AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
The 55 Account Blocked Situation code (2125) is a standardized designation used across banking and legal contexts to indicate that an account has been restricted due to specific reasons like insolvency, death, lunacy, or suspected fraud. This status significantly impacts the processing of transactions, cheque clearance, and liability under applicable laws, notably Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Proper verification of account status is crucial in legal proceedings involving cheque dishonor or claims against account holders.

Search Results for "55 Account Blocked Situation Covered in 2125"

S.JAYANTHI  F/A 38 YEARS  vs P.SUKUMARAN  M/A 40 YEARS

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 15941 India - High Court of Madras

Honourable Mrs Justice R. HEMALATHA

The accused issued a cheque that was later returned due to an account block. ... Act - Section 138 - The court affirmed that an account closure and discrepancies in signatures led to the non-repayment claim being ... Issues: Whether the accused was liable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act given the account issues and lack ... The cheque (Ex.P1) was returned for the reason '55-Account #H....

SHRI VENKATAPPA B. H. vs SHRI PRASHANTH  Y.

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 31643 India - State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

with an intimation with a reason “55-account blocked situation covered in 2125” they are: Withdrawal stopped owing to death of account holder. ... Withdrawal stopped owing to insolvency of account holder.

SHRI VENKATAPPA B. H. vs SHRI PRASHANTH, Y.

India - National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

an intimation with a reason “55-account blocked situation covered in 2125” they are:       “21 Payment ... Withdrawal stopped owing to death of account holder. ...  Withdrawal stopped owing to lunacy of account holder.

SHRI VENKATAPPA B. H. vs SHRI PRASHANTH  Y.

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 32646 India - State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

with an intimation with a reason “55-account blocked situation covered in 2125” they are: Withdrawal stopped owing to death of account holder. ... Withdrawal stopped owing to insolvency of account holder.

MAVEN INDIA PVT. LTD. R/BY ITS DIRECTORSMT. BHAVANA W/O. PRAVEEN MAHAJAN vs SHRI. MAHAVEER DHOTRE

India - Karnataka

, Account is blocked situation covered in 2125= and therefore after p style="text-align: ... When he presented the said cheque for the second time, it was returned with endorsement <55

Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd.  VS T.  Venkatram Reddy

2014 0 Supreme(AP) 1115 India - Andhra Pradesh

R.KANTHA RAO

On 06.11.2012 adducing the reason for return as 'account blocked situation covered in 2125' vide five cheque return memos dated 06.11.2012 ... situation' in their account issued them to the complainant bank and as such the accused are liable to be prosecuted under Section ... According to the complainant, all the accused knowing fully well that all the five cheques woul....

R.K. DISTILLERIES PRIVATE LIMITED    VS Sreenivas  RaoRavinuthala RP

2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 528 India - National Company Law Tribunal

DR. VENKATA RAMAKRISHNA BADARINATH NANDULA, SH. CHARAN SINGH, JJ

Professional’s decisions regarding claim admissions - Claims were either partially admitted or rejected based on verification of books of accounts ... blocked situation covered in 2125”. ... blocked situation covered in 2125”. ... But we have received the Transaction Report wherein it is noted there are adjustments entries into your #....

Javaid Iqbal Balwan VS State

2006 0 Supreme(J&K) 210 India - Jammu and Kashmir

NIRMAL SINGH, HAKIM IMTIYAZ HUSSAIN

The new rules superseded all existing rules and orders relating to the matters covered by the said rules. ... The stop gap arrangement shall be covered by Rule 85 of CSR and while making postings/promotions on stop gap basis, the cases of ... Almost a similar situation arose in Suraj Parkash Gupta v.

Vaman Narain Ghiya VS State of Rajasthan

2014 0 Supreme(Raj) 85 India - Rajasthan

R.S.CHAUHAN, VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA

P.C. deals specifically with the situation where the accused is alleged to have committed falsification of account in order to facilitate ... P.C. it is also covered by Section 23 of the AAT Act. ... In order to understand the use of the words “by, or with”, one has to take into account Rule 15 of the Rules.

THE REGIONAL OFFICER, MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. LATUR AND ANR vs BABU EKNATH LAD

India - Bombay

invested money will be blocked

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top