AI Overview...
Summary of 2025 Insc on Line Sc 291
- Legal Precedents and Judicial Decisions
- The case references multiple judgments from 2025, notably SCC 590, SCC 570, SCC 706, and SCC 18, indicating ongoing judicial interpretation of various legal issues.
- The judgment in BVG (India) Ltd. (2018) emphasizes the authority's role in selecting the best quotation for contracts, highlighting the importance of expertise in procurement processes.
-
The Uttar Pradesh case (2025 SCC Online SC 706) clarifies that the presumption of loan advancement shifts the burden to the accused to rebut, aligning with principles from Naresh Verma vs. Narinder Chauhan (2020) see Para 21, 22.
-
Constitutional and Procedural Insights
- Dayamoy Mahato (2025 INSC 1418) reinforces that Article 21 rights are paramount but must be balanced against other constitutional interests, especially in criminal proceedings.
-
The conflict of interest in bidding and procurement is addressed, emphasizing transparency and the need to prevent undue influence (Gulfisha Fatima VS State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) - Supreme Court).
-
Arbitration and Legislative Framework
-
References to Arbitral Award paragraphs (291, 373-375, 478-479) and the Arbitration Act, 1996, suggest ongoing judicial review of arbitration procedures and the need for legislative amendments to align with international standards (Sepco Electric Power Construction Corporation VS GMR Kamalanga Energy Ltd. - Supreme Court).
-
Criminal and Procedural Law
- Cases like Saumya Chaurasia (2024) and Padam Chand Jain (2025) discuss the scope of criminal proceedings, emphasizing that crossing certain legal lines can lead to criminal liability or procedural violations (Sharjeel Imam vs State of NCT of Delhi - Delhi).
-
The Durg case (CHH 2025) discusses mens rea in criminal acts under Section 304, highlighting distinctions between premeditated and sudden acts (UTTAM MANHARE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH - Chhattisgarh).
-
Regulatory and Administrative Law
- The judgment involving Aarti Industries (2025 SCC OnLine SC 18) underscores the importance of regulatory oversight in industrial cases, referencing prior cases like National Small Industries Corporation Ltd.
Analysis and Conclusion
- The judgments from 2025 reflect a nuanced approach to balancing constitutional rights, procedural fairness, and administrative authority.
- Emphasis is placed on the presumption in financial cases, the authority's discretion in procurement, and the need for legislative updates to improve arbitration laws.
- Criminal law decisions continue to refine the understanding of mens rea and procedural violations, ensuring justice while safeguarding constitutional guarantees.
References: - SCC 590, 570, 706, 18 - INSC 1418, 1059, 867, 329, 739 - CHH 2025 INSC 632 - Various other citations as detailed above.
Search Results for "2025 Insc on Line Sc 291"
2025 6 Supreme 736 • India - Supreme Court
J. K. MAHESHWARI, RAJESH BINDAL
, (1996) 10 SCC 590 : 1996 INSC 1108 (See Para 21). ... PFC , 2009 INSC 1174 : (2009) 15 SCR 1; Corporation Bank vs. Saraswati , 2008 INSC 1321 : (2008) 16 SCR 340; MSR Leathers vs. S Palaniappan 11 [In Civil Appeal No. 5537 of 2025] in his capacity as Chairman of Palm Groves Bungalow Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. was dismissed at the stage of admission itself.
2025 0 Supreme(HP) 770 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KAINTHLA
Pavithran Prasanth, 2024 INSC 1059, we opined:‘8. ... He admitted in the opening line of his cross-examination that the cheque (Ex. CW-1/A) bears his signature. It was laid down by this Court in Naresh Verma vs. Narinder Chauhan 2020(1) Shim. ... State of U.P., 2025 SCC OnLine SC 706 that the complainant is not to prove the advancement of a loan to the accused because it is a matter of presumption. It is for the accused to rebut the presumption. It was observed: 22. ... It was observed at page 291: - 19. As regards the c....
2026 0 Supreme(SC) 4 • India - Supreme Court
ARAVIND KUMAR, N. V. ANJARIA
291. ... Dayamoy Mahato , 2025 INSC 1418 reiterated that while Article 21 remains paramount, it does not operate in a vacuum divorced from competing constitutional interests. ... No. 14030 of 2025], Umar Khalid [SLP (Crl.) No. 14165 of 2025], Shifa Ur Rehman [SLP (Crl.) No. 14859 of 2025], Mohd. Saleem Khan [SLP (Crl.) No. 15335 of 2025], Meeran Haider [SLP (Crl.) No. 14132 of 2025], Shadab Ahmed [SLP (Crl.) No. 17055 of 2025], and....
2025 0 Supreme(SC) 1750 • India - Supreme Court
B. R. GAVAI, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
Reference may be made to paragraphs 291, 373 to 375, 478 to 479 of the Arbitral Award. 108. ... Meril Life Sciences Private Limited , 2025 SCC Online SC 570. 78. ... It is only for Parliament to amend the aforesaid provision in the light of the experience of the courts in the working of the Arbitration Act, 1996, and bring it in line with other legislations the world over.” ... Union of India and Others , 2023 INSC 708 : (2023) 15 SCC 472 and a 3-Judge Bench decision in Project Director, National Highways No. 45 E and 2....
2025 0 Supreme(Del) 387 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Navin Chawla, Shalinder Kaur
2024 INSC 739 . SaumyaChaurasia v. Directorate of Enforcement, SLP(Crl.) No.12492/2024 dated 25.09.2024. Padam Chand Jain v. Enforcement Directorate , SLP(Crl.) No.17476/2024, dated 16.01.2025. ... NIA, 2025 SCC OnLine Del 1561, as under: “71. ... In the present case, the appellant has not at all crossed the line.” (Emphasis Supplied) 50. ... No. 738/2025; Supreme Court. NIA vs. Areeb Ejaz Majeed , 2021 SCC OnLine Bom 239. Thwaha Fasal v. Union of India a href="./..
2025 Supreme(Online)(ORI) 86 • India - Orissa High Court
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, CJ, HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO, J
JUDGMENT 16.01.2025 Chakradhari Sharan Singh, CJ. 1. ... BVG (India) Ltd., (2018) 5 SCC 462: (2018) 3 SCC (Civ) 291] he argues that the authority concerned is in the best position to find out the best person or the best quotation depending on the work to be entrusted under the contract. ... State of Haryana, 2024 INSC 867 151. ... In the above circumstances, it puts either or both of them in a position to have access to each other‟s information about, or to influence the Bid of either or each other, which attracts Conflict of Interest i....
2025 0 Supreme(SC) 626 • India - Supreme Court
J. B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN
Etc. reported in 2025 INSC 329, a two-Judge Bench of this Court, of which one of us (J.B. ... That line, once crossed, would have no limit.”151. The views of the Federal Court in Galati (supra) that the grant of royal assent by the Governor-General was a legislative act and hence, non-justiciable was in line with the view of the Court in Gallant v. ... The law as propounded in the line of precedents adverted to above must negate the submissions which were urged on behalf of the petitioners. ... vii) Th....
2025 Supreme(Online)(HP) 4274 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Vijender Katoch, J
Pavithran Prasanth, 2024 INSC 1059, we opined: ‘8. ... It was observed at page 291: - 19. As regards the claim of compensatiHon raised on behalf of the respondent, we are conscious of the settled principles that the object of Chapter XVII of Ashok Kumar Versus State of U.P, 2025 SCC Online SC 706 that the complainant is not to prove the advancement of the loan because it is a matter of presumption. It was observed: 22. ... From the above line of cases, it becomes very clear that a sentence of imprisonment can be grant....
2025 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 10504 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
2025:CGHC:47998-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRA No. 291 of 2025 Uttam Manhare S/o Late Mitthu Lal Manhare Aged About 44 Years R/o Shanichri Bazar, Siddhart Nagar, Durg P.S. Durg- District- Durg ( C.G. ). ... The dividing line between Part I and Part II of Section 304 turns on mens rea. ... State of Bihar5, the Supreme Court has observed that in cases of a sudden without premeditation, where the accused acted neither cruelly nor with 4 2023 INSC 632 5 2024 INSC....
2025 Supreme(Online)(HP) 4462 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KAINTHLA
Aarti Industries, (2025) 256 Comp Cas 606: 2025 SCC OnLine SC 18, wherein it was observed: 15. This court in the case of National Small Industries Corporation Ltd v. ... Revision No. 683 of 2024 Reserved on: 01.07.2025 Date of Decision: 09.07.2025 Daleep Singh ...Petitioner Versus PNB and anr. ..Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? ... Ltd. [(2002) 108 Comp Cas 48 (SC); (2002) 1 SCC 234; 2002 SCC (Cri) 121; 2001 SCC OnLine SC 1364; [2001] INSC 572.....
Filter by Legal Phrase
