AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
The sources collectively depict a complex scenario involving delayed criminal investigations, procedural challenges in legal and tax cases, allegations of police misconduct, and civil disputes involving Rajesh. The repeated filing of writ petitions and court orders reflect ongoing struggles for justice and procedural compliance. Notably, issues of police interference and conspiracy in criminal cases are highlighted, emphasizing systemic challenges in timely justice delivery. Overall, these references underscore the multifaceted legal battles faced by Rajesh across criminal, civil, and tax domains, illustrating procedural delays, investigative hurdles, and allegations of misconduct.

Search Results for "143 of 2011 Rajesh"

Bodhi Pandit VS State of Jharkhand

India - Crimes

RAJESH SHANKAR

The subsequent trajectory of the investigation, marked by its languorous pace and lack of efficacy, necessitated the initiation of a Writ Petition on 23-06-2011. ... (ii) The present writ petition was filed on 23.06.2011 i.e. after about one year of the lodging of the FIR with a prayer to take legal action against the accused persons, who were roaming freely in the locality. ... (B) Interim Period of Investigation (08-05-2010 to 17-03-2011): I. Rightful Action: None evidence. (ii) Almost after passing of one-year period from r....

Bodhi Pandit VS State of Jharkhand

2024 0 Supreme(Jhk) 72 India - Jharkhand

RAJESH SHANKAR

JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR The present writ petition was initially filed by Tekni Devi W/o Sri Teklal Pandit (hereinafter referred as the original petitioner) for issuance of direction ... The subsequent trajectory of the investigation, marked by its languorous pace and lack of efficacy, necessitated the initiation of a Writ Petition on 23-06-2011. ... (ii) The present writ petition was filed on 23.06.2011 i.e. after about one year of the lodging of the FIR with a prayer to take legal action against the accused persons, who were roaming freel....

PARTH BHADRESH MEHTA VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2019 0 Supreme(Bom) 213 India - Bombay

T.V.NALAWADE

Najima Mamtaj, (2014) AIR(SC)(Cri) 1078) and the Full Bench decision of this Court reported as (Rajesh Chalke v. State of Maharashtra,2011 5 AIRBomR 322). The provisions of sections 142, 143, 144, 146 etc, of the Negotiable Instruments Act are also considered. ... SBI Global Factors Ltd., 2011 STPL 14020 Bombay). ... (3) (Rajesh Chalke v. State of Maharashtra, 2011 STPL 5502 Bombay). ... (4) (Netcore Solutions Pvt. ltd v. Pinnacle Teleservices Pvt. Ltd., 2011 STPL 325....

Rajesh Kumar Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar Through K. S. Dwivedi, The Director General Of Police, State Of Bihar, and Ors

India - Patna High Court

Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad

================================================= Rajesh Kumar Choudhary Son of Laxman Chaudhary Resident of Village- Enai, P.S.- Revelganj, District- Saran (Chapra). ... 19218 of 2011. ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.143 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15487 of 2011 ===== ... Writ petition is dismissed for non- Patna High Court MJC No.143 of 2019(3) dt.17-07-2019 2/4 prosecution.” Admittedly, the applicant was a party to....

Dextsoft Solution Pvt. Ltd. vs Income Tax Officer

2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 4515 India - Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Delhi Bench)

SATBEER SINGH GODARA, J, S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACJ

The appeal pertains to the assessment year 2011-12 and contests the CIT(A)’s order dated 25.11.2019 under section 147/143(3) of the ... Rajesh Kumar Dhanesta, Sr. ... 147/143(3) of the ITA No.9499/Del/2019 Assessment Year: 2011-12 Dextsoft Solution Pvt. Ltd., 1626/33, 4th Floor, Naiwala, Karol Bagh, New Delhi Vs. ... DR Date of hearing 02.07.2025 Date of pronouncement 02.07.2025 ORDER PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2011-12, arises against t....

Best Cybercity (India) Pvt.  Ltd.  VS Income Tax Officer, Ward 4(3)

2019 0 Supreme(Del) 1503 India - Delhi

S.MURALIDHAR, I.S.MEHTA

Fact of the Case: The Petitioner, a real estate development company, filed its return of income for the AY 2011-2012 ... Rajesh Arora, Chartered Accountant, Authorized Representatives, attended the assessment proceedings in compliance to notices under section 142(1) & 143 (2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 from time to time. ... The fact is that the original assessment was under Section 143 (3) of the Act. ... In the first place, the proforma filled up by the AO for seeking approval of the superior officer for the re-open....

Best Cybercity (India) Pvt. Ltd.  VS Income Tax Officer, Ward 4(3)

2019 0 Supreme(Del) 406 India - Delhi

S.MURALIDHAR, I.S.MEHTA

Petitioner, a real estate development company, challenged a notice seeking to re-open the assessment for the Assessment Year (AY) 2011 ... Rajesh Arora, Chartered Accountant, Authorized Representatives, attended the assessment proceedings in compliance to notices under section 142(1) & 143 (2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 from time to time. ... The fact is that the original assessment was under Section 143 (3) of the Act. ... In the first place, the proforma filled up by the AO for seeking approval of the superior officer....

A. S.  Santhosh Kumar VS State of Kerala, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Thiruvananthapuram

2017 0 Supreme(Ker) 616 India - Kerala

SUNIL THOMAS

They hatched a conspiracy and engaged one 'Happy Rajesh' who was a local goonda. Happy Rajesh and his gang were given the quotation to attack Babu Unnithan. Accordingly, on 16.04.2011, Happy Rajesh and his gang attacked Babu Unnithan with weapons, who sustained near fatal injuries. ... In the meanwhile, alleging that Happy Rajesh was murdered at the instance of senior police officers and that, they were exerting undue influence and pressure on the police to sabotage the investigation, widow of Happy #HL....

Rajesh Kumar vs Vidhut Vitran Nigam

India - National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

विरूद्ध) Rajesh Kumar, S/o Sri Shiv Prasad Sharma, R/o Village Mohamadpur, Goshi, Mau. ... (सुरक्षित)                                                                                   अपील संख्‍या:-143/2012 (जिला उपभोक्‍ता फोरम, मऊ द्धारा परिवाद सं0-93/2011 में पारित निर्णय/आदेश दिनांक 16.12.2011 के ... Rajesh Kumar a...........Appellant(s)Versus(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. ... में पारित निर्णय/आदेश दिनांक 16.12.2011 के विरूद्ध योजित की गई है, उक्‍त निर्णय क....

Rajesh Kumar VS Pratibha

2010 0 Supreme(MP) 864 India - Madhya Pradesh

M.K.SINGH

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top