IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
HARISH TANDON, MADHURESH PRASAD, JJ.
Vikram Constructions - Appellant
Versus
Anustup Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. – Respondent
FA 62 of 2023, CAN 1 of 2023
Decided On : 21-12-2023
JUDGMENT :
(Harish Tandon, J.)
While assailing the judgment of the High Court, the appellant tried to interpret of provisions of law enunciated in a plethora of judgments rendered by this Court concerning an issue raised in the instant appeal.
2. Before we proceed to deal with the points urged by the appellant, it would be profitable to narrate the salient facts involved in the instant litigation which are more or less undisputed.
3. The appellant is a partnership firm and is engaged in the business of construction in the housing sector. The respondent is a housing society registered under the West Bengal Housing Society Cooperative Act and purchased the land from the West Bengal Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation for setting up the housing society with an intent to provide the residential units to each of its members. An agreement was entered into on 25th January, 2017 between the appellant and the respondent for construction of the housing complex to cater the residential need of the members of the housing cooperative society on a consideration as mentioned therein. Upon completion of the construction the dispute arose in relation thereto and certain RA Bills which were submitted by the appellant remained unpaid. The suit was instituted for recovery of the said amount together with an interest and the damages which the appellant allegedly suffered because of the non-payment of the dues.
4. The respondent appeared and took a plea of demurer in taking out an application under Order 7 Rule 11 (d) of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking rejection of the plaint solely on the ground that the jurisdiction of the Civil Court is expressly ousted in relation to the nature of the dispute raised in the plaint by virtue of the provision contained in Section 102 (1) (d) and Section 102 (4) of the West Bengal Cooperative Society Act. The Trial Court rejected the plaint on the ground that the moment the jurisdiction of the Civil Court is ousted by an expressed provision in the statute, the Civil Court is denuded of its jurisdiction to adjudicate the disputes raised therein. It would be relevant to refer and understand the provision contained in Section 102 of the said Act which runs thus:
(a) among members, past members and persons claiming through members and deceased members or then sureties: or
(b) between member, past member or a person claiming through a member, past member or deceased member representing through heirs or legal representatives and the Co-operative society, its board or any officer, agent or employees of the Co-operative society or liquidator, past or present; or
(c) between the Co-operative society or its board and any past board, any officer, agent or employee or any past officer, past agent; or past employee or the nominee, heirs or legal representatives of any deceased officer or deceased employee of the Co-operative society; or
(d) between two Co-operative society or between a Co-operative society and a liquidator of another Co-operative or between liquidator of two different Co-operative or between a Co-operative society and any person having transaction with it or between a Co-operative society and its financing bank.
(2) Any dispute mentioned in sub-section (1) other than a dispute relating to recovery of money shall be filed before the Registrar within three months from the date on which the cause of action arises.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in this section or in any other law for the time being in force. the Registrar may adm
The jurisdiction of Civil Courts is ousted in disputes concerning cooperative societies, which must be adjudicated by the Registrar according to Section 102 of the West Bengal Cooperative Societies A....
The jurisdiction to hear cooperative disputes lies with the Cooperative Court when the matters directly impact the society's business and management.
Jurisdiction and maintainability in cooperative disputes depend on specific statutes and bylaws; a cooperative court retains authority to hear disputes related to member resolutions unless explicitly....
Rest of nature of dispute to be referable to Register in the given context of this case, will govern the entire situation. The recovery proceedings initiated under Section 102 of the West Bengal Co-o....
The management of a co-operative society includes the recovery of its assets, and disputes regarding such recovery fall within the jurisdiction of the Co-operative Court under Section 91 of the Mahar....
Disputes between cooperative societies and their employees are not maintainable under Section 91 of the MCS Act, requiring civil suits for resolution.
Arbitrators under co-operative housing acts cannot declare title; their jurisdiction is limited to disputes over allotments, not ownership rights.
Section 9 of Code of Civil Procedure, Civil Court is vested jurisdiction to adjudicate all suits of civil nature. Exclusion of jurisdiction of Civil Court to adjudicate suit of civil nature is an exc....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.