Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Transfer of Case to CBI Court - The courts have frequently considered and allowed the transfer of cases to the CBI Court to ensure proper judicial proceedings and avoid jurisdictional conflicts. For example, in ["THE STATE OF A.P. vs SRI S.RAMU AND 9 OTHERS - Telangana"], the court allowed the transfer of O.P.No.1112 of 2005 to the Special Judge for CBI Cases, noting that both matters be tried by the same Court and emphasizing that no prejudice will be caused to the respondents. Similar sentiments are echoed in ["THE STATE OF A.P. vs SRI S.RAMU AND 9 OTHERS - Telangana"], where the court also permitted transfer under similar reasoning.
No Prejudice & Equal Remedies - The courts have consistently held that transferring cases to the CBI does not prejudice the respondents and that remedies available before civil courts remain accessible. ["THE STATE OF A.P. vs SRI S.RAMU AND 9 OTHERS - Telangana"], ["THE STATE OF A.P. vs SRI S.RAMU AND 9 OTHERS - Telangana"] both state that if the case is transferred to the CBI Court, no prejudice will be caused to the respondents, and all remedies...can be raised before the CBI Court.
Jurisdictional & Procedural Considerations - The courts have distinguished jurisdictional issues from the merits of transfer, often stating that transfers are based on the need for proper investigation or trial efficiency. ["THE STATE OF A.P. vs SRI S.RAMU AND 9 OTHERS - Telangana"] notes that the court was of the opinion that both matters be tried by the same Court, and that the issue was regarding jurisdictional competence between two civil fora, which is a factor in transfer decisions.
Discretion & Exceptional Circumstances - Transfer decisions are made based on facts and necessity, not routine. Several decisions emphasize that no universal or hard and fast rules can be prescribed, and transfers should be based on reasonable apprehension that justice may not be done or to discover the truth ["THE STATE OF A.P. vs SRI S.RAMU AND 9 OTHERS - Telangana"], ["THE STATE OF A.P. vs SRI S.RAMU AND 9 OTHERS - Telangana"], ["Suneetha Narreddy VS Central Bureau of Investigation - Supreme Court"]. Courts exercise their extraordinary powers cautiously, only when justified by circumstances.
Cases Against Transfer & Administrative Grounds - In some instances, petitions for transfer have been opposed or withdrawn, but courts have still transferred investigations based on administrative exigencies or health reasons, as in ["Suneetha Narreddy VS Central Bureau of Investigation - Supreme Court"], where the High Court transferred investigation to CBI despite initial withdrawal of petition, emphasizing that the High Court was pleased to transfer the investigation to the CBI.
Limitations & Non-Exceptional Cases - Not all cases qualify for transfer. For example, ["Kailashkumar Shankarlal Chauhan VS State Of Gujarat - Gujarat"] states that no exceptional case is made out for transfer to CBI, indicating that transfers require compelling reasons, not just procedural or convenience grounds.
Analysis and Conclusion:The provided sources collectively establish that transferring cases or investigations to the CBI is a discretionary judicial power exercised with caution. Transfers are justified when there are concerns about jurisdiction, the need for impartial investigation, or judicial efficiency, and not merely for convenience. Courts have repeatedly emphasized that such transfers should be based on substantive grounds, such as ensuring justice or proper investigation, rather than routine or superficial reasons. This approach preserves the integrity of judicial proceedings and prevents misuse of transfer powers.References:["THE STATE OF A.P. vs SRI S.RAMU AND 9 OTHERS - Telangana"]["THE STATE OF A.P. vs SRI S.RAMU AND 9 OTHERS - Telangana"]["THE STATE OF A.P. vs SRI S.RAMU AND 9 OTHERS - Telangana"]["Suneetha Narreddy VS Central Bureau of Investigation - Supreme Court"]["SABU K.S vs CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION - Kerala"]["Radha Kishan Joshi vs Central Bureau Of Investigation - Central Administrative Tribunal"]["Royden Harold Buthello VS State of Chhattisgarh - Supreme Court"]["Veedhi Nookaratnam, W/o. Satyanaratna VS Union of India - Andhra Pradesh"]["Archana Lunawat VS State of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"]["Central Bureau of Investigation VS Deshraj Singh - Supreme Court"]["Kailashkumar Shankarlal Chauhan VS State Of Gujarat - Gujarat"]["Chowgule And Company Pvt. Ltd. VS State Of Goa through the Public Prosecutor, State of Goa. Porvorim - Bombay"]
In high-profile cases involving scams, murders, or political influence, parties often seek to TRANSFER THE CASE TO CBI. But can you simply demand a shift from state police to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI)? Indian courts, especially High Courts under Article 226 and the Supreme Court under Articles 32, 136, or 142, hold extraordinary powers to order such transfers. However, this is not routine—it's exercised sparingly in exceptional circumstances to ensure impartiality and public confidence. This blog explores the legal principles, valid grounds, common refusals, and practical tips, drawing from key precedents.
Courts view transferring a case to CBI as an extraordinary power to be used sparingly and in exceptional circumstances. Arnab Ranjan Goswami VS Union of India - 2020 8 Supreme 487 State police are presumed capable unless compelling evidence shows otherwise, like serious lapses, bias, or larger conspiracies. This stems from constitutional rights under Article 21 (fair investigation) and CrPC provisions like Sections 482 or 173(8). Ashok Kumar Todi VS Kishwar Jahan - 2011 2 Supreme 249Dinubhai Boghabhai Solanki VS State of Gujarat - 2014 1 Supreme 737
Mere distrust of local police or unsubstantiated allegations won't suffice. The stage of the case—pre-charge sheet, post-charge sheet, or even during trial—doesn't bar transfer if justice demands it. Dharam Pal VS State of Haryana - 2016 1 Supreme 702
Transfers are typically allowed when state investigations reveal clear inadequacies:- Investigation Lapses or Inadequacy: Failure to examine key witnesses, hasty conclusions, or non-compliance with law. In a rape-murder case, the court noted, Certain material witnesses not examined... Impartial and truthful investigation is imperative. It directed CBI takeover despite trial progress. Dharam Pal VS State of Haryana - 2016 1 Supreme 702- Political Influence or Larger Conspiracies: In a massive chit-fund scam worth Rs. 10,000 crores involving influential figures, the court found the state probe not faulty, but inadequate – Larger conspiracy angle not properly investigated. Transfer was deemed proper. Subrata Chattoraj VS Union of India - 2014 4 Supreme 709- Bias or Political Victimization: Where fair probe is a constitutional right under Article 21, courts invoke inherent powers. Balwiinder Singh @ Kukku VS State Of Punjab - 2021 0 Supreme(P&H) 325
Additional cases reinforce this. In an extortion racket at Haldia Dock, suspicious FIR delays, Section 41A violations, and ineffective probes led to CBI transfer: The court ordered the transfer of the case to the CBI and stayed the investigation by the State Police. Rajib Paul VS State of West Bengal - 2022 Supreme(Cal) 83 Similarly, in an alleged abduction and false NDPS implication, evidence of biased investigation prompted a CBI preliminary report. Royden Harold Buthello VS State of Chhattisgarh - 2022 Supreme(Chh) 17
Most requests fail without prima facie evidence:- No Exceptional Circumstances: Routine claims of bias or lack of faith in police are insufficient. Mere allegations of biased investigation or lack of faith in the police were not sufficient grounds to transfer the investigation to CBI. T. Tamilarasi VS State - 2012 0 Supreme(Mad) 1150- Completed Investigations or Delays: In a 15-year-old case with final report filed, transfer was rejected: Case 15 years old - Investigation completed and final form filed. K. V. Rajendran VS Superintendent of Police, CBCID South Zone, Chennai - 2013 6 Supreme 136- No Prima Facie Material: Courts require sufficient material before intervening. SHREE SHREE RAM JANKI JI ASTHAN TAPOVAN MANDIR VS STATE OF JHARKHAND - 2019 5 Supreme 178
In a SEBI-related petition, no case was established for CBI or SIT transfer. Lakshmi W/o Shri Selvaraju vs State by Mahalakshmi Layout Police Station - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 35620 A chit scheme case criticized weak reasons for CBI handover, emphasizing purity in adjudication. Pramod Kumar VS Union of India Rep. by its Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs Grih Mantralaya New Delhi - 2021 Supreme(Mad) 2316
High Courts and Supreme Court can act without state consent, but sparingly to respect federalism (police as state subject). Ashok Kumar Todi VS Kishwar Jahan - 2011 2 Supreme 249 Accused have no right to choose the agency or pre-transfer hearing. Dinubhai Boghabhai Solanki VS State of Gujarat - 2014 1 Supreme 737
Post-charge sheet, transfers go to CBI-designated courts, distinct from investigation shifts. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION vs UNION TERRITORY THROUGH DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU - 2024 Supreme(JK) 599 Final refusals can't be reopened under Section 482 due to Section 362 bar. State Rep. By D. S. P. , S. B. C. I. D. , Chennai VS K. V. Rajendran - 2008 6 Supreme 589
CBI's constraints, like manpower shortages, are noted in critiques, yet public faith drives demands: Crimes are committed and there is no proper investigation by the local police, there is a demand for CBI investigation. Courts urge CBI enhancements but don't relax standards. Ramanathapuram District Pathikkapattor Sangam VS State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Principal Secretary - 2021 Supreme(Mad) 1507
To boost chances:1. Gather Concrete Evidence: Unexamined witnesses, political links, or probe gaps. Dharam Pal VS State of Haryana - 2016 1 Supreme 7022. Demonstrate Public Confidence Need: Sensitive cases like scams or extortion. Arnab Ranjan Goswami VS Union of India - 2020 8 Supreme 4873. File Strategically: Under Article 226/S.482 in High Court or SLP in Supreme Court. Exhaust CrPC remedies first.4. Seek Monitoring: Request timelines (4-6 months) and status reports.5. Avoid Pitfalls: No reviews of final orders; fresh petitions on new facts only.
In economic offence wings' probes falling short (e.g., Rs. 300 crores deposits vs. Rs. 5 crores attachments), courts may still scrutinize but demand proof. Ramanathapuram District Pathikkapattor Sangam VS State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Principal Secretary - 2021 Supreme(Mad) 1507
Disclaimer: This is general information based on precedents and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your case, as outcomes depend on facts.
For more on Indian criminal procedure, stay tuned. References include core cases like Subrata Chattoraj VS Union of India - 2014 4 Supreme 709, Dharam Pal VS State of Haryana - 2016 1 Supreme 702, and others cited.
#CBITransfer, #IndianLaw, #FairInvestigation
Therefore, he prayed the Court to transfer O.P.No.1112 of 2005 to the Court of the Special Judge for CBI Cases. 4. ... If the case is transferred to the CBI Court, no prejudice will be caused to the respondents, and all the remedies available before the City Civil Court can equally be raised before the CBI Court. 7. ... Furthermore, the judgment relied on by the respondents does not advance their case, becasue in that case the issue was regarding jurisdictional compet....
Therefore, he prayed the Court to transfer O.P.No.1112 of 2005 to the Court of the Special Judge for CBI Cases. 4. ... If the case is transferred to the CBI Court, no prejudice will be caused to the respondents, and all the remedies available before the City Civil Court can equally be raised before the CBI Court. 7. ... Furthermore, the judgment relied on by the respondents does not advance their case, becasue in that case the issue was regarding jurisdictional compet....
Therefore, he prayed the Court to transfer O.P.No.1112 of 2005 to the Court of the Special Judge for CBI Cases. 4. ... If the case is transferred to the CBI Court, no prejudice will be caused to the respondents, and all the remedies available before the City Civil Court can equally be raised before the CBI Court. 7. ... Furthermore, the judgment relied on by the respondents does not advance their case, becasue in that case the issue was regarding jurisdictional compet....
Jaganmohan Reddy withdrew his petition to transfer the investigation to CBI and the State opposed such transfer. However, the High Court was pleased to transfer the investigation to the CBI and that is how the CBI took over the investigation. ... It is true that as per the settled position of law and even as observed and held by this Court in the case of Amarinder Singh (supra) for transfer of a criminal case, there must be a reason....
that there is no direction by the Division Bench to transfer the case. ... This is an admitted fact that the charge sheet in the instant case is pending before the court of Special Judge, Anti-Corruption, Baramulla and the said court has declined to transfer the charge sheet on the ground that one court cannot transfer the case to another court of co-ordinate jurisdiction and ... In the instant case, the case was further investigated by the #HL_START....
The Special CBI Court-I, Ernakulam, is directed to transfer the entire case records in C.C.No.3/2014 to the Special CBI Court-II, Ernakulam, forthwith. ... In the instant case, the transfer sought is from a CBI court to another CBI court and both the courts are Special Courts notified under the PC Act as well as under the PML Act. ... The prayer in the petition is to transfer the entire records in C.C.No.3/2014 pending before the Sp....
him from CBI-Pune to CBI-Ghaziabad in terms respondent's own transfer policy (ANNEXURE-A-1) expeditiously and without any delay, in a time-bound manner. ... applicant in the case of the applicant in a stipulated time frame 6. ... Avadh Bihari Kaushik) Versus Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), (Through its director) Plot No. 5-B, 6th Floor, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003 …Respondent (By Advocate: Mr. ... The learned counsel for the applicant contended that the applicant h....
It is submitted that transfer and posting of employees of CBI is decided in CBI Head Office on the basis of administrative requirements. ... The brief facts of the case as inter alia averred by the applicant in the OA is that applicant entered service as a Constable in Orissa State Police on 14.08.1987, joined the Central Bureau of Investigation on deputation basis on 09.08.1989 and absorbed into the permanent service of CBI w.e.f. 17.03.1998 ... It is submitted that respondents vide o....
extraordinary power of this Court to transfer an investigation to CBI. ... In fact, the High Court having framed two points for its consideration, on the aspect relating to the transfer of the case to CBI as sought for, has considered it while answering point No.2. ... In assessing the contention for the transfer of the investigation to CBI, we have factored into the decision-making calculus the averments on the record and submissions urged on behalf of the petitioner....
The petitioners seek the transfer of the investigation from SEBI to CBI or an SIT. The question that falls for decision is whether a case has been established by the petitioners for the court to issue such a direction. 32. ... Accordingly, he sought for transfer of investigation to the respondent No.6-CBI. 6. Per contra, Sri. ... It is the case of the petitioner that the respondent-Police have encountered resulting in death of her son Ashik and therefore, petitioner has sought for #HL....
CBI has sought transfer of the trial from court at Meerut to the CBI court at Ghaziabad:
There is therefore strong and prima facie case made out for transfer of the case from the State to the CBI. The faith of the public at large in such investigation could be eroded.
2. Whether any case is made out for transfer of the case to CBI for further investigation? 36. Point No. 2 whether any case is made out for transfer of case to CBI or not? The Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Arnab Ranjan Goswami (Supra) has summarized the principle where a case may be transferred to CBI for further investigation, the relevant part of the judgment is extracted below:- “42. The main ground taken by the petitioners is that petitioner No. 1 was abducted forcefully from Talcher to Raipur and thereafter petitioner No. 1 was falsely implicated i....
These reasons have been criticized by both Mr. N.R.Elango, learned Senior Counsel and Mr.Vijay Narayan, learned Senior Counsel. They stated that these reasons are not at all sufficient even remotely sufficient to transfer the case to CBI.
Hence, he seeks the transfer of the case to the CBI. The investigation is not properly done by the Economic Offences Wing and only movables worth about Rupees Five Crores alone have been attached when the deposit is to the tune of Rupees Three Hundred Crores.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
