G. CHANDRASEKHARAN
RM. Meenal – Appellant
Versus
RM. Sethu – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This is a suit for partition, accounts and costs.
2. The plaintiff is one of the coparceners of the joint family, consisting of her father late P.L.Ramanathan @ P.L.Meenakshi Sundaram and her brother R.M.Sethu. Defendants 2 and 3 are the plaintiff’s mother and sister. The joint Hindu family of late P.L.Ramanathan @ P.L.Meenakshi Sundaram possessed several immovable properties at Chennai, Madurai and Kumbakonam, apart from the properties owned in Malaysia. The properties were purchased during the lifetime of plaintiff’s grandfather late Palaniappa Chettiar out of the joint family nucleus in the name of various members of joint Hindu Family of grandfather late Palaniappa Chettiar. Some of the properties of larger joint Hindu family of grandfather late Palaniappa Chettiar were divided and distributed to the joint Hindu family of his sons including joint Hindu family of P.L.Ramanathan @ P.L.Meenakshi Sundaram and few other properties still retain their character as properties of joint Hindu family of grandfather late Palaniappa Chettiar. Thus, all the assets and properties
Achuthan Nair v. Chinnamu Amma [(1966) 1 SCR 454 : AIR 1966 SC 411
Appasaheb Peerappa Chamdgade Vs. Devendra peerappa chamdgade and others
Bhagwant P. Sulakhe v. Digambar Gopal Sulakhe
C.N. Arunachala Mudaliar v. C.A. Muruganatha Mudaliar
Govindbhai Chhotabhai Patel v. Patel Ramanbhai Mathurbhai
Mithilesh kumari and another Vs.Prem behari khare
Rohit Chauhan Vs. Surinder singh and others
Rukhmabai v. Lala Laxminarayan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.