AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
Yes, you can ask for both the total amount and the balance amount in a recovery suit. It is common and permissible to claim the full amount due along with the specific balance, provided the reliefs are well-supported by the contract, account statements, or other evidence. Courts typically allow such reliefs, especially when they are clearly delineated and justified, but the suit must be properly structured, and court fees should reflect the total amount claimed.

Search Results for "Can i Asked Two Relief in Recovery of Suit Total Amount and Balance Amount"

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA WATER AUTH Vs N.K.MOHAMMED

2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 30439 India - High Court of Kerala

A.M.SHAFFIQUE, P.SOMARAJAN, JJ

and what relief should be granted. ... Recovery - Contractual Obligation - None Fact of the Case: The plaintiff sought recovery of amounts due for completed ... Despite claims and submissions, payments were withheld by the defendants, leading to the filing of the suit for recovery. ... OS No.96/2001 was filed by the respondent/plaintiff seeking for recovery of an amount of `38,49,923/- being the amount payable to him for the works ....

Umabai VS Nilkanth Dhondiba Chavan (Dead) By Lrs.

2005 3 Supreme 508 India - Supreme Court

S.B.SINHA, H.K.SEMA

He proceeded on the basis that he was not required to pay any amount. ... on the premise that the provisions of the Maharashtra Debt Relief Act were attracted. ... sale in favour of first appellant to repay loan amount—First appellant agreed to reconvey the said property in favour of first respondent ... In fact the suit for recovery of the amount was decreed by the trial court on 24.7.1985 but he himself preferred a revision against the decree wherein an order of rejection of the plai....

L. V. Bhujanga Rao VS Ch. Venkateswara Rao and Others, Defendants

1992 0 Supreme(Mad) 274 India - Madras

ARUMUGHAM

amount, reflected in the suit. ... Fact of the Case: Plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of a sum of Rs. 1, 77, 033.35 with interest at 24% per annum ... was not paid by the defendants, after issuing notice on 16th January, 1991 the present suit has been filed for the recovery of the ... was not paid by the defendants, after issuing notice on 16th January, 1991 the present suit has been filed for the recovery of the amount, reflec....

Municipal Committee, Simla VS Gurdial Singh

1972 0 Supreme(HP) 52 India - Himachal Pradesh

R.S.PATHAK, CHET RAM THAKUR

The plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of the aforesaid amount. ... by them as parking fee during the year 1958-59 and for a decree for the total amount thus received. ... Issue No. 2 was split up into two parts: (a) whether the defendants are liable or not, and (b) for how much amount. ... He estimated such balance at Rs. 500 but the frame of his relief showed that he not only asked for Rs. 500 but for any #HL_ST....

A.K.CHACKO vs K.GEORGE DOMINIC

2013 Supreme(Online)(KER) 16683 India - High Court of Kerala

T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, JJ

Transfer - Recovery of Possession - Transfer of Property Act - Sections 53A, 55; Specific Relief Act - Sections 12(3), 26 - The ... Defendant paid part of the sale amount, but failed to complete the sale by the agreed date, claiming readiness to perform both prior ... Fact of the Case: The plaintiffs filed a suit to recover possession of property from the defendant who entered into ... There is no evidence to show that after paying the above amounts, any amount was ....

STATE OF GUJARAT VS STATE BANK OF SAURASHTRA

1994 0 Supreme(Guj) 160 India - Gujarat

B.C.PATEL

suit all three loans clubbed - Court fee calculated on different loan amount - Held, cause of action arises out of different contracts ... Fees Act, 1957 - Sec. 18 - Multifarious Suits - Computation of court fee - Three separate and district loans advanced by Bank - In recovery ... Anand, the relief asked for is total amount due, and therefore, the Court fees are payable on the total amount. ... The subjectmatter of the su....

Sha Peerchand VS Jandhyala Venkata Subramanya Jyosyulu

1993 0 Supreme(AP) 534 India - Andhra Pradesh

A.GOPAL RAO

A-l was not intended to be a mere security for ensuring the recovery of amounts due under the two promissory notes, Exs. ... Plaintiff shall deposit in the lower,court the balance of the amount of agreed consideration under Ex. ... The suit property consists of two shops with open space the total area being 150 square yards. ... A-l was not intended to be a mere security for ensuring the recovery of amounts due und....

New Okhla Industrial Development Authority VS Marwan Hotels Pvt.  Ltd.

India - Current Civil Cases

SUDHIR AGARWAL, BRIJESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA II

of allotment letter – Cannot be a relevant circumstance to justify non-paynment of balance amount. ... and requiring plaintiff to deposit balance amount – Plaintiff making some complaint about encroachment by slum dwellers after receipt ... consequential relief. ... The defendant, however, informed plaintiff that either it should pay balance amount alongwith interest else 25% amount already deposited shall be forfeited and recovery ....

Sree Varaha Devaswom VS Rukkia Bai

1950 0 Supreme(Ker) 51 India - Kerala

KUNHI RAMAN, SANKARAN

Fact of the Case: The Devaswom sought recovery of the mortgage amount and arrears of pattom due to it from the plaint ... Mortgage - Redemption of Properties - Cochin Agriculturists' Relief Act - S. 8, S. 9 - Ext. IV, Ext. ... The plaintiffs sought redemption of the mortgage and recovery of possession of the properties with mesne profits. ... Under the provisions of the Agriculturists' Relief Act, this balance also has to be treated as interest on the mortgage amount#HL_END....

Sohanlal VS Gulabchand

1965 0 Supreme(Raj) 94 India - Rajasthan

JAGAT NARAYAN

parties, and even though there are other unsettled accounts — No distinction whether balance only is proved or whether account only ... (b) Account stated—Whether can be basis of suit — Account sent by agent to principal can be basis of suit, even though unsigned by ... It was farther asserted that out of the amount of Rs. 9266-4-6 two items of Rs. 377-2-6 and Rs. 346-14-6 were due on account of wagering transactions and were not recoverable. The suit was brought for the reco....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top