AI Overview...

Ashok Kumar Monga - Main points and insights:
Monga is involved in legal proceedings related to his suspension and reinstatement issues with UCO Bank. Despite winning his case for reinstatement and consequential benefits, he remained suspended for nearly 18 years, highlighting delays in implementation (ASHOK KUMAR MONGA VS UCO BANK - Delhi, ASHOK KUMAR MONGA VS UCO BANK - Delhi, HOTEL TAJ PALACE VS RAVI ROHILLA - Delhi).
In his litigation, the court held that Monga was entitled to reinstatement with benefits, but salary arrears and allowances were limited to 50%. His case was appealed in LPA No. 411/1999 (ASHOK KUMAR MONGA VS UCO BANK - Delhi, ASHOK KUMAR MONGA VS UCO BANK - Delhi).
The Supreme Court has emphasized the principle that a person should not act as both judge and witness or prosecutor simultaneously, underscoring the importance of impartiality in judicial and quasi-judicial functions (ASHOK KUMAR MONGA VS UCO BANK - Delhi).
Monga's case has been referenced in various legal contexts, including reviews and appeals, indicating ongoing judicial scrutiny (LODHI HOTEL EMPLOYEES WELFARE ASSOCIATION VS UNION OF INDIA - Delhi, TAJ MAHAL HOTEL VS INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - Delhi, HOTEL TAJ PALACE VS RAVI ROHILLA - Delhi).
Analysis and Conclusion:
Monga’s prolonged suspension despite favorable court rulings reflects systemic delays in administrative justice.
His case exemplifies the legal principle that reinstatement should be effective and timely, and highlights the judiciary's role in ensuring employee rights are upheld.
The references to Monga’s case in multiple legal reports suggest its significance in employment law and administrative justice, especially concerning wrongful suspension and reinstatement benefits (ASHOK KUMAR MONGA VS UCO BANK - Delhi, ASHOK KUMAR MONGA VS UCO BANK - Delhi, HOTEL TAJ PALACE VS RAVI ROHILLA - Delhi).

References: - Supreme Court principles on impartiality: Kamini Kumar Vs. West Bengal AIR 1972 SC 2060 (ASHOK KUMAR MONGA VS UCO BANK - Delhi) - Monga’s suspension and reinstatement case details: ASHOK KUMAR MONGA VS UCO BANK - Delhi, ASHOK KUMAR MONGA VS UCO BANK - Delhi, HOTEL TAJ PALACE VS RAVI ROHILLA - Delhi - Legal citations involving Monga: N. K. Sareen vs. Punjab National Bank, AIR 2003 SC 1872, and others.

Search Results for "Ashok Kumar Monga"

1999 0 Supreme(Del) 686 • India - Delhi

A.K.SIKRI

In Kamini Kumar Vs. West Bengal AIR 1972 SC 2060 the Supreme Court observed that a person should not act both as a Judge and a witness, or as a Judge and the prosecutor, or as a complainant and a Judge at one and the same time. ... ... ( 2 ) WHILE petitioner was working as Special Assistant and was posted in Chawri Bazar Branch of the bank, three FDRs of Rs. 25. 000. 00 each on the basis of transfer voucher were prepared in the name of one Shri Ramesh Kumar on 23-3-81 ... These FDRs matured on 8-5-81 and said Shri Ramesh Kumar encashed t....

2003 0 Supreme(Del) 1052 • India - Delhi

VIKRAMAJIT SEN

Monga has remained suspended for almost 18 years despite succeeding in his litigation. In Abdul Shakur and Ors. v. ... Monga was held to be entitled to Restatement in service with consequential benefits; however, the arrears of salary and admissible ... Monga was held to be entitled to Restatement in service with consequential benefits; however, the arrears of salary and admissible allowances were limited to 50%. This Order was appealed in LPA No. 411/1999 on 16. 11. 1999. ... Monga has remained suspended for almost 18 y....

2003 0 Supreme(Del) 1047 • India - Delhi

VIKRAMAJIT SEN, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL

Monga has remained suspended for almost 18 years despite succeeding in his litigation. In Abdul Shakur and Ors. v. ... Monga was held to be entitled to Restatement in service with consequential benefits; however, the arrears of salary and admissible ... MONGA WAS HELD TO BE ENTITLED TO REINSTATEMENT in SERVICE WITH CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS; HOWEVER, THE ARREARS OF SALARY AND ADMISSIBLE allowances WERE LIMITED TO 50%. THIS ORDER WAS APPEALED IN LPA NO. 411/1999 ON 16. 11. 1999. ... MONGA HAS remained SUSPENDED FOR ALMOST 18....

2023 0 Supreme(P&H) 1700 • India - Punjab and Haryana

HARPREET SINGH BRAR

Ashok

2016 0 Supreme(P&H) 1619 • India - Punjab and Haryana

DAYA CHAUDHARY

2022 0 Supreme(P&H) 512 • India - Punjab and Haryana

AVNEESH JHINGAN

2016 0 Supreme(Del) 1323 • India - Delhi

I.S.MEHTA

Union of India (Supra), Ashok Kumar Monga vs. UCO Bank & Ors. (Supra), N. K. Sareen vs. Punjab National Bank (Supra), Taj Mahal Hotel vs. Industrial Tribunal-I & Ors (Supra), Indian Refrigeration Industries vs. Ram Rattan Sharma (Supra), Taj Mahal Hotel vs. Industrial Tribunal-I & Ors. ... State of Bihar and Ors., AIR 2003 SC 1872, Ashok Kumar Monga vs. UCO Bank & Ors., 1999 LLR 1171, N. K. Sareen vs. Punjab National Bank, 1994 LLR 676, Taj Mahal Hotel vs. Industrial Tribunal-I & Ors.,....

LODHI HOTEL EMPLOYEES WELFARE ASSOCIATION VS UNION OF INDIA

2005 0 Supreme(Del) 799 • India - Delhi

VIKRAMAJIT SEN

... ( 3 ) THE question of maintainability of an application for Review filed in a situation where an appeal had also been preferred came up for consideration in Ashok Kumar Monga Vs UCO Bank reported as 2003 VIII ad (DELHI) 493.

2010 0 Supreme(Del) 428 • India - Delhi

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

Attention is also invited to Ashok Kumar Monga Vs.

• India - Delhi High Court

Filter by Legal Phrase

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

Approbate and Reprobate: Key Legal Doctrine Explained Vague Threatening Phone Calls: Why They Fail in Court Does SCC Own Copyright on Full Text Judgments? G.O. Ms No. 108: TN Salesman & Packer Recruitment Rules Article 226 vs 227: Key Differences in High Court Powers Judgments on One-Time GNA Charges in India TIP: Judicial vs Executive Magistrate Rules Explained Can a Sole Dissenting Member Block Society Redevelopment? How to Sue Fake Facebook Accounts for Defamation in India Illustrations: Person Dominating Will in Indian Law Perusal in Court Orders: What It Means in Law Litigant Vigilance: Essential Duty in Court Proceedings What to Do If Company Suit Signatory Dies Renting House Without Rent Agreement in India: Risks Stay on Money Realization After Ejectment: Is It Possible?