AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
While some offences under IPC, notably Sections 420 and 406, are generally compoundable with or without court permission, offences under Section 120B IPC (criminal conspiracy) are predominantly non-compoundable unless explicitly permitted under the law or specific legal provisions. The courts consistently uphold the principle that offences outside the scope of the specified tables in Section 320 CrPC cannot be compounded, emphasizing the importance of legal clarity in such matters. Therefore, 120B IPC can typically not be compounded unless special permissions or exceptions apply GOPAL SINGH @ GOPAL MAHARAJ S/O SHRI BHAIRU SINGH RAWAT, Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Rajasthan, Hanuman Prasad VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan.

References:
- GOPAL SINGH @ GOPAL MAHARAJ S/O SHRI BHAIRU SINGH RAWAT, Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Rajasthan
- Rajeev Grover VS State - Crimes
- Hanuman Prasad VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan
- Dharmendra Singh VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan
- Hashmat Alam VS State - Rajasthan
- Raj Reddy Kallem VS State of Haryana - Supreme Court
- Vasumathi Marimuthu VS State rep. by Inspector of Police, CBI/ACB/Chennai - Madras
- Darshan Lal VS State Of Haryana - Punjab and Haryana
- Sanjay Sharma son of Om Parkash VS State of Himachal Pradesh - Himachal Pradesh

Search Results for "120b Ipc can be Compounded"

GOPAL SINGH @ GOPAL MAHARAJ S/O SHRI BHAIRU SINGH RAWAT, Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN

India - High Court Of Rajasthan

ANOOP KUMAR DHAND

Issues: Whether the offences under Sections 409, 477A, 201, and 120B IPC could be compounded despite being non-compoundable ... IPC. ... IPC, relying on the Supreme Court judgments in Gian Singh v. ... However, the trial Judge has declined to verify the compromise as regards to the offence punishable under Section 409, 477A, 201 and 120B IPC on the ground that the said offences are non-compoundable. ... petition is allowed and the petitioner is discharged of ....

Rajeev Grover VS State

India - Crimes

ARUNA SURESH

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Section 482—Petition to quash charge-sheet for offence under Sections 506/406/420/120B/34 Indian Penal ... Code—Offence compounded between parties—Accused applicants were alleged to have cheated complainant of Rs. 66,00,000 on pretext ... Offence under Section 406/420 IPC are compoundable with the permission of the court. Offence under Section 506 IPC can be compounded by the parties without the permission of the court if offence of criminal intimidation f....

Hanuman Prasad VS State of Rajasthan

2011 0 Supreme(Raj) 2344 India - Rajasthan

MEENA V.GOMBER

, 467, 468, 471 read with 120 ... State & others , (2008) 16 SCC 1 , the Hon'ble Apex Court while dealing with a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C . for quashment of proceedings of an FIR under Sections 420, 468, 471 , 34, 120B IPC, held that except Section 420 IPC, which could be compounded with the permission ... of the court, other offences under Sections 468, 471, 34 and 120B IPC, mentioned in FIR, could not even be compounded with the permission....

Dharmendra Singh VS State of Rajasthan

2014 0 Supreme(Raj) 1760 India - Rajasthan

SANDEEP MEHTA

Fact of the Case: The petitioners sought quashing of criminal proceedings for offences under Sections 420, 418, and 120B ... The trial Court by order dated 4.7.2014 has accepted the said application only to the extent of Sections 420 and 418 IPC and has compounded the proceedings to that extent. ... So far as the offence under Section 120B IPC is concerned, the application has been rejected by the trial Court on the ground that the offence under Section 120B IPC is n....

Hashmat Alam VS State

2012 0 Supreme(Raj) 1050 India - Rajasthan

MEENA V.GOMBER

. — Offences u/S. 420, 406 and 120-B IPC — Parties amicably settled their dispute out of the court — Held — Sec. 420 is compoundable ... , other offences under Sections 406 and 120B IPC, mentioned in FIR, could not even be compounded with the permission of the Court and that High Court or even Supreme Court would not ordinarily be justified in doing something indirectly which could not be done directly. ... In the judgment in the case of Manoj Sharma (supra), the Hon'ble Apex Court while dealing with a petition under Sec....

Raj Reddy Kallem VS State of Haryana

2024 4 Supreme 114 India - Supreme Court

A. S. BOPANNA, SUDHANSHU DHULIA

of IPC arising out of the FIR had to be compounded. ... NI Act does not elaborate upon manner in which offences should be compounded – In cases of Section 138 of NI Act, accused must try ... Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 – Sections 138 and 147 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 406, 420 read ... Once the entire amount was paid, the entire proceedings under Section 138 of NI Act as well as offences under Section 406, 420 read with 120B of IPC arising out of the FIR had to be #HL_ST....

SMT. AMRUTA D/O. RAMESH KARADIGUDDA, SMT. ANNAPURNA W/O. RAMESH KARADIGUDDA vs GIRISH V. P.

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 15048 India - Karnataka High Court

VENKATESH NAIK T, J

It is hereby ordered that the offences punishable under Sections 384, 120B, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC stands compounded in view of the settlement between the parties.

Vasumathi Marimuthu VS State rep.  by Inspector of Police, CBI/ACB/Chennai

2016 0 Supreme(Mad) 2433 India - Madras

R.SUBBIAH

Criminal Produce Code, 1973 - Section 239 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 120-B r/w 420, 467, 468 r ... Further, if at all the matter is settled, it could be settled only for the offence under Section 420 IPC; so far as the offences under Sections 120B, 467 & 468 IPC are concerned, the said offence cannot be compounded. ... 11. ... The chargesheet has been filed against the accused persons for the alleged offences under Sections 120-B r/w 420, 467, 468 r/w Section 471 IPC. ... 3. ....

Darshan Lal VS State Of Haryana

2002 0 Supreme(P&H) 404 India - Punjab and Haryana

V.M.JAIN

and that only offenses covered by the specified tables can be compounded. ... Section 482 - Quashment of FIR - IPC 420/465/468/471/120B - Section 320, CrPC - Surendra Nath Mohanty v. ... State of J&K to determine that the offenses under Sections 465/467/468/120B, IPC, could not be quashed on the ground of compromise ... It was held that in view of the aforesaid legislative mandate, only the offences, which are covered by table 1 or 2 (as given in Section 320, CrPC) can be compounded an....

Sanjay Sharma son of Om Parkash VS State of Himachal Pradesh

2014 0 Supreme(HP) 1917 India - Himachal Pradesh

P.S.RANA

offence under Section 120B IPC is non-compoundable. ... Compounding - Criminal Conspiracy - Sections 420, 120B, 34 IPC - The court rejected the application for quashing the FIR as the ... Fact of the Case: The petition was filed to quash an FIR registered under Sections 420, 120B read with Section 34 IPC ... State of HP that criminal offences which are not compoundable under Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure could not be allowed to be compounded even if ....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top