Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - First bail application under Section 483 for arrest related to Crime No. 17/2025 in Bemetara, involving multiple sections (281, 296, 351(3), etc.) Nageshwar Nishad vs The State of Chhattisgarh - Chhattisgarh
Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita - Interpretation of legal provisions emphasizes clarity and unambiguity, especially regarding time extensions and procedural rules; courts rely on literal and golden rules of interpretation to uphold the sanctity of the law XXXXXX VS State of U. T. Chandigarh - Punjab and Haryana, Abhishek Jain VS State of U. T. Chandigarh - Punjab and Haryana
Equal Pay Doctrine - Supreme Court decisions affirm that equal pay for equal work is implicit in Article 14, reinforcing principles of equality and non-discrimination in employment contexts Udai Pratap Singh, Sri Shyam Bihari Singh VS State of U. P. - Allahabad
Transfer of matrimonial cases - Transfer requests based solely on employment transfers are discouraged as they impede the expeditious adjudication of matrimonial disputes; convenience and fairness for all parties are considered essential Mandeep Kaur VS Harpreet Singh - Punjab and Haryana
Investigation Powers - Sections 154 and 156 of the CrPC are not to be misused; courts have held that exceeding their scope constitutes abuse of statutory investigative powers Rajesh Yadav S/o Kamli Yadav vs State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand, Surendra Yadav S/O Bindeshwar Yadav vs State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand, Deepak Rawani @ Deepak Kr. Rawani S/o Karm Chand Rawani vs State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand, Santosh Yadav @ Kokan Yadav @ Koka @ Koka Yadav, S/o Jamo Yadav @ Fuleshwar Yadav vs State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand, Mahbubul Hoque, S/o. LT. Ibrahim Ali vs State Of Assam, Represented By The PP, Assam - Gauhati
Analysis and Conclusion:
The sources collectively highlight key legal principles in Indian law, including the procedural interpretation of statutes under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, the constitutional guarantee of equality in employment, and the appropriate scope of investigative powers. The first case emphasizes the procedural aspects of bail under the new Sanhita, while judicial interpretations reinforce the importance of clarity and fairness in legal processes. Transfer requests in matrimonial cases are scrutinized to prevent delays, and misuse of investigative powers is firmly discouraged.
This case concerns a bail application under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. ... This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. ... 17/2025 registered at Police Station Nandghat, District Bemetara (C.G.), for the offences punishable under Sections 281 , 296, 351(3), 115(2), 3(5), 109(1), 324(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya #HL_STA....
Savita and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors. , 1985 Suppl. ... Pramod Bhartiya and Ors. AIR 1993 S. C. 286, Honble Apex Court has held in para 1 of the decision that equal pay for equal work, it is self-evident, is implicit in the doctrine of equality enshrined in Article 14, it flows from it. ... C. 637, Post and Telegraph Department through Bhartiya Dock Mazdoor Manch v. Union of India reported in AIR 1987 S. C. 2342, U. P. Income Tax Department Contingent paid Staff Welfare, Association v. Union of India reported in AIR 1988 S. C. 517, K....
this Sanhita by reason only of the fact that a longer period therefor is specified by this Sanhita or provisions are made in this Sanhita for the extension of time." ... In the considered opinion of this Court, Section 531 of BNSS is unequivocal and unambiguous nay crystal clear. ... This aspect of the matter is further fortified by applying the Golden Rule of Interpretation nay Literal Rule of Interpretation. ... under that Code, shall be deemed to have been accorded or given under the corresponding pr....
BNS S is unequivocal and unambiguous nay crystal clear. Accordingly, once the altered procedural law namely a href="./.. ... (3) Where the period specified for an application or other proceeding under the said Code had expired on or before the commencement of this Sanhita, nothing in this Sanhita shall be construed as enabling any such application to be made or proceeding to be commenced under this Sanhita ... that Code, shall be deemed to have been accorded or given under the corresponding provisions of this ....
In case; if wife in question is employed in a transferable job, she cannot be permitted to seek transfer nay repeated transfer(s) of the matrimonial related litigation(s) if her job results in her being transfer from one place to another. ... Such plea nay repeated plea(s) for transfer of the proceedings/trial will impede the very process for which such transfer is granted, i.e. facilitating the proceedings and expeditious adjudication of matrimonial disputes. 9. ... Convenience nay comparative convenience of all the concerned is required....
It would clearly be beyond the purview of Sections 154 and 156 CrPC, nay, a case of abuse of the statutory power of investigation in a given case.
It would clearly be beyond the purview of Sections 154 and 156 CrPC, nay, a case of abuse of the statutory power of investigation in a given case.
It would clearly be beyond the purview of Sections 154 and 156 CrPC, nay, a case of abuse of the statutory power of investigation in a given case.
It would clearly be beyond the purview of Sections 154 and 156 CrPC, nay, a case of abuse of the statutory power of investigation in a given case.
It would clearly be beyond the purview of Sections 154 and 156 CrPC, nay, a case of abuse of the statutory power of investigation in a given case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.