Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Wrong facts in Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act can affect ad interim maintenance under Section 23 The core issue is whether inaccuracies or wrong facts presented in proceedings under Section 12 can influence the grant of interim maintenance under Section 23. Several judgments clarify that Section 23 grants powers to the Magistrate to pass interim and ex-parte orders as he deems just and proper ["Mohd. Yahaya VS State of U. P. - Allahabad"], ["Md. Azgar Ali, S/o. Md. Abed Ali VS State of Assam, Rep. by the P. P. , Assam - Gauhati"]. The law emphasizes that the primary focus is on the existence of domestic violence or the likelihood of its occurrence, which can be prima facie established without exhaustive proof, and the order for interim maintenance is a civil remedy aimed at immediate relief ["Virendra Kumar Kushwaha VS State of U. P. - Allahabad"], ["Monalisha Sahoo vs Anshuman Naik - Orissa"].
Main points and insights:
An order under Section 23 is not a final adjudication of domestic violence but an interim measure, which can be revisited or challenged in appeal, and the presence of wrong facts does not necessarily bar such orders ["Hasina Khatoon VS State of U. P. - Allahabad"], ["Bhanu Kiran VS Rahul Khosla - Punjab and Haryana"].
Analysis and conclusion: The presence of incorrect or wrong facts in proceedings under Section 12 does not inherently affect the validity or enforceability of interim maintenance orders granted under Section 23. The law recognizes that Section 23 empowers Magistrates to pass interim orders based on prima facie satisfaction, which is a lower standard than proof beyond doubt. Therefore, even if some facts are shown to be wrong or misrepresented, such errors do not automatically negate or impact the interim maintenance granted, unless the order was based solely on false facts and the order is challenged through appropriate appellate or revisional remedies ["Virendra Kumar Kushwaha VS State of U. P. - Allahabad"], ["GITIKA BARMAN D/O LATE MUKUNDA BARMAN VS SANJEEV BARMAN S/O SHRI UPENDRAJIT BARMAN - Gauhati"]. Ultimately, the focus remains on the prima facie satisfaction of domestic violence or its likelihood, not on the correctness of facts in initial proceedings.
In domestic violence cases under India's Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act), applications under Section 12 often form the basis for seeking urgent reliefs like ad interim maintenance under Section 23. But what happens if the facts presented in the Section 12 application are incorrect or misleading? Can they derail the grant of interim maintenance? This is a common concern for respondents facing such proceedings.
This blog post dives deep into the legal nuances, drawing from key judicial precedents. We'll examine whether wrong facts can affect ad interim maintenance, the court's approach to prima facie satisfaction, and practical steps for parties involved. Note: This is general information based on case law and not specific legal advice—consult a lawyer for your situation.
Section 12 of the DV Act allows an aggrieved person to file an application before a Magistrate for various reliefs, including protection orders (Section 18), residence orders (Section 19), monetary relief (Section 20), custody orders (Section 21), and compensation (Section 22). BHARAT BARARIA VS PRIYANKA BARARIA - 2017 0 Supreme(Del) 1502
Section 23 empowers the Magistrate to grant interim and ex parte orders if the application prima facie discloses domestic violence or its likelihood. Specifically, Section 23(1) states the Magistrate may pass such interim orders as he deems just and proper, while Section 23(2) allows ex parte orders based on the aggrieved person's affidavit if prima facie satisfied. SHARAD KAPOOR VS MINI MALHOTRA - 2017 0 Supreme(Del) 1974BHARAT BARARIA VS PRIYANKA BARARIA - 2017 0 Supreme(Del) 1502
The core question: Can wrong facts shown in Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act affect the ad interim maintenance under Section 23?
Generally, incorrect or misleading facts in a Section 12 application can influence the grant of ad interim maintenance under Section 23, but the decision hinges primarily on the court's prima facie satisfaction about domestic violence, not exhaustive fact verification. SHARAD KAPOOR VS MINI MALHOTRA - 2017 0 Supreme(Del) 1974
Interim orders are protective and provisional, designed for immediate relief without a full trial. Courts do not conduct a mini-trial at this stage; instead, they assess if the application discloses a prima facie case. BHARAT BARARIA VS PRIYANKA BARARIA - 2017 0 Supreme(Del) 1502
Key points include:- The Magistrate's power under Section 23 is discretionary and based on initial material, often the affidavit. SHARAD KAPOOR VS MINI MALHOTRA - 2017 0 Supreme(Del) 1974- Correctness of facts can be challenged later, but interim relief stands on prima facie evaluation. BHARAT BARARIA VS PRIYANKA BARARIA - 2017 0 Supreme(Del) 1502- Supreme Court rulings emphasize these orders provide immediate aid, not final fact adjudication. BHARAT BARARIA VS PRIYANKA BARARIA - 2017 0 Supreme(Del) 1502
For instance, one judgment notes: The conduct of the parties even prior to the coming into force of the DV Act, could be taken into consideration while passing an order under Sections 18, 19 and 20 of DV Act. BHARAT BARARIA VS PRIYANKA BARARIA - 2017 0 Supreme(Del) 1502
Under Section 23(1), Magistrates have broad discretion for just and proper interim orders. Subsection (2) permits ex parte relief on affidavit if domestic violence is prima facie evident. This framework prioritizes speed to prevent harm during pendency. SHARAD KAPOOR VS MINI MALHOTRA - 2017 0 Supreme(Del) 1974BHARAT BARARIA VS PRIYANKA BARARIA - 2017 0 Supreme(Del) 1502
Wrong facts don't automatically invalidate interim maintenance. The order relies on the Magistrate's initial view of the material, which may include unverified claims. However, significant falsehoods can be contested in appeals or trials, potentially leading to modification. BHARAT BARARIA VS PRIYANKA BARARIA - 2017 0 Supreme(Del) 1502
Another ruling clarifies: The remedy under Section 23 of the DV Act which has been provided to the respondent by way of grant of interim maintenance is merely an attempt to restore the 'civil rights' to wife and children of the petitioner. Khushi VS State of Rajasthan - 2018 0 Supreme(Raj) 101
This provisional nature means interim maintenance persists until full adjudication, even if facts are later disputed.
Several judgments reinforce this approach while highlighting procedural aspects:
In a case involving delayed filings, limitations under CrPC Section 468 apply only post-breach of Section 12 orders, not to initial applications. This underscores the Act's focus on protection over technical bars. Abhishek Kumar Chandan, Son of Kamta Prasad vs Criminal Miscellaneous No.46935 of 2024 - 2025 Supreme(Pat) 641
Interim maintenance doesn't always require a Form III affidavit in non-ex parte cases, prioritizing the aggrieved party's welfare to avoid destitution. Section 23(2) provides: Power to grant interim and ex parte orders.—(1) In any proceeding before him under this Act, the Magistrate may pass such interim order as he deems just and proper. Ashok Meghwal, S/o. Baldev Ram vs Nirmala Devi, W/o. Ashok Meghwal, D/o Shimhu Ram - 2025 Supreme(Raj) 2101
Courts must consider financial capacity and living standards for maintenance, not wealth equalization. In one appeal, relief was revised upward based on these factors. Hasin Jahan vs State of West Bengal - 2025 Supreme(Cal) 507
Non-payment of maintenance under Section 20 doesn't trigger Section 31 penalties, which apply only to protection order breaches (Section 18). Roopa B.C. W/o Tharesh vs Tharesh S/o Byregowda - 2025 Supreme(Kar) 169
Even in Muslim divorce proceedings, interim maintenance is grantable under inherent powers, emphasizing spousal duty. Danish Memon VS Nusra Iqbal - 2024 Supreme(Mad) 2232
Revisionary jurisdiction is narrow; courts won't interfere unless orders are perverse, considering living standards and circumstances. Taron Mohan VS State - 2021 Supreme(Del) 1993
These cases illustrate that while facts matter, interim relief under Section 23 is robustly protective.
Wrong facts aren't inconsequential:- Deliberate fabrication: Respondents can prove falsity later, seeking order cancellation. BHARAT BARARIA VS PRIYANKA BARARIA - 2017 0 Supreme(Del) 1502- Material discrepancies: If core to prima facie finding, they may prompt review, though not automatic nullification.- No conclusive fact-finding: Interim stage avoids final determinations. SHARAD KAPOOR VS MINI MALHOTRA - 2017 0 Supreme(Del) 1974
In quashing petitions, mere pendency of divorce or other cases doesn't bar DV proceedings if not suppressed. Birobrata Paul S/o Bijoy Ranjan Paul VS State of Assam - 2018 Supreme(Gau) 724
For respondents:- File objections or appeals promptly against false claims.- Gather evidence for trial to rebut facts.
For applicants:- Ensure affidavits are accurate to withstand scrutiny.
Courts should balance protection with fairness, scrutinizing material without delaying relief. Parties must prepare for full merits hearing. BHARAT BARARIA VS PRIYANKA BARARIA - 2017 0 Supreme(Del) 1502SHARAD KAPOOR VS MINI MALHOTRA - 2017 0 Supreme(Del) 1974
In summary, wrong facts in a Section 12 DV Act application may influence but do not solely dictate ad interim maintenance under Section 23. These orders rest on prima facie satisfaction for immediate protection, with factual disputes resolved later. BHARAT BARARIA VS PRIYANKA BARARIA - 2017 0 Supreme(Del) 1502SHARAD KAPOOR VS MINI MALHOTRA - 2017 0 Supreme(Del) 1974
Key takeaways:- Interim orders are not final—challenge falsehoods in subsequent stages.- Focus on prima facie case strengthens applications.- Seek professional advice tailored to your case.
This approach upholds the DV Act's protective intent while safeguarding against abuse.
References1. BHARAT BARARIA VS PRIYANKA BARARIA - 2017 0 Supreme(Del) 1502: Prima facie basis for Section 23 orders.2. SHARAD KAPOOR VS MINI MALHOTRA - 2017 0 Supreme(Del) 1974: Discretionary interim powers.3. Khushi VS State of Rajasthan - 2018 0 Supreme(Raj) 101: Civil rights restoration via interim maintenance.
This post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
#DVA ct #InterimMaintenance #DomesticViolenceLaw
DV Act - Summoning Order - Section 23 of D.V. ... Fact of the Case: The case involved a complaint under Section 12 of the D.V. ... 12 of the D.V. ... During pendency of proceeding under Section 12 of D.V. Act, learned court has passed an ex-parte order dated 3.12.2022 under Section 23 of D.V. Act granting interim maintenance to the tune of Rs....
Domestic Violence - Maintenance - Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 23, Section 12 Fact of the ... act of domestic violence. ... ... "Section 23: Power to grant interim and ex-parte orders: - (1) In any proceedings before him under this Act, the Magistrate may pass such interim order as he deems just and proper. ... In such view of the matter I do not....
Section 23 of the Domestic Violence Act provides for interim maintenance, which read as under :- “[i] In any proceeding before him under this Act, the Magistrate may pass such interim order as he deems just and proper. ... Thereafter, on 08.02.2018, the respondent No. 2 had preferred one petition, under section 23 of the Domestic Violence Act, ....
(A) Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 - Section 12 and 23(2) - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 128 ... The proceeding under the Cr.P.C. operated only as a vehicle to give effect to an order originating under Section 23(2) of the Act. ... Act but has at any point of time lived so or had the right to live and has been subjected to domestic violence or is later subjected to domestic #HL_S....
Facts in brief are that marriage was solemnized on 22.11.2019 and an application under Section 12 of the Protection of Woman from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 seeking various claims was preferred and an application under Section 23 of Protection of Woman from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was also preferred ... 14.08.2023 in CRA No.44/2023 by Addtional Session Judge, Tarana District Ujjain, M.P. wher....
But, the learned Sessions Judge has misread the provision, as if it was under section 23 of the Domestic Violence Act. It is to be noted here that section 23 of the said Act provides for power to grant interim and ex-parte orders, which read as under: “23. ... as such the lump sum amount granted her under section 23 of the Domestic Violence #HL....
Act are not barred by limitations before the complaint breaches an order made under Section 12 of the Act. ... (A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482 - Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 - Section 12 - Quashing ... 12 of the D.V. ... -II, Danapur in Domestic Violence Act Case No.4 of 2023, which is as under:- “Record is fixed for order for grant of interim maintenance of application fi....
Section 12 of the Act of 2005, the power has been given to the Magistrate to grant interim and ex parte orders. Sub-Section 2 of Section 23 of the Act of 2005 provides as under:- “23. Power to grant interim and ex parte orders.—(1) In any proceeding before him under this Act, the Magistrate may pass such interim order as he deems just and proper.
Section 12 of the Act, magistrate shall make every endeavour to dispose of every such application within a period of sixty days form the date of it’s first hearing. ... Such amount is to be paid by the opposite party/husband form the date of filing of the application under section 23 of the PWDV Act, as decided by the Apex Court in Rajnish Vs. Neha (supra). ... of the case, does not hold good and considering that there being domestic relationship between the parties a....
(A) Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 - Section 12, 18, 20, and 31 - Appeal against conviction of respondent for ... Therefore, when it is said that in order to pass order u/s. 23 of the Act, there should be a domestic violence and in order pass orders u/s. 18 also there should be a domestic violence. ... Under Section 19 of the Act, the Court, if satisfied that the domestic #HL....
60. Dehors all these provisions, I am bound to take notice of Section 26 of the Protection Of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The said provision reads as follows: “26. Relief in other suits and legal proceedings.— (1) Any relief available under sections 18, 19,20, 21 and 22 may also be sought in any legal proceeding, before a civil court, family court or a criminal court, affecting the aggrieved person and the respondent whether such proceeding was initiated before or after the commencement of this Act. Section 26 of the Domestic Violence Act and grant of interim maintenanc....
The findings of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate as upheld by the learned Sessions Court is that the petitioner was not providing adequate maintenance to the respondent and since the adequate maintenance was not being paid, the petitioner was directed to pay a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards maintenance. The orders have been passed in an application for interim maintenance under the Domestic Violence Act. Matrimonial proceedings are still pending between the parties. The object of Section 397 CrPC is to settle a patent defect or an error in exercising jurisdiction or if the....
For instance, it is reported from Ganderbal that " in most of cases maintenance under Section 23 of the Domestic Violence Act granted." This report does not inform this Court about the compliance with the orders regarding payment of maintenance. The maintenance granted must reach the persons in need thereof.
The respondent No. 2 filed an application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter, for short, the Domestic Violence Act) alleging domestic violence and seeking relief of residence order under Section 19, monetary relief under section 20, compensation order under section 22 as well as interim relief under section 23(2) of the Domestic Violence Act. On receipt of the application the learned Judicial Magistrate by order dated 07.06.2016 issued notice to the respondents/petitioners and also called for a domestic incident report ....
Alongwith the application under section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act an application under section 23(2) has also been filed. 7. The respondent/complainant has filed an application under section 12 read with sections 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
