Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Arbitration and Conciliation Act provisions are also considered, but generally, disputes under the Co-operative Societies Act are to be settled via statutory bodies, not consumer forums or civil courts ["Secretary, E. & NF Railway Junior Co-operative Credit Society Limited, Eastern Railway VS Jyotish Chandra Sarkar - Calcutta"], ["MEMBER SECRETARY AND PROJECT DIRECTOR vs THE W.B STATE COOPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION LTD. AND ORS - Calcutta"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
References:- ["Secretary, E. & NF Railway Junior Co-operative Credit Society Limited, Eastern Railway VS Jyotish Chandra Sarkar - Calcutta"]- ["AMALENDU SARKAR VS NABADWIP CO-OPERATIVE BRICKS & POTTARY SOCIETY LTD. - Consumer"]- ["Vikram Constructions VS Anustup Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. - Calcutta"]- ["Md. Nazir Hossain vs Branch Manager, UCO Bank - Consumer State"]- ["MEMBER SECRETARY AND PROJECT DIRECTOR vs THE W.B STATE COOPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION LTD. AND ORS - Calcutta"]- ["Dilip Kumar Dutta VS Chief Executive Officer, West Bengal State Consumers’ Co-operative Federation Ltd. - Calcutta"]- ["Md. Nazir Hossain vs Branch Manager, UCO Bank - Consumer State"]- ["Bhagirath Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. VS Nahalchand Laloochand Pvt. Ltd. - Consumer"]- ["Balageria Central Co-operative Bank Limited VS Star Sea Food - Calcutta"]- ["MRINAL KANTI PAL VS PUTUL SAHA - Consumer"]- ["Biswanath Ghosh VS Hijal Kanya Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. - Calcutta"]
In the realm of consumer rights and cooperative housing in West Bengal, a common question arises: any case against co operative society is barred before consumer commission under provisions of west bengal co operative society act? This issue frequently surfaces for members facing disputes over management, elections, membership, or services provided by their cooperative society. Understanding the jurisdictional boundaries is crucial to avoid wasted time and resources in the wrong forum.
This blog post delves into the provisions of the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act (primarily the 1983 and updated 2006 versions), relevant case laws, exceptions for consumer forums, and practical recommendations. While this provides general insights, it is not legal advice—consult a qualified lawyer for your specific situation.
The West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act establishes a specialized mechanism for resolving disputes within cooperative societies. Under the 1983 Act, Section 90 explicitly bars the jurisdiction of civil courts and other authorities, including consumer forums, for disputes concerning the affairs of a cooperative society. These must be referred to the Registrar of Cooperative SocietiesSau. Varsha Ravindra Isai VS Sow. Rajashri Rajkumar Chaudhari - 2010 0 Supreme(Bom) 1761.
The 2006 Act, Section 102, reinforces this by mandating that any dispute concerning the management or business or affairs of a Co-operative society be resolved through the Registrar Sujit Biswas VS State of West Bengal - 2024 Supreme(Cal) 1313Md. Nazir Hossain vs Branch Manager, UCO Bank. For instance, Section 102(1) states: Any dispute concerning the management or business or affairs of a Co-operative society as and when such election is conducted by the Co- The Manager, Alipurduar West Bengal State Co-operative Bank Ltd. vs Sri Kajal Dey. This provision ousts parallel forums to ensure uniformity in handling internal matters.
Civil courts are similarly barred, as seen in cases where suits were rejected under Order 7 Rule 11, directing parties to the Registrar Tamralipta Co-operative Spinning Mills Ltd. vs Smt. Seetadevi Jagdishprasad Chandak - 2018 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 2Amit Chowdhury VS Anamika Chowdhury - 2018 Supreme(Cal) 83.
Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, empowers consumer forums to handle complaints about deficient services or unfair trade practices. However, this does not override the specific bar under the WB Co-operative Societies Act for society affairs M. D. , Orissa Coop. Housing Corpn. Ltd. VS K. S. Sudarshan - 2009 0 Supreme(SC) 1875.
Courts have consistently held that disputes on management, constitution, elections, membership, or internal governance cannot be entertained by consumer commissions. They must go to the Registrar Sau. Varsha Ravindra Isai VS Sow. Rajashri Rajkumar Chaudhari - 2010 0 Supreme(Bom) 1761Secretary, Thirumurugan Co-operative Agricultural Credit Society VS M. Lalitha (Dead) through Lrs. - 2004 1 Supreme 326Supriya Basu VS W. B. Housing Board - 2005 5 Supreme 371. In one ruling: disputes regarding the management and internal affairs of a cooperative society are barred from civil courts and consumer forums and must be referred to the Registrar Sau. Varsha Ravindra Isai VS Sow. Rajashri Rajkumar Chaudhari - 2010 0 Supreme(Bom) 1761.
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) has dismissed complaints citing Section 102 of the 2006 Act, noting the District Forum lacked jurisdiction Md. Nazir Hossain vs Branch Manager, UCO BankDistrict Central Co-Opt. Bank Ltd. vs Sanjib Sarkar. Similarly, writ petitions for management disputes are not maintainable due to statutory remedies under Sections 29 and 102 Sujit Biswas VS State of West Bengal - 2024 Supreme(Cal) 1313.
Several judgments clarify the scope:
Bar on Internal Affairs: A court emphasized that membership rights, transfers, or governance issues fall under Section 90 (1983 Act) or 102 (2006 Act), barring consumer forums Supriya Basu VS W. B. Housing Board - 2005 5 Supreme 371Amit Chowdhury VS Anamika Chowdhury - 2018 Supreme(Cal) 83. In a membership dispute based on a lease, the civil court lacked jurisdiction, remitting it to the Registrar Amit Chowdhury VS Anamika Chowdhury - 2018 Supreme(Cal) 83.
Management Disputes: Challenges to manager employment or salary payments were dismissed from writ jurisdiction, upholding alternative remedies under the 2006 Act Sujit Biswas VS State of West Bengal - 2024 Supreme(Cal) 1313.
Expulsion and Financial Obligations: Expulsion for non-payment followed proper hearings under Rule 133, with courts stressing compliance with society rules S. K Jalaluddin VS State of West Bengal - 2018 Supreme(Cal) 68.
These cases underscore: when a statutory mechanism exists, courts and forums defer to the Registrar Sujit Biswas VS State of West Bengal - 2024 Supreme(Cal) 1313.
Not all disputes are barred. Consumer forums retain jurisdiction for claims involving deficiency in service or matters outside internal management, such as:
Failure to provide services to members or third parties, like issuance of notices or delivery of goods Secretary, Thirumurugan Co-operative Agricultural Credit Society VS M. Lalitha (Dead) through Lrs. - 2004 1 Supreme 326M. D. , Orissa Coop. Housing Corpn. Ltd. VS K. S. Sudarshan - 2009 0 Supreme(SC) 1875.
Claims for damages from services rendered, sale of flats, possession, or property rights not purely internal Secretary, Thirumurugan Co-operative Agricultural Credit Society VS M. Lalitha (Dead) through Lrs. - 2004 1 Supreme 32600100037495KAMAWATI VS DIGBIJAI SINGH - 1921 0 Supreme(SC) 52.
The Supreme Court has noted: complaints alleging deficiency in service by a cooperative society, especially to members or third parties, can be maintainable unless purely about internal issues Secretary, Thirumurugan Co-operative Agricultural Credit Society VS M. Lalitha (Dead) through Lrs. - 2004 1 Supreme 326. For example, contractual claims related to flat sales may proceed in consumer forums KAMAWATI VS DIGBIJAI SINGH - 1921 0 Supreme(SC) 52.
However, even here, if the dispute touches on statutory functions or membership, it may be redirected The Manager, Alipurduar West Bengal State Co-operative Bank Ltd. vs Sri Kajal Dey. Foreign nationals inheriting society flats via will can claim membership, subject to formalities, without jurisdictional bars under Section 92(3) of the 2006 Act AUDREY CHRISTINNE BHATTACHARYYA VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL - 2016 Supreme(Cal) 711.
To navigate this:
Analyze the Dispute Nature: Is it internal (e.g., elections, membership transfer, mismanagement)? Refer to Registrar Sau. Varsha Ravindra Isai VS Sow. Rajashri Rajkumar Chaudhari - 2010 0 Supreme(Bom) 1761. Service deficiency (e.g., poor maintenance, undelivered services)? Consider consumer forum Secretary, Thirumurugan Co-operative Agricultural Credit Society VS M. Lalitha (Dead) through Lrs. - 2004 1 Supreme 326.
Exhaust Statutory Remedies: Approach the Registrar first for society affairs to avoid dismissal Sujit Biswas VS State of West Bengal - 2024 Supreme(Cal) 1313Tamralipta Co-operative Spinning Mills Ltd. vs Smt. Seetadevi Jagdishprasad Chandak - 2018 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 2.
Timelines Matter: Consumer complaints have limitation periods; society disputes follow Act timelines District Central Co-Opt. Bank Ltd. vs Sanjib Sarkar.
Seek Specialist Advice: Cooperative laws are nuanced—engage lawyers familiar with WB regulations.
Generally, cases against West Bengal co-operative societies involving internal management, elections, or membership are barred before consumer commissions under Sections 90 (1983 Act) or 102 (2006 Act), mandating referral to the Registrar Sau. Varsha Ravindra Isai VS Sow. Rajashri Rajkumar Chaudhari - 2010 0 Supreme(Bom) 1761M. D. , Orissa Coop. Housing Corpn. Ltd. VS K. S. Sudarshan - 2009 0 Supreme(SC) 1875. Exceptions apply for pure deficiency in service claims outside internal affairs Secretary, Thirumurugan Co-operative Agricultural Credit Society VS M. Lalitha (Dead) through Lrs. - 2004 1 Supreme 326.
Key Takeaways:- Internal disputes → Registrar.- Service deficiencies → Potentially consumer forums.- Always check the dispute's core nature.
This framework promotes efficient resolution while protecting cooperative autonomy. For tailored guidance, consult legal experts. Stay informed on evolving case laws to safeguard your rights in WB's cooperative sector.
References include select judgments like Sau. Varsha Ravindra Isai VS Sow. Rajashri Rajkumar Chaudhari - 2010 0 Supreme(Bom) 1761, Secretary, Thirumurugan Co-operative Agricultural Credit Society VS M. Lalitha (Dead) through Lrs. - 2004 1 Supreme 326, M. D. , Orissa Coop. Housing Corpn. Ltd. VS K. S. Sudarshan - 2009 0 Supreme(SC) 1875, Sujit Biswas VS State of West Bengal - 2024 Supreme(Cal) 1313, and others cited inline.
#WBCoopLaw, #ConsumerForumBar, #CoopDisputes
Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order passed by the District Forum the present petitioner preferred an appeal before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, West Bengal being S.C. Case No. FA/ 451 of 2012. ... Thus, in view of the specific embargo created under the Special Act, the District Consumer Forum was not competent to pass any order and as such District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum and the State Consumer#HL_....
The case laws as discussed above clearly establish that despite the provisions contained in Section 95 and Section 134 of the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, the jurisdiction of the District Forum or State Commission created under the C.P. ... We find from the impugned order that the Forum relied upon Section 95 of the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 wherein it has been enjoin....
Bengal Cooperative Society Act. ... The respondent is a housing society registered under the West Bengal Housing Society Cooperative Act and purchased the land from the West Bengal Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation for setting up the housing society with an intent to provide the residential units to each of its members. ... As a matter of fact, the provision contained in Section 95 of....
Section 102 of the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 2006, reads as follows:- “102. ... as specified in Section 102 of the West Bengal Cooperative Societies Act, 2006. ... Bhattacharya then referred to Section 29(8) of the 2006 Act, which reads as follows:- “29(8) If the board of directors, constituted under [sub-section] [Substituted by section 8(c) of the West Bengal Co-operative Societies....
District Forum holding inter alia that it lacked due jurisdiction to adjudicate the subject dispute in view of the provisions laid down under the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 2006. Both sides were heard through their respective Ld. ... Before embarking on analyzing the legality of the impugned order, let me first append below the detail provision as laid down u/s 102 of the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 20....
Short case of the Revisionist is that the complaint case was not maintainable in view of the provision laid down u/s 102 of the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the 2006 Act’); yet, the Ld. ... “According to Sec. 102(1) of the Act: Any dispute concerning the management or business or affairs of a Co-operative society as and when such election is conducted by the Co-#....
In this suit, the applicants appeared and filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure claiming that the suit was barred by the provisions of West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 2006 . It was pleaded that under Section 102 (1)(d) of the present Act of 2006, relied upon in the instant case. Section 134(2) of the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act#HL_E....
District Forum erred in law in allowing the Petition of Complaint ignoring the provisions of Clause (d) of Sub section 1 of Section 102 read with Sub section 4 of Section 102 of the West Bengal Cooperative Societies Act, 2006, the conjoint provisions of which clearly bar the jurisdiction of the Consumer ... Advocate also submits that the Complaint Case was barred by limitation as stipulated under the Consumer Protection A....
Act XXI of 1940) or the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 1973 (West Ben. Act XXXVIII of 1973) or the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 (West Ben. ... (3) Every Co-operative soceity existing at the commencement of this Act which has been registered or deemed to have been registered under the Co-operative So....
Act XXI of 1940) or the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 1973 (West Ben. Act XXXVIII of 1973) or the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 (West Ben. ... (3) Every Co-operative soceity existing at the commencement of this Act which has been registered or deemed to have been registered under the Co-operative So....
It would not be out of the context to take note of the fact that the plaintiff/opposite party is claiming membership based on the lease which was executed by defendant no. 3 an allottee member of the suit flat under the Co-operative Society who usually resides in Germany who had given the consent in favour of the opposite party/plaintiff for the grant of probate in respect of will of her father, but the grant of such probate on the consent of defendant no. 2. It is contended that the plaint case reveals a challenge of the action on the part of the defendant no. 1 which is a dispute....
On the date of filing of the writ petition, the Society had a total of 48 members. 2. All six petitioners are residents of Khowab Housing Co-operative Society Limited, a co-operative Society registered under the provisions of the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Society’). The petitioners allege that they were required to pay certain amounts of money for obtaining a flat of a specified area, which according to the petitioners, was contrary to the decision approved in the Special General Meeting held in June 2013.
The petitioner is a Co-operative Society registered under West Bengal Co-Operative Societies Act. 2. The case of the petition in brief is as follows:- The petitioner society since its inception in the year 1982 had been successfully operating and managing the affairs of the Nabadwip Ferry Ghat. The object of the petitioner society is to provide facilities for operating water transport, boats and other country crafts as well as other public conveyances.
Being such a member, she was allowed to own a unit/flat (No. N-3) in the building owned by the Co-operative Society. She was a member of the Vidyasagar Samabaya Abasan Samity Ltd. a "Co-operative Society under the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 2006.
OPD 7. Whether any right, title and interest in the property at A-20, West End Avenue, New Delhi, is conferred on the nominee Smt. Parvati Bisht and if so, the extent of her right? Whether the suit is barred under the provisions of Bombay Co-operative Society Act? OPD 6. Whether Late Thakur Dan Singh Bisht was owner of property No. A-20 West End Avenue, New Delhi?
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
