AI Overview...
-
Customs Preventive Activities - Officers like Inspector Bharat Roy and Inspector Ram Ekbal Roy conducted investigations, examined parcels, and scrutinized evidence related to smuggling and customs violations in the North Eastern Region, including Shillong. Their work involved inspecting declared goods, such as food items and parcels, to detect discrepancies and prevent illegal trade Navratan Lal Soni, S/o Late Mothu Ram VS Superintendent of Customs Preventive Unit Customs - Gauhati.
-
Preventive Detention Laws and Orders - Several references discuss the legal framework governing preventive detention under the National Security Act and other statutes. Orders of detention are formulated based on grounds prepared by authorities, and courts have examined their validity, ensuring detention aligns with legal standards. Notably, the detention of individuals like Faizan Akther Bhat and others has been challenged in courts, emphasizing the importance of procedural correctness and substantive grounds Tilak Barman VS Union of India - Gauhati, Faizan Akhter Bhat VS Union Territory of Jammu And Kashmir - Jammu and Kashmir.
-
Role of Customs Preventive Officers - Officers such as Roy Chowdhury and others played key roles in raids and enforcement actions, including searches at premises suspected of smuggling or illegal trade. Their activities are crucial in maintaining border security and enforcing customs laws SHYAMLAL SEN VS STATE - Calcutta.
-
Legal Proceedings and Judicial Review - Courts have reviewed detention orders and preventive actions, ensuring compliance with constitutional and statutory provisions. Cases highlight the importance of proper formulation of detention grounds, adherence to procedural safeguards, and the authority's decision-making process, including the necessity of considering preliminary issues before final orders ARUN KUMAR BAJORIA VS UNION OF INDIA - Calcutta, ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF CUSTOMS FOR PREVENTION VS THE NEW CENTRAL JUTE MILLS CO. LTD. - Calcutta.
-
Seniority Disputes in Preventive Social Medicine Department - Apart from law enforcement, Roy has been involved in departmental disputes, such as seniority and appointment issues within the Department of Preventive Social Medicine, indicating administrative and personnel management challenges in preventive services Suraj Nayak VS State Of Bihar - Patna, Chittaranjan Roy,Son of Sri Braj Kishore Roy VS State of Bihar - Patna.
Analysis and Conclusion:
A. K. Roy's role as a Preventive Officer involves enforcement of customs laws, investigation, and detention activities aimed at preventing illegal trade and smuggling. His work is supported by legal frameworks that require proper procedural adherence and judicial oversight. The references collectively underscore the importance of diligent enforcement, lawful detention procedures, and judicial scrutiny to uphold rights and ensure legality in preventive actions. Roy's activities exemplify the critical functions of preventive officers in maintaining border security and enforcing trade regulations within the legal and constitutional boundaries.
Search Results for "A K Roy Preventive"
2022 0 Supreme(Gau) 22 • India - Gauhati
AJIT BORTHAKUR
Customs Preventive Unit, Office of Commissioner, North Eastern Region Shillong having jurisdiction over all North Eastern States ... On scrutiny of the evidence of the P.W.3, Inspector Bharat Roy, Customs Preventive Unit, Shillong, P.W.4 Inspector Ram Ekbal Roy of Customs Preventive Unit, Shillong-cum-investigating officer, P.W.5 Manindra Sarania, Superintendent, Customs Preventive Unit, Shillong and P.W.6 Inspector Sarwan Kumar Gerari ... Customs Preventive Unit, Off....
1969 0 Supreme(SC) 295 • India - Supreme Court
I.D.DUA, S.M.SIKRI
agent - Articles were declared to be worth Rs. 20 but freight which had been paid came - This excited the suspicion of Customs Preventive ... denomination - Order of acquittal - Appeal by special leave - Contentions made before it is necessary to state relevant facts - Customs Preventive ... Roy examined a parcel {wooden case) which purported to contain Rasogolla, Achar, Papar and dried vegetable, booked for Hongkong, ... This excited the suspicion of the Customs Preventive Officer, B. Roy, and on openi....
2005 0 Supreme(Gau) 60 • India - Gauhati
AFTAB H.SAIKIA, AMITAVA ROY
National Security Act - Preventive Detention - Act Section 14 - Summary of the acts and sections referenced and discussed by the ... The preventive detention of the petitioner following the order dated 17.7.2004 passed by the District Magistrate, Kamrup (Metropolitan), Guwahati, under the National Security Act, 1980 (hereafter referred to as the Act) is in challenge in the instant proceeding. ... JUDGMENT ... Amitava Roy, J. ... 1. ... In support of his contention that the unexplained in action of the two Governments as above has rendered....
2022 0 Supreme(J&K) 538 • India - Jammu and Kashmir
VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL
detention - preventive detention - A.K. Roy v. Union of India, AIR 1982 SC 710; Santokh Singh v. ... Fact of the Case: The petitioner sought to quash the order of detention of Faizan Akther Bhat under preventive detention ... It is, therefore, for the detaining authority to prepare and formulate the grounds of detention and satisfy itself that the grounds of detention so prepared/formulated warrant passing of the order of preventive detention. ... After all, the preventive detention envisaged under th....
1972 0 Supreme(Cal) 12 • India - Calcutta
P.C.BOROOAH, S.K.CHAKRAVARTY
Roy Chowdhury (P.W. 3) and the other Preventive Officers P.W. 2 B. C. Roy, P.W. 5. M. N. Mukherjee, P.W. 6 Shyamapada Mukherjee P.W. 1 A. G. Chakraborty, P.W. 9 C. R. ... On the 21st May 1965 a party of Customs Officials led by Sri Julka (P.W. 7) the Assistant Collector and Superintendent Preventive Service. Customs Calcutta, raided the premises No. 7.
2016 0 Supreme(Megh) 104 • India - Meghalaya
DINESH MAHESHWARI, VED PRAKASH VAISH
and not the considered decision on the preliminary issues as required by the order dated 5-11-2015, which has to be taken by the competent authority, who would ultimately deal with the matter on merits, if occasion so arise, i.e., the Additional Commissioner in the office of Commissioner of Customs (Preventive
2011 0 Supreme(Pat) 755 • India - Patna
NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH
Chittaranjan Roy and others in the Department of Preventive Social Medicine. ... Seniority Dispute - Department of Preventive Social Medicine - 23.11.1976, 24.05.1978, 29.01.1990, 20.10.1990, 30.10.1990, 17.12.1990 ... analyzed a series of notifications issued by the State Government affecting inter se seniority and promotions in the Department of Preventive ... Chittaranjan Roy and others on the other side who are all in the Department of Preventive Social Medicine (PSM) as teachers. ....
2018 0 Supreme(Pat) 574 • India - Patna
RAJENDRA MENON, RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Chittaranjan Roy and others in the Department of Preventive Social Medicine (PSM) as teachers. ... APPOINTMENT - Inter-se seniority dispute in the Department of Preventive Social Medicine (PSM) - Notifications and resolutions ... Chittaranjan Roy and another on the other side, all of them were in the Department of Preventive Social Medicine (PSM) as teachers. ... BRIEF FACTS AND ISSUES ... 3. ... Chittaranjan Roy was placed at Sl. No. 10 along with others who were directly appointed as....
1991 0 Supreme(Cal) 253 • India - Calcutta
SUSANTA CHATTERJI
PETITION - JURISDICTION - Vires of COFEPOSA Act - Grounds for interference by Court before execution of detention order - Scope of preventive ... An order of preventive detention may be made with or without prosecution and in anticipation or after discharge or even acquittal. The pendency of prosecution is no bar to an order of preventive detention. An order of preventive detention is not a bar of prosecution. ... The attention of this Court has been drawn to the observation of the Hon'ble Supreme Court that the power of....
1972 0 Supreme(Cal) 226 • India - Calcutta
B.C.MITRA, AMIYA KUMAR MUKHERJI
"roy, J. ... ... ( 1 ) THIS appeal is by the Assistant Collector of Customs, Preventive Officer and Union of India against the judgment of K. L. ... On 16th of May, 1968, the respondent moved this Court on an application under Article 226 of the Constitution, challenging the validity of the order of authorisation dated 11-5-1958 under which the preventive officer of the Customs department, appellant No. 2, was authorised under Section 105 of the ... Roy, J. , dated 26-11-1969, quashing an authorisation under Section 105....
Filter by Legal Phrase
