommended a revamp of the system. A similar order was passed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in CWP No.1868 of 2011 where the High Court was informed by the State of Punjab and Haryana that incinerators for the destruction of such contrabands and drugs shall be provided by March 2012. The Court in that case noticed that 57% of the samples sent for testing were pending examination for four years causing delay in the trial of NDPS cases which was unfortunate to say the least.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
