SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.B. Pardiwala, R. Mahadevan, JJ.
The State of Tamil Nadu – Petitioner
VERSUS
The Governor of Tamilnadu & Anr. – Respondents
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1239 of 2023
Decided On : 08-04-2025
JUDGMENT :
(J.B. PARDIWALA, J.)
For the convenience of the exposition, this judgment is divided in the following parts:
| INDEX | |
| A | A. FACTUAL MATRIX |
| i. Factual background with respect to assent to bills | |
| ii. Factual background with respect to accord of sanction for investigation into cases of corruption against public servants | |
| iii. Factual background with respect to the files pertaining to premature release of prisoners | |
| iv. Factual background with respect to the appointments to the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission (TNPSC) | |
| v. Factual background with respect to dismissal of ministers and allocation of ministries | |
| B. | SUBMISSIONS OF THE PARTIES |
| i. Submissions on behalf of the Petitioner | |
| ii. Submissions on behalf of the Respondents | |
| C. | ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION |
| D. | ASSENT TO BILLS – HISTORICAL BACKGROUND |
| i. Concept of assent to bills as envisaged by certain historical documents drafted during the freedom struggle. | |
| ii. Debates of the Constituent Assembly on Article 200 of the Constitution | |
| E. | ARTICLE 200 OF THE CONSTITUTION - DEVELOPMENTS POST THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION |
| i. First Administrative Reforms Commission, 1966 | |
| ii. Rajamannar Commission, 1971 | |
| iii. Sarkaria Commission | |
| iv. Punchhi Commission | |
| F. | INTERNATIONAL JURISPRUDENCE ON ASSENT TO BILLS |
| G. | ANALYSIS |
| i. What courses of action are available to the Governor in exercise of his powers under Article 200 of the Constitution? | |
| ii. Whether the Governor can reserve a Bill for the consideration of the President when it is presented to him for assent after being reconsidered in accordance with the first proviso to Article 200, more particularly, when he had not reserved it for the consideration of the President in the first instance? | |
| iii. Whether there is an express constitutionally prescribed time-limit within which the Governor is required to act in the exercise of his powers under Article 200 of the Constitution? | |
| iv. Whether the Governor in the exercise of his powers under Article 200 can only act in accordance with the aid and advice tendered to him by the State Council of Ministers? | |
| a. The Office of the Governor | |
| b. Constituent Assembly Debates on the mode of Selection of the Governor | |
| c. Constituent Assembly Debates on the Exercise of Discretion by the Governor | |
| d. The decision of this Court in B.K. Pavitra (supra) is per incuriam | |
| v. Whether the exercise of discretion by the Governor in discharge of his functions under Article 200 could be said to be subject to judicial review? If yes, what are the parameters for such judicial review? | |
| vi. What is the manner in which the President under Article 201 of the Constitution is required to act once a Bill has been reserved for his consideration by the Governor under Article 200 of the Constitution? | |
| vii. On Exercise of Article 142 | |
| H. | CONCLUSION |
1. While the framers of the Constitution set out with a vision that the Governor would be a “constitutional head, a sagacious counselor and adviser to the Ministry”1[8, CONSTITUENT ASSEMB. DEB., (May 30, 1949) 431], someone who can “pour oil over troubled waters”, what has unfolded before us in the instant litigation has been quite the opposite, as this Court has been called upon to calm the troubled waters stirred by the ensuing long-drawn battle of a high constitutional order between the petitioner and the respondent.
2. The State of Tamil Nadu, being aggrieved by the action of the Governor on few issues of prime public importance, has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking appropriate reliefs as prayed for in the writ petition. The petitioner is aggrieved by the action, or rather inaction, on part of the Governor
State of Bihar v. Kameshwar Singh
Rameshwar Prasad & Ors. v. Union of India reported in (2006) 2 SCC 1 [Para 130]
Durga Pada Ghosh v. State of West Bengal reported in (1972) 2 SCC 656 [Para 226]
State of Telangana v. Governor of Telangana reported in (2024) 1 SCC 405 [Para 228]
Periyammal (Dead) thr. LRs & Ors. v. Rajamani & Anr. Etc. reported in 2025 INSC 329 [Para 248]
B.P. Singhal v. Union of India reported in (2010) 6 SCC 331 [Para 291]
Maru Ram v. Union of India reported in (1981) 1 SCC 107 [Para 298]
State of Gujarat v. R.A. Mehta reported in (2013) 3 SCC 1 [Para 302]
Indra Sawhney v. Union of India reported in (1992) Supp (3) SCC 217 [Para 327]
State of Rajasthan v. Union of India reported in (1977) 3 SCC 592 [Para 328]
Minerva Mills v. Union of India reported in (1980) 3 SCC 625 [Para 336]
A.K. Kaul v. Union of India reported in (1995) 4 SCC 73 [Para 338]
Epuru Sudhakar v. Govt. of A.P. reported in (2006) 8 SCC 161 [Para 339]
Bharat Sevashram Sangh v. State of Gujarat
Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. State of Bihar
Gram Panchayat of Village Jamalpur v. Malwinder Singh
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.