SUMEET GOEL
Abhishek Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of U. T. Chandigarh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Mr. Sumeet Goel, J.
The present petition has been filed, under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘Cr.P.C’) for quashing of FIR No. 71 dated 04.11.2023 registered at Police Station, Sector 17, Women Cell, Chandigarh under Section 406 /498-A of IPC 1860; final report under Section 173 of Cr.P.C., 1973 presented therein as also all the proceedings emanating therefrom.
2. On 08.07.2024, the following order was passed :
At the asking of the Court, Mr. Manish Bansal, P.P. U.T., Chandigarh with Ms. Diksha Sharma, Advocate appears and accepts notice for respondent No.1-U.T., Chandigarh.
Learned counsel for the rival parties are directed to make submissions qua maintainability of the instant petition which has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., 1973.
Adjourned to 10.07.2024.
To be shown in the urgent list.”
3. Learned Public Prosecutor, U.T. Chandigarh has raised a preliminary objection/submission that the instant petition, filed on 03.07.2024, under Section 4 82 of Cr.P.C. is not maintainable in view of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (hereinafter to
Rao Shiv Bahadur Singh and another vs. State of Vindhya Pradesh
Union of India vs. Sukumar Pyne
Ram Beyas Singh and others vs. The State of Bihar
Garikapati Veeraya vs. N. Subbiah Choudhry and others
Laddu Lal Sahu and Ors. Vs. Dharnidhar Sahu and Anr.
Chief Justice of A.P. vs. L.V.A. Dikshitulu
National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Laxmi Narain Dhut
R.M.D. Chamarbaugwalla and another vs. Union of India and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.