IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
E.S.INDIRESH, J.
Lakshmi W/o Shri Selvaraju – Appellant
Versus
The State by Mahalakshmi Layout Police Station – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 4425 of 2017
Decided On : 07-11-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks cbi investigation for ashik's death. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court hears arguments from both parties. (Para 4) |
| 3. petitioner's counsel claims mistaken identity in shooting. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court outlines legal status and key facts. (Para 8) |
| 5. conditions for cbi investigation outlined by supreme court. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 6. court concludes petition lacks merit for investigation transfer. (Para 12 , 14) |
ORDER :
1. In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for a direction to the respondent No.1 in Crime Nos.272/2016 and 299/2016 and the respondent No.2 in Crime No.293/2016 to place the entire material pertaining to the death of late Ashik S/o the petitioner before the respondent No.6-Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI); inter alia sought for direction to the respondent No.6-CBI to conduct free, fair and impartial investigation pertaining to the encounter death of late Ashik S/o the petitioner and submit the report to the jurisdictional Court.
2. The facts in nutshell for the purpose of adjudication of this writ petition are that the petitioner is the mother of deceased Ashik. It is stated in the writ petition that, based on the statement of one Sri. Bharamappa, Police Inspector of Mahalakshmi Layout Police Station, Bengaluru, the complaint is lodged and F.I.R. registered in Crime No.293 of 2016 before the Jnanabharathi Police Station, Bengaluru City against three accused persons, alleging that, on 07th October, 2016 upon the credible information, the complainant-Police Inspector along with his sub-ordinate officers went to arrest the accused persons in Crime Nos.272/2016 and 299/2016 and as such, tried to caught hold of the accused persons namely, Santhosh and Arun. At that time, the said accused persons had tried to escape in the Swift Dezire car by dashing their car to other two to three vehicles and a Police vehicle, which resulted in injury to Woman Police Inspector Smt. Roopa Tambhada.
3. It is further stated in the writ petition that the Police have arrested the three accused in the aforementioned crime and on the statement made by the accused, respondent-Police came to know that, one Kulli Ramesha and deceased Ashik were involved in the commission of offence in Crime Nos.272/2016 and 299/2016. On the basis of the credible information, the Police Officers reached the Health Layout, situate at Annapoorneshwari Nagar and after, came to know about the same, the said Kulli Ramesh tried to attack a Police personnel with a Dragger and the deceased Ashik hit the complainant-Police Inspector Sri. Bharamappa with a sickle on the chest and on account of the same, the complainant got injured and there was bleeding from the chest. Immediately, in order to save his life and his team members, including the Women Sub-Inspector, the complainant took his service revolver and shot a gun fire on the head of deceased Ashik and on account of the same, Ashik fell down with bleeding injury. Later the Police called the Ambulance and rushed the accused- Ashik and the Women Police Inspector Smt. Roopa Tambhada to the nearest Hospital, wherein the deceased Ashik was declared dead. In this regard, F.I.R. was registered in Crime No.293/2016 for the offences punishable under Sections 307 , 333, 353 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 of the Arms Act at Jnanabharati Police Station, Bengaluru. It is the case of the petitioner that the respondent-Police have encountered resulting in death of her son Ashik and therefore, petitioner has sought for transfer of the investigation to the respondent No.6-CBI, by filing the present writ petition.
4. Heard Sri. Rajesh Rao K., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner; Sri. Mahantesh Shettar, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents 1 to 5 and Sri. P. Prasanna Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.6.
5. Sri. Rajesh Rao K., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner by referring to the statement mentioned in the F.
Himanshu Kumar and Others vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others
Vishal Tiwari vs. Union of India and Others
K.V. Rajendran vs. Superintendent of Police, CBCID South Zone, Chennai and Others
Transfer of investigation to CBI requires exceptional circumstances; mere allegations against local police are insufficient for such action.
Criminal Law - Transfer of investigation - Not rarest of rare case - Investigation to be conducted officer above rank of A.C.P.
Point of law : Criminal Law – Transfer of investigation - Transfer of investigation to CBI is not a matter of routine, in extraordinary circumstances by using powers of this Court sparingly in except....
Judicial intervention in criminal investigations is warranted to ensure fair process and public trust when local authorities are ineffective or biased.
If a citizen, who is a defacto complainant in a criminal case alleging commission of a cognizable offence affecting violation of his legal or fundamental rights against influential persons, prays bef....
The necessity for a C.B.I. investigation arises in cases where police personnel are accused, ensuring fairness and public confidence in the judicial process.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.