AI Overview

AI Overview...

#PatentLaw, #IPAssignment, #PatentLicensing

Can Patents Be Sold, Licensed, or Assigned?


In the world of intellectual property (IP), patents represent valuable assets for inventors and businesses. But can a patent be sold, licensed, or assigned? The short answer is yes—in most cases, patents can be transferred, licensed, or sold, subject to specific legal requirements under Indian law, primarily the Patents Act, 1970. This blog post breaks down the concepts, drawing from judicial precedents and statutory provisions to help you navigate these options.


Note: This is general information based on legal principles and case law. It is not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified IP attorney for your situation, as outcomes depend on individual facts.


Understanding Patent Ownership and Transfer


Patents grant exclusive rights to inventors for a limited period (typically 20 years in India) to exclude others from making, using, selling, or importing the invention. These rights are personal property and can be dealt with like movable or immovable property—they can be assigned/transferred, mortgaged, or licensed HCL LIMITED vs THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NEW DELHI.


Key Legal Framework



  • Patents Act, 1970:

  • Section 48: Outlines patentee's rights, which can be exercised through assignment or license.

  • Section 68: Requires assignments to be in writing and registered with the Patent Office to be valid against third parties.

  • Section 69: Governs licensing agreements, which must also be registered.


Assignments and licenses must be formalized via a deed of assignment or license agreement to ensure enforceability.


Patent Assignment: Full Transfer of Rights


An assignment transfers all rights, title, and interest in the patent from the assignor (original owner) to the assignee. It's akin to selling the patent outright.



  • Characteristics:

  • Complete ownership shift.

  • Assignee gains full control, including enforcement rights.

  • Often includes future improvements or related patents.


From case law: According to this deed of assignment, not only the right, title or interest in the patent in question were assigned but number of other patents were also assigned to the plaintiffs Vringo Infrastructure Inc. VS Indiamart Intermesh Ltd. - 2014 Supreme(Del) 1850. Similarly, BMS has assigned, transferred and conveyed to appellant its rights Bristol-Myers Squibb Holdings Ireland VS Mylan Laboratories Limited - 2014 Supreme(AP) 1354


Requirements for Valid Assignment



  • Must be in writing (deed).

  • Specify consideration (lump sum or royalties).

  • Registered within 6 months (Section 69(5)).

  • Stamp duty applicable.


Example: In infringement suits, assignees enforce rights: Plaintiffs claimed a patent originally belonging to Nokia Corporation was assigned to them by a Confidential Patent Purchase Agreement Vringo Infrastructure Inc. VS Indiamart Intermesh Ltd. - 2014 Supreme(Del) 1850.


Patent Licensing: Permission to Use Without Transfer


A license grants permission to use the patent without transferring ownership. The licensor retains title but allows the licensee to exploit the invention.



  • Types:

  • Exclusive: Only licensee can use.

  • Non-exclusive: Multiple users.

  • Sole: Licensor and licensee only.


Licenses often involve royalties (e.g., percentage of sales). Running royalty @ 2.5% on the net selling price of each licensed product sold was also payable Panalfa Dongwon India Ltd. VS Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai. Agreements may prohibit challenging patent validity: prohibits the licensee... from contesting the validity of any such patent Commissioner of Income Tax VS Lucas - T. V. S. Limited (No. 1) - 1976 Supreme(Mad) 632.


Distinction from Assignment: Courts differentiate based on agreement terms. sold under an agreement were only a license, not an outright assignment MADHU MUTTOM vs FAZIL & ORS. - 2007 Supreme(Online)(KER) 11489. If it's a limited license to use the Licensed Property – trademarks, copyrights and designs ownership stays with licensor Luxembourg Brands S. A R. L VS G. M Pens International Pvt. Ltd. - 2018 Supreme(Del) 3202.


Selling a Patent: Assignment with Lump Sum Payment


Selling a patent is typically an absolute assignment for a lump sum, severing all ties. It's common for monetizing inventions.



Practical Considerations and Case Insights


Enforcement and Infringement


Assignees or licensees can sue for infringement, but standing matters:
- Assignee: Full rights.
- Licensee: Depends on agreement scope.


In Vringo v. ZTE, court examined assignment deeds for prima facie infringement claims Vringo Infrastructure Inc. VS Indiamart Intermesh Ltd. - 2014 Supreme(Del) 1850. Balance of convenience favored no injunction without proof Vringo Infrastructure Inc. VS Indiamart Intermesh Ltd. - 2014 Supreme(Del) 1850.


Registration and Challenges



Competition and CCI Jurisdiction


Licensing can't abuse dominance. Patents Act Chapter XVI governs anti-competitive practices, sometimes overriding Competition Act Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (publ) VS Competition Commission of India - 2023 Supreme(Del) 3297.


Bullet Points on Risks:
- Non-registration: Loses priority.
- Invalid terms: E.g., perpetual royalty-free licenses post-assignment.
- Tax pitfalls: Lump sums vs. royalties (e.g., US$82,500 franchise fee for patent use M. G. M. Entertainments VS Commissioner of Customs, Chennai).
- Jurisdictional issues: Foreign assignments need Indian registration.


Additional Context: Mortgages and Other Deals


Patents can be mortgaged as security. Licenses may include tech know-how: Fixed royalty of US$ 800 for each licensed product HCL LIMITED vs THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NEW DELHI.


In global deals: BMS has assigned transferred and conveyed to appellant... rights and interests for export products Bristol-Myers Squibb Holdings Ireland VS Mylan Laboratories Limited - 2014 Supreme(AP) 1354.


Key Takeaways



  • Yes, patents can be sold (assigned absolutely), licensed (permission to use), or assigned partially under the Patents Act.

  • Always use written deeds/agreements and register them.

  • Distinguish assignment (ownership transfer) from license (usage rights) via contract terms.

  • Seek registration to protect against infringers.

  • Consider royalties, taxes, and competition law.


| Aspect | Assignment/Sale | License |
|--------|----------------|---------|
| Ownership | Transfers fully | Retained by licensor |
| Control | Assignee full | Licensor controls |
| Payment | Lump sum/royalty | Typically royalty |
| Duration | Permanent | Fixed/revocable |


For inventors or businesses, these mechanisms unlock value. However, legal situations vary—e.g., post-grant oppositions or foreign patents add complexity M/s.HI TECH CHEMICALS LIMITED vs Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs, Intellectual Property Office - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 67466.


Conclusion: Patents are flexible assets. Whether selling, licensing, or assigning, compliance ensures protection. Always engage IP experts to draft enforceable documents and avoid pitfalls like those in Hogar Controls (exclusive IP retention) Hogar Controls India Private Limited VS Anadasu Vijay Kumar - 2024 Supreme(Del) 204 or Monsanto (licensing dominance) Monsanto Holdings Pvt. Ltd. . VS Competition Commission of India - 2020 Supreme(Del) 1348.


Disclaimer: This post provides general insights from case law like Bristol-Myers Squibb Holdings Ireland VS Mylan Laboratories Limited - 2014 Supreme(AP) 1354, Vringo Infrastructure Inc. VS Indiamart Intermesh Ltd. - 2014 Supreme(Del) 1850, and others. Laws evolve; professional advice is essential.

Search Results for "Can Patents Be Sold, Licensed, or Assigned?"

State Of Haryana VS Bhajan Lal - 1990 Supreme(SC) 740

1990 0 Supreme(SC) 740 India - Supreme Court

S.R.PANDIAN, K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY

Garg made a cascade of vitriolic comments on the reasons assigned and the conclusions drawn therefrom by the High Court and assailed ... in which indiscriminate allegations have been levelled by Dharam Pal, respondent No. 5 against the petitioner in Annexure P-9 is patent ... In the result, the appeal is disposed of accordingly but at the same time giving liberty to the State Government to direct an investigation

Central Inland Water Transport Corporation LTD.  VS Brojo Nath Ganguly: Tarun Kanti Sengupta - 1986 Supreme(SC) 115

1986 0 Supreme(SC) 115 India - Supreme Court

D.P.MADAN, A.P.SEN

Patent Steam Carpet Co. Ltd. (1978) 1 QB 69, are also useful and require to be quoted. ... Under the said agreement, the song writer assigned to the publisher the full copyright for the whole world in his musical compositions ... The Appellants before us went in Letters Patent Appeal before a Division Bench of the said High Court against the said ad interim

A. R. Antulay VS R. S. Nayak - 1988 Supreme(SC) 337

1988 0 Supreme(SC) 337 India - Supreme Court

B.C.RAY, G.L.OZA, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH, RANGANATH MISRA, S.NATARAJAN, S.RANGANATHAN, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE

Unfortunately, however, the High Court Judge is not a person to whom the trial of the case can be assigned under section 7(1) of ... The circumstance that a much superior forum is assigned to try a case than the one normally available cannot by itself be treated ... For the same reason it is not possible to hold that the power of transfer contained in clause 29 of the Letters Patent of the Bombay ... The contention was that a case assigned by the State Government under the 1952 Act to a Special Judge cannot be ....

Nagawwa VS Veeranna Shivalingappa Konjalgi - 1976 Supreme(SC) 190

1976 0 Supreme(SC) 190 India - Supreme Court

A.C.GUPTA, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI

case resulting from F.I.R. lodged before police to stay proceedings to extent judgment was not to be pronounced until appeal was disposed ... to repel the argument of the appellant on the ground that the order of the Magistrate was perverse and as the case was full of patent ... On that day arguments were heard but before any order could be passed the Magistrate who had recorded the evidence was transferred ... F.I.R. lodged before the police to stay proceedings to the extent that the judgment was not to be pronounced until this appeal wa....

Salem Advocate Bar Association, T. N.  VS Union Of India - 2005 5 Supreme 236

2005 5 Supreme 236 India - Supreme Court

Y.K.SABHARWAL, D.M.DHARMADHIKARI, TARUN CHATTERJEE

The powers delegated to the Commissioner under Order XXVI Rules 16, 16-A, a href ... Section 64(1), inter alia, provides that where an attachment has been made, any private transfer or delivery of property attached ... inserted by Act 22 of 2002—Execution—Whether Section 39(4) prohibits executing Court from executing a decree against a person or property ... Track 3 may include suits concerning partition and like property disputes, trade­marks, copyrights and other intellectual property#HL_END....

MADHU MUTTOM vs FAZIL & ORS. - 2007 Supreme(Online)(KER) 11489

2007 Supreme(Online)(KER) 11489 India - High Court of Kerala

K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, J

determined whether rights were assigned or merely licensed, influencing the plaintiff's ability to claim copyright infringement. ... sold under an agreement were only a license, not an outright assignment. ... Copyright - Intellectual Property - Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 14, 30 - The agreement's interpretation between the parties ... On the other hand, as claimed by the appellant if the right assigned under Ext.A1 is a personal right the appell....

HCL Limited VS Commissioner of Income Tax New Delhi - 2015 Supreme(Del) 159

2015 0 Supreme(Del) 159 India - Delhi

SANJIV KHANNA, V.KAMESWAR RAO

to use the intellectual rights and knowhow. ... Final Decision: The appeal is accordingly disposed of. In the facts of the case, there will be no order as to costs. ... periodical payments were required to be made after five years, if what was conferred and granted to HCL was mere right to use or permission ... Intellectual property rights can be dealt with like both movable and immoveable property, for it can be assigned/#HL_STAR....

CUB PTY LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS FOSTER'S AUSTRALIA LTD) VS UOI - 2016 Supreme(Del) 2512

2016 0 Supreme(Del) 2512 India - Delhi

BADAR DURREZ AHMED, SANJEEV SACHDEVA

property rights to SABMiller. ... Intellectual Property Rights - Situs of Intangible Assets - Income Tax Act, 1961, Section 9(1)(i) Fact of the Case: ... property rights by a non-resident company. ... Furthermore, 16 trademarks, which were owned by the petitioner (which included the said four licensed trademarks), were sold/assigned ... property rights, which were assi....

Pr.  Commissioner of Income Tax-2 VS Mobisoft Tele Solutions P.  Ltd.  - 2018 Supreme(P&H) 138

2018 0 Supreme(P&H) 138 India - Punjab and Haryana

S.J.VAZIFDAR, AVNEESH JHINGAN

the applicability of Sections 47(xiv) and 47A(3) in the context of royalty payment and concluded that the sole proprietor had not assigned ... the intellectual property to the company and had received consideration in cash, thus the exemption under Section 47 was not available ... the intellectual property to the company and had received consideration in cash, thus the exemption under Section 47 was not available ... The assets relating to the business which are to be sold, a....

Monsanto Holdings Pvt.  Ltd. .  VS Competition Commission of India - 2020 Supreme(Del) 1348

2020 0 Supreme(Del) 1348 India - Delhi

VIBHU BAKHRU

rights was excluded and whether the agreements entered into by MMBL were an abuse of its rights under the Patents Act. ... issues were whether the jurisdiction of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to examine matters related to the exercise of patent ... Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the jurisdiction of the CCI to entertain complaints regarding abuse of dominance in respect to patent ... Grant of a Patent recognizes and confers an intellectual ....

Commissioner of Income Tax VS Lucas - T. V. S. Limited (No. 1) - 1976 Supreme(Mad) 632

1976 0 Supreme(Mad) 632 India - Madras

M.M.ISMAIL, SETHURAMAN

at any time licensed under the agreement and prohibits the licensee, during the continuance of the licence or after termination thereof, from contesting the validity of any such patent either directly or indirectly or in any way assisting counsel or procuring others so to do. ... Under clause 7(a)(i) in consideration of the technical services rendered by the grantor, a fee amounting to one per cent. of the factory cost of all licensed devices and spare parts for such devices manufactured and sold by the licensee shall be....

HCL Limited VS Commissioner of Income Tax New Delhi

2015 0 Supreme(Del) 159 India - Delhi

SANJIV KHANNA, V.KAMESWAR RAO

Intellectual property rights can be dealt with like both movable and immoveable property, for it can be assigned/transferred, mortgaged or licensed. ... ADC or its licensors had exclusive right to file any patent application in India relevant to the licensed products and any patent, granted to ADC or its offices in India with respect to the licensed products during the term of the agreement were considered to be a part of the technology and were to be ... On HCL filing such p....

Commissioner of Income Tax, Tamil Nadu Iii VS Brakes India Limited - 1979 Supreme(Mad) 113

1979 0 Supreme(Mad) 113 India - Madras

BALASUBRAMANYAN, SETHURAMAN

the same to the U.K. company which would enjoy a royalty-free licence under any patent that the Indian company may obtain covering such improvement or addition for the term of such patent. ... , and ... (iii) In consideration of the licence and other rights granted hereunder in respect of the schedule patents, and the, grantor's designs royalty amounting to two per cent. of the factory cost of all licensed devices and spare parts for such device manufactured and sold the ... (a) That the licensee will pay to the grantor ....

HCL LIMITED vs THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NEW DELHI

India - Delhi High Court

Intellectual property rights can be dealt with like both movable and immoveable property, for it can be assigned/transferred, mortgaged or licensed. ... ADC or its licensors had exclusive right to file any patent application in India relevant to the licensed products and any patent, granted to ADC or its offices in India with respect to the licensed products during the term of the agreement ... Fixed royalty of US$ 800 for each licensed product manufacture....

HCL LIMITED vs THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NEW DELHI

India - Delhi High Court

Intellectual property rights can be dealt with like both movable and immoveable property, for it can be assigned/transferred, mortgaged or licensed. ... ADC or its licensors had exclusive right to file any patent application in India relevant to the licensed products and any patent, granted to ADC or its offices in India with respect to the licensed products during the term of the agreement ... Fixed royalty of US$ 800 for each licensed product manufacture....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top