Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Based on a thorough review of the provided sources, none of the documents contain an article or draft regulation from the Supreme Court regarding the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Supreme Court. The sources primarily deal with other legal topics such as electricity regulations, prison law, property rights, and wildlife protection. Therefore, I cannot provide a link to the requested article from the given materials.
Here is a summary of the key thematic findings within the sources, which may be tangentially related to technology and court proceedings:
Right to Access Court Proceedings via Technology - Several sources discuss the fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a) to access virtual court proceedings. The High Court of Gujarat and the Supreme Court have recognized the use of technology (e.g., Webex, Zoom) to live-stream or relay court hearings. pruthvirajsinh zala vs high court of gujarat - Gujarat Pruthvirajsinh Zala VS High Court of Gujarat - Gujarat The Supreme Court in Swapnil Tripathi noted that use of technology to relay or publicize the live court proceedings can be a way forward. Pruthvirajsinh Zala VS High Court of Gujarat - Gujarat
AI and Regulation of Content - One source mentions a writ petition concerning the immediate requirement to curb the creation and use of such AI deepfakes which immediately penetrate the social fabric. Vikas Vijay Nair vs State Of Gujarat - Gujarat This case discusses the role of intermediaries in removing unlawful content upon receiving actual knowledge, but does not relate to a Supreme Court regulation on AI use within the Court itself. Vikas Vijay Nair vs State Of Gujarat - Gujarat
Regulatory Drafts and Public Consultation - Other sources reference draft regulations (e.g., from 2010 and 2013) that were made available for public comment, but these pertain to electricity transmission and access, not AI in the judiciary. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI VS MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION - Bombay ["
Commission's Order on Open Access (30-01-2004) - Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
"]The provided documents do not contain the requested article on a Supreme Court draft regulation for use of AI in Supreme Court. The closest related content involves the use of technology for virtual hearings and the regulation of AI-generated deepfakes, but no formal draft regulation from the Supreme Court on this specific topic was found in the supplied sources. To locate such an article, you would need to search directly on the official website of the Supreme Court of India or a reputable legal news database.
When legal practitioners and researchers look for information regarding the formal adoption of technology, they often search for specific administrative documents or draft regulations. A common inquiry involves the existence of a Supreme Court draft regulation for the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Finding clear, authoritative answers to such queries is essential for understanding how the judicial landscape is evolving. Based on a comprehensive review of relevant judicial documentation and administrative records, it is necessary to clarify the current status of these frameworks.
It is a common misconception that there is a single, centrally published Draft Regulation on Artificial Intelligence. Upon reviewing extensive materials—ranging from constitutional provisions to specific procedural rules—there is no evidence of a formal draft regulation document currently in the public domain concerning the broad use of AI by the Supreme Court.
The available legal literature and court records focus heavily on procedural standards, jurisdiction, and the right to information, but they do not contain a dedicated regulatory framework for AI Central Public Information Officer, VS Subhash Chandra Agarwal - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 1256 Kantaru Rajeevaru VS Indian Young Lawyers Association Thr. Its General Secretary - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 1260 Supreme Court Bar Association VS State of Uttar Pradesh - 2025 3 Supreme 477. While the Supreme Court regularly deals with administrative rules, such as those concerning Advocates-on-Record or constitutional interpretation, the integration of AI has largely proceeded through committee-led initiatives and specific project pilots rather than a single omnibus regulatory policy Nandini Sharma VS Registrar - 2022 0 Supreme(SC) 1725.
While a draft regulation document may not exist in the traditional sense, the Supreme Court has nonetheless been proactive in implementing AI-driven tools. The absence of a formal regulation does not imply an absence of policy or implementation. In fact, specific projects have been institutionalized through the .
The judiciary’s approach to technology remains highly practical and case-specific. Courts often focus on existing legislative frameworks rather than generating new, isolated AI regulations. For example, digital platforms and intermediaries are already subject to obligations regarding unlawful content. The courts have emphasized that, regardless of how content is generated—whether by AI or traditional means—intermediaries must adhere to strict removal protocols upon notification html>body
This regulatory environment relies on:* Constitutional Protections: The court preserves the balance under of the Constitution of India, even when dealing with modern digital challenges Vikas Vijay Nair vs State Of Gujarat - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 10633.* : Even when technology is utilized, the court mandates adherence to the (). For instance, in matters of proclaimed offenders and public notifications, the court has emphasized the need for compliance with the to ensure is never compromised by digital speed Sunil Tyagi VS Govt of NCT of Delhi - 2021 Supreme(Del) 831.* Accountability: As established in various rulings, is conditional. Compliance involves more than just automated systems; it requires strict and timely takedown obligations when unlawful digital content is identified html>body
In Shaw, on which the District Court relied, the Supreme Court declined to give prisoner-to- prisoner legal assistance any First Amendment protection “above and beyond the protection normally accorded prisoners’ speech.” 532U.S. ... In order to assist the inmate, Wisniewski obtained a draft grievance from another inmate regarding the same topic to use as a template. ... In performing those duties, he obtained a copy of a draft grievance to use in ass....
The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Dhanraj Gobindram’s case (supra) observed that force majeure includes any event over which the performing party has no control. ... As per Regulation 4 and Regulation 2(1)(q) of the CERC (Grant of Connectivity, Long Term Access and Medium Term Open Access in Inter State Transmission and related matters) Regulations, 2009 (“Connectivity Regulations”), PGCIL is also nodal agency for grant of long term access to inter- state ... Hence, the ju....
As per Regulation 4 and Regulation 2(1)(q) of the CERC (Grant of Connectivity, Long Term Access and Medium Term Open Access in Inter State Transmission and related matters) Regulations, 2009 (“Connectivity Regulations 15 Supreme Court in China Cotton Exporters v. Beharilal Ramcharan Cotton Mills Ltd. ... Reliance placed by PGCIL on the judgment of the Supreme Court in China Cotton in this behalf is apt. 21. ... Regulation 8....
The Apex Court has, thus, preserved the constitutional balance under Article 19(1)(a) subject to the permissible restrictions under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. ... Many a times, the response of the intermediaries would be that the URL or link provided in the notice cannot be located despite the fact that the link corresponds to the unlawful content identified by the law enforcement agency. ... Such response often results into a situation where the content remains accessible through th....
The draft Regulations of 2010 and the draft Regulations of 2013 both contained Regulation 4.10. These were made available for public comments and suggestions. All this pre-dated the Supreme Court decision. ... In paragraphs 25 to 27 of this decision, the Supreme Court inter alia said that there is an exception to the open access regime under Section 42(3) for a distribution licensee that is also a local authority. ... As the Supreme....
In Asha Ranjan (Supra), the Supreme Court, though in a different context, laid down a useful guiding principle: when two fundamental rights appear to be in conflict, the Court should not give such overwhelming importance to one that the other is completely lost. ... Further, the Regulation is alleged to transgress the right to environment – a right which is an integral part of Article 21 as held by the Supreme Court in Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar....
In Asha Ranjan (Supra), the Supreme Court, though in a different context, laid down a useful guiding principle: when two fundamental rights appear to be in conflict, the Court should not give such overwhelming importance to one that the other is completely lost. ... Further, the Regulation is alleged to transgress the right to environment – a right which is an integral part of Article 21 as held by the Supreme Court in Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar....
In Asha Ranjan (Supra), the Supreme Court, though in a different context, laid down a useful guiding principle: when two fundamental rights appear to be in conflict, the Court should not give such overwhelming importance to one that the other is completely lost. ... Further, the Regulation is alleged to transgress the right to environment – a right which is an integral part of Article 21 as held by the Supreme Court in Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar....
Learned counsel relied upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in Cellular Operators Association of India vs. ... The interpretation of this provision has been considered in detail in the Supreme Court judgment in COAI (supra) [paragraphs 80-92]. ... He has submitted that in the absence of an individual citizen, a company cannot claim a right under Article 19(1)(g) and has relied on the judgment in Star India Pvt. Ltd. vs. TRAI, (2008) 146 DLT 455 upheld by the order of the Supreme #HL_....
, total transmission capacity of the link, scheduled capacity use (giving customer-wise break-up) and current capacity of the link in use. ... In the draft regulations, based on the duration of use of the transmission system, the open access customers have been divided into two categories; namely, the short- term open access customers and the long-term open access customers. ... BSES has further observed that the proposal contained ....
eDAR National Dashboard - Under the aegis of Artificial Intelligence Committee of Supreme Court, a decision was arrived at to use AI Tool SUPACE (Supreme Court Portal for Assistance in Court Efficiency) in various legal fields like criminal appeals, income tax matters, land acquisition cases, Negotiable Instruments Act complaints, and Motor Accident Claims. Such exercise has already been carried out and tested in at least three projects out of which one is eDAR National Dashboard. The eDAR Dashboard is developed in such a way that it seamlessly exchanges data with CCTNS of ....
The Supreme Court has directed the Delhi High Court model to be implemented all over the country. A Sub Committee was formed by the AI Committee of Supreme Court under Chairmanship of Hon’ble Mr. Justice DN Patel, with HMJ Midha, Retd. Justice K. Kannan as its Member and Sh. Surinder S Rathi as its Convener. 7. In the meanwhile, AI Committee of Supreme Court of India resolved to use Artificial Intelligence in MACT.
As held by the Supreme Court in Naresh Shridhar Mirajkar (supra), the public confidence in the administration of justice is of such great significance that there can be no two opinions on the broad proposition that in discharging their functions as judicial Tribunals, the Courts must generally hear the causes in open and must permit the public admission to the Court room. Live streaming/open access methodology is hereinafter attached: Court Live Streaming/open access methodology High Court of Kerala Publishing Zoom Links and allo....
There was no reference to anybody waiting in the staircase. In the case at hand, there is no evidence to show the chain of circumstances for this Court to use the motive as a missing link. 42. Coming to the case of Isakki Selvam (A9) and Rajkumar (A10), it is the clear case of the eyewitnesses that till the CB-CID took over the investigation, only three persons had entered the office of Gandhi. It should be borne in mind that motive provides the missing link for completing the chain of circumstances.
In Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs. Union of India (2006) 3 SCC 1, the Supreme Court, inter alia, considered as to what would constitute goods in the case of telecommunications contracts, for the purposes of Article 366(29A)(d). The judgment of the Supreme Court notes that all the sub-clauses of Article 366(29A) bring transactions where one or more of the essential ingredients of sale under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 are absent within the ambit of purchase and sale for the purpose of levy of sales tax. Related to this was whether the nature of the transaction involved a composite contract of s....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
