Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Checking relevance for Jogibhai Mangalbhai Tandel VS Mamlatdar And Agricultural Land Tribunal, Pardi...
Checking relevance for Gundaji Satwaji Shinde VS Ramchandra Bhikaji Joshi...
Checking relevance for VINODCHANDRA SAKARLAL KAPADIA VS STATE OF GUJARAT...
Checking relevance for Musamia Imam Haider Bax Razvi VS Rabari Govindbhai Ratnabhai...
Checking relevance for Govindbhai Gordhanbhai Patei VS Gulam Abbas Mull A Allibhai...
Checking relevance for Nanasaheb Vasantrao Jadhav VS State of Maharashtra...
2022 0 Supreme(Bom) 80 : Section 63(1A) of the Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (BTAL Act) was amended by Maharashtra Act No. XXV of 2005, with retrospective effect from 1st July, 2000. The amendment expanded the definition of ''''bona fide industrial use'''' to include ''''the activity of tourism within the areas notified by the State Government as the tourist place or hill station''''.Checking relevance for Arjun Narayan Patil VS Shitalkumar Balchand Jain...
Checking relevance for Lh Of Late Jashvantbhai Abhesingbhai Vasava VS Jesingbhai Abhesingbhai Vasava...
Checking relevance for State Of Gujarat VS Rekha Subhash Sagar...
Checking relevance for STATE OF GUJARAT VS REKHA SUBHASH SAGAR...
Checking relevance for STATE OF GUJARAT VS LEGAL HEIR OF THAKORBHAI DAHYABHAI MODI...
Checking relevance for Trimurti Sahakari Griha Nirman Sanstha Limited VS Additional Commissioner Pune Division , Pune...
Checking relevance for Sarifabibi Mohmed Ibrahim VS Commissioner Of Income Tax, Gujarat...
Checking relevance for Jagad Bandhu Chatterjee VS Nilima Rani...
Checking relevance for Patel Narshi Thakershi VS Pradyumansinghji Arjunsinghji...
Checking relevance for Forward Construction Company: Municipal Corporation Of Greater Bombay: Prabhat Mandal VS Prabhat Mandal (Regd. ) , Andheri: Prabhat Mandal: Municipal Corporation Of Greater Bombay...
Checking relevance for Kashibai W/o Lachiram VS Parwatibai W/o Lachiram...
Checking relevance for MAVJIBHAI DHARSIBHAI VS STATE...
Checking relevance for Shobhechi Daru Utpadan Kharedi Vikri Sangh VS State of Maharashtra and another...
1997 0 Supreme(Bom) 320 : Section 63(1A) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 provides that where any condition subject to which permission to transfer was granted is contravened, then the land in respect of which such permission was granted shall be liable to be forfeited in accordance with the provisions of section 84-CC of the Act.Checking relevance for GUNVANTLAL RATANCHAND SINCE DECEASED THRO HEIRS VS RAMESHBHAI PURSHOTTAMDAS PATEL...
2015 0 Supreme(Guj) 405 : Section 63(1A) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holding) Act, 1961 provides that where any condition subject to which permission to transfer was granted is contravened, then the land in respect of which such permission was granted shall be liable to be forfeited in accordance with the provisions of section 84CC.Checking relevance for ABDUL KARIM PIRSAHEB SHEIKES VS LAXMAN BAPU BHOSALE...
Checking relevance for Nilesh VS State Of Maharashtra, Through Secretary Revenue Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai...
Checking relevance for Hafizabi w/o Kasam Patel VS Sitaram Khushal Patil...
Checking relevance for Bombay Environmental Action Group & another VS State of Maharashtra and others...
1998 0 Supreme(Bom) 222 : Section 63-1A of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (as amended in 1994) permits the transfer of agricultural land to a non-agriculturist for bona fide industrial use without the need for permission from the Collector. This provision overrides the general restriction in Section 63, which otherwise prohibits valid sale of land to non-agriculturists. Since tourism is recognized as an industry, lands purchased for tourism development fall within the scope of ''''bona fide industrial use'''' under Section 63-1A.