AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
The sources collectively highlight key legal principles in Indian law, including the procedural interpretation of statutes under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, the constitutional guarantee of equality in employment, and the appropriate scope of investigative powers. The first case emphasizes the procedural aspects of bail under the new Sanhita, while judicial interpretations reinforce the importance of clarity and fairness in legal processes. Transfer requests in matrimonial cases are scrutinized to prevent delays, and misuse of investigative powers is firmly discouraged.

Search Results for "Bhartiya Nay Sahita"

Nageshwar Nishad vs The State of Chhattisgarh

2025 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 6860 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

Ramesh Sinha, CJ

This case concerns a bail application under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. ... This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. ... 17/2025 registered at Police Station Nandghat, District Bemetara (C.G.), for the offences punishable under Sections 281 , 296, 351(3), 115(2), 3(5), 109(1), 324(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya #HL_STA....

Udai Pratap Singh, Sri Shyam Bihari Singh VS State of U. P.

2005 0 Supreme(All) 519 India - Allahabad

SABHAJEET YADAV

Savita and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors. , 1985 Suppl. ... Pramod Bhartiya and Ors. AIR 1993 S. C. 286, Honble Apex Court has held in para 1 of the decision that equal pay for equal work, it is self-evident, is implicit in the doctrine of equality enshrined in Article 14, it flows from it. ... C. 637, Post and Telegraph Department through Bhartiya Dock Mazdoor Manch v. Union of India reported in AIR 1987 S. C. 2342, U. P. Income Tax Department Contingent paid Staff Welfare, Association v. Union of India reported in AIR 1988 S. C. 517, K....

XXXXXX VS State of U. T.  Chandigarh

2024 0 Supreme(P&H) 1169 India - Punjab and Haryana

SUMEET GOEL

this Sanhita by reason only of the fact that a longer period therefor is specified by this Sanhita or provisions are made in this Sanhita for the extension of time." ... In the considered opinion of this Court, Section 531 of BNSS is unequivocal and unambiguous nay crystal clear. ... This aspect of the matter is further fortified by applying the Golden Rule of Interpretation nay Literal Rule of Interpretation. ... under that Code, shall be deemed to have been accorded or given under the corresponding pr....

Abhishek Jain VS State of U. T.  Chandigarh

2024 0 Supreme(P&H) 416 India - Punjab and Haryana

SUMEET GOEL

BNS S is unequivocal and unambiguous nay crystal clear. Accordingly, once the altered procedural law namely a href="./.. ... (3) Where the period specified for an application or other proceeding under the said Code had expired on or before the commencement of this Sanhita, nothing in this Sanhita shall be construed as enabling any such application to be made or proceeding to be commenced under this Sanhita ... that Code, shall be deemed to have been accorded or given under the corresponding provisions of this ....

Mandeep Kaur VS Harpreet Singh

2024 0 Supreme(P&H) 1300 India - Punjab and Haryana

SUMEET GOEL

In case; if wife in question is employed in a transferable job, she cannot be permitted to seek transfer nay repeated transfer(s) of the matrimonial related litigation(s) if her job results in her being transfer from one place to another. ... Such plea nay repeated plea(s) for transfer of the proceedings/trial will impede the very process for which such transfer is granted, i.e. facilitating the proceedings and expeditious adjudication of matrimonial disputes. 9. ... Convenience nay comparative convenience of all the concerned is required....

Rajesh Yadav S/o Kamli Yadav vs State of Jharkhand

2025 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1821 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

It would clearly be beyond the purview of Sections 154 and 156 CrPC, nay, a case of abuse of the statutory power of investigation in a given case.

Surendra Yadav S/O Bindeshwar Yadav vs State of Jharkhand

2025 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1676 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

It would clearly be beyond the purview of Sections 154 and 156 CrPC, nay, a case of abuse of the statutory power of investigation in a given case.

Deepak Rawani @ Deepak Kr. Rawani S/o Karm Chand Rawani vs State of Jharkhand

2025 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1340 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

It would clearly be beyond the purview of Sections 154 and 156 CrPC, nay, a case of abuse of the statutory power of investigation in a given case.

Santosh Yadav @ Kokan Yadav @ Koka @ Koka Yadav, S/o Jamo Yadav @ Fuleshwar Yadav vs State of Jharkhand

2025 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1461 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Anil Kumar Choudhary

It would clearly be beyond the purview of Sections 154 and 156 CrPC, nay, a case of abuse of the statutory power of investigation in a given case.

Mahbubul Hoque, S/o. LT. Ibrahim Ali vs State Of Assam, Represented By The PP, Assam

2025 0 Supreme(Gau) 1837 India - THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT, (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

PRANJAL DAS

It would clearly be beyond the purview of Sections 154 and 156 CrPC, nay, a case of abuse of the statutory power of investigation in a given case.

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top