Has Justice Ashish Chavan Delivered Any Judgments? A Detailed Analysis

In the intricate world of Indian judiciary, tracking the contributions of individual judges can provide valuable insights into their expertise and tenure. A common query among legal researchers, practitioners, and the public is: has Justice Ashish Chavan delivered any judgments? This question often arises when assessing a judge's judicial record, especially in high-profile courts like the Bombay High Court or National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC). In this post, we delve into available legal records, distinguish between similarly named individuals, and highlight confirmed instances of judgments delivered by Justice Ashish S. Chavan. Note that this is general information based on public sources and not specific legal advice—consult a qualified attorney for personalized guidance.

Who is Justice Ashish S. Chavan?

Justice Ashish S. Chavan serves on the bench of the Bombay High Court. Legal databases reveal his involvement in judicial proceedings, often alongside senior colleagues. For instance, court records note him as part of the coram in significant matters. 2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 6023 His role typically involves hearing appeals, writ petitions, and other high-stakes cases, contributing to the court's jurisprudence.

It's essential to differentiate him from other legal figures with similar names. Multiple records reference Ashish Chavan in various capacities— as advocates, litigants, or witnesses—but only specific entries confirm his judicial authorship. This distinction is crucial to avoid confusion in legal research.

Confirmed Judgments Delivered by Justice Ashish S. Chavan

Yes, Justice Ashish S. Chavan has delivered judgments. A prominent example is documented in a Bombay High Court case where he authored the judgment. The record states: CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE & ASHISH S. CHAVAN, JJ. ... Reserved on : 10th OCTOBER 2025 Pronounced on : 13th NOVEMBER 2025 JUDGMENT : (Per Ashish S. Chavan, J.) ... CHAVAN, J. BHARATI DANGRE, J. ASHISH 2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 6023. This indicates he penned the final decision, showcasing his active role in adjudication.

Such pronouncements typically follow reserved hearings, reflecting thorough deliberation. While full details of the case's subject matter may require accessing the complete judgment via official portals like the Bombay High Court website or Indian Kanoon, this entry confirms his delivery of at least one substantive ruling. Researchers often use these coram notations to attribute authorship accurately.

Distinguishing Justice R.C. Chavan and Other Records

Legal searches frequently surface Justice R.C. Chavan, President of the NCDRC, who has an extensive record of judgments. For example:

• In consumer disputes: JUSTICE R.C.Chavan PRESIDENT HON'ABLE MR. ... JUSTICE R.C.Chavan]PRESIDENT HON'ABLE MR. Dhanraj KhamatkarMember ... Justice R. C. Chavan, President Appellants in person are present alongwith their counsel Adv. Sunil Ghatge.

  Shrikant Mahadeo Kalyankar vs Mr. Dilip Narayan Yadav

• Revision petitions: ORDER Per Hon’ble Mr.Justice R.C.Chavan, President ... Heard Mr.Ashish Gogte-Advocate for the applicant/ revision petitioner.

  ICICI Bank Ltd vs Mr. Rajendra Singh Kathayat

  ICICI Bank Ltd vs Vijay Ranka

• First appeals: JUSTICE R.C.Chavan PRESIDENT HON'ABLE MR. ... Justice R. C. Chavan, President Heard Adv. Anand V. Patwardhan on behalf of the Appellant.

  M/s Kundan Nahar Associates vs Smt Sulbha G Kainth

These cases highlight Justice R.C. Chavan's prolific output in consumer law, but they are distinct from Justice Ashish S. Chavan. Additionally, non-judicial mentions of Ashish Chavan appear in criminal matters:

• Anticipatory bail: The ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 230 OF 2022 Indisputably, there are two accused, who have already been NITIN by SNEHA NITIN CHAVAN 2022 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 4332
• Other proceedings: Ashish Shivajirao Chavan, said statement that said Ashish Chavan had performed Sachin Deshmukh.

  ASHISH SHIVAJIRAO CHAVAN vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

  When the complainant learnt that some persons were cria1635.17 allegation that Yogesh instigated brothers to finish Ashish ... According to him, he noticed that four persons, namely, Yogesh Chavan

  SUNIL @ SONU TIPPER S/O. MURLIDHAR MAGAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

• Chavan. ... The reason is that apart from Ashish Chavan, there are other witnesses

  GANESH S/O RAMCHANDRA WADTE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. P.S.O. DARWHA, YAVATMAL

These refer to parties or advocates, not the judge.

Broader Legal Contexts and Research Tips

Beyond direct judgments, related cases offer context on judicial trends. For instance, labor law rulings emphasize employer burdens under the Payment of Gratuity Act: Merely because an establishment is categorized as seasonal establishment, does not advance the case to claim benefit under the second proviso so as to qualify for the benefit of payment of gratuity at a reduced rate. 2017 0 Supreme(Bom) 558 2017 0 Supreme(Bom) 561. The court clarified: To avail the benefit of second proviso below subsection (2), two things are required to be established– that an employee works only in season, and that he is not employed throughout the year. This underscores evidentiary standards, a principle judges like Justice Ashish S. Chavan may apply in their benches.

In criminal procedure: Having considered the rival contentions, it is not in dispute that all the five cases have arisen out of the same transactions. This court has also passed a common judgement in all the five cases. 2017 0 Supreme(Guj) 357. Courts may direct concurrent sentences based on factual overlap, as held: Court in singular as involved and having regard to duration of his incarceration and remission earned by him extended benefit of discretion.

For researching judges' outputs:- Use official databases: Bombay High Court e-filing portal, NCDRC site, SCI website.- Key search terms: Judge's full name + coram or per initials, J..- Tools: Indian Kanoon, Manupatra, SCC Online.- Verify authorship: Look for (Per Judge, J.) notations.

Judges' reversals are common: Insofar as judgments are concerned, I doubt as to whether any judge, who has been on the bench for quite some time and has delivered judgements in numbers, can claim that none of his judgements has ever been overruled. 2014 0 Supreme(Cal) 360. This humanizes the judiciary.

Other precedents stress procedural fairness, like in writ jurisdictions: The publication of the public notice in West Bengal... constituted an integral and essential part of the cause of action. 2014 0 Supreme(Cal) 360 (contextual reference). Or natural justice limits: It has been held in number of judgements... that natural justice cannot be invoked to revive wrong order after the mistake has been rectified. 2002 0 Supreme(J&K) 71

Key Takeaways

• Yes, Justice Ashish S. Chavan has delivered judgments, notably as author in Bombay High Court cases 2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 6023.
• Distinguish from Justice R.C. Chavan's NCDRC rulings and non-judicial Ashish Chavans.
• Judicial records evolve; regular database checks are advised.
• Understanding judges' outputs aids in anticipating case outcomes.

This analysis draws from public legal snippets. For comprehensive research or advice, engage legal experts. Stay informed on Indian judiciary developments!