AI Overview

AI Overview...

Search Results for "Can Dhr Proceeds against Deceased Dhr for Moveable Assets"

MADAPPA VS LINGAPPA

1986 0 Supreme(Kar) 134 India - Karnataka

P.A.KULKARNI

So also where no notice was issued to the legal representatives of a deceased judgment-debtor under this rule but they were subsequently served with notice under Rule 66, it was held that they could not apply to set aside the court sale held subsequently on the ground of want of notice under Rule 22. ... C. reads as: - (1) Where any immovable property has been sold in execution of a decree, the decree-holder, or the purchaser, or any other person entitled to share in a rateable distribution of assets, or whose interest are affected by the sale, may apply t....

Dalip Kumar Jha VS State of Punjab

2014 0 Supreme(P&H) 1480 India - Punjab and Haryana

M.M.S.BEDI

It has been brought to the notice of the Court that the entire assets, properties-moveable or immovable, belong to Divya Jyoti Jagriti Sansthan (Regd. ... He, as per assertion in the writ petition, at the time of his death, left moveable assets worth hundreds of crores and immoveable assets worth thousands of crores of rupees in the Public Charitable Trust ""Divya Jyoti Jagriti Sansthan"". ... The petitioner claimed that the reports came out regarding the act of siphoning of moveable #....

International Society for Krishna Consciousness VS Ishwari Prasad Singh Roy

2019 0 Supreme(Cal) 338 India - Calcutta

SOUMEN SEN, RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR

During her lifetime, she executed a will dated 6th April 1926, by which she bequeathed 'ka' and 'kha' Schedule property at 3 Albert Road, Kolkata in favour of Saileswar Singh Roy and Lila Mohan Singh Roy both since deceased. ... It is further alleged that after the death of their predecessor Lila Mohan Singh Roy also since deceased and his son Kamla Prasad Singh Roy became the joint owners of the land and building at the re-numbered premises no.3C, Albert Road, Kolkata. 8. ... The principle is applicable to both movable and immovable prop....

TOTAPPA S/O SHANTAPPA YELAMAILI  Vs THE GADAG CO-OPERATIVE COTTON

India - High Court of Karnataka

In other words, they were basically mortgaging their business assets, which were movable properties. 67. ... The DHR wats only to take inventory. ... When any encumbrance on the property is to be discharged from out of the sale proceeds, the Court shall have like power to direct the production of title deeds by the The award also stipulated that the Society could recover the amounts due in the first instance by the sale of the properties mortgaged as described in the balance amount personally from Shantap....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad
SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top