In the world of intellectual property (IP), patents represent valuable assets for inventors and businesses. But can a patent be sold, licensed, or assigned? The short answer is yes—in most cases, patents can be transferred, licensed, or sold, subject to specific legal requirements under Indian law, primarily the Patents Act, 1970. This blog post breaks down the concepts, drawing from judicial precedents and statutory provisions to help you navigate these options.
Note: This is general information based on legal principles and case law. It is not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified IP attorney for your situation, as outcomes depend on individual facts.
Patents grant exclusive rights to inventors for a limited period (typically 20 years in India) to exclude others from making, using, selling, or importing the invention. These rights are personal property and can be dealt with like movable or immovable property—they can be assigned/transferred, mortgaged, or licensed HCL LIMITED vs THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NEW DELHI.
Assignments and licenses must be formalized via a deed of assignment or license agreement to ensure enforceability.
An assignment transfers all rights, title, and interest in the patent from the assignor (original owner) to the assignee. It's akin to selling the patent outright.
From case law: According to this deed of assignment, not only the right, title or interest in the patent in question were assigned but number of other patents were also assigned to the plaintiffs Vringo Infrastructure Inc. VS Indiamart Intermesh Ltd. - 2014 Supreme(Del) 1850. Similarly, BMS has assigned, transferred and conveyed to appellant its rights Bristol-Myers Squibb Holdings Ireland VS Mylan Laboratories Limited - 2014 Supreme(AP) 1354
Example: In infringement suits, assignees enforce rights: Plaintiffs claimed a patent originally belonging to Nokia Corporation was assigned to them by a Confidential Patent Purchase Agreement Vringo Infrastructure Inc. VS Indiamart Intermesh Ltd. - 2014 Supreme(Del) 1850.
A license grants permission to use the patent without transferring ownership. The licensor retains title but allows the licensee to exploit the invention.
Licenses often involve royalties (e.g., percentage of sales). Running royalty @ 2.5% on the net selling price of each licensed product sold was also payable Panalfa Dongwon India Ltd. VS Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai. Agreements may prohibit challenging patent validity: prohibits the licensee... from contesting the validity of any such patent Commissioner of Income Tax VS Lucas - T. V. S. Limited (No. 1) - 1976 Supreme(Mad) 632.
Distinction from Assignment: Courts differentiate based on agreement terms. sold under an agreement were only a license, not an outright assignment MADHU MUTTOM vs FAZIL & ORS. - 2007 Supreme(Online)(KER) 11489. If it's a limited license to use the Licensed Property – trademarks, copyrights and designs ownership stays with licensor Luxembourg Brands S. A R. L VS G. M Pens International Pvt. Ltd. - 2018 Supreme(Del) 3202.
Selling a patent is typically an absolute assignment for a lump sum, severing all ties. It's common for monetizing inventions.
Assignees or licensees can sue for infringement, but standing matters:
- Assignee: Full rights.
- Licensee: Depends on agreement scope.
In Vringo v. ZTE, court examined assignment deeds for prima facie infringement claims Vringo Infrastructure Inc. VS Indiamart Intermesh Ltd. - 2014 Supreme(Del) 1850. Balance of convenience favored no injunction without proof Vringo Infrastructure Inc. VS Indiamart Intermesh Ltd. - 2014 Supreme(Del) 1850.
Licensing can't abuse dominance. Patents Act Chapter XVI governs anti-competitive practices, sometimes overriding Competition Act Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (publ) VS Competition Commission of India - 2023 Supreme(Del) 3297.
Bullet Points on Risks:
- Non-registration: Loses priority.
- Invalid terms: E.g., perpetual royalty-free licenses post-assignment.
- Tax pitfalls: Lump sums vs. royalties (e.g., US$82,500 franchise fee for patent use M. G. M. Entertainments VS Commissioner of Customs, Chennai).
- Jurisdictional issues: Foreign assignments need Indian registration.
Patents can be mortgaged as security. Licenses may include tech know-how: Fixed royalty of US$ 800 for each licensed product HCL LIMITED vs THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NEW DELHI.
In global deals: BMS has assigned transferred and conveyed to appellant... rights and interests for export products Bristol-Myers Squibb Holdings Ireland VS Mylan Laboratories Limited - 2014 Supreme(AP) 1354.
| Aspect | Assignment/Sale | License |
|--------|----------------|---------|
| Ownership | Transfers fully | Retained by licensor |
| Control | Assignee full | Licensor controls |
| Payment | Lump sum/royalty | Typically royalty |
| Duration | Permanent | Fixed/revocable |
For inventors or businesses, these mechanisms unlock value. However, legal situations vary—e.g., post-grant oppositions or foreign patents add complexity M/s.HI TECH CHEMICALS LIMITED vs Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs, Intellectual Property Office - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 67466.
Conclusion: Patents are flexible assets. Whether selling, licensing, or assigning, compliance ensures protection. Always engage IP experts to draft enforceable documents and avoid pitfalls like those in Hogar Controls (exclusive IP retention) Hogar Controls India Private Limited VS Anadasu Vijay Kumar - 2024 Supreme(Del) 204 or Monsanto (licensing dominance) Monsanto Holdings Pvt. Ltd. . VS Competition Commission of India - 2020 Supreme(Del) 1348.
Disclaimer: This post provides general insights from case law like Bristol-Myers Squibb Holdings Ireland VS Mylan Laboratories Limited - 2014 Supreme(AP) 1354, Vringo Infrastructure Inc. VS Indiamart Intermesh Ltd. - 2014 Supreme(Del) 1850, and others. Laws evolve; professional advice is essential.
Garg made a cascade of vitriolic comments on the reasons assigned and the conclusions drawn therefrom by the High Court and assailed ... in which indiscriminate allegations have been levelled by Dharam Pal, respondent No. 5 against the petitioner in Annexure P-9 is patent ... In the result, the appeal is disposed of accordingly but at the same time giving liberty to the State Government to direct an investigation
Patent Steam Carpet Co. Ltd. (1978) 1 QB 69, are also useful and require to be quoted. ... Under the said agreement, the song writer assigned to the publisher the full copyright for the whole world in his musical compositions ... The Appellants before us went in Letters Patent Appeal before a Division Bench of the said High Court against the said ad interim
Unfortunately, however, the High Court Judge is not a person to whom the trial of the case can be assigned under section 7(1) of ... The circumstance that a much superior forum is assigned to try a case than the one normally available cannot by itself be treated ... For the same reason it is not possible to hold that the power of transfer contained in clause 29 of the Letters Patent of the Bombay ... The contention was that a case assigned by the State Government under the 1952 Act to a Special Judge cannot be ....
case resulting from F.I.R. lodged before police to stay proceedings to extent judgment was not to be pronounced until appeal was disposed ... to repel the argument of the appellant on the ground that the order of the Magistrate was perverse and as the case was full of patent ... On that day arguments were heard but before any order could be passed the Magistrate who had recorded the evidence was transferred ... F.I.R. lodged before the police to stay proceedings to the extent that the judgment was not to be pronounced until this appeal wa....
The powers delegated to the Commissioner under Order XXVI Rules 16, 16-A, a href ... Section 64(1), inter alia, provides that where an attachment has been made, any private transfer or delivery of property attached ... inserted by Act 22 of 2002—Execution—Whether Section 39(4) prohibits executing Court from executing a decree against a person or property ... Track 3 may include suits concerning partition and like property disputes, trademarks, copyrights and other intellectual property#HL_END....
determined whether rights were assigned or merely licensed, influencing the plaintiff's ability to claim copyright infringement. ... sold under an agreement were only a license, not an outright assignment. ... Copyright - Intellectual Property - Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 14, 30 - The agreement's interpretation between the parties ... On the other hand, as claimed by the appellant if the right assigned under Ext.A1 is a personal right the appell....
to use the intellectual rights and knowhow. ... Final Decision: The appeal is accordingly disposed of. In the facts of the case, there will be no order as to costs. ... periodical payments were required to be made after five years, if what was conferred and granted to HCL was mere right to use or permission ... Intellectual property rights can be dealt with like both movable and immoveable property, for it can be assigned/#HL_STAR....
property rights to SABMiller. ... Intellectual Property Rights - Situs of Intangible Assets - Income Tax Act, 1961, Section 9(1)(i) Fact of the Case: ... property rights by a non-resident company. ... Furthermore, 16 trademarks, which were owned by the petitioner (which included the said four licensed trademarks), were sold/assigned ... property rights, which were assi....
the applicability of Sections 47(xiv) and 47A(3) in the context of royalty payment and concluded that the sole proprietor had not assigned ... the intellectual property to the company and had received consideration in cash, thus the exemption under Section 47 was not available ... the intellectual property to the company and had received consideration in cash, thus the exemption under Section 47 was not available ... The assets relating to the business which are to be sold, a....
rights was excluded and whether the agreements entered into by MMBL were an abuse of its rights under the Patents Act. ... issues were whether the jurisdiction of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to examine matters related to the exercise of patent ... Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the jurisdiction of the CCI to entertain complaints regarding abuse of dominance in respect to patent ... Grant of a Patent recognizes and confers an intellectual ....
at any time licensed under the agreement and prohibits the licensee, during the continuance of the licence or after termination thereof, from contesting the validity of any such patent either directly or indirectly or in any way assisting counsel or procuring others so to do. ... Under clause 7(a)(i) in consideration of the technical services rendered by the grantor, a fee amounting to one per cent. of the factory cost of all licensed devices and spare parts for such devices manufactured and sold by the licensee shall be....
Intellectual property rights can be dealt with like both movable and immoveable property, for it can be assigned/transferred, mortgaged or licensed. ... ADC or its licensors had exclusive right to file any patent application in India relevant to the licensed products and any patent, granted to ADC or its offices in India with respect to the licensed products during the term of the agreement were considered to be a part of the technology and were to be ... On HCL filing such p....
the same to the U.K. company which would enjoy a royalty-free licence under any patent that the Indian company may obtain covering such improvement or addition for the term of such patent. ... , and ... (iii) In consideration of the licence and other rights granted hereunder in respect of the schedule patents, and the, grantor's designs royalty amounting to two per cent. of the factory cost of all licensed devices and spare parts for such device manufactured and sold the ... (a) That the licensee will pay to the grantor ....
Intellectual property rights can be dealt with like both movable and immoveable property, for it can be assigned/transferred, mortgaged or licensed. ... ADC or its licensors had exclusive right to file any patent application in India relevant to the licensed products and any patent, granted to ADC or its offices in India with respect to the licensed products during the term of the agreement ... Fixed royalty of US$ 800 for each licensed product manufacture....
Intellectual property rights can be dealt with like both movable and immoveable property, for it can be assigned/transferred, mortgaged or licensed. ... ADC or its licensors had exclusive right to file any patent application in India relevant to the licensed products and any patent, granted to ADC or its offices in India with respect to the licensed products during the term of the agreement ... Fixed royalty of US$ 800 for each licensed product manufacture....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.