AI Overview

AI Overview...

References: - A. N. Arunachalam VS T. Sivaprakasam - Madras - A. N. Arunachalam VS T. Sivaprakasam - Madras - Shvedh, a Partnership Firm, Represented by its Partner Nitinsathyaa VS Shraddha Entertainment, Represented by its Partner Mr. Badri Kasturi - Madras - M/s.Viprah Technologies Limited and 2 others vs T.GANESAN AND 2 OTHERS - Madras - AN ARUNACHALAM vs T. SIVAPRAKASAM - Madras - 1. Dosapati Narayana Rao vs 1.The Branch Manager Andhra Bank - Consumer State - 1. Dosapati Narayana Rao vs 1.The Branch Manager Andhra Bank - Consumer State - SMT SHAILA CHEBBI GOVIND Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY - Karnataka - M/S SHEVDH A PARTNERSHIP FI vs M/S SHARADDHA ENTERTAINMENT - Madras

Search Results for "Abj in Damages Suit"

A. N.  Arunachalam VS T.  Sivaprakasam

2011 0 Supreme(Mad) 432 India - Madras

R.MALA

BURDEN OF PROOF - SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE - RELIEF - GRANT OR DENIAL - FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED - DELAY - WAIVER - EQUITABLE RELIEF - DAMAGES ... The suit is decreed as prayed for in the plaint, with costs. ... - ALTERNATIVE RELIEF - SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE SUIT - PLEADINGS - READINESS AND WILLINGNESS - AVERMENTS - INTERPRETATION - DELAY - ... "Merely because the plaintiff claims damages in a suit for specific performance of contract as an alternative relief, it cannot be said that he is not entitled to the m....

A. N. Arunachalam VS T. Sivaprakasam

2011 0 Supreme(Mad) 458 India - Madras

R.MALA

The suit is decreed as prayed for in the plaint, with costs. ... Fact of the Case: The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement, Ex.A-1, dated ... However, the trial Court dismissed the suit, stating that the appellant/plaintiff was not always ready and willing to perform his ... ... "Merely because the plaintiff claims damages in a suit for specific performance of contract as an alternative relief, it cannot be said that he is not entitled to the main relief of s....

Shvedh, a Partnership Firm, Represented by its Partner Nitinsathyaa VS Shraddha Entertainment, Represented by its Partner Mr. Badri Kasturi

2020 0 Supreme(Mad) 1021 India - Madras

V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

enforceable rights of substantiated character - No interim order need to be granted when respondent claimant can be compensated by way of damages ... No interim order need to be granted when the respondent/claimant can be compensated by way of damages in the event of succeeding the claim petition before the learned Arbitrator. 27. ... The respondent filed three applications under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 : A.No.1 of 2019 for ABJ of the untitled film being produced by the appellant. ... Any party before the A....

M/s.Viprah Technologies Limited and 2 others vs T.GANESAN AND 2 OTHERS

India - Madras High Court

In all other cases, ABJ will last as long as the suit lasts, and even beyond it, if the suit is decreed in favour of the plaintiff. ... But the damage is done and in the name of law. The legal system that has been over anxious to rush to the aid of the plaintiff, is now remorse- less in its inability to recompense the damage the defendant might have suffered. ... cess in the suit. ... claim in the eventuality of a plaintiffs’ success in the suit. ... When....

AN ARUNACHALAM vs T. SIVAPRAKASAM

India - Madras High Court

"Merely because the plaintiff claims damages in a suit claim, failing which, ABJ was sought for. ... But subsequently, the suit was disposed of 21.12.2001, stating that compromise memo filed and the suit was disposed of p style

1. Dosapati Narayana Rao vs 1.The Branch Manager  Andhra Bank

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 11252 India - State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

the complainants, aggrieved by the order of the Commission below dated 16.12.2020 in CC SR No.685/2020 for the rejection of the complaint filed for seeking direction against the opposite parties to settle the claim payable under accident insurance benefit policy, with interest @ 12% per annum besides damages ... ABJ/01/00001143 with the opposite party No.1, since 24.11.2005; that account was covered with accident insurance for Rs.1,00,000/-; that on 25.02.2009, Smt. ... After going through the complaint averments, we are of the view that for the reasons be....

1. Dosapati Narayana Rao vs 1.The Branch Manager  Andhra Bank

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 18255 India - State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

the complainants, aggrieved by the order of the Commission below dated 16.12.2020 in CC SR No.685/2020 for the rejection of the complaint filed for seeking direction against the opposite parties to settle the claim payable under accident insurance benefit policy, with interest @ 12% per annum besides damages ... ABJ/01/00001143 with the opposite party No.1, since 24.11.2005; that account was covered with accident insurance for Rs.1,00,000/-; that on 25.02.2009, Smt. ... After going through the complaint averments, we are of the view that for the reasons be....

SMT SHAILA CHEBBI GOVIND Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY

India - High Court of Karnataka

It was in this background that it was felt necessary to divest him of the share holding in the company to prevent further damage. ... And suspecting mala fides and evil actions on his part, the petitioners are said to have filed a civil suit in O.S.No.25382/2015, which was said to have been withdrawn later, as a more comprehensive suit was to have been filed thereafter. ... Sd/- JUDGE KS* ABJ: p class="sub_para" left_margin="244.799759364" pos_bottom ... Given the mercurial and diabolic nature of Madhukar, the petition....

M/S SHEVDH, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM vs M/S SHARADDHA ENTERTAINMENT

India - Madras

No interim order need to be granted when the respondent/claimant ● A.No.1 of 2019 for ABJ ... Power vests to the Civil Court to grant an interim relief in a pending suit, the Application, which is more or like an application moved under protect the interest of a party seeking the same, pending the suit

M/S SHEVDH  A PARTNERSHIP FI vs M/S SHARADDHA ENTERTAINMENT

2020 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 4353 India - High Court of Madras

Hon`ble Mrs Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

No interim order need to be granted when the respondent/claimant can be compensated by way of damages in the event of succeeding the claim petition before the learned Arbitrator. ... Any party before the Arbitrator is at liberty to invoke Section 17 Application, which is more or like an application moved under Section 39 Rule 1 of CPC in a pending suit. ... Power vests to the Civil Court to grant an interim relief in a pending suit, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act vests some certain power with the Arbitrator to grant interim relief p....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad
SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top