Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Legal enforceability of valuation reports - Valuation reports are generally considered non-binding unless explicitly made so by contractual or statutory provisions. For instance, in Bank Negara Malaysia v. Mohd Ismail (1978), if a valuation does not adhere to the terms of the contract or consent order, it is deemed non-binding ( DATO DENNIS GANENDRA vs DATO ROSALINE GANENDRA & ANOR (ENCLS 8 & 10) - 2021 MarsdenLR 428 DATO DENNIS GANENDRA vs DATO ROSALINE GANENDRA & ANOR (ENCLS 8 & 10) - 2021 MarsdenLR 428
Reliance on valuation reports by banks - Banks often rely on valuation reports to disburse loans and proceed with enforcement actions. In Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad v. Islam Malaysia Berhad (1994), the bank's entitlement to claim the full loan amount was based on the valuation of charged properties ( PROLINK MARKETING SDN BHD vs AMBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD - 2021 MarsdenLR 3574
Standards and procedural compliance - Valuations are expected to follow Malaysian Valuation Standards issued by the Board of Valuers, Appraisers and Estate Agents Malaysia, and other recognized standards ( BANK ISLAM MALAYSIA BERHAD vs MOHD NASIR SAAT & ORS - 2024 MarsdenLR 1441 BANK ISLAM MALAYSIA BERHAD vs MOHD NASIR SAAT & ORS - 2024 MarsdenLR 1441
Valuation reports in auction and sale processes - When properties are auctioned, valuation reports are used to determine reserve prices. Nonetheless, if the valuation is obtained improperly or not in accordance with rules, such as combining valuations of different asset types, courts have set aside sales (2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 1208, BANK ISLAM MALAYSIA BERHAD vs MOHD NASIR SAAT & ORS - 2024 MarsdenLR 1441
Use of valuation reports prepared for different entities - There are instances where valuation reports prepared for one bank or entity are improperly used for another, leading to questions about their validity. For example, reliance on reports not prepared by the current valuer or not visiting the property can undermine their binding effect ( CIMB ISLAMIC BANK BERHAD vs KHAIRUDDIN ABU HASSAN - 2021 MarsdenLR 3371 CIMB Islamic Bank Bhd vs Khairuddin bin Abu Hassan - 2025 MarsdenLR 6435
Impact of misrepresentation or fraud allegations - Claims of fraud, misrepresentation, or conspiracy related to valuation reports can affect their binding nature. In cases where allegations of misrepresentation are proven, valuation reports may lose their binding or evidentiary value, as seen in the Shah Alam High Court case ( PROLINK MARKETING SDN BHD vs AMBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD - 2021 MarsdenLR 3574
In Malaysia, valuation reports for charged properties are generally not inherently binding unless explicitly stipulated by contractual agreement or statutory provisions. Their primary function is to inform and guide banks and courts in decision-making, such as loan disbursement and enforcement actions. However, for a valuation report to be considered binding, it must adhere strictly to professional standards, procedural rules, and be free from misrepresentation or procedural irregularities. Deviations from these requirements can render the valuation non-binding or invalid, especially when challenged in court. Therefore, the binding effect of a valuation report in Malaysia is conditional, relying heavily on compliance with legal, procedural, and professional standards.
When a property charged to a bank in Malaysia goes up for sale—often through auction—buyers, sellers, and creditors alike wonder: How binding is a valuation report? This question arises frequently in scenarios, where properties secured by loans are sold to recover debts. A valuation report from a Government Approved Valuer plays a pivotal role, but its influence isn't absolute. This article explores the legal landscape, drawing from key rules and court decisions to clarify its weight in determining reserve prices and sale validity.
In Malaysia, particularly for properties charged to banks, a valuation report is generally considered a significant and authoritative document. It guides courts and secured creditors in setting a reasonable for sales. However, it is not strictly binding—courts retain discretion to scrutinize and adjust based on evidence. Under , the authorized officer must obtain a valuation from an Approved Valuer before fixing the , in consultation with the ().
This requirement ensures fairness and transparency, but as courts emphasize, the report is an opinion, not an unchallengeable fact. Valuations can vary by purpose (e.g., loan security vs. auction) and market conditions, making judicial oversight crucial.
Valuation reports are mandatory for charged property sales. Rule 8(5) mandates: the authorized officer should obtain valuation thereof from an Approved Valuer and thereafter fix its in consultation with the (). This underscores the need for independent, professional input to reflect market value.
Courts prioritize reports from reputable, approved valuers. In cases of negligence, such as , liability can arise. For instance, in
, a valuer's breach of duty under Malaysian led to overvaluing a property at RM2.2 million (actual RM900,000), causing bank losses. The court held: The Defendants, as estate valuers, breached their ... resulting in (Paras 19-91). This highlights the report's reliance factor in financing and sales.
Reports typically hold weight for up to one year. In 2018 0 Supreme(AP) 143, a valuation over 11 months old raised concerns: courts may deem it unreliable due to market shifts, preferring recent assessments unless justified by policy.
Courts don't rubber-stamp valuations. They scrutinize methodology, comparables, and relevance. In 2008 5 Supreme 109, the court stated it is the duty of the Court to accept the highest bid... but must ensure that the sale fetches an adequate price, with the valuation report disclosed to all interested parties (Paras 26-28). The report is a must for deciding a reasonable price, but verifiable for fairness.
Similarly, sales without proper valuation or disclosure are . In 2000 4 Supreme 426, flawed procedures invalidated proceedings, reinforcing transparency.
Even purpose-specific reports influence outcomes. In , a financial reporting valuation had limited direct impact on market price as it wasn't for sale, yet informed decisions if recent and reputable (the purpose of the value of the Property and the Valuation Report was for financial reporting purposes and not for the purposes of sale).
Multiple reports? Courts favor the latest, most relevant one. In 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 2481, a bank's higher valuation prevailed over a petitioner's lower one, noting: The Bank had option before it to accept the valuation given by the petitioner or to reject it or to accept the counter valuation. Valuation isn't an exact science, but must be materially reasoned.
Flawed reports invite challenges. Overvalued properties in loan contexts, as in
, expose valuers to . Courts set aside sales if prices are grossly undervalued or processes opaque, prioritizing integrity.
).
In auctions, inadequate prices risk nullification, as seen in related proceedings where low offers without scrutiny were overturned.
To avoid pitfalls:- Secure valuations from independent Approved Valuers.- Ensure recency and purpose alignment.- Disclose reports pre-sale for transparency.- In divergences, prioritize professional, latest reports.
Banks should heed negligence risks, as overreliance on poor valuations leads to losses and suits (
).
A valuation report in Malaysia is highly persuasive but not binding per se. It ensures fair reserve prices in bank-charged property sales, subject to court discretion. Proper procedures—independent valuers, recency, disclosure—uphold validity. While this provides general insights, consult a qualified lawyer for specific advice, as outcomes depend on facts.
Key Takeaways:- Mandatory under Rule 8(5) ().- Scrutinized for fairness (2008 5 Supreme 109).- Non-binding but critical (2018 0 Supreme(AP) 143).- Negligence actionable (
).
Stay informed on Malaysian property law to navigate sales confidently.
#MalaysiaPropertyLaw, #ValuationReport, #BankForeclosure
The Plaintiff had earlier commenced an action against the Detendant and the Defendant's valuer in Shah Alam High Court Suit No: BA- 22NCvC-182-06/2020 based on allegations of fraud, conspiracy and misrepresentation of the valuation report of the charged properties. ... [59] The Plaintiff's action at the Shah Alam High Court in Suit No: BA-22NCvC-182-06/2020 which was based on allegations of fraud, conspiracy and misrepres....
Neither the Bank nor the Auction Purchaser has placed the valuation report before this Court to properly address the objections of the Borrower regarding the combined sale notice for movable and immovable properties. ... Therefore, we hold that the action of the 1st respondent Bank in selling the movable items and the immovable items after obtaining the valuation #HL_ST....
In reliance of the Defendants' Valuation Report, the Plaintiff had disbursed a financing to the Borrowers with the Property charged as an overvalued Property. ... The properties of PW4's chosen comparables in terms of size, locality, tenure and transaction date were obviously consistent with the Property. ... If the verbal indicative is lower and formal valuation report....
The cases of Malayan Banking Berhad v Zainal Abidin bin Abdullah and Anor Co-operative Central Bank Ltd v Meng Kuang Properties Bhd Bank Pertanian Malaysia v Blue Valley Plantation Bhd & Ors United Overseas Bank (Malaysia) Bhd v Sri Ram ... default was given in pursuance of the conclusive evidence clause it was binding according to its terms, the cl....
The properties which the Defendants used as comparisons in the Court 's view was appropriate and proper in terms of the type of property as well as location. In the Court 's view the Defendants have not breached any rules as to valuation. ... [18] The Court does see any logic in this reply as the Defendants managed to prepare the valuation report in a period of 2 months as the valuation#HL_....
As stated by Mohd Azmi SCJ in Bank Negara Malaysia v. Mohd Ismail , [1978] 1 Lloyds Re p 175 had determined, if the valuation had not been made in accordance with the express terms of the contract (or in this appeal, the consent order) then it is clearly not binding. ... Negara Malaysia v. ... [64] In the present appeal, Ernst & Young had clearly departed in a material respect from th....
The valuation report of one R.Nagarajan, dated 23/05/2014 obtained by the Bank and relied by the prosecution as document Nos: 383 to 388 for the very same properties is higher than the valuation given by the petitioner. ... The Bank had option before it to accept the valuation given by the petitioner or to reject it or to accept the counter valuation #....
8.3 It is submitted that the Bank obtained the valuation report for the secured asset from the approved valuer and produced it before the Debts Recovery Tribunal. The said valuation report was not challenged by the petitioners. ... The petitioners had availed credit facilities to the tune of Rs.53 crores from the first respondent Bank for the construction of a five-star resort. The said....
She was therefore wrong to conclude that the Appellant's valuation report was CIMB Bank Berhad's report and not the Appellant's report. ... [46] The Appellant's witness, DW 6 did not visit the comparable properties used in the valuation report. He had only assumed the comparable properties had the same amenities as the Property for a....
But, in terms of business prudence and efficient management of resources, the instruction for the valuation report can come from the appellant or CIMB Bank Bhd, both being in the same banking group. And the valuation report is for the purpose of auctioning the property and nothing else. ... [46]The appellant’s witness, DW6 did not visit the comparable properties used i....
First defendant is the absolute owner of the properties. It is denied that the first defendant purchased properties at Trichy and constructed a bungalow using the amounts collected by selling the properties at Malaysia. Trichy property belongs to the first defendant and his wife jointly and was purchased out of their own funds.
PW16 and PW17 valuers nowhere stated that the properties were over valued. Recording outstanding due settlement and the compromise, the DRT-III, Chennai passed order dated 21.05.2015 discharged the mortgage of properties. Further, the properties have been properly valued and the valuation report Exs.
The valuer found the built up area to be 1,807.7 square feet and the super built up area to be 2,258 square feet. On behalf of the bank it is contended that, a valuation report was obtained in respect of the property concerned. Since, the bank was not in actual possession of the property when it put the property up for sale, the question of the petitioners taking any inspection of the property does not arise. The valuer found the built up area to be 1,807.7 square feet and th....
Therefore, the valuation in the report submitted in that behalf was accepted and the properties were sold. This Court held that if there was any material irregularities in the conduct of sale and if it causes sufficient injury to the judgment debtor the same could be set aside, where the court mechanically conducts the sale not bothering to see that the offer is too low and the better price could have obtained. If in fact the price is substantially inadequate there is both ma....
The valuation as has been assessed in the years 1971 to 1973 ranged between nine to eleven lacs. In the event, houses would have been auctioned by making them as separate unit, it might be possible that much more amount could have been obtained. On record there appears to be valuation report in respect to the property, given by valuation officer, Income Tax Department which speaks about much higher valuation of properties. Commissioner, Income Tax in the letter dated 22.10.19....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
