IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
ROBIN PHUKAN, J.
Md. Azgar Ali, S/o. Md. Abed Ali - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Assam, Rep. by the P.P., Assam & Ors. - Respondents
Crl. Rev. P. No. 219 of 2019
Decided On : 30-05-2023
Criminal Procedure Coe, 1973 - Section 482 - Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 - Section 29, 12, 23 - Concealed about first marriage - Torture and rebuked with abusive words - Interim maintenance - Petitioner challenge judgment and order passed – Vide impugned order learned Judicial Magistrate directed petitioner to pay a sum as interim maintenance to respondent No. 2 - Respondent No. 2 has no income of her own, and she is dependent upon income of others for a two square meal a day - Para 12.
Finding of the Court: It appears from affidavit that after 2 days when she became ill she was taken to Hospital for treatment and on next day she was subjected to torture and rebuked with slang words by petitioner and his first wife on ground that she is a barren lady - Petitioner is a practicing lawyer of Bar Association - It is also not in dispute that respondent No. 2 has no income of her own, and she is dependent upon income of others for a two square meal a day – Court find that petitioner has failed to show how impugned order, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 2 suffers from any illegality or infirmity requiring any interference of court.
Result: Petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Heard Ms. D. Saikia, learned Amicus Curie; Mr. P.S. Lahkar, learned Addl. P.P. for the State respondent No. 1; and Mr. R. Islam, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2.
2. In this petition, under sections 397/401 read with section 482 of the Cr.P.C., the petitioner has to put to challenge the judgment and order, dated 22.04.2019, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Kamrup [M], Guwahati, in Criminal Appeal No. 86/2018. It is to be noted here that vide impugned judgment and order, dated 22.04.2019, the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Kamrup [M], Guwahati has dismissed the appeal preferred by the petitioner under section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. It is also to be noted here that vide impugned order, dated 22.05.2018, the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kamrup [M], Guwahati in D.V. Case No. 116M/2017, directed the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs. 5,000/- per month, as interim maintenance to the respondent No. 2.
3. The background facts leading to filing of the present petition are adumbrated here in below:-
On receipt of notice the petitioner appeared before the court below and submitted his written objection. Thereafter, the Protection Officer, Kamrup [M] Guwahati also submitted one Domestic Incident Report (herein after DIR) dated 10.10.2017. Thereafter, on 08.02.2018, the respondent No. 2 had preferred one petition, under section 23 of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005 for granting interim maintenance, which was opposed by the petitioner on the ground that there was no valid marriage between her and the petitioner. Thereafter, the learned court below, after hearing both the parties, vide impugned order dated 22.05.2018, directed the petitioner to pay interim maintenance @ of Rs. 5,000/- per month to the respondent No. 2.
Being aggrieved by the impugned order, the petitioner preferred an appeal under section 29 before the learned Additional Session Judge No. 2, Kamrup [M] Guwahati and after hearing both the sides the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Kamrup [M] Guwahati
Section 23 of Domestic Violence Act provides for interim maintenance.
A wife must establish a prima facie case of domestic violence to be entitled to interim maintenance under the Domestic Violence Act, considering both parties' financial statuses.
The obligation of a husband to maintain his wife under Section 125 of the CrPC is a statutory duty, and the assessment of maintenance must consider the husband's income and the wife's financial needs....
The court affirmed that the DV Act provides protection based on the definition of 'domestic relationship,' even amid claims of prior marriages, and emphasized the need to utilize statutory appeal mec....
Courts can grant maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act while other maintenance orders exist; proper assessment of the husband's income is essential for determining just....
A domestic relationship under the Domestic Violence Act exists even if a divorce is claimed, provided domestic violence occurred while living together.
The court emphasized that the interim maintenance should be adequate, fair, and reasonable, and consistent with the standard of living of the aggrieved person. The court also highlighted the presumpt....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.