Legal Proceedings and Submissions
The case involves detailed hearings where counsels for the parties presented rival submissions, emphasizing the importance of legal arguments and interpretations. The references indicate extensive judicial discussion on contractual disputes, financial recoveries, and procedural aspects Sorin Group Italia S. R. L. VS Neeraj Garg - Delhi, SORIN GROUP ITALIA S.R.L vs NEERAJ GARG - Delhi.
Judicial Precedents Cited
The case references multiple significant judgments, including:
Emaar India Ltd v. Tarun Aggarwal Projects LLP, relevant for dispute resolution frameworks.
Core Issues Addressed
The case appears to focus on contractual obligations, financial recovery (notably ₹4.46 crore), and legal interpretations surrounding commercial agreements initiated in 2012. The judgments also touch upon procedural fairness, inadvertence, and legal remedies available to parties LEVITATE MOBILE TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD Vs STANDARD CHARTERED BANK AND ANR - Delhi.
Legal Principles and Insights
The case underscores the importance of:
The applicability of precedents to current disputes, especially concerning contractual obligations and financial remedies.
Additional Context
The case references other legal issues such as statutory relaxations for specific categories (e.g., minors, women, infirm persons) and procedural nuances in enforcement actions INDINDIA_2022_DHC_4476, INDINDIA_2022_DHC_3086.
The 2012 SCC OnLine Del 5507 case exemplifies a typical commercial dispute where courts analyze contractual obligations, enforceability, and remedies. The case highlights the significance of meticulous legal submissions, referencing authoritative precedents, and judicial discretion in resolving financial claims. It also demonstrates the court's approach to procedural fairness, inadvertence, and statutory relaxations in enforcement proceedings.
References: - M/s Gumlink A/S, (2012) SCC OnLine Del 5507 - Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd v. Pinkcity Midway Petroleums, (2003) SCC 503 - Sasan Power Limited v. North American Coal Corporation (India) Pvt Ltd, SCC 896 - Emaar India Ltd v. Tarun Aggarwal Projects LLP, SCC 2022 - Additional judgments and procedural references as noted above.
M/s Gumlink A/S, (2012) SCC OnLine Del 5507 7. I have heard the counsels for the parties and the rival submissions. 8. ... And Anr., 2019 SCC OnLine Del 10225 b) Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd v. Pinkcity Midway Petroleums, (2003) 6 SCC 503 c) Sasan Power Limited v. ... NCC Limited (2022) SCC OnLine SC 896 b) Emaar India Ltd v. Tarun Aggarwal Projects LLP And Anr. (2022) SCC #HL....
M/s Gumlink A/S, (2012) SCC OnLine Del 5507 7. I have heard the counsels for the parties and the rival submissions. 8. ... , 2019 SCC OnLine Del 10225 b) Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd v. ... (2022) SCC OnLine SC 1328 c) Ms. Sancorp Confectionary Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. ... NCC Limited (2022) SCC OnLine SC 896 b) Emaar India Ltd v. Tarun Aggarwal Projects ....
M/s Gumlink A/S, (2012) SCC OnLine Del 5507 7. I have heard the counsels for the parties and the rival submissions. 8. ... , 2019 SCC OnLine Del 10225 b) Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd v. ... (2022) SCC OnLine SC 1328 c) Ms. Sancorp Confectionary Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. ... NCC Limited (2022) SCC OnLine SC 896 b) Emaar India Ltd v. Tarun Aggarwal Projects ....
M/s Gumlink A/S, (2012) SCC OnLine Del 5507 7. I have heard the counsels for the parties and the rival submissions. ... , 2019 SCC OnLine Del 10225 b) Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd v. Pinkcity Midway Petroleums, (2003) 6 SCC 503 c) Sasan Power Limited v. North American Coal Corporation (India) Private Ltd. ... NCC Limited (2022) SCC OnLine SC 896 b) Emaar India Ltd v. Tarun Aggarwal Projects LLP ....
recovery of ₹4,46,50,000/- along with interest, stemming from a dispute over a mobile application development agreement initiated in 2012 ... Bipin Kumar Gupta, [2023 SCC OnLine Del 5507] and a decision of Andhra Pradesh High Court in Penumatsa Anil Kumar v. State of A.P. ... , [2024 SCC OnLine Del 5192], Roots Cooling System (P) Ltd. v. ... , [2021 SCC OnLine Del 4897], the mere inadvertence does....
State of Maharashtra, 2009 SCC OnLine Bom 770, Digvijay Saroha vs. State, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 10324 and K.T. Naveen Kumar @ Naveen vs. State of Karnataka, Crl. P.No.5507/2019 decided on 10.01.2020 by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. ... Lalit Somdatta Nagpal & Anr., (2007) 4 SCC 171, State (NCT of Delhi) vs. Brijesh Singh @ Arun Kumar & Anr. (2017) 10 SCC 779 and Muniraju R. vs. ... State of Maharashtra, (2007) 3 SCC 633, J....
SFIO, 2022 SCC OnLine Del 4543 dated 21.12.2022 (2022/DHC/005738) wherein the learned single judge after noticing Shivani Rajiv Saxena (supra) held: "30.6. ... , 2000 SCC OnLine Del 119, wherein it was observed: "14. The legal position emerging from the above discussion can be summarised as follows: ...... ... Directorate of Enforcement, 2022 SCC Online Del 3086(2022:DHC:4121) to contend that the proviso to section 45(1) has been in....
ACIT (2012) 143 TTJ 500 (Jodhpur), ACIT vs. Mrs. Uttara S. Shorewala ( ITA No. 5506 & 5507/Mum/2009 and CO. [ΙΤΑ 5068/M/2009). No 107/Mum/2010), Jafferali K. Rattonsey vs. DCIT [ a href="./.. ... Acit, anandita no.2778/ahd/2012 vi. ITA T, Delhi SMC Bench ITA No. 5936/Del/2016 in the case of SH. VIKAS KAPOOR, VS ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-04, vii. a href="./.. ... Shukla (1998) (3) SCC 410 iv. ITAT Kolkatta in the case of T.S. Venkatesan Vs. ACIT 69 TTJ (cal) Further, it is also well settled that no addit....
Directorate of Enforcement 2022 SCC Online Del 3086(2022:DHC:4121) to contend that the proviso to section 45(1) has been incorporated as a relaxation for persons below sixteen years of age; a woman; or one who is sick or infirm. ... Directorate of Enforcement 2023 SCC Online Del 1094 where it was observed: ―34. Considering the submission of the petitioner, viz. the petitioner's claim he did not have knowledge if the funds of M/s. ... SFIO 2022 SCC OnLine#HL_....
Union of India (2012) SCC OnLine Madras 1735 and on judgment of a Single Judge of the High Court of Karnataka in Lundbeck India Private Limited Vs. ... Union of India (2013) SCC OnLine Kar 6622 holding such consultation with DTAB to be not mandatory but I am respectfully unable to agree with the said view. ... Home Secretary, UOI (2012) 5 SCC 1 to contend that when the statute provides for establishment of expert body, creation of an ad hoc body and relian....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.