AI Overview

AI Overview...

Summary of Provided Sources on Cab Engineers Private Limited

Key Points and Insights

  • Legal Proceedings and Court Cases
  • The company is involved in various legal cases, including a notable case No. 1533 of 2012, which references officials from the Road Construction Department in Jharkhand, indicating possible contractual or administrative disputes (IND_HC_JHHC010290542012).
  • Several court judgments are cited involving private companies, such as Dyna Technologies Pvt Ltd vs. Crompton Greaves (2024) SCC 375, which support the interpretation of contractual and arbitration issues (IND_HC_WBCHCO0038062018, 00200015729).
  • Cases also involve disputes over bank guarantees and contractual obligations, highlighting the company's engagement in complex legal and financial arrangements (00200015729).

  • Regulatory and Licensing Issues

  • The sources mention the importance of licenses and regulatory compliance, especially in contexts involving monopolies and private broadcasters, which may relate to CAB Engineers' operational licensing or regulatory oversight (IND_HC_WBCHCO0038062018, 00200015729).
  • The Supreme Court emphasizes that obtaining licenses from multiple departments is necessary for lawful operation, and mere departmental approvals do not substitute for formal licensing (IND_HC_WBCHCO0038062018, 00200015729).

  • Contractual and Arbitration Matters

  • Several judgments discuss the nature of arbitration, the authority of legal practitioners to settle or concede points, and the enforceability of agreements, which could relate to CAB Engineers' contractual disputes (00200015729, 01400021859).
  • Disputes over tenders, bid documents, and performance bonds are noted, indicating ongoing or past contractual negotiations or litigations involving the company (IND_HC_WBCHCO0038062018, 00200040292).

  • Operational and Administrative Context

  • The references to government departments, cooperative societies, and public-private arrangements suggest CAB Engineers operates within a framework requiring compliance with government regulations, and may have been subject to administrative actions or disputes (IND_HC_JHHC010290542012, 01400021859).
  • The mention of legal rights related to employment and departmental attachments indicates possible internal or employment-related legal issues affecting the company or its personnel (01400021859).

Analysis and Conclusion

CAB Engineers Private Limited appears to be a company actively engaged in infrastructure, construction, or engineering projects, with ongoing legal proceedings primarily concerning contractual disputes, arbitration, licensing, and regulatory compliance. The company’s operations are intertwined with government departments and subject to legal judgments emphasizing the importance of proper licensing and adherence to statutory requirements. The references highlight the complex legal landscape in which CAB Engineers operates, including disputes over guarantees, tenders, and contractual obligations, supported by relevant Supreme Court judgments.

References:
- IND_HC_JHHC010290542012
- IND_HC_WBCHCO0038062018
- 00200015729
- 00200040292
- 01400021859

Search Results for "Cab Engineers Private Limited"

CAB ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED vs STATE OF JHARKHAND  And ORS

India - Jharkhand

(C) No. 1533 of 2012 CAB Engineers Private Limited through its Director 7.Executive Engineer,Road Construction Department, Deoghar 8.Sri ... Satyanand Sinha, presently posted as Executive Engineer, Rural Engineering Organization, Dumka 6.Superintending Engineer, Road Construction Department, Dumka Department, State of Jharkhand, Dhurwa, Ranchi 5.The Engineer

M/S. CAB ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR

India - Original Side

STATE OF WB & ANR. vs C.A.B ENGINEERS PVT. LTD.

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 2956 India - Calcutta High Court

Sen relied on a judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Dyna Technologies Private Limited vs. Crompton Greaves Limited , (2024) 2 SCC 375 . ... Our aforesaid conclusion finds support from the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Dyna Technologies Private Limited (supra). Paragraphs 34 and 35 of the said judgment are quoted herein below for facility of reference: “34. ... Paragraphs 44 to 47 of the aforesaid judgment in the case of Batliboi Environmental Engineers#....

VENKATESWARA, K. V. SUDARSANA REDDY VS State OF A. P. , REP. , BY ITS SECRETARY, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, HYDERABAD

1993 0 Supreme(AP) 467 India - Andhra Pradesh

G.RADHA KRISHNA RAO, P.RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU

Singh Consultants and Engineers (P) Ltd. (supra) and g. E. T. Services Company Inc. vs. M/s Punj Sons (P) Ltd. (supra), are also relied on in this case. In similar circumstances another Division Bench of this Court in a. A. O. ... Singh consultants and Engineers (P) Ltd. , submits that though suits have been filed for production of agreement or for appointment of arbitrator, they are in effect an attempt to prevent the respondents from invoking the bank guarantees. ... ... ( 22 ) THE learned Advocate General also submits that pending the suit, application....

Secretary, Ministry Of Information And Broadcasting, Government Of India: Cricket Association Of Bengal VS Cricket Association Of Bengal: Union Of India

1995 0 Supreme(SC) 222 India - Supreme Court

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, P.B.SAWANT, S.MOHAN

medium controlled by a monopoly - whether the monopoly is of the State or any other individual group or organization - As a matter private ... necessary to safeguard the interests of public and interests of law as also to avoid uncertainty confusion and consequent litigation CAB ... obtained by it from the several departments mentioned in judgment are no substitute for a license Section In absence of such a license CAB ... SC, therefore, in the context of the right claimed by the private broadcasters are irrelevant for o....

PROGRESSIVE CONSTRUCTIONS LTD.  VS SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION, TELUGU GANGA PROJECT CIRCLE

1999 0 Supreme(AP) 509 India - Andhra Pradesh

V.ESWARAIAH

Fact of the Case: The petitioner, Progressive Constructions Limited, challenged the action of the respondents in not ... Ramu Real Estate Developers Private Limited is having is having 20% share and M/s. R.D.S. ... The learned Counsel for the petitioner relied on a decision of the Supreme Court in the case of New Horizons Limited v. ... Sealed covers containing technical bid documents were opened on 1-4-1999 in respect of six tenderers namely : (1) National Projects Constructions Corporation Limited, ....

Government of A. P. rep. by its Prinicipal secretary Irrigation and C. A. D. Dept. Hyderabad VS S. V. Contractors, Seethamma- dhara, Visakhapatnam, rep. by its managing Partner, M. R. L. Rajagopal

1991 0 Supreme(AP) 144 India - Andhra Pradesh

A.LAKSHMANA RAO, P.VENKATRAMA REDDY

( 22 ) WE are also of the view that for the purpose of exercising the implied authority which a legal practitioner has, to compromise or concede a point at issue, it does not make any difference in principle whether be is a counsel appearing for a private

HAMIRPUR TRANSPORT! CO-OP. SOCIETY LTD.  VS PARVEEN LATA KAPOOR

1989 0 Supreme(HP) 67 India - Himachal Pradesh

BHAWANI SINGH

The brief facts are that the Hamirpur Co-operative Society Limited, Hamirpur (to be called hereinafter as the Transport Society), is registered under the Himachal Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act. ... Ltd., 1971 ACJ 206 (SC) and limited the liability of the insurer to Rs. 2,000 as provided by the Act at that time............ ** ** ** ** ... 13. ... His arm was dislocated which be got treated from a private person and not from any hospital. The police did not record his statement about this accident. ... ....

Kampu Dolo VS State of Arunachal Pradesh

2015 0 Supreme(Gau) 449 India - Gauhati

RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN

respondent post no way preferred any appeal before authorities concerned to challenge the attachment of the private respondent No ... scale of with five years regular service in grade failing which by deputation/transfer from analogous posts of State/Central Govt – Private ... Joint Director that he has legal right to claim the same post and his legal right has been infringed by way of attachment of the private ... respondent No. 4 was attached to the department of the petitioner for a limited period of three years with ....

STAR SPORTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED VS PRASAR BHARATI

2016 3 Supreme 690 India - Supreme Court

A.K.SIKRI, PRAFULLA C.PANT

the position that in terms of Section 3(1) of the Sports Act, the obligation of a television Broadcaster, i.e., the appellant, is limited ... , including the private agencies. ... Reference was made to the judgment of this Court in Executive Engineer, Southern Electricity Supply Company of Orissa Limited (Southco) and Another Vs. ... As stated earlier, we are not concerned in the present case with the right of the private broadcasters, but only with the limited right for telecasting pa....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top