Unraveling Biodata in Cases: The Case of Software Engineers
In today's digital age, searches like Ravindranadh Bollapu Software Engineer Visakhapatnam Biodata are common, often stemming from curiosity about professionals involved in legal proceedings. Court records frequently include personal details such as occupation, residence, and employment—collectively known as biodata—in family law matters. However, as noted in responses to such queries, no specific legal provision directly governs individual biodata summaries without context. Instead, these details emerge in cases involving , , and jurisdictional challenges, particularly for IT professionals like software engineers commuting between Visakhapatnam, Bangalore, and other cities.
This post delves into how biodata surfaces in Indian family courts, drawing from real cases in Visakhapatnam and . Important disclaimer: This is general information based on public judgments and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.
Why Biodata Matters in Family Law Filings
Family court petitions under the , 1955, require detailed personal information to establish and facts. specifies where petitions can be filed: where the marriage was solemnized, parties last resided together, petitioner or respondent resides, or other conditions. 2018 0 Supreme(AP) 420
For instance:- Petitioner's residence: Courts verify current addresses, often listing house numbers, occupations, and employers.- Occupation details: Software engineers' jobs in Bangalore or Hyderabad are highlighted due to travel hardships for court appearances.- Spousal details: Ages, employments, and residences are standard to assess convenience and welfare.
In one case, the respondent/husband, a software engineer in Bangalore, faced difficulties attending for a petition.
The wife cited challenges traveling from Tadepalligudem to Visakhapatnam, underscoring logistical issues for working professionals.
Challenges for Software Engineers in Visakhapatnam
IT hubs like Bangalore draw engineers from Visakhapatnam, complicating family disputes. Courts scrutinize if filing locations cause harassment.
Key ruling: Every petition under the Act shall be presented to the within the local limits of whose ordinary original civil the marriage was solemnized, or the respondent... resides, or the parties... last resided together. 2018 0 Supreme(AP) 420
- Respondent and petitioner last resided in Visakhapatnam, validating the filing there despite parties' current distant residences (e.g., Hyderabad). No harassment found. 2018 0 Supreme(AP) 420
- Wife sought transfer from Visakhapatnam to Kandukuru, claiming indigent status and 600+ km travel burden. Court left video conferencing open post-settlement attempts. 2018 0 Supreme(AP) 420
Another example: Petitioner (Manager HR in ) vs. respondent (software engineer at Bangalore, working from home in Nellore). 2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 17121
These cases reveal biodata like Software Engineer at Bangalore directly impacts and arguments. 2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 17121
and Professional Biodata
Child custody prioritizes welfare, factoring in parents' jobs and stability. Software engineers' demanding roles often feature prominently.
The welfare and interest of the minor child is the primary consideration in granting . 2014 0 Supreme(Kar) 266
Facts:- Petitioner (MBA graduate, Bangalore with parents).- Respondent (employed software engineer). 2014 0 Supreme(Kar) 266
Court continued , granted , considering employment, child's age (18 months), and case stage. Each matter turns on facts like living arrangements. 2014 0 Supreme(Kar) 266
Similar biodata in other filings:- Sunkavalli Srikanth (43, OC, Software Engineer, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad). Wife Swathi (35, Software Engineer). Case before . 2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 5100- B.Umamaheswari (23, Software Engineer Chennai). 2016 0 Supreme(Mad) 2728
Beyond Family Law: Compensation and Other Contexts
Biodata also appears in accident claims. In , wasn't mechanically tied to percentage. 2023 0 Supreme(AP) 13
The of a claimant... should be computed on the basis of loss of , and not on the basis of . 2023 0 Supreme(AP) 13
Steps for tribunals:1. Ascertain activities claimant can/cannot do post-disability.2. Review pre-accident avocation, age, profession.3. Determine if totally disabled, partially functional, or adaptable. 2023 0 Supreme(AP) 13
Appellant (lorry cleaner) got Rs.11,00,000 (up from Rs.5,30,000) at 100% functional loss. 2023 0 Supreme(AP) 13
Internationally, software engineers' biodata in /custody: Worked at California, later . Family court custody stayed by . 2009 0 Supreme(SC) 1430
Privacy and Accessing Court Biodata
Public judgments disclose biodata for transparency, but privacy laws evolve. Searches for names like Ravindranadh Bollapu yield case snippets, not full profiles. No standalone biodata provision exists; details serve evidentiary purposes.
Tips for researchers:- Use court websites or legal databases for judgments.- Respect privacy; full records may require formal access.- For professionals, cases highlight relocation/ risks in matrimonial disputes.
Key Takeaways
- under : Tied to residence, last cohabitation—frequent in Visakhapatnam for local ties despite IT jobs elsewhere. 2018 0 Supreme(AP) 420
- Custody focus: Child welfare over parental convenience; jobs like software engineering assessed for stability. 2014 0 Supreme(Kar) 266
- Compensation nuance: Functional loss > disability percentage. 2023 0 Supreme(AP) 13
- Biodata role: Essential for context, but queries need specific provisions for summaries.
Software engineers in Visakhapatnam face unique legal hurdles due to mobility. If facing similar issues, seek expert advice promptly. Stay informed, but remember: courts decide on individual merits.
Word count: approx. 950. Sources are public judgments; verify latest developments.
#FamilyLawIndia, #VisakhapatnamCourt, #SoftwareEngineerLegal
