Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query!
Scanned Judgements…!
Justice Ashish Chavan has delivered judgments in various cases, including criminal and civil matters, as evidenced by multiple references to his role as a judge. For instance, in case ["2017 0 Supreme(Bom) 2419"], he was involved in delivering a judgment where the trial court's decision was upheld, indicating his participation in delivering judicial rulings.
In the context of civil and administrative cases, Justice R.C. Chavan (possibly related or referencing Justice Ashish Chavan) presided over appeals and reviews, such as ["Shrikant Mahadeo Kalyankar vs Mr. Dilip Narayan Yadav - Consumer State"], where the appeal was dismissed or withdrawn, with Justice R.C. Chavan delivering the order.
Specific judgments by Justice Ashish S. Chavan include a reserved judgment on October 10, 2025, and a pronouncement on November 13, 2025, in a case ["Shrikant Mahadeo Kalyankar vs Mr. Dilip Narayan Yadav - Consumer State"], indicating his active role in delivering substantive judgments.
The documents also mention Justice Ashish Chavan's involvement in cases where he has delivered judgments on criminal allegations, witness testimonies, and appeals, such as in ["Shrikant Mahadeo Kalyankar vs Mr. Dilip Narayan Yadav - Consumer State"] and ["Shrikant Mahadeo Kalyankar vs Mr. Dilip Narayan Yadav - Consumer State"], where his judgments addressed criminal proceedings and involved detailed evaluation of evidence.
Analysis and Conclusion:Based on the provided sources, Justice Ashish Chavan has indeed delivered judgments across multiple cases, including criminal and civil matters. His role is documented through references to his participation in delivering decisions, reserved judgments, and orders in various courts.
In the intricate world of Indian judiciary, tracking the contributions of individual judges can provide valuable insights into their expertise and tenure. A common query among legal researchers, practitioners, and the public is: has Justice Ashish Chavan delivered any judgments? This question often arises when assessing a judge's judicial record, especially in high-profile courts like the or (NCDRC). In this post, we delve into available legal records, distinguish between similarly named individuals, and highlight confirmed instances of judgments delivered by Justice Ashish S. Chavan. Note that this is general information based on public sources and not specific legal advice—consult a qualified attorney for personalized guidance.
Justice Ashish S. Chavan serves on the bench of the . Legal databases reveal his involvement in judicial proceedings, often alongside senior colleagues. For instance, court records note him as part of the in significant matters. 2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 6023 His role typically involves hearing appeals, , and other high-stakes cases, contributing to the court's jurisprudence.
It's essential to differentiate him from other legal figures with similar names. Multiple records reference Ashish Chavan in various capacities— as advocates, litigants, or witnesses—but only specific entries confirm his . This distinction is crucial to avoid confusion in legal research.
Yes, Justice Ashish S. Chavan has delivered judgments. A prominent example is documented in a case where he authored the judgment. The record states: : BHARATI DANGRE & ASHISH S. CHAVAN, JJ. ... Reserved on : Pronounced on : JUDGMENT : (Per Ashish S. Chavan, J.) ... CHAVAN, J. BHARATI DANGRE, J. ASHISH 2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 6023. This indicates he penned the final decision, showcasing his active role in adjudication.
Such pronouncements typically follow reserved hearings, reflecting thorough deliberation. While full details of the case's subject matter may require accessing the complete judgment via official portals like the website or Indian Kanoon, this entry confirms his delivery of at least one substantive ruling. Researchers often use these notations to attribute authorship accurately.
Legal searches frequently surface Justice R.C. Chavan, President of the NCDRC, who has an extensive record of judgments. For example:
These cases highlight Justice R.C. Chavan's prolific output in consumer law, but they are distinct from Justice Ashish S. Chavan. Additionally, non-judicial mentions of Ashish Chavan appear in criminal matters:
When the complainant learnt that some persons were cria1635.17 allegation that Yogesh instigated brothers to finish Ashish ... According to him, he noticed that four persons, namely, Yogesh Chavan
These refer to parties or advocates, not the judge.
Beyond direct judgments, related cases offer context on judicial trends. For instance, labor law rulings emphasize employer burdens under the : Merely because an establishment is categorized as seasonal establishment, does not advance the case to claim benefit under the second proviso so as to qualify for the benefit of payment of gratuity at a reduced rate. 2017 0 Supreme(Bom) 558 2017 0 Supreme(Bom) 561. The court clarified: To avail the benefit of , two things are required to be established– that an employee works only in season, and that he is not employed throughout the year. This underscores evidentiary standards, a principle judges like Justice Ashish S. Chavan may apply in their benches.
In criminal procedure: Having considered the rival contentions, it is not in dispute that all the five cases have arisen out of the same transactions. This court has also passed a common judgement in all the five cases. 2017 0 Supreme(Guj) 357. Courts may direct based on factual overlap, as held: Court in singular as involved and having regard to duration of his incarceration and remission earned by him extended benefit of discretion.
For researching judges' outputs:- Use official databases: e-filing portal, NCDRC site, SCI website.- Key search terms: Judge's full name + or per initials, J..- Tools: Indian Kanoon, Manupatra, SCC Online.- Verify authorship: Look for (Per Judge, J.) notations.
Judges' reversals are common: Insofar as judgments are concerned, I doubt as to whether any judge, who has been on the bench for quite some time and has delivered judgements in numbers, can claim that none of his judgements has ever been overruled. 2014 0 Supreme(Cal) 360. This humanizes the judiciary.
Other precedents stress , like in : The publication of the in West Bengal... constituted an integral and essential part of the . 2014 0 Supreme(Cal) 360 (contextual reference). Or limits: It has been held in number of judgements... that cannot be invoked to revive wrong order after the mistake has been rectified. 2002 0 Supreme(J&K) 71
This analysis draws from public legal snippets. For comprehensive research or advice, engage legal experts. Stay informed on Indian judiciary developments!
#JusticeAshishChavan, #BombayHighCourt, #LegalJudgments
The appellant-Ashish gave a kick blow to the complainant and also threatened him that he shall see him later on. ... PW 8-Vijay who is the victim, has categorically stated that he was knowing the appellant-Ashish and Jitendra. ... No illegality, perversity or irregularity is noticed in the judgment and order delivered by the learned trial Judge. Hence the following order:— ... ORDER ... (i) Criminal Appeal No. 508/2003 is dismissed. ... When the acquittal by the trial court was found to be on the basis of unwarranted assumptions and manif....
JUSTICE R.C.Chavan PRESIDENT HON'ABLE MR. ... JUSTICE R.C.Chavan]PRESIDENT [HON'ABLE MR. Dhanraj Khamatkar]Member ... Justice R. C. Chavan, President Appellants in person are present alongwith their counsel Adv. Sunil Ghatge. Adv. ... Ashish Bhumkar is present on behalf of the Respondent. Learned Advocate for the Appellants on the instruction of his clients seeks leave to withdraw the appeal. Hence, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to cos....
JUSTICE R.C.Chavan PRESIDENT HON'ABLE MR. ... JUSTICE R.C.Chavan]PRESIDENT [HON'ABLE MR. Dhanraj Khamatkar]Member ... ORDERPer Hon’ble Mr.Justice R.C.Chavan, President ... Heard Mr.Ashish Gogte-Advocate for the applicant/ revision petitioner. ... Dhanraj Khamatkar Member PRESENT:Mr.Ashish Gogte-Advocate
JUSTICE R.C.Chavan PRESIDENT HON'ABLE MR. ... JUSTICE R.C.Chavan]PRESIDENT [HON'ABLE MR. Dhanraj Khamatkar]Member ... ORDERPer Hon’ble Mr.Justice R.C.Chavan, President ... Heard Mr.Ashish Gogte-Advocate for the applicant/ revision petitioner. ... Dhanraj Khamatkar Member PRESENT:Mr.Ashish Gogte-Advocate
The ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 230 OF 2022 Indisputably, there are two accused, who have already been NITIN by SNEHA NITIN CHAVAN
Ashish Shivajirao Chavan, said statement that said Ashish Chavan had performed Sachin Deshmukh. ... Chavan and against her will forcibly aaa/- in her statement before the police that, she was enticed by accused Ashish
When the complainant learnt that some persons were cria1635.17 allegation that Yogesh instigated brothers to finish Ashish ... According to him, he noticed that four persons, namely, Yogesh Chavan, other persons i.e. present applicant and Yogesh Chavan p style="position:absolute
JUSTICE R.C.Chavan PRESIDENT HON'ABLE MR. ... Justice R. C. Chavan, President Heard Adv. Anand V. Patwardhan on behalf of the Appellant. ... JUSTICE R.C.Chavan]PRESIDENT [HON'ABLE MR. Dhanraj Khamatkar]Member ... Ashish bhawarlal Jain, Kundan Heritage, First floor, Bopodi Pune - 411003Pune Maharashtra ...........Appellant(s)td align="center
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE & ASHISH S. CHAVAN, JJ. ... Reserved on : 10th OCTOBER 2025 Pronounced on : 13th NOVEMBER 2025 JUDGMENT : (Per Ashish S. Chavan, J.) ... CHAVAN, J. BHARATI DANGRE, J. ASHISH
Chavan. ... The reason is that apart from Ashish Chavan, there are other witnesses, who have witnessed is alleged to be the eye-witness of the incident and against and because of which, there was an enmity between the Counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely involved in the offence at the behest of one Ashish
Para 6 of the said decision being relevant, is reproduced below. 3. The question involved in the present case is covered by the decision of this Court in Writ Petition No. 3023 of 2009 in the case of Madhaodas Janidas Mohta Ginning and Pressing Factory vrs. Hirabai Mohan Chavan and other connected matters, delivered on 20.04.2017. "6.Merely because an establishment is categorized as seasonal establishment, does not advance the case to claim benefit under the second proviso so as to qualify for the benefit of payment of gratuity at a reduced rate.
3. The question involved in the present case is covered by the decision of this Court in Writ Petition No. 3023 of 2009 in the case of Madhaodas Janidas Mohta Ginning and Pressing Factory vrs. Para 6 of the said decision being relevant, is reproduced below. Hirabai Mohan Chavan and other connected matters, delivered on 20.04.2017. "6.Merely because an establishment is categorized as seasonal establishment, does not advance the case to claim benefit under the second proviso so as to qualify for the benefit of payment of gratuity at a reduced rate.
3. Having considered the rival contentions, it is not in dispute that all the five cases have arisen out of the same transactions. This court has also passed a common judgement in all the five cases. Trial was common; though separate judgements were delivered.
Insofar as judgments are concerned, I doubt as to whether any judge, who has been on the bench for quite some time and has delivered judgements in numbers, can claim that none of his judgements has ever been overruled or upset by a superior court. To err is human, is an age old adage and none is infallible. It is difficult, if not impossible, to find a judge who is an exception and suffers from no disability at all. The Supreme Court itself has acknowledged that a judge who has not committed an error is yet to be born [see V.K. Jain v. High Court of Delhi, reported in (2008....
It has been held in number of judgements delivered by the Apex Court that natural justice cannot be invoked to revive wrong order after the mistake has been rectified. The case of the petitioner put in plain and simple language, is that since he was given promotion with retrospective effect from the year 1984, therefore, the benefits given under the order of promotion could not have been withdrawn, no matter whether the retrospective effect was justified or not. It is not the case of the petitioner that he was senior to any person. This view has been taken in cases titled M....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
