Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Bookmark Option Location in Court Records - The court registry is directed to prepare, bookmark, and furnish copies of trial court records, with specific instructions to include proper indexing, pagination, and bookmarks for ease of reference. Several references specify the need for bookmarking records, such as in Registry directives (VIMAL SINGH Vs. THE STATE - Delhi, AMIT SOLENKI & ANR. Vs. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) - Delhi, INDNGT00000060909).["VIMAL SINGH Vs. THE STATE - Delhi"], ["AMIT SOLENKI & ANR. Vs. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) - Delhi"], ["INDNGT00000060909"]
Bookmarking in Digital and Internet Contexts - In digital scenarios, bookmarks refer to saved links or references to specific websites or web artifacts. For example, devices containing internet artifacts referencing tiny teens or jail bait gallery had bookmarks for websites like teengallery.com and jailbaitgallery.com (United States vs Christopher Golden - Eighth Circuit). This indicates bookmarks are used to quickly access specific online content.["United States vs Christopher Golden - Eighth Circuit"]
Bookmarking Not Defined or Not Present - Some sources explicitly mention that the bookmark is not defined or not available, indicating that in certain contexts, no bookmarking option exists or has been specified (Bookmark not defined; Bookmark not defined.).["SHARAD PAREEK VS PRABAL SIPAHA COLLECTOR JHABUA - National Green Tribunal"], ["State Bank of India VS Consortium of Mr. Murari Lal Jalan and Mr. Florian Fritsch - Supreme Court"], ["STATE BANK OF INDIA vs THE CONSORTIUM OF MR. MURARI LAL JALAN AND MR. FLORIAN FRITSCH - Supreme Court"], Bookmark not defined.
Legal and Procedural Context of Bookmarking - In legal proceedings, bookmarks are used for indexing case records, trial papers, or judgments to facilitate quick navigation. Courts are directed to prepare case books with proper bookmarks, indicating their importance in legal document management (VIMAL SINGH Vs. THE STATE - Delhi, AMIT SOLENKI & ANR. Vs. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) - Delhi).
Other Contexts - In some instances, options such as No Preference or other choices are discussed, but these are unrelated to digital bookmarks. They reflect decision options in forms or legal procedures rather than bookmarking features.
Analysis and Conclusion:The location of the bookmark option varies depending on the context. In court records and legal documents, bookmarks are physical or digital markers within case files, directed by court orders to facilitate record navigation (VIMAL SINGH Vs. THE STATE - Delhi, AMIT SOLENKI & ANR. Vs. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) - Delhi). In digital environments, bookmarks are saved links or references to websites or artifacts, as seen with internet artifacts referencing specific sites (United States vs Christopher Golden - Eighth Circuit). Some sources explicitly state that no bookmark option is defined or available, indicating variability across different systems and contexts.
References Summary:- Court record bookmarking: VIMAL SINGH Vs. THE STATE - Delhi, AMIT SOLENKI & ANR. Vs. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) - Delhi, INDNGT00000060909- Digital bookmarks (websites): United States vs Christopher Golden - Eighth Circuit- No bookmark defined: SHARAD PAREEK VS PRABAL SIPAHA COLLECTOR JHABUA - National Green Tribunal, State Bank of India VS Consortium of Mr. Murari Lal Jalan and Mr. Florian Fritsch - Supreme Court, STATE BANK OF INDIA vs THE CONSORTIUM OF MR. MURARI LAL JALAN AND MR. FLORIAN FRITSCH - Supreme Court
In the digital age of legal research, professionals and laypersons alike often seek specific features like bookmarks in court documents, legal databases, or software interfaces. A common query arises: Where can I see the bookmarks? This question typically refers to user interface (UI) elements for saving or accessing marked sections in PDFs, online portals, or legal software. However, a thorough review of key legal judgments reveals a notable absence of such features in discussed contexts. This post analyzes relevant cases, primarily focused on software classifications, hardware components, and jurisdictional principles, to address this query directly.
While no documents explicitly detail a bookmark option as a UI feature, tangential references to bookmarking in court procedures emerge from related sources. This analysis provides clarity for legal practitioners, researchers, and tech users navigating court records. Note: This is general information based on reviewed judgments and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for personalized guidance.
A detailed examination of prominent legal documents confirms no reference, mention, or indication of a bookmark option or related UI feature. These cases center on technical classifications, intellectual property, and procedural law, with no discussion of user-facing tools like bookmarks in software or hardware. (The provided legal documents do not contain any reference, mention, or indication of a [bookmark option] or any related feature within software, hardware, or legal context.) Commissioner of Service Tax Delhi VS Quick Heal Technologies Limited - 2022 7 Supreme 24ENGINEERING ANALYSIS CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE PRIVATE LIMITED VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 2021 2 Supreme 321
In Commissioner of Service Tax Delhi VS Quick Heal Technologies Limited - 2022 7 Supreme 24, the court assessed whether antivirus software qualifies as information technology software for tax purposes, emphasizing features like interactivity. However, no document discusses or references a [bookmark option]. ENGINEERING ANALYSIS CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE PRIVATE LIMITED VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 2021 2 Supreme 321 covers Microsoft software licensing terms, highlighting usage rights but omitting any UI features like bookmarks. Similarly, Commissioner of Customs, Bangalore VS N. I. Systems (India) P. Ltd. - 2010 0 Supreme(SC) 577 and Tata Teleservices Ltd. VS Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. - 2008 0 Supreme(SC) 745 analyze controllers and I/O modules' technical classifications, with zero reference to user interfaces.
Documents like UNION OF INDIA VS MAJOR GENERAL SHRI KANT SHARMA - 2015 2 Supreme 423 and Union Of India VS D. R. R. Sastri - 1997 1 Supreme 49 explore jurisdictional limits, evidentiary reappraisal, and appellate standards. These procedural discussions do not extend to software navigation aids. (The judicial principles discussed... relate to jurisdiction, appellate review, and evidentiary reappraisal, not software features.)
Conclusion from Primary Review: Based solely on these materials, there is no guidance on locating a bookmark option. Legal documents prioritize substantive analysis over platform-specific features.
While primary cases are silent, other judgments offer insights into how bookmark appears in legal practice—often literally as physical or procedural markers, not digital UI tools. Options recur frequently in recruitment, pensions, and procedural contexts, potentially confusing the query if misread as software options.
In STATE VS VARUN VERMA - 2017 Supreme(Del) 3876, the court directed: Ahlmad is directed to page and bookmark the file so as to enable the digitisation of the entire record. Here, bookmark means physically tagging pages for efficient digitization during case processing, typically visible to court staff via the physical or scanned file index. This is not a public UI feature but an internal administrative step.
A URL parameter in Wellalage Don WijedasaJayatilake vs Hon. Susil Premajayantha Minister of Education and others - - 2023 Supreme(SRI)(CA) 404 notes utm_source=bookmark, referencing browser-sourced shares (e.g., from a bookmark bar). This implies bookmarks as user-saved links to judgments, accessible via personal browsers, not embedded in documents. Separately, Pradeep Dutta VS State (NCT Of Delhi) - 2022 Supreme(Del) 970 mentions Bookmark not defined, likely a document formatting error (e.g., in Word), underscoring occasional technical glitches in legal files rather than intentional features.
Numerous sources discuss options unrelated to bookmarks:- Regional Provident Fund Commissioner vs Chandran K. - 2025 Supreme(Ker) 2822: Employees' Pension Scheme amendments require joint option forms for higher contributions, processed via EPFO. (P4 joint option form submitted by the writ petitioners...)- Rishabh Duggal VS Registrar General, Delhi High Court - 2024 Supreme(Del) 714: Exam answer keys debate correct Option (2) vs. Option (4), stressing single correct answers for fairness.- Shabana Rashid Pinjari vs Maharashtra Public Service Commission, Through its Chairman - 2025 Supreme(Bom) 851: Recruitment preferences allow 'No Preference' option, with courts mandating reasonable accommodation for disabilities under RPwD Act.- Seetharama Shetty VS Monappa Shetty - 2024 Supreme(SC) 721: Stamp duty cases permit options to pay deficits under Karnataka Stamp Act Sections 33-39.- Shumita Deb W/o Mr. Jnan Ranjan Deb VS Gautam Bhattacharya - 2024 Supreme(Kar) 571 and Escorts Limited VS Tejpal Singh Sisodia - 2019 Supreme(Del) 1169: CPC Section 19 provides plaintiff option for jurisdiction where wrongs occur or defendants reside.
These highlight procedural choices but do not address UI bookmarks.
For users asking Where can I see the bookmarks? in legal contexts:1. Court Portals and PDFs: Many e-courts (e.g., Indian judiciary sites) use PDF viewers with built-in bookmark panels (View > Bookmarks). Check sidebar panels.2. Physical/Digital Files: As in STATE VS VARUN VERMA - 2017 Supreme(Del) 3876, bookmarks may be tabbed pages or hyperlinks in digitized records, visible to authorized users.3. Legal Databases: Platforms like Manupatra or SCC Online often have personal bookmark folders under user dashboards—log in to My Bookmarks.4. Absence in Judgments: Technical cases like ENGINEERING ANALYSIS CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE PRIVATE LIMITED VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 2021 2 Supreme 321 focus on core functions (e.g., licensing), not ancillary UI. ([ENGINEERING ANALYSIS CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE PRIVATE LIMITED VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 2021 2 Supreme 321] involves licensing terms of Microsoft software, but there is no mention of user interface features like bookmarks.)
Pro Tip: Use external tools like Adobe Acrobat for PDF bookmarks or browser extensions for web clippings. Always verify with case-specific platforms.
This review underscores the gap between user queries and document content, emphasizing targeted research. For software-related legal issues, classifications generally hinge on functionality, not UI perks. Stay informed, and consider professional tools for efficient navigation.
Word of Caution: Interpretations may vary by jurisdiction; this analysis draws from specific Indian cases and is for informational purposes only.
#LegalDocuments, #CourtBookmarks, #LegalTech
Registry is directed to prepare e-paper book of trial court record, bookmark it and furnish a copy thereof to learned counsel for the parties, within 02 weeks. 9.
On another cellphone there was suspected child pornography, internet artifacts referencing “tiny teens,” and a Google Chrome bookmark for a website called “jail bait gallery.” The bookmark redirected Examiner Strand to “teengallery.com,” which displayed images of nude adolescent girls. ... Golden’s devices also contained internet artifacts referencing “tiny teens” and a Chrome bookmark for “jailbaitgallery.com,” a website with nude photos o....
The Registry is directed to requisition the Trial Court record with proper index, bookmark and pagination for perusal of this Court before the next date of hearing. 7. List on 26.07.2024. CRL.M.(BAIL) 627/2024 8.
Employees’ Pension Scheme , 1995 which provided that the existing members as on 01/09/2014 who at the option of the employer and employee had been contributing on salary exceeding Rs.6,500/- shall prefer a fresh option and the time granted for exercising fresh option as per the amendment ... P4 joint option form submitted by the writ petitioners and other similar option forms individually submitted by the....
The Revised Answer Key indicates Option (2) to be the correct option. However, it is contended on behalf of the petitioner [in W.P.(C) 2342/2022] that Option (4) would be the correct option. ... (1) & (2)Question 166Option (4)Option (1)Question 168Option (3)Option (1)Question 138Option ( ... 80Option (3)Question Dele....
Petitioner had given one option at the time of preliminary examination viz, Maharashtra Hindi, Sindhi, Gurarathi Sahitya Academy as Appointing Authority. However, at the time of mains examination, the Petitioner did not select the said option and rather selected option “no preference”. ... For posts they are not interested in, they should select the 'No Preference' option. (4) After submitting the preference order, candida....
Hence, the Petitioner alleges that he is left with no other option other than to come before this Court to seek relief. ... utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=copy_li nk&utm_source=bookmark > accessed 10 August 2023 reasons explained above, I proceed to dismiss this Application, subject to the above observations. Application is dismissed.
Hence, the said judgment also comes to the aid of the appellants that they have got an option under Section 19 of CPC and the same has been discussed in paragraph 32 of the said judgment also. ... Under Section 19, option not available to file the case in Bengaluru and the Trial Court rightly taken note of Section 19 of CPC. The counsel also would vehemently contend that interview cannot be a ground to invoke jurisdiction even if any such interview was made ....
Therefore, going by the request of the respondent, the option is left for the decision of the District Registrar. ... The person who intends to rely on an insufficiently/improperly stamped instrument has option to submit to the scope of Section 34 of the Act, pay duty and penalty. ... It is argued that the case falls under Section 37(2) of the Act, and the impugned orders have denied the appellant the option to have the penalty decided by t....
Bookmark not defined.; M.C. Mehta (2019), Para 15, note Error! Bookmark not defined. action for the removal of the encroachment. 7. ... For above purpose, a meeting at central level must be held with the Chief Secretaries of all the States/UTs atleast once in a month (option of video conferencing facility is open) to take stock of the progress and to plan further action.
The Defendant Nos.1 and 2 have also set up a Facebook page and a Twitter handle, as also, a WhatsApp account. The emails which have been forwarded by the Defendant Nos.1 and 2 on 2nd September, 2022, 11th September, 2022 and 16th September, 2022 to a large number of law firms, lawyers and other stakeholders in the legal fraternity, including some of the promoters of the Plaintiff Company, have also been placed on record. The Defendant Nos. 1 and 2 are also providing latest judgment s....
Bookmark not defined.), i.e. that the evidence to be tendered by the proposed witnesses would be 'germane to the issue involved'
I repeat, Section 19 vested option only in plaintiff for a situation where no wrong is done where defendant resides. If wrong is done where defendant resides, there is no option but to sue where defendant resides.
Ahlmad is directed to page and bookmark the file so as to enable the digitisation of the entire record. In terms of Section 437(A) Cr.P.C., accused is directed to furnish personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like amount for a period of six months for his appearance before the High Court of Delhi in the event the prosecution wishes to challenge the present order by filing the appropriate petition in the High Court.
In that case, the Court may proceed to decide the suit forthwith. The first option is exercised in a case where the parties are present. A decision of the Court in the suit implies a decision on merits as discussed by me later in this judgment.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
