Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Transfer of Right to Use - The transfer of the right to use goods is distinct from the transfer of ownership and does not necessarily involve a transfer of property in goods. Tax under Article 366(29A)(d) applies only when there is a transfer of the right to use goods, which occurs when a contract grants such a right, and the control remains with the transferor. Merely leasing or hiring goods without transferring the right to use does not constitute a taxable transfer of such rights. [["2024 0 Supreme(UK) 372"], ["2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 547"], ["2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 450"], ["2022 0 Supreme(Bom) 1668"], ["2023 0 Supreme(Bom) 1563"], ["2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 2029"]]
Essential Conditions for Transfer of Right to Use - Judicial decisions emphasize that for a transfer of the right to use goods to occur, there must be a legal right vested in the transferee to use the goods, availability of goods for delivery, and the transfer must exclude the transferor’s control during the period. Giving goods on rent or lease without transferring such exclusive rights does not amount to a transfer of the right to use. [["2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 547"], ["2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 2029"]]
Contractual and Legal Framework - The transfer of rights, whether of leasehold land or goods, is subject to specific legal and contractual conditions. For land, permissions and restrictions by government authorities govern transferability, and such transfers may involve fees and conditions. Similarly, in goods, transfer of the right to use depends on contractual terms that confer exclusive control and legal rights on the transferee. [["2023 0 Supreme(Cal) 1498"], ["2023 0 Supreme(UK) 578"]]
Tax Implication - The tax liability under Article 366(29A)(d) is on the transfer of the right to use goods, not merely on the delivery or possession of goods for use. If there is no transfer of such rights, the transaction may be classified as a service or lease, not a transfer of goods, and taxed accordingly. [["2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 450"], ["2022 0 Supreme(Bom) 1668"]]
Legal and Judicial Clarifications - Courts have clarified that giving goods on hire or lease without transferring the right to use does not constitute a transfer of such rights. The emphasis is on the transfer of legal rights and control, not just possession. Also, the transfer of property rights in land or goods involves specific legal procedures and permissions. [["2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 2029"], ["1988 0 Supreme(SC) 337"]]
Analysis and Conclusion:A transfer of the right to use goods occurs only when the transferor grants the transferee a legal right to control and use the goods exclusively, with control remaining with the transferee during the relevant period. Mere leasing or hiring, without such transfer of rights, is not considered a transfer of the right to use under tax laws and judicial rulings. Therefore, transactions lacking the transfer of such rights are not taxable as transfer of goods but may be classified under other categories like leasing or services. Proper contractual and legal conditions are critical to establishing a valid transfer of the right to use goods.
In today's digital economy, businesses frequently license software, intellectual property (IP), or equipment, raising a critical question: What exactly constitutes a 'transfer of the right to use' goods? This issue often arises in contexts like sales tax, VAT, or contractual disputes, where merely signing a document may not suffice. Understanding this distinction is vital for compliance and avoiding unexpected liabilities.
This post breaks down the legal principles, drawing from authoritative rulings and statutes. Note: This is general information based on case law and should not be taken as specific legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for your situation.
The term transfer of the right to use goods—including tangible items, software, or IP—goes beyond executing a contract. Courts emphasize it requires an overt act that places the goods at the transferee's disposal, with the transferor relinquishing control. This creates an exclusive legal right for the transferee during the specified period. Simply signing a document without such transfer does not qualify. 2000 4 Supreme 534
Legal dictionaries and statutes define 'transfer' broadly as encompassing all modes, voluntary or involuntary, absolute or conditional, of disposing of or parting with property or interests therein. 2000 4 Supreme 534 The Supreme Court reinforces that it includes acts by operation of law, but the core is disposal and control shift. 2000 4 Supreme 534
To establish a valid transfer:- Passing of control: The transferee gains domain over the goods for exclusive use.- Overt act of disposal: Delivery, installation, activation, or access provision—making use possible. 2000 4 Supreme 534- Relinquishment by transferor: No retained control during the period. 2022 0 Supreme(SC) 460
Mere execution of a license agreement without these steps fails the test. 2000 4 Supreme 534
Software licensing exemplifies this principle. Granting a license confers a right to use the copyright, but only if accompanied by an overt act like providing access, installation, or activation, plus licensor control relinquishment. Without this, it's not a transfer. 2000 4 Supreme 534
In tax contexts, Article 366(29A)(d) of the Constitution deems such transfers 'sales' subject to VAT/sales tax. The transfer of right is the sine qua non for the right to use any goods, and such transfer takes place when the contract is executed under which the right is vested in the lessee. 2022 7 Supreme 24 However, courts clarify it's not on mere use but the transfer itself. 2022 7 Supreme 24
For anti-virus software on CD, once possession and control pass to the user, it's a deemed sale, exempting service tax on updates if sales tax was paid. User is put in possession and full control of software – It amounts to 'deemed sale' which would not attract service tax. 2022 7 Supreme 24
Courts consistently apply the 'dominant nature test' and control criteria across scenarios:
Vessel Charters: In a tug vessel hire, delivery to the charterer with exclusive use for six months constituted transfer. Effective control for the entire period of six months given to the charterers - Vessel delivered - Use of license and permission at disposal of the charterer and to exclusion of the contractor. Taxable under Karnataka Sales Tax Act. 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 1319
Equipment Supply: Supplying pipes and SKID equipment (valves, meters) for gas distribution was taxable as supply for use without possession transfer. Key: No effective control to recipient; provider retains it. 2020 0 Supreme(SC) 513
Franchise Agreements: Royalty for trademarks in McDonald's or GSK cases was not a transfer. Limited, non-exclusive rights lacked exclusive use transfer. To constitute a transaction for the transfer of the right to use the goods the transaction must have... transfer of the exclusive right to use the goods. 2017 0 Supreme(Del) 1523
Advertisement Sites: Revenue from ad displays required scrutiny: Is there right to use transfer or mere service? Dominant object determines VAT liability. 2016 0 Supreme(Del) 1857
These cases highlight: Goods must be identifiable, consensus on identity, and exclusive right passed. No transfer if provider retains control. 2017 0 Supreme(Del) 1523
Property transfers like settlements or assigned lands show limits: Prohibitions on alienation prevent vesting rights without compliance. E.g., Andhra Pradesh Act bars permanent alienation of assigned lands. 2023 0 Supreme(Telangana) 482
Not every permission qualifies:- Restrictive licenses: Imposing conditions without control pass. 2000 4 Supreme 534- No overt act: Document signing alone. 2000 4 Supreme 534- Retained control: E.g., equipment where provider oversees use. 2020 0 Supreme(SC) 513- Bailment vs. Transfer: Distinguished under Article 366(29A)(d); bailment for hire without right transfer isn't taxable as sale. 2022 7 Supreme 24
A license that only restricts the use or imposes conditions but does not pass control or make the goods available does not amount to a transfer. 2000 4 Supreme 534
To substantiate a transfer:1. Document overt acts: Delivery receipts, access logs, installation proofs.2. Clearly delineate licenses (permission) vs. transfers (control shift).3. For tax: Assess situs (agreement location) and deemed sale triggers. 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 13194. Review contracts holistically—tenders, conditions, agreements together. 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 1319
In software deals, ensure user possession/control to claim deemed sale, avoiding dual taxation. 2022 7 Supreme 24
A transfer of the right to use goods demands more than paper—it's an overt act enabling exclusive use with control relinquishment. Vital for software/IP, this principle impacts tax, contracts, and disputes. Cases affirm: Substance over form prevails.
Key Takeaways:- Require delivery/control shift for validity. 2000 4 Supreme 534- Distinguish from services/licenses. 2017 0 Supreme(Del) 1523- Tax hinges on transfer occurrence. 2022 7 Supreme 24
Stay compliant by evaluating transactions against these tests. For tailored guidance, seek professional legal counsel.
References: Insights drawn from cited documents including 2000 4 Supreme 534, 2022 0 Supreme(SC) 460, 2022 7 Supreme 24, 2020 0 Supreme(SC) 513, 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 1319, 2017 0 Supreme(Del) 1523, 2016 0 Supreme(Del) 1857, 2023 0 Supreme(Telangana) 482.
#TransferOfRights,#RightToUseGoods,#DeemedSaleLaw
of the right to use any goods and if there was a transfer of the right to use the goods, will it amount to a sale in terms of Clause (29A)(d) of Article 366 of the Constitution of India. ... The assesse had only entered into a contract to transfer the goods and there was no transfer of the right to use the vehicle, tankers etc. 18. ......
That apart, it cannot be held that it is a requirement of law that there should be a transfer of the entire right to the exclusion of the transferor for there to be a transfer of the right to use. The transfer of the right to use goods is distinct and separate from the transfer of goods. ... From the judicial decisions, the settled es....
The levy of tax under Article 366(29-A)(d) is not on the use of goods. It is on the transfer of the right to use goods which accrues only on account of the transfer of the right. In other words, the right to use goods arises only on the transfer of such right to use goods. ... The transfer....
by way of hiring, leasing, licensing or any such manner without transfer of right to use and the criteria to determine whether the transaction involves transfer of right to use goods. ... According to petitioner, and as submitted to respondent no.3, the transfer of right to use goods was subject to levy of VAT. ... right#HL_....
It indicates there was no transfer at all, let alone transfer of the right to use. It was a clear case of giving on hire of cranes. ... No clause in the contract in this case can be construed so as to conclude that there was intention to transfer the right to use the cranes in favour of SISL. ... (iii) The specified timing of work do not indicate transfer#HL_....
,(iv) a transfer of the right to use goods for any purpose (whether or not for a specified period) for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration." ... The Assessing Officer found that the respondent-assessee indulged in providing crane services to various customers, inadvertently giving them the right to use and therefore, transferring goods from one person to another i.e. a transfe....
The matter was considered by the appropriate authority of the Government of West Bengal and permission for transfer of the leasehold right and change of land use purpose was granted. ... lease deed as well as other relevant clauses restricting the transfer to order that the Government of West Bengal shall allow the lessee of the land to out-right transfer the leasehold right#HL....
” also be inclusive of creation of a right by virtue of a Will though, it is not a mode of transfer prescribed under clause (5) of the Grant dated 26.12.1985. ... the property and its products (if any) as a person of ordinary prudence would use them if they were his own; but he must not use, or permit another to use, the property for a purpose other than that for which it was leased, or fell 3[or sell] ti....
It extends to every species of valuable right and interest, more particularly, ownership and exclusive right to a thing, the right to dispose of the thing in every legal way, to possess it, to use it, and to exclude everyone else from interfering with it. ... It extends to every species of valuable right and interest, more particularly, ownership and exclusive right to a thing, the #HL_S....
no right or title in such assigned land shall vest in any person acquiring the land by such transfer. ... extent of land that can be assigned, and Sub-rule (3) lays down the procedure to be followed for allotment or assignment of Government lands for use of house-sites or for purposes of agriculture shall mutatis mutandis apply to the allotment or transfer of lands under the Rules. ... Government of A.P., (Writ Petition No....
(f) The levy of tax under Article 366(29A)(d) is not on the use of goods. In other words, the right to use goods arises only on the transfer of such right to use goods. (g) The transfer of right is the sine qua non for the right to use any goods, and such transfer takes place when the contract is executed under which the right is vested in the lessee. It is on the transfer of the right to use goods which accrues only on account of the transfer of the right.
Transfer of the right to use any goods is leviable to sales tax/VAT as deemed sale of goods [Article 366(29A)(d) of the Constitution of India]. Excavators, wheel loaders, dump trucks, crawler carriers, compaction equipment, cranes, etc., offshore construction vessels & barges, geo-technical vessels, tug and barge flotillas, rigs and high value machineries are supplied for use, with no legal right of possession and effective control. Transfer of right to use involves transfer of both ....
There is no dispute as to the vessel and the charterer has a legal right to use the goods, and the permission/licence has been made available to the charterer to the exclusion of the contractor. Thus, there is complete transfer of the right to use. Thus in view of the provisions inserted in Article 366(29-A) (d), section 5C, and definition of ‘sale’ in section 2 of the KST Act, there is no room for doubt that there is a transfer of right to use the vessel. It cannot be said t....
To constitute a transaction for the transfer of the right to use the goods the transaction must have the following attributes: a. There must be goods available for delivery; b. There must be a consensus ad idem as to the identity of the goods; c. For a transaction to constitute a transfer of the right to use goods, there should mandatorily be a transfer of the exclusive right to use the goods being transferred. This was also highlighted in the dominant nature test as laid dow....
a "transfer of the right to use" and not merely a licence to use the goods; (e) Having transferred the right to use the goods during the period for which it is to be transferred, the owner cannot again transfer the same rightstoothers.” There must be goods available for delivery; (b) There must be a consensus ad idem as to the identity of the goods; (c) The transferee should have a legal right to use the goods consequently all legal consequences of such use including any perm....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.